Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.advisorAltay, İsmail Fırat
dc.contributor.authorDemirağ, Nizamettin Bleda
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-11T12:39:06Z
dc.date.available2019-02-11T12:39:06Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.submitted2018-05-29
dc.identifier.citationAl Mamun, A. (2014). Effectiveness of audiovisual aids in language teaching in tertiary level (Master’s Thesis). BRAC University, Bangladesh. Alban Rodriguez, B. (2011). Suggestopedia: Use and review of the technique and steps to be applied in an EFL classroom (Master’s Thesis). University of Cuenca, Ecuador. Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, ASCD. Badri, A., Badri, A., & Badri, G. (2015). The effects of peripheral teaching on Iranian EFL vocabulary improvement. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(1), 10-18. Retrieved from http://www.ijeionline.com/ attachments/article/35/IJEIonline_Vol.2_No.1_2015-1-02.pdf Bahmani, M., Pazhakh, A., & Sharif, M. R. (2012). The effect of peripheral learning on vocabulary acquisition, retention and recall among Iranian EFL learners. Higher Education of Social Science, 3(1), 44-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.hess.1927024020120301.1132 Bancroft, W. J. (1978). The Lozanov Method and its American adaptations. Modern Language Journal, 62(4), 167-175. DOI: 10.2307/324351 Bancroft, W. J. (2005). Suggestopedia and Language. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Barbe, W.B., & Milone, M. N. (1981). What we know about modality strengths: Research that shows students have different modality strengths should be used to improve learning. Educational Leadership. 38. 378-380. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_198102_barbe.pdf Caskey, O. L., & Flake, M. H., (1976). Essentials of suggestopedia: A primer for practitioners. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED119063 Christ, R. E. (1975). Review and analysis of color coding research for visual displays. Human Factors, 17(6). 542-570. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/001872087501700602 Çetin, Y., & Flamand, L. (2013). Posters, self-Directed learning, and L2 vocabulary acquisition. ELT Journal, 67(1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs065 Dolati, R. I., & Richards, C. (2012). The perception of English language teachers in the use of visual learning aids. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(5), 2581-2595. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/228335285_The_Perception_of_English_Language_Teachers_in_the_Use_of_Visual_Learning_Aids Fatemipour, H. (2013). Peripheral learning of English language: A comparison between ESL and EFL contexts provided for university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1394-1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.050 Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles In engineering education. Engr. Education, 78(7), 674–681. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/LS-1988.pdf Fleming, N. D. (1995). I'm different; not dumb. Modes of presentation (VARK) in the tertiary classroom. Research and Development in Higher Education, Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference of the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), 18, 308-313. Retrieved from http://www.vark-learn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ different_not_dumb.pdf Fleming, N., & Baume, D. (2006) Learning styles again: VARKing up the right tree!, Educational Developments, 7(4), 4-7. Retrieved from https://semcme.org/wp-content/uploads/Flora-Educational-Developments.pdf Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. (2.ed.). Oxford, The United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Frensch, P. A., & Rünger, D. (2003). Implicit learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01213 Gardner, H., Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of Multiple Intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4-10. Retrieved from https://www.sfu.ca/~jcnesbit/EDUC220/ ThinkPaper/Gardner1989.pdf Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 200-209. Retrieved from https://learnweb.harvard.edu/WIDE/courses/files/Reflections.pdf Gezer, M., Şen, B., & Alcı, B. (2012). The effect of peripheral learning applied in English instruction on english idioms learning. The International Journal of Educational Researchers, 3(3), 19-34. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/ download/article-file/89892 Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology Metabolism, 10(2). 486-489. DOI: 10.5812/ijem.3505 Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment? Psychological Review, 62(1), 32-41. DOI: 10.1.1.294.9167 Grinder, J. & Bandler, R. (1981). Trance-formations: Neuro-linguistic programming and the structure of hypnosis. Moab, UT: Real People Press. Güçlü, B., Ayhan, & M. S., (2015). Suggestopedia in Turkish language for foreigners: Georgian In Practice: Georgia. Inter. J. Edu. Res. Technol. 