Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSulak, Sema
dc.contributor.authorKelecioglu, Hulya
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-09T05:54:32Z
dc.date.available2021-06-09T05:54:32Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1309-6575
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.21031/epod.530528
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/24776
dc.description.abstractIn this research, computerized adaptive testing item selection methods were investigated in regard to ability estimation methods and test termination rules. For this purpose, an item pool including 250 items and 2000 people were simulated (M = 0, SD = 1). A total of thirty computerized adaptive testing (CAT) conditions were created according to item selection methods (Maximum Fisher Information, a-stratification, Likelihood Weight Information Criterion, Gradual Information Ratio, and Kullback-Leibler), ability estimation methods (Maximum Likelihood Estimation, Expected a Posteriori Distribution), and test termination rules (40 items, SE < .20 and SE < .40). According to the fixed test-length stopping rule, the SE values that were obtained by using the Maximum Likelihood Estimation method were found to be higher than the SE values that were obtained by using the Expected a Posteriori Distribution ability estimation method. When ability estimation was Maximum Likelihood, the highest SE value was obtained from a-stratification item selection method when the test length is smaller then 30. Whereas, Kullback-Leibler item selection method yielded the highest SE value when the test length is larger then 30. According to Expected a Posteriori ability estimation method, the highest SE value was obtained from a-stratification item selection method in all test lengths. In the conditions where test termination rule was SE <.20, and Maximum Likelihood Ability Estimation method was used, the lowest and highest average number of items were obtained from the Gradual Information Ratio and Maximum Fisher Information item selection method, respectively. Furthermore, when the SE is lower than.20 and Expected a Posteriori ability estimation method was utilized, the lowest average number of items was obtained through Kullback-Leibler, and the highest was obtained through Likelihood Weight Information Criterion item selection method. In the conditions where the test termination rule was SE < .40, and ability estimation method was Maximum Likelihood Estimation, the maximum and minimum number of items were obtained by using Maximum Fisher Information and Kullback-Leibler item selection methods respectively. Additionally, when Expected a Posteriori ability estimation was used, the maximum and minimum number of items were obtained via Maximum Fisher Information and a-stratification item selection methods. For the cases where the stopping rule was SE < .20 and SE <.40 and Maximum Likelihood Estimation method was used, the average number of items were found to be highest in all item selection methods.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionof10.21031/epod.530528
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United States
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjecta-stratification
dc.subjectComputerized adaptive testing
dc.subjectgradual information ratio
dc.subjectkullback-leibler
dc.subjectlikelihood weight information criterion
dc.subjectmaximum fisher information
dc.titleInvestigation Of Item Selection Methods According To Test Termination Rules In Cat Applications
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Measurement And Evaluation In Education And Psychology-Epod
dc.contributor.departmentEğitim Bilimleri
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 United States