dc.contributor.advisor | Sarıçoban, Arif | |
dc.contributor.author | Yavuz, Ayhan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-12T06:15:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-12T06:15:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-01-19 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11655/3480 | |
dc.description.abstract | The progress of the communicative
competences as well as the speaking abilities
of people all around the world in terms of the correct and fluent use of English
have gained a considerable amount of importance since the formulation and
formation of the CEFR within the European Union countri
es. The CEFR as well as
the criteria it has brought to the process of language teaching and learning have
been accepted as one of the corner stones in this field by Turkish linguists and
authorities as well.
With the development of the CEFR, the Council of
Europe promoted to embosom
all the cultural values of the European countries through a very close relation and
cooperation of the members in terms of their social and cultural capacites. While
doing so, the main anchor for the union has been the mutual un
derstanding and
tolerance for the otherness of the cultures by means of multicultural and
multilingual togetherness.
This study has aimed to develop some CEFR
-
based speaking practices for the B1
level Turkish EFL university students so that they could enh
ance their
communicative competence and consequently their tolerance for other cultures.
Prior to the design of these practices, a Needs Analysis questionnaire was
prepared with the help of the B1 level ̳can do‘ descriptors. Thus, the practices
have been d
eveloped considering the results of the questionnaire that helped the
researcher specify which of the subjects to choose for the training process.
In the implementation phase the practices were applied on 44 students, the 25 of
whom were the Experimental G
roup and the 19 were the Control Group. The
process lasted for five weeks and both before and after this treatment process the
ix
Pre and Posttests were applied on these students. The results of these tests
indicated that the treatment process including the C
EFR
-
based practices has been
useful to develop the speaking skills and the communicative competence of the
students.
In addition, it has been understood that the kind of activities centering
communicative competence help students focus on the point and have fun while
participating the class actively and voluntarily. The assessment of the qualitative
data that the researc
her has provided by way of the interviews indicates that
students are motivated much more for active participation to the lesson when they
feel happy and confident in the class | tr_TR |
dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLE OF CONTENTS
YAYIMLAMA VE FİKRİ MÜLKİYET HAKLARI BEYANI
................................
.........
iii
ETİK BEYANNAMESİ
................................
................................
............................
iv
ACKNOWLODGEM
ENTS
................................
................................
.......................
v
ÖZ
............
................................
................................
................................
...........
vi
ABSTRACT
..........................................................................................
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
................................
................................
..........................
x
LIST of TABLES
................................
................................
................................
...
xiv
LIST of FIGURES
................................
................................
................................
..
xv
LIST of ABBREVIATIONS
................................
................................
....................
xvi
1. INT
RODUCTION
................................
................................
................................
.
1
1.1. Introduction
................................
................................
................................
...
1
1.2. Background to the Study
................................
................................
..............
3
1.3. Statement of the Problem
................................
................................
.............
4
1.4. Purpose of the Study
................................
................................
....................
4
1.5. Research Questions
................................
................................
.....................
5
1.6. Scope of the Study
................................
................................
.......................
5
1.7. Assumptions and Limitations
................................
................................
........
6
1.8. Definitions of Specific Terms
................................
................................
........
6
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
................................
................................
.......................
8
2.1. Introduction
................................
................................
................................
...
8
2.2. Needs Analysis
................................
................................
.............................
8
2.2.1. Needs Analysis in ELT
................................
................................
...........
8
2.2.1.1. Development of ELT Materials through NA
................................
.....
9
2.2.1.2. Development of ELT Materials for Speaking Classes
....................
10
2.3. The CEFR
................................
................................
................................
...
10
2.3.1. The Purpose of the CEFR
................................
................................
....
11
2.3.2. The Common Reference Levels of the CEFR
................................
......
12
2.3.3. B1 Level Descriptors of the CEFR
................................
........................
14
2.3.4. The CEFR and Competences
................................
..............................
15
2.4. Communication & Communicative Competence
................................
.........
16
2.4.1. Models of Communication
................................
................................
....
17
2.4.1.1. Transmission Model of Communication
................................
.........
17
2.4.1.2. Interaction Model of Communication
................................
.............
18
2.4.1.3. Transaction Model of Communication
................................
...........
19
2.4.2. Types of Needs that Communication Meets
................................
.........
20
2.4.3. Communicative Competence
................................
...............................
21
2.4.4. Developing Communicative Competence
................................
............
24
2.4.4.1. Verbal Communication
................................
................................
..
24
2.4.4.2. Nonverbal Communication
................................
............................
25
2.4.5. Models of Communicative Competence and Performance
..................
25
2.4.5.1. Dell Hymes‘ Model
................................
................................
.........
25
2.4.5.2. M. A. K. Halliday‘s ̳Meaning Potential‘
................................
..........
26
xi
2.4.5.3. Munby‘s Theoretical Framework
................................
....................
26
2.4.5.4. Widdowson‘s Theory of Communicative Competence
...................
27
2.4.5.5. Canale and Swain Model
................................
...............................
28
2.4.5.6. Canale‘s Adaptation of Canale and Swain Model
..........................
28
2.4.5.7. Van Ek‘s Model of Communicative Ability
................................
......
28
2.4.5.8. Bachman‘s Communicative Language Ability
................................
29
2.4.5.9. Celce
-
Murcia Model of Communicative Competence
....................
29
2.4.6. Classroom Activities in Communicative Language Teaching
...............
31
2.4.6.1. Design of the Classroom Activities
................................
................
32
2.4.6.2. Forms of the Classroom Activities
................................
.................
32
2.4.6.3. CLT as a Paradigm Shift
................................
................................
33
2.4.7.1. Content
-
Based Instruction
................................
.............................
34
2.4.7.2. Task
-
Based Instruction
................................
................................
..
35
2.4.7.3. Product
-
Based Approaches
................................
...........................
35
2.4.7.4. Text
-
Based Instruction
................................
................................
...
36
2.4.7.5. Competency
-
Based Instruction
................................
......................
36
2.4.8. Problems with the Use of CLT in EFL Contexts
................................
...
36
2.4.9. Solutions for the Problems
................................
................................
...
38
2.5. Speaking Skill
................................
................................
.............................
39
2.5.1. The Lexical Aspect of Speaking
................................
...........................
39
2.5.2. The Linguistic Aspect of Speaking
................................
.......................
40
2.5.3. The Social Aspects of Speaking
................................
...........................
41
2.5.4. Why is Speaking Difficult?
................................
................................
....
42
2.5.5. The Importance of Speaking Skill
................................
.........................
43
2.5.6. Communicative Tasks and Teaching Speaking
................................
...
43
2.5.6.1. Theoretical Rationale for Tasks
................................
.....................
44
2.5.6.2. Advantages of Tasks in Speaking Instruction
................................
45
2.5.7. The Purpose of Speaking
................................
................................
.....
46
2.5.8. Teaching Speaking
................................
................................
...............
47
2.5.9. General Outline of a Speaking Lesson
................................
.................
48
2.5.10. Speaking Activities
................................
................................
.............
49
2.6. Conclusion
................................
................................
................................
..
51
3. METHOD
................................
................................
................................
...........
52
3.1. Introduction
................................
................................
................................
.
52
3.2. Resea
rch Design
................................
................................
........................
52
3.3. The Participants
................................
................................
..........................
53
3.4. Research Questions
................................
................................
...................
54
3.5. Data Collection Instruments
................................
................................
........
54
3.5.1. Needs Analysis Questionnaire
................................
.............................
54
3.5.2. Order of the Subjects in the Treatment Process
................................
...
55
3.5.3. Pretest / Posttest Questions and Marking Charts
................................
.
55
3.5.4. The Treatment Process Instruments
................................
....................
56
3.5.4.1. Voluntary Participation Forms
................................
........................
56
3.5.4.2. Lesson Plans
................................
................................
.................
56
3.5.5. Interviews
................................
................................
.............................
57
3.6. Data Analysis
................................
................................
..............................
57
3.6.1. Ana
lyses of the Quantitative Data
................................
........................
58
3.6.2. Analyses of the Qualitative Data
................................
..........................
58
4. RESULTS & DISCUSSION
................................
................................
...............
59
xii
4.1. Introduction
................................
................................
................................
.
59
4.2. Findi
ngs of the Study
................................
................................
..................
59
4.2.1. The Needs Analysis Questionnaire
................................
......................
59
4.2.2. Pretest / Posttest Scores
................................
................................
......
74
4.2.2.1. The First Research
Question
................................
.........................
74
4.2.2.2. The Second Research Question
................................
....................
77
4.2.3. Qualitative Data Assessment
................................
...............................
81
4.2.3.1. The Findings about The Third Rese
arch Question
........................
82
4.2.3.2. The Findings about The Fourth Research Question
......................
86
5. SUGGESTED SPEAKING PRACTICES
................................
...........................
88
5.1. Introduction
................................
................................
................................
.
88
5.2. General Aims
................................
................................
..............................
88
5.3. The Order of the Subjects to be Studied
................................
.....................
88
5.4. Practice One
................................
................................
...............................
89
A.
INTRODU
CTION
................................
................................
...................
89
B.
PROCEDURE
................................
................................
.......................
90
C. PRODUCTION
................................
................................
..........................
96
D.
NOTES for T
EACHERS
................................
................................
........
99
5.5. Practice Two
................................
................................
.............................
103
A. INTRODUCTION
................................
................................
.....................
103
B. PROCEDURE
................................
................................
..........................
103
C. PRODUCTION
................................
................................
........................
114
D. NOTES for TEACHERS
................................
................................
...........
118
PRODUCTION
................................
................................
.............................
122
5.6. Practice Three
................................
................................
..........................
124
A. INTRODUCTION
................................
................................
.....................
124
B. PRODUCTION
................................
................................
.........................
131
C. NOTES for TEACHERS
................................
................................
..............
133
PRODUCTION: Collaborative Study
.
................................
...........................
134
5.7. Practice Four
................................
................................
............................
135
A. INTRODUCTION
................................
................................
.........................
135
B. PRODUCTIO
N
................................
................................
.........................
147
C. NOTES for TEACHERS
................................
................................
...........
150
PRODUCTION
................................
................................
.............................
151
5.8. Practice Fi
ve
................................
................................
.............................
152
A. INTRODUCTION
................................
................................
.....................
152
B. PROCEDURE
................................
................................
..........................
152
C. PRODUCTION
................................
................................
........................
163
D. NOTES for TEACHERS
................................
................................
...........
165
PRODUCTION
................................
................................
.............................
166
6.1. Introduction
................................
................................
...............................
167
6.2. Conclusion
................................
................................
................................
167
6.3. Suggest
ions
................................
................................
..............................
170
REFERENCES
................................
................................
................................
....
172
APPENDICES
................................
................................
................................
.....
178
APPENDIX 1: ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL
................................
.............
179
APPENDIX 2: NEEDS ANALYSIS QUESTIONNAIRE
................................
........
180
APPENDIX 3: GÖNÜLLÜ KATILIM FORMU
................................
.......................
182
xiii
APPENDIX 4: PRE
-
TEST / POST
-
TEST QUESTIONS
................................
......
183
APPENDIX 5: ORAL PROFICIENCY CRITERIA
................................
................
1
84
APPENDIX 6: LESSON PLAN
................................
................................
............
187
APPENDIX 7: TEACHER EVALUATION FORM
................................
.................
188
APPENDIX 7: ORIGINALITY REPORT
................................
...............................
190
CURRICULUM VITAE
................................
................................
.........................
191 | tr_TR |
dc.language.iso | en | tr_TR |
dc.publisher | Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü | tr_TR |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Communicative competence | tr_TR |
dc.subject | AOÖÇ (Avrupa Ortak Ölçüt Çerçevesi) | |
dc.subject | Avrupa Konseyi | |
dc.subject | YDİ (Yabancı Dil olarak İngilizce) | |
dc.subject | İhtiyaç Analizi | |
dc.subject | Yapabilirlik tanımlayıcıları | |
dc.subject | Motive olmuş | |
dc.subject | Etkin katılım | |
dc.subject | İletişimsel yeterlik | |
dc.subject | CEFR | |
dc.subject | The Council of Europe | |
dc.subject | EFL | |
dc.subject | Needs analysi | |
dc.subject | Can do descriptors | |
dc.subject | Motivated | |
dc.subject | Active participation | |
dc.title | Some Suggested Practices to Develop Speaking Skills and Communicative Competence of B1 Level Efl Learners at Tertiary Level | tr_TR |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis | tr_TR |
dc.description.ozet | Tüm dünyadaki insanların, İngilizceyi doğru ve akıcı kullanmaları yönüyle
iletişimsel becerilerinin yanı sıra konuşma kabiliyetlerinin de gelişmesi, Avrupa
Birliği ülkelerinde AOÖÇ‘nin (Avrupa Ortak Ölçüt Çerçevesi) formü
le edilip şekil
verilmesiyle hatırı sayılır derecede önem kazanmıştır. AOÖÇ ve onun dil öğretim
ve öğrenimine getirdiği kriterler, Türk dilbilimci ve otoriteleri tarafından bu alanın
temel taşları olarak kabul edilmişlerdir.
Avrupa Konseyi, AOÖÇ‘nin gelişm
esiyle birlikte Avrupa ülkelerinin çok yakın
ilişkileri ve üye ülkelerin de sosyal ve kültürel yönden işbirliğine gitmeleri sonucu
tüm kültürel değerlerine kucak açma noktasına geldi. Bunu yaparken birliğin temel
dayanak noktası, çok kültürlü ve çok dilli
bir birliktelik vasıtasıyla kültürel
farklılıklara karşı gelişen karşılıklı anlayış ve hoşgörü olmuştur.
Bu çalışma, B1 düzeyindeki üniversite öğrencilerinin iletişimsel yeterliklerini ve
buna bağlı olarak da diğer kültürlere karşı hoşgörülerini artırabilm
elerine dönük
bazı AOÖÇ temelli uygulamalar geliştirmeyi amaç edinmiştir. Bu uygulamaların
tasarımından önce B1 düzeyi ̳yapabilirlik‘ tanımlayıcları vasıtasıyla bir İhtiyaç
Analizi anketi hazırlanmıştır. Böylece, eğitim sürecinde hangi konuların
seçileceği
ni belirleyen araştırmacı, anketin sonuçlarının da yardımıyla
uygulamaları geliştirmiştir.
İyileştirme sürecinde 44 öğrenci bulunuyordu ve bunların 25‘ine, deney grubunda
oldukları için söz konusu çalışmalar uygulanmıştır. Öbür 19 öğrenci ise kontrol
grubu
nda olup kendilerine bu aktiviteler uygulanmamıştır. Uygulama süreci 5 hafta
sürmüş olup çalışmaların öncesi ve sonrasında tüm öğrencilere öntest ve sontest
yapılmıştır. Bu testlerin sonuçları, AOÖÇ temelli uygulamaları içeren iyileştirme
sürecinin öğrenci
lere ait konuşma yeteneklerini ve iletişimsel yeterliklerini
geliştirdiğini göstermişlerdir.
vii
Ayrıca, iletişimsel yeterliğe odaklı bu türden etkinliklerin, derse odaklanma ve
gönüllü olarak derse katılımları konusunda öğrenciye katkı sağladığı anlaşılmıştır
.
Araştırmacının, mülakatlar vasıtasıyla elde ettiği nitel verilerin değerlendirmesi de
göstermiştir ki, öğrenciler sınıf ortamında mutlu ve kendinden emin hissettiklerinde
derse etkin katılımla ilgili daha fazla motive olabiliyorlar | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Yabancı Diller Eğitimi | tr_TR |