6(1), 105-108. DOI: 10.15515/ijert.0976-4089.6.1.105108 Hale, G. A., & Piper, R. A. (1973). Developmental trends in children's incidental learning: Some critical stimulus differences. Developmental Psychology, 8(3), 327-335. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1972.tb01023.x Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching (3.ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited. Hawkins, R. P. (1973). Learning of peripheral content in films: A developmental study. Child Development, 44(1), 214-217. DOI: 10.2307/1127707 Hubenthal, M., O’Brien, T., & Taber, J. (2011). Posters that foster cognition in the classroom: multimedia theory applied to educational posters, Educational Media International, 48(3), 193-207. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09523987.2011.607322 Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050084 Kim, T. K. (2015). T test as a parametric statistic. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 68(6), 540-546. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.540 Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40214287 Krashen, S. D. (2009). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Retrieved from http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/ principles_and_practice.pdf Krashen, S. D. (1996). The case for narrow listening. System, (24)1. 97-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00054-N Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1995). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Prentice Hall Europe: Hertfordshire. Larsen-Freeman, (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press Lozanov, G. (1978). Suggestology and Suggestopedia: Theory and Practice. Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and Incidental Learning in the Workplace. London and New York: Routledge. Mateva, G. (1997). A portrait of the suggestopedic teacher. Teacher Development, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13664539700200005 Mathew, N. G. & Alidmad A. O. H. (2013). A Study on the usefulness of audio-visual aids in EFL classroom: Implications for effective instruction. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2). 86-92. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p86 McGlothlin, J. D. (1997). A child’s first steps in language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(10). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/McGlothlin-ChildLearn.html McKay, S. L. (2011). Teaching English as an international language: Implications for cultural materials in the classroom. Tesol Journal, 9(4), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2000.tb00276.x Mishra, S. K., & Yadav, B. (2014). Audio-visual aids & the secondary school teaching. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: Linguistics & Education, 14(1). 14-24. Retrieved from https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume14/3-Audio-Visual-Aids-and-The-Secondary.pdf Mohamadpur, M. (2013). Effects of peripheral English learning and creating motivation on Iranian secondary school EFL learners of elementary level. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 2(2013). 44-45. Retrieved from http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JLLL/article/view/9215/9445 National Research Council. (2006). Learning to Think Spatially. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11019 Osa, J. O., & Musser, L. R (2004). The role of posters in teacher education programs. Education Libraries, 27(1), 16-21. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ983927.pdf Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(6), 855-863. Retrieved from http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~pal/pdfs/pdfs/reber67.pdf Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 219-235. Retrieved from http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~pal/pdfs/pdfs/reber89.pdf Richards, J. and Rodgers, T. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rickards, M. (1970). Posters of Protest and Revolution. Bath: Adams and Dart Rokni, S. J., Porasghar, H., & Taziki, Z. (2014). The effect of peripheral learning on EFL learners’ spelling. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities, 1(V), 201-215. Retrieved from http://ijellh.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/The-Effect-of-Peripheral-Learning-on-EFL-Learners-Spelling.pdf Rokni, S. J. A. (2014). Does peripheral learning improve EFL learners’ spelling? International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(2), 62-67. Retrieved from http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20140202. 13.pdf Ruxton, G. D., & Neuhäuser, M. (2010). When should we use one-tailed hypothesis testing? Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(2), 114-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00014.x Stevick, E. W., (1976). Memory, Meaning and Method: Some Psychological Perspectives on Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12241 Şener, S., & Bostan, D. (2017). Using posters in EFL classroom: An elementary school case. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(4), 552-560. Retrieved from http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/ article/view/242/190 Takahashi, C., & Matsuya, A. (2013). Learning English phrasal verbs with audiovisual aids, INTED2013 Proceedings, 4630-4635. Wu, J. H., & Yuan, Y. (2003). Improving searching and reading performance: The effect of highlighting and text color coding. Information & Management 40. 617-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00091-5tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/5845
dc.description.abstractThe idea that being exposed to information contained in the learning environment over a period of time causes subconscious learning is called ‘peripheral learning’. This term was coined by Georgi Lozanov in the 1970’s, who viewed the learning environment as a crucial part of the learning process and emphasized the optimization of the environment for the learning process. Utilizing this phenomenon in the classroom could lead to effortless and automatic learning. The aim of this study was to explore the potential benefits of peripheral learning via the use of colorful, illustrative educational posters within the classroom and the cognitive and emotional effects of using such posters on university English preparation students in Turkey. One such classroom in a foreign languages department was decorated with 27 different posters containing grammatical and lexical items along with illustrative and written examples, which remained for a total of 12 weeks. Two midterm exams were conducted by the department during this period (the first after four weeks of exposure, the second after 12 weeks of exposure). The scores of the experimental group (24 students) were compared to those of a control group (21 students). It was found that the experimental group had somewhat significantly higher grammar and vocabulary scores in the first exam, and significantly higher grammar and vocabulary scores in the second exam. A comparison of each group’s progress between the first and second midterms also showed a significant difference in favor of the treatment group. Furthermore, interviews with the students exposed to the posters showed that students generally tended to have positive feelings towards them and tended to examine the posters often.tr_TR
dc.language.isoentr_TR
dc.publisherEğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectÇevresel Öğrenmetr_TR
dc.subjectRastlantısal Öğrenmetr_TR
dc.subjectÖrtülü Öğrenmetr_TR
dc.subjectBilinçaltı Öğrenmetr_TR
dc.subjectSınıfta Posterlertr_TR
dc.subjectİngilizce Öğretimitr_TR
dc.titlePeripheral Learning and Its Effectiveness in Intensive English Classeseng
dc.title.alternativeYoğun İngilizce Sınıflarında Çevresel Öğrenme ve Etkinliğitr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetÖğrenme ortamında bulunan bilgilere bir süre maruz kalmanın bilinçaltı öğrenmeye yol açtığı iddiasına ‘çevresel öğrenme’ denir. Bu terim, 1970’li yıllarda, öğrenme çevresini öğrenme sürecinin en önemli faktörlerinden biri olarak gören ve çevreyi öğrenme işlemi için en ideal şekle getirmenin önemini vurgulayan Georgi Lozanov tarafından oluşturulmuştur. Bu fenomenden sınıfta yararlanılarak, zahmetsiz ve otomatik öğrenmeye yol açılabilir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, çevresel öğrenmenin renkli ve resimli eğitimsel posterler aracılığıyla sınıfta kullanılmasının potansiyel faydalarını ve böyle posterlerin Türkiye’de üniversite İngilizce hazırlık öğrencileri üzerindeki bilişsel ve duygusal etkilerini incelemekti. Bu doğrultuda, bir hazırlık sınıfı gramer ve kelime bilgileri ile örnekler içeren 27 posterle donatıldı ve bu posterler toplam 12 hafta sınıfta asılı kaldı. Bu süre içinde kurum tarafından iki ara sınav yapıldı (ilki 4 hafta sonra, ikincisi 12 hafta sonra). Deney grubunun (24 öğrenci) puanları aynı seviyedeki bir kontrol grubunun (21 öğrenci) puanları ile karşılaştırıldı. Deney grubunun ilk sınavdaki gramer ve kelime puanlarının biraz daha yüksek olduğu ve ikinci sınavdaki gramer ve kelime puanlarının önemli derecede daha yüksek olduğu bulundu. Grupların birinci ve ikinci ara sınavlar arasında gösterdikleri ilerleme karşılaştırıldığında da deney grubunun lehine önemli bir fark bulundu. Ayrıca, öğrenciler ile yapılan mülakatlar sonucunda öğrencilerin genellikle posterlere olumlu düşünceler beslediği ve onları sıklıkla incelediği ortaya çıkmıştır.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentYabancı Diller Eğitimitr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID238671tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster