Endotrakeal Tüp Kaf Basınçlarının Monitörize Edilerek Belirli Aralıkta Tutulmasının Cerrahi Sonrası Öksürük, Boğaz Ağrısı, Ses Kısıklığı İnsidansı Üzerine Etkisi
View/ Open
Date
2024Author
Mahmudova, Kheyrana
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-emb
Acik erisimxmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item recordAbstract
Mahmudova. Kh. The effect of monitoring endotracheal tube cuff pressures and
keeping them within a certain range on the incidence of post-surgical cough, sore
throat and hoarseness. Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of
Anesthesiology and Reanimation. Thesis in Anesthesiology and Reanimation. Ankara 2024. Although the safe cuff pressure range for high volume-low pressure
tubes used today is defined as 20-30 cmH2O, routine cuff pressure monitoring is not
performed in operating rooms. The aim of this study is to investigate whether there
is a significant pressure difference between blindly inflated cuffs and the cuffs
inflated by controlling the cuff pressure aided by monitorization, and the effects of
any detected pressure difference on the trachea using the clinically detectable
parameters of sore throat, hoarseness and cough. The patients included in this
prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind study were divided into two
groups: the study group whose cuff pressures were monitored continously (n = 163)
and the control group (n = 100). The study group was constantly monitored with an
invasive pressure monitoring system. In addition, a researcher who was blind to the
groups measured the endotracheal tube cuff pressure with the help of a manometer
after intubation in both groups, before extubation, and in long-term cases, at the
3rd hour after intubation. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated for sore throat, cough, and hoarseness using VAS scoring at the 2nd and 24th hour by another
researcher blinded to the study groups. Statistical evaluation was made using the
Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows 20 (SPSS-IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) program. Complaint of sore throat was observed significantly less at 2nd and
24th hours in the group with cuff pressure monitoring (p=0.00 for 2nd hour sore
throat, p=0.02 for 24th hour sore throat). No difference was detected between the
groups in terms of hoarseness and cough. It has been observed that manometer
measurements also reduce the pressure due to the use of air in the same closed
system. The quantity of this reduction, which some researchers have previously
stated, needs to be studied in more detail. In conclusion, intraoperative ETT cuff
pressure monitoring may be effective in preventing sore throat and the mucosal
ischemia that causes this pain.