YÜRÜYÜŞ PARAMETRELERİ FONKSİYONEL PERFORMANS DENGE AĞIRLIK AKTARMA VE YAŞAM KALİTESİ AÇISINDAN TRAVMA VE DİYABET NEDENLİ TRANSTİBİAL AMPUTELERİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Göster/ Aç
Tarih
2025-02-28Yazar
Tosun Çekiç, Neşe
Ambargo Süresi
Acik erisimÜst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını gösterÖzet
Tosun N., Comparison of Trauma and Diabetes Induced Transtibial Amputees
in Terms of Gait Parameters Functional Performance Balance Weight Bearing
and Quality of Life, Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Health Sciences,
Prosthesis-Orthesis and Biomechanics Program, PhD Thesis, Ankara, 2025. This
study was planned to compare the results of gait parameters, balance, weight transfer
symmetry, functional capacity, functional mobility, quality of life and prosthesis
satisfaction in diabetes and trauma induced transtibial amputees (TTA). Ten trauma
and 10 diabetes-induced TTA subjects aged 18-65 years were included in the study.
All amputees in the trauma and diabetes groups were wearing a transtibial prosthesis
with vacuum assisted suspension system and carbon composite foot. Gait analysis and
weight transfer symmetry were evaluated by computerised gait analysis system,
balance by Biodex Balance System, functional capacity by Six Minute Walk Test,
functional mobility by Timed Up and Go Test and Stair Climb and Descent Test,
prosthesis satisfaction by Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale and
quality of life by Short Form-36. When the results of the trauma and diabetes groups
were compared, a significant difference was found in favor of the trauma group among
the gait parameters of stride length (p<0.05), amputated limb step length (p<0.05),
non-affected limb step length (p<0.05), balance assessment parameters of general
postural stability (p<0.001), anterio-posterior postural stability (p<0.001), medio
lateral postural stability (p<0.05), Stair Climbing and Descent Test (p<0.001), activity
restriction subsection of Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale (p<0.05).
No significant difference was found between the parameters of velocity, cadence, step
width, amputee and non-affected limb weight bearing percentages, Timed Up and Go
Test, Short Form-36 and Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale (Psycho
social Adjustment, Prosthesis Satisfaction, Daily Prosthesis Use Time subsections).
There was a correlation between functional performance and gait parameters (stride
stride length, amputee limb step length, non-affected limb step length, speed), postural
stability (general, anterio-posterior, medio-lateral), Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis
Experience Scale (physical function, energy/vitality/, social function, general health
perception) assessments (p<0.05). When the results of diabetic and traumatic amputees
were evaluated in our study, it was seen that the difference in favor of traumatic
amputees became evident, especially in activity-related measurements and when the
difficulty level of the activity increased. In other parameters, the use of vacuum
assisted suspension system prosthesis by the participants had a positive effect on the
results of the diabetes group and contributed to the emergence of results close to the
trauma group. The fact that diabetic amputees use their prostheses as long as traumatic
amputees during the day and the choice of prosthesis and suspension system can be
counted as factors in favour of diabetic amputees. It is thought that these factors will
provide a different perspective to the relevant health professionals in terms of the
success of rehabilitation and will guide future studies on a larger number of amputees,
including different levels of amputation and different suspension systems.
Key words: Trauma, Diabetes, Transtibial, Amputee, Gait, Balance