Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSarıçoban, Arif
dc.contributor.authorYürük, Nurcihan
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-13T08:51:42Z
dc.date.available2017-02-13T08:51:42Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016-11-23
dc.identifier.citationAl-Arishi, A. Y. (1994). Technology in communicative language teaching. Language Quarterly, 32, 175–191. Allan, M. (1985). Teaching English with video. Essex: Longman. Al-Sayyed, S.W., & Dweick, B.S. (2015). Teaching western culture to Jordanian students majoring in English language: Perceptions and achievements, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 5, 140-147. Altman, R. (1989). The video connection. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. Anderson, D. D. (1992). Using feature films as tools for analyst in psychology and law course. Teaching of Psychology, 19(3), 155-158. Aparisi, M. C., Blanco, J. A., & Rinka, M. D. (2007). Revista: Conversación sinbarreras [Magazine: Conversation without barriers]. Boston: Vista Higher Learning. Arcario, P. (1992). Criteria for selecting video materials. In S. Stempleski & P. Arcario (Eds.). Video in second language teaching: Using, selecting and producing video for the classroom,TESOL Quarterly,20, 109-121. Alexandria, VA.. Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press. Arnold, J. & Harmer, J. (1984). Advanced writing skills. England: Longman Group Ltd. Atkins, S. J. (2001). Constructing visual literacy teaching: An investigation of two primary school teachers' construction of visual literacy teaching. Unpublished Honours Dissertation. University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia. Bacon, S. (1995). Coming to grips with the culture: Another use of dialogue journals in teacher education. Foreign Language Annals, 28 (2), 193-207. Baker, W. (2003). Should culture be an overt component of efl instruction outside of English speaking countries? The Thai context. Asian EFL Journal, [Online:http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/dec-03-sub.wb.php, Date Accessed: 05.02. 2010]. Barthes, R. (1993). Mythologies. London: Vintage. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (2000). Situated literacies. London: Routledge. Barwind, J., & Piecowye, J. (2002). Your media, my literacy. Zayed University. [Online: http://www.zu.ac.ae/cmtr/gmr/articles-2002-12/medialiteracy1.html, Date Accessed: 12.01.2005]. Bateson, G. (1977). Step to ecology of mind. London: Ballantine. Berwald, J.P. (1987). Teaching foreign languages with realia and other authentic materials, ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics: Washington, D.C. Birch, D. & Gardiner, M. (2005). Students' perceptions of technology-based marketing courses. Paper Presented at The ANZMAC Conference: Broadening The Boundaries, Fremantle, Western Australia, 5-7 December. Blanco, J., & Tocaimaza-Hatch, C. (2007). Imagina: Español sin barreras [Imagine: Spanish without barriers]. Boston: Vista Higher Education. Bo, B. (2008). The differences between novels and films: Enhance literature teaching by using films. U.S.-China Education Review, 5 (7), 58-61. Brandvold, D., Chang, L. L., Probst, G., & Bennion, J. (1986). Effectiveness of the interactive videodisk workstation in use in the English language center at Brigham Young University. Calico Journal, 4 (2), 25-39. Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (2003). Content-based second language instruction – Michigan Classics Edition. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Pearson Education. Brown. W., Lewis, R. J. & Harceload, F. W. (1983). AV instruction: Technology, media and methods. New York: Mcgraw-Hill. Bueno, K. A. (2009). Got film? Is it a readily accessible window to the target language and culture for your students? Foreign Language Annals, 42(2), 318–339. Buckingham, D. (1993). Children talking television: The making of television literacy. London: The Falmer Press. Burn, A., & Durran, J. (2007). Media literacy in schools: Practice, production and progression. London: Paul Chapman Burn, A., & Parker, D. (2003). Analysing media texts. London: Continuum Books. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007) Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı, Elementary Education Online, 7(1), 6-8. Byram, M., & Fleming, M. (1997). Language learning in intercultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Canagarajah, S. (2003). Foreword. In G. Smitherman and V. Villanueva (Eds.) Language Diversity in the Classroom: From intention to practice, 9-14. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Carr, T., & Duncan, J. (1987). The VCR revolution: Feature films for language and cultural proficiency. In Birckbichler, D. W. (Eds.) Proficiency, Policy, and Professionalism in Foreign Language Education. (ED 285422), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Carter, R., & Mcrae, J. (1996). Language, literature and the learner: Creative classroom practice. Harlow: Longman. Casanave, C., & Freedman D. (1995). Learning by collaboration and teaching a film presentation project. [Monograph]. In C. Casanave & Simons (Eds.), Pedagogical Perspective on Using Films in Foreign Language Classes, 28-39. Keio University SFC. Champoux, J. E. (1999). Film as a teaching resource. Journal of Management Inquiry, 8(2), 206–217. Chapple, L. & Curtis, A. (2000). Content-based instruction in Hong Kong: Student responses to film. System 28(3), 419-433. Charlebois, J. (2008). Developing critical consciousness through film. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL Du Canada, 25, 124–132. Chung, J. (1995). Nonverbal communication in leadership. Paper Presented at The Annual Conference of Speech Communication Association in San Diego, CA, November 20-23. Cononelos, T., & Oliva, M. (1993). Using computer networks to enhance foreign language/culture education. Foreign Language Annals, 26 (4), 527-534. Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge. Corbett, J. (2003). An intercultural approach to English language teaching. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Corder, S. P. (1968). Film and television in modern language teaching. In Jalling, H. (Eds.). Modern language teaching. London: Oxford University Press. Crozet, C., & Liddicoat, A.J. (1999). The challenge of intercultural language teaching: engaging with culture in the classroom. In J. Lo Bianco, A.J. Liddicoat and C. Crozet (Eds). Striving for the third place: Intercultural competence through language education, 113-125. Melbourne, Australia: Language Australia. Curwood, J.S., & Gibbons, D. (2009). Just like I have felt: Multimodal counter narratives in youth-produced digital media. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(4), 59-77. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010) Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi. Doyen, C. (1998). Films for self-study. Modern English Teacher, 7(4), 60–61. Dubois, M., & Vial, I. (2000). Multimedia design: The effects of relating multimodal information. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 157-165. Duffield, A. (1999). Literacy and cyber culture. [Online: http://www.readingonline.org/articles/dudfield/main.html., Date accessed 17.4.2007]. Keen, A. N. (2003). You’ve got mail: A film workshop. ELT Journal 57, (1) 51–9. Emir, J. (1983). The web of meaning: Essays on writing, teaching learning and thinking. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook. Evans, M. S. (2007). Narrative film: Promoting reading and learning. The International Journal of Learning, 14 (5), 253-266. Finnegan, M. D. (1996). The World Wide Web and foreign language teaching. ERIC/CLL News Bulletin, 20 (1). Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2003). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research (text 20), section on SLA. In Seidlhofer, B. (Eds.), Controversies in applied linguistics, 173-198. New York: CUP. Foucault, M. (1991). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock. Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. London: Routledge Furmanovsky, M. (1996). Content video in the EFL classroom. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Association of Language Teachers. Gale, L. E. (1989). Macario, montevidisco, and interactive dígame: Developing interactive video for language instruction. In F. Smith (Eds.), Modern technology in foreign language education: Applications and projects, 235-247. Lincoln Wood, IL: National Textbook. Gareis, E. (1997). Literature and film adaptations: Dealing with hot topics in the Esland literacy classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 41 (3), 222-223. Gareis, R. (2001). Benchmarking the project-oriented society, In PM Days Conference, University of Economics and Business Administration Vienna. George, D., & Shoos, D. (1999). Dropping bread crumbs in the intertextual forest: Critical literacy in a postmodern age, passions, pedagogies, and 21st century literacies. (Eds.). Gail E. Hawisher and Cynthia L. Selfe. Logan, UT: Utah State UP, Print, 115-126. Giroux, H. (2006). Is there a role for critical pedagogy in language/culture studies? an interview with Henry A. Giroux. [With M. Guilherme] Language and Intercultural Communication, 6 (2), 163-175. Goffman, E. (1976). Gender advertisements. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 3, 69-74. Grant, S. W. (2006). Using video to develop writing fluency in low proficiency ESL students, The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XII, [Online: http://itselj.Org/, Date Accessed: 08.08. 2006]. Hall, J.K., & Eggington, W.G. (1997). Introduction. In J.K. Hall and W.G. Eggington (Eds) The sociopolitics of English language teaching, 1-4). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London, Edward Arnold. Harrison, L. G. (2009). Foreign films in the classroom: Gateway to language and culture. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 6 (8), 89-93. Herron, C., Dubreil, S., Corrie, C., & Cole, S. P. (2002). A classroom investigation: Can video improve intermediate-level French language students' ability to learn about a foreign culture? The Modern Language Journal, 86 (1), 36-53. Hill, C. A. (2004). Reading the visual in college writing classes: Visual rhetoric in a digital world. Ed. Carolyn Handa. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 107-130. Hinkel, E. (1999). Building awareness and practical skills to facilitate cross-cultural communication. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Eds.) (2001), Teaching English as second or foreign language, (3rd Edition). USA: Heinle and Heinle. Hodge, R. & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Ithaca: Cornell UP. Hunfeld, H. (1990). Das Deutliche gegenüber. In Hunfeld, H. (1989), Literatur ALS sprachlehre. Ansätze eines hermeneutisch orientierten fremdsprachenunterrichts. Berlin Und München, 60-77. Ismaili, M. (2013). The effectiveness of using movies in the EFL classroom – A study conducted as South East European University. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(4), 121-132. Jenkins, A. (2006). What community college policies and practices are effective in promoting student success? A study of high-and low-impact institutions, community college research center, Teachers College, Columbia University. Jolly, A. B. (1998). The effectiveness of learning with concept mapping on science problem solving of sixth-grade children. [Online: http://wwwlib.Umi.Com/Dissertations//Fullcit/9908097. Date Accessed: 17.12.2005]. Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. Tesol Quarterly, 40 (1), 183-210. Kikuchi, Y. (1997). Keigo [Honorific Expressions]. Tokyo: Kodansha Gakujutsubunko. King, J. (2002). Using DVD Feature films in the EFL classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15 (5), 509–23. Kist, A. (2004). New literacies in action: Teaching and learning in multiple media, Language and Literacy Series, Teachers College. Kohonen, D. (2007). Towards transformative foreign language teacher as a professional social actor. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen and H. Nieme (Eds), Education as a societal contributor, 2-206. Berlin: Peter Lang. Kozma, R. (1991). Will media influence learning: Reframing the debate? Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7-19. Kramsch, C. (1987). The cultural discourse of foreign language textbooks. In A. Singerman (Eds.), Towards a new integration of language and culture, 63-68. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference. Kramsch, C. (1991). Culture in language learning: A view from the United States. In K. De Bot, R.B. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch (Eds), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective, 217-240). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kramsch, C. (1998). The privilege of the intercultural speaker. In M. Byram and M. Fleming (Eds), Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography, 16-31. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Kramsch, C. (2006). Language and culture. New York: Oxford University Press. Kress, G. & Jewitt, C. (Eds.) (2003) Multimodal literacy. New York: Peter Lang. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London and New York: Continuum. Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images – the grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication, Arnold, London. Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). The grammar of visual design. London: UCL Press. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: Exploring contemporary methods of communication. London: Routledge. Kuang, J. F. (2007). Developing students’ cultural awareness through foreign language teaching. Sino-US English Teaching, 4(12), 74-81. Kusumarasdyati. (2004). Listening, viewing and imagination: Movies in EFL classes. Paper Presented at 2nd International Conference On Imagination and Education, Vancouver, Canada. Kusumarasdyati. (2006). The use of movie videos to enhance cross-cultural understanding. The 16th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia in Wollongong 26 June - 29 June 2006. [Online: http://coombs.anu.edu.au/Specialproj/ASAA/Biennial-Conference / 2006 / Kusumarasdyati ASAA2006.Pdf] Lafayette, R. C. (Ed.). (1996). National standards: A catalyst for reform. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook& American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2003) Changing literacies. [With J.P. Gee, and C. Searle.] Miltonkeynes, UK: Open University Press. Lemke, J. (2007). Video Epistemology: In-and-outside the box: Traversing attentional spaces. In, R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences, 39-52. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Lemke, J. L. (2010). Transmedia traversals: Marketing meaning and identity. In A. Baldry & E. Montagna (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on multimodality: Theory and practice. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multimodality. Campobasso: Palladino. Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading Science, 87-113. London: Routledge. Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299-325. Lin, L. Y. (2002). The effects of feature films upon learners’ motivation, listening comprehension performance and speaking skills: The learner-centered approach. Tapei: Crane. Luo, J. J. (2003). Using DVD films to enhance college freshmen’s English listening comprehension and motivation. Master’s Thesis, National Tsing-Hua University. Lynch, L. M. (2008). 5 ways to use popular movies for English language teaching. [Online: http://www.Grammar4you.Com/341/.Html.] Date accessed: 13.07.2014. Maguire, L. L. (2005). Literature review: Faculty participation in online distance education: Barriers and motivators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8 (1). Malinowski, B. (2006). Crime and custom in savage society. London: Read. Manovich, L. (2002). The language of new media, Institute of Technology Massachusetts, USA. Markee, N. (1997). Second language acquisition research: A resource for changing teachers’ professional cultures? Modern Language Journal, 81, 80–93. Melin, C. (2010). Between the lines: When culture, language, and poetry meet in the classroom. Language Teaching, 43, 349–365. Metz, C. (1974). Film language: A semiotics of the cinema. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mitchell, W.J.T. (1994). Picture theory, essays on verbal and visual representation, University of Chicago MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Profession, 7, 234–245. Moore, Z. (1996). Culture: How do teachers teach it? In Z. Moore (Eds.), Foreign language teacher education: Multiple perspectives, 269-288. Maryland: University Press of America. Morrison, M., Sweeney, A., & Hefferman, T. (2003). Learning styles of on-campus and off-campus marketing students: The challenge for marketing educators ‖, Journal of Marketing Education, 25 (3), 208-217. Muller, V. (2006). Film as film: Using movies to help students visualize literary theory. The English Journal, 95 (6), 32-38. National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project (1999). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press. Nelson, M. E., Hull, G., & Roche-Smith, J. (2008). Challenges of multimedia self-presentation: Taking, and mistaking, the show on the road. Written Communication, 25 (4), 415-440. New London Group (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies, designing social futures. In B. Cope, B. & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. South Yarra, Melbourne: Macmillan. Nostrand, H. (1989). The beginning teacher’s cultural competence: Goal and strategy. Foreign Language Annals, 22 (2), 189-193. Omaggio Hadley, A. C. (2001). Teaching language in context, (3rd Ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle. Pegrum, M. (2008). Film, culture and identity: Critical intercultural literacies for the language classroom. Language and Intercultural Communication, 23, 248-301. Pally, M. (1998). Film studies drive literacy development of ESL university students, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 41 (8), 620-629. Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re) construction of selves. In J. Lantolf (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 155-177. New York: Oxford University Press. Phipps, A. & Gonzalez, M. (2004). Modern languages, teaching in an intercultural field. Sage Publications, London. Ryan, S. (1998). Using films to develop learner motivation. TESL Journal 4, (11), 22-35. Saint-Léon, C. (1988). The case for authentic materials on videodisk. Calicojournal, 6 (2), 27-40. Sankey, M. D. (2006). A neomillennial learning approach: Helping non-traditional learners studying at a distance. The International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2 (4), 82-99. Savignon, S. J., & Sysoyev, P. V. (2005). Cultures and comparisons: Strategies for learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38 (3), 357-365. Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185-213. Schmidt, K. (1994). What works: The results of evaluations of two interactive multimedia programs. International Journal of Instructional Media, 21(4), 269-277. Schulz, R. A. (2007). The challenge of assessing cultural understanding in the context of foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 40 (1), 9-26. Selber, S. A. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Shea, D. (1995). Whole moview and engaged response in the Japanese university ESL classroom. In C. Casanave & Simons (Eds.), Pedagogical perspective on suing films in foreign language class, 3-17. Keio University SFC. Sherman, J. (2003). Using authentic video in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Sinatra, R. (1986). Visual literacy connections to thinking, reading, and writing. Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas. Slater, D. (1997). Persuasion processes across receiver goals and message genres. Communication Theory, 7, 125–148. Sommer, P. (2001). Using film in the English classroom: Why and how. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44 (5), 485-487. Starkey, H. (2007). Language education, identities and citizenship: Developing cosmopolitan perspectives. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7(1), 56–71. Stempleski, S. (1992). Teaching communication skills with authentic video. In video in second language teaching: Using, selecting, and producing video for the classroom, Ed. S. Stempleski & P. Arcario. Alexandria: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. Stempleski, S. (2000). Video in the ESL classroom: Making the most of the movies. ESL Magazine, March/April, 10-12. Stempleski, S. (2002). Video in the ELT classroom: The role of the teacher in methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, Ed. J. Richards and W. Renandya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Strasheim, L. (1981). Establishing a professional agenda for integrating culture into the K-12 foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 65 (1), 67-69. Sugden, R. & Wilson, J.R. (2001). Globalization: The new economy and regionalization: Globalization and world cities study group network (Gawc), Research Bulletin, 70. Tang, Y. (2006). Beyond behaviour: Goals of cultural learning in the second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90 (1), 86-99. Tang, Y. (1999). Language, truth, and literary interpretation: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of the History of Ideas, 60, 1-20. Tanriverdi, B. & Apak, Ö. (2008). An analysis of three children stories by Rıfat Ilgaz in view of their convenience for reading classes in elementary schools. Elementary Education Online, 7(2), 252-272. Tavşancıl, E. (2005). Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara. Telatnik, M. A. & Kruse, W. D. (1982). Cultural videotapes for the ESL classroom. In M. Geddes & G. Sturtridge (Eds.), Video in the language classroom, 171-181. London: Heinemann Educational Books, Inc. Tomalin, B. (1986). Video, TV and radio in the English class. London: Macmillan. Tsui, A.B.M. (2005). Plenary language policy, culture and identity in the era of globalization. In B. Beaven (Eds.) IATEFL 2005: Cardiff Conference Selections, 41-51. Canterbury, UK: IATEFL. Tuncay, H. (2014). An integrated skills approach using feature movies in EFL at tertiary level. The Turkish Online. Journal of Educational Technology, 13 (1), 56-63. UNESCO (2009). UNESCO Universal declaration on cultural diversity. Paris: UNESCO. [Online:http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001271/127160m.pdf.Date Accessed: 10.03.2010]. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Valdes, J. M. (1986). Culture bound: Bridging the cultural gap in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J.P. Lantolf (Eds.). Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 245-259. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81 (4), 470-481. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Wood, D. J. (1995). Good video movies for teaching English as a foreign or second language. Bulletin of the International Cultural Research Institute of Chikushijogakuen College, 6, 105-125. Wray, D. (Ed.) (2004). Literacy: Major themes in education, new literacies: The impact of technology, London: Routledge Falmer. Young, R. F., & Miller, E. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 519-535.tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/3165
dc.description.abstractOne of the greatest challenges of an English teacher in English as a foreign language context faces is that English is not used authentically in the settings in which students live. Thus, learners do not have many natural opportunities to be exposed to the language or use it in authentic interaction. To fulfill the educational potential of language teaching, learners’ language acquisition and knowledge of the target language through foreign language classes can be enhanced by implementing teaching methods such as multimodality as a socio-semiotic approach in language teaching and learning. Film is widely used as a teaching material in foreign language classes as one of the most important ways of multimodality in terms of supplying both social and semiotic features of a target language thanks to its qualities. This study analyzes the effects of using film as a multimodal way on developing students’ comprehension skills in reading and enhancing cultural awareness in English Language and Literature Department at Selçuk University. The study was conducted on a sample of two groups: an experimental and a control group taught conventionally. The study was carried out at Selçuk University in Language and Literature Department. The participants in this study were sophomore students at B1+ level aged 19-21. The results of the study have shown that there were significant differences between experimental and control group of students on using film incorporated in the teaching material. The study concluded that a visual context helps students enhance and improve their comprehension skills in reading. The scores of the groups who received the course through different methods related to the perception scale and the benefits of cultural awareness displayed a significant difference and their common effect on perception scale scores.tr_TR
dc.description.tableofcontentsDECLARATION OF PUBLISHING AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS iii DECLARATION OF ETHICAL CONDUCT viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix TABLE OF CONTENTS xi LIST OF TABLES xiv LIST OF FIGURES xvii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xviii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Introduction 1 1.2. Background to the Study 1 1.3. Purpose of the Study 4 1.4. Significance of the Study 4 1.5. Research Questions 5 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 7 2.1. Presentation 7 2.2. Theoretical Trends Supporting the Use of Films in Class 7 2.3. Advantages of Using Film to Teach Languages 9 2.4. Integrating Films into School Curriculum and EFL Classrooms 10 2.4.1. Short Sequence Approach 10 2.4.2. Whole Film Approach 13 2.4.3. Selection Criteria 16 2.4.4. Captioned Films 17 2.4.5. Non-Captioned Films 18 2.5. Developing Reading Skills and Sub-Skills 19 2.6. Multimodality 22 2.6.1. Multimodality and Its Modes 23 2.6.2. Types of Multimodality 23 2.6.3. Types and Features of Multimodal Texts 25 2.7. Multimodality and Multimedia 26 2.8. Multimodality: Literacy, Multiliteracy and Intercultural Literacy 27 2.9. Multimodality in Relation to Various Media of Communication 31 2.10. Digital Media as Multimodality 32 2.11. Film as a Multimodal Way 32 2.11.1. The Kineikonic Mode 34 2.11.2. Multimodal Pedagogies: Learning and Teaching Languages through Film 35 2.12. Using Films to Enhance Cultural Understanding 39 2.12.1. Culture in a Foreign Language Classroom 40 2.12.2. Technology and Teaching Culture 41 2.12.3. Films as Rich Sources of Culture 44 2.12.4. Limitations of Using Films in Teaching Culture 48 3. METHODOLOGY 50 3.1. Presentation 50 3.2. Research Design 50 3.3. Subjects 52 3.4. Data Collection 53 3.5. Procedures 54 3.6. Data Collection Instruments 57 3.6.1. Proficiency Test 58 3.6.2. The Attitude Scale for Using Films in Language Classes 58 3.6.2.1. The Reliability and Validity Values of the Scale for the Attitude of Using Films in Language Classes 59 3.6.3. The Perception Scale Related to the Benefits of Cultural Awareness 65 3.6.3.1. The Reliability and Validity Values of Perception and Opinion related to the Benefits of Cultural Awareness 66 3.6.4. Academic Achievement Test (Post-test) 73 4. DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 76 4.1. The Comparison of Perceptions and Attitudes of the Groups 76 4.1.1. The Distribution of the Answers Given to the Attitude Scale for Using Films in Language Classrooms 76 4.1.2. The Effects of Using Films in the Language Classrooms on the Attitudes of Experimental Group 80 4.2. The Distribution of the Answers Given to the Perception Scale for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness 81 4.2.1. The Effects of Groups on the Perceptions Related to the Benefits of Cultural Awareness 89 4.2.2. Comparison of the Groups related to Perception Scores for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness according to high school graduations 91 4.3. Comparison of the Groups for Their Academic Achievements 92 4.3.1. The Academic Achievement Levels of the Groups Prior to Implementation 92 4.3.2. The Academic Achievement Levels of the Groups after the Implementation 93 4.3.3. The Comparison of the Academic Achievement Test Scores after the Implementation According to Gender 94 4.3.4. The Comparison of Academic Achievement Test Scores after the Implementation among the Groups According to the High School Graduations 95 5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 98 5.1. Introduction 98 5.2. Discussion of the Findings 98 5.2.1. Discussion on the Findings Related to Research Question 1 98 5.2.2. Discussion on the Findings Related to Research Question 2 99 5.2.3. Discussion on the Findings Related to Research Question 3 100 5.2.4. Discussion on the Findings Related to Research Question 4 102 5.2.5. Discussion on the Findings Related to Research Question 5 103 5.2.6. Discussion on the Findings Related to Research Question 6 103 5.2.7. Discussion on the Findings Related to Research Question 7 104 5.3. Pedagogical Implications 105 5.4. Limitations of the Study 106 5.5. Suggestions for Further Study 106 5.6. Conclusion 107 REFERENCES 112 APPENDICES 122 APPENDIX 1. EXEMPTION FROM APPROVAL OF ETHICS COMMITTEE 122 APPENDIX 2. POST-TEST 123 APPENDIX 3. QUESTIONNAIRE I 127 APPENDIX 4. QUESTIONNAIRE II 129 APPENDIX 5. PROFICIENCY TEST 130 APPENDIX 6. ANSWER KEY 140 APPENDIX 7. KEYWORD LIST 141 APPENDIX 8. ORIGINALITY REPORT FORM 142 CURRICULUM VITAE 143   LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1. The Distribution of the Number of Study Groups in the Studies of Reliability and Validity 59 Table 3.2. The Values of Arithmetic Means and Standard Deviations of the items in the Attitude Scales for Using of Films in the Language Classes 59 Table 3.3. The Internal Coefficients of the Attitude towards Using Films in Language Classes 60 Table 3.4. The Results of Item Total Analysis of the Attitude Scale for Using Films in Language Classes 61 Table 3.5. The Results of Item Remaining Analysis of the Attitude Scale for Using Films in Language Classes 62 Table 3.6. The Results of Item Distinctiveness for the Attitude Scale for Using Films in Language Classes 63 Table 3.7. The Results of Kaiser-Meyer Olkin and Bartlett Tests Conducted for the Scale of Attitude towards Using Films in Language Classes 64 Table 3.8. The Cronbach Alpha Values of Factor Load and Factors in the Scale of Attitude towards Using Films in Language Classes 65 Table 3.9. The Distribution of the Numbers of Study Group of Reliability and Validity Activities 66 Table 3.10. The Values of Arithmetical Average and Standard Deviation of the Scale of the Perception for Cultural Awareness 67 Table 3.11. The Internal Consistency Coefficients of the Entire Scale of Perception for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness 68 Table 3.12. The Results of Item Total Analysis of the Perception Scale of the Benefits of Cultural Awareness 69 Table 3.13. The Results of Item Remaining in the Scale of Perception for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness 70 Table 3.14. The Results of the General Perception Scale for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness 71 Table 3.15. The Results of Kaiser-Meyer Olkin and Bartlett Tests Conducted for the Scale of Perception for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness 72 Table 3.16. The Factor Loads of the Scale of Perception for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness and Cronbach Alpha Value of the Factors 73 Table 3.17. The Difficulty Levels of the Questions in the Achievement Test 75 Table 3.18. The Distinctiveness Levels of the Questions in the Achievement Test 75 Table 4.1. The Opinions of the Students for “the Attitude Scale for Using Films in the Language Classrooms” in the Experimental Group (N=27) 77 Table 4.2. The Perception Levels of the Students for “the Attitude Scale for Using Films in the Language Classrooms” in the Experimental Group 79 Table 4.3. The Results of Dependent t-Test for the Difference in the Perception Scores of the Students in Experimental Group Related to Using Films in the Language Classrooms According to Gender 80 Table 4.4. The Results of Independent t-Test for the Attitude Scale towards the Use of Films in the Language classrooms among the Students in Experimental Group According to high school graduations 80 Table 4.5. The Opinions of the Students for “the Perception Scale for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness” in the Experimental Group (N=27) 82 Table 4.6. The Perception Level of the Students for “the Perception Scale for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness” in the Experimental Group 85 Table 4.7. The Opinions of the Students for “the Perception Scale for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness” in the Control Group (N=25) 86 Table 4.8. The Perception Level of the Students for “the Perception Scale for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness” in the Control Group 89 Table 4.9. The Results of Independent t-Test for the Repeated Measurements related to the Perception Scores of the Students in Experimental and Control Groups for the Benefits of Cultural Awareness 89 Table 4.10. The Results of Independent t-test for the Scores of the Perception among the Students in the Experimental Group According to their Gender Related to the Benefits of the Cultural Awareness 90 Table 4.11. The Results of Independent t-test for the Scores of the Perception among the Students in the Control Group According to Gender Related to the Benefits of the Cultural Awareness 90 Table 4.12. The Results of Independent t-test for the Difference in the Perception Scores Related to the Benefits of Cultural Awareness among the Students in the Experimental Group According to High School Graduations 91 Table 4.13. The Results of Independent t-Test for the Difference in the Perception Scores of the Students in Control Group Related to the Benefits of Cultural Awareness According to High School Graduations 92 Table 4.14. The Results of Independent t-Test for the Repeated Measurements Related to the Academic Achievement Levels among the Students in Experimental and Control Groups 93 Table 4.15. The Results of Independent t-Test for the Repeated Measurements Related to the Academic Achievement Scores of the Students in the Experimental and Control Groups 93 Table 4.16. The Results of Independent t-test after the Implementation for the Differences between the Academic Achievement Scores of the Students in the Experimental Group According to Gender 94 Table 4.17. The Results of Independent t-Test after the Implementation for the Differences between the Academic Achievement Scores of the Students in the Control Group According to Gender 95 Table 4.18. The Results of Independent t-test after the Implementations for the Differences between the Academic Achievement Scores of the Students in the Experimental Group According to High School Graduations 95 Table 4.19. The Results of Independent t-test for the difference in the Academic Achievement Scores of the Students in the Control Group According to the High School Graduations 96 Table 4.20. The Results of Independent t-Test for the difference in the Academic Achievement Scores and Retention Test Scores of the Students in the Experimental and Control Groups 96   LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1. A Model of Intercultural Literacies 31 Figure 2.2. A Multimodal Design 37 Figure 2.3. Media Literacy Skills 38 Figure 3.1. Pre-reading Questions 55 Figure 3.2. While-watching Questions 56tr_TR
dc.language.isoentr_TR
dc.publisherEğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectmultimodality,reading skills, culture, cultural awarenesstr_TR
dc.titleFilms As A "Multimodal Way" To Improve Learners' Reading Skills And Enhance Cultural Awareness In English Language And Literature Departmentstr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetYabancı dil olarak İngilizcenin öğretilmesi bakımından bir İngilizce öğretmeninin karşılaştığı en büyük zorluklardan biri, öğrencilerin yaşadığı çevrede İngilizcenin özgün bir dil olarak kullanılmıyor olmasıdır. Bu yüzden öğrencilerin dile maruz kalma açısından ya da özgün bir etkileşimde bulunmak için çok fazla tabii fırsatları olmamaktadır. Dil öğretiminin eğitimsel potansiyelini ortaya çıkarmak için, öğrencilerin yabancı dil ve bu dile ait bilgi edinimi, yabancı dil öğretimi ve öğreniminde sosyo-semiyotik bir yaklaşım olarak kabul edilen çokmodluluk gibi öğretim metotlarının uygulanmasıyla geliştirilebilir. Film, nitelikleri dikkate alındığında, yabancı dil sınıflarında hedef dilin sosyal ve semiyotik özelliklerini sağlaması bakımından en önemli çokmodlu yöntemlerden biri olup öğretim materyali olarak yaygın bir şekilde kullanılabilir. Bu çalışma Selçuk Üniversitesi İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı Bölümü öğrencilerinin okuduklarını anlama becerilerini geliştirmek ve kültürel farkındalıklarını artırmak için filmin “çokmodlu bir yöntem” olarak kullanımının etkilerini incelemektedir. Bu çalışma iki örnek grup ile gerçekleştirilmiştir: bir deney ve bir geleneksel yöntemle eğitim alan kontrol grubu. Çalışma, Selçuk Üniversitesi İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı bölümünde yürütülmüştür. Bu çalışmadaki katılımcılar 19-21 yaş aralığında ve B1+ seviyesindeki ikinci sınıf öğrencileridir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, filmin öğretim materyallerine dahil edilerek kullanılmasıyla birlikte deney ve kontrol grubu öğrencileri arasında önemli farklılıkların olduğunu göstermiştir. Çalışma sonunda, bir görsel içerik olarak filmin öğrencilere okuduklarını anlama becerilerini artırmada ve ilerletmede yardımcı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Filmin kültürel farkındalıkları artırması açısından faydalarıyla ilgili farklı metotlar uygulanan grupların sonuçları arasında önemli bir farklılık gözlemlenmiştir.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentYabancı Diller Eğitimitr_TR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record