Özet
Meeting the evolving needs and expectations of users over time is crucial to staying on top of the pace of change in university libraries, as in many other institutions. The aim of this study is to determine the priorities of Hacettepe University Beytepe Library users and staff for factors that are expected to be affected by the change regarding the library, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. These factors were determined based on the literature and expert opinions as Services, Institutional Administrative Structure, Staff, Collection, Space, and Information System. While obtaining the findings for the AHP, user opinions were also consulted via open-ended questions, and the findings were elaborated based on the evaluation of these comments. The evaluators were a total of 28 people, including library users (undergraduate students, graduate students, and academic staff) and library staff. According to the findings of the research, all user groups prioritized the Collection as the factor that needs to change. According to the Library Staff, the factor that needs to be changed primarily is the Staff. Following the evaluation of the findings on the basis of the literature, it was determined that libraries, which have to realize a multi-faceted transformation, cannot determine the path they will follow in the process of change only by revealing the priorities of their users and staff. Since user and staff priorities are limited to individual information needs, perceptions, and library experiences, it was observed that libraries need to act beyond the expectations and requests expressed by their users and develop proactive services. In addition to identifying user needs in the process of change, the study also offers suggestions on what different approaches libraries can adopt to contribute to their own functionality, and what kind of path they can follow in this regard by taking into account the dynamics of their own institutions for their needs besides determining the user needs in the change process.
Künye
Adeyoyin, S. O., Imam, A. ve Bello, T. O. (2012). Management of change in the 21st century libraries and information centres. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 695. Erişim adresi: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/695
Akın, A., Arar, T. ve Ulukök, E. (2018). Örgütlerdeki ahlaki standartları etkileyen faktörlerin AHP yöntemi ile belirlenmesi. AKÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 57-68.
Akingbola, K., Rogers, S. E. ve Baluch, A. (2019). Change management in nonprofit organizations. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Aksoy, M. (2013). Kavram olarak hayat boyu öğrenme ve hayat boyu öğrenmenin Avrupa Birliği serüveni. Bilig, 64, 23-48. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/234337
Aktan, C. C. (2005). Değişim çağında yönetim. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
Al Harbi, K. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), 19-27.
Al Jaradat, O., Nagresh, M., Al Shegran, A. ve Jadellah, N. (2013). Impact of change management on the performance of employees in university libraries in Jordan. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 169-178.
Alshaher, A. A. (2013). The McKinsey 7S model framework for e-learning system readiness assessment. International Journal of Advances in Engineering & Technology, 6(5), 1948-1966.
Andrade, P. R. M., Albuquerque, A. B., Teofilo, W. ve Silva, F. A. (2016). Change management: Implementation and benefits of the change control in the information technology environment. International Journal of Advanced Information Technology (IJAIT), 6(1), 23-33.
Andaleeb, S. S. ve Simmonds, P. L. (1998). Explaining user satisfaction with academic libraries: Strategic implications. College & Research Libraries, 59(2), 156-167.
Anuradha, P. (2018). Digital transformation of academic libraries: Opportunities and challenges. IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology, 3(1), 8-10.
Appiah, A. B., Adams, M. ve Adu, I. N. (2016). Change management in library environments: A comparative study of private and public university libraries in Ghana. An International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 13(1), 25-38.
Aslam, M. (2018). Currrent trends and issues affecting academic libraries and leadership skills. Library Management, 39(1/2), 78-92.
Aslam, M. (2019). Leadership in challenging times of academic libraries. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 69(3),135-149.
Aslam, M. (2021). Adapting to change in academic libraries. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(8/9), 672-685.
Aslam, M. (2022). Changing behavior of academic libraries and role of library professionals. Information Discovery and Delivery, 50(1), 54-63.
Asnina, E., Pudane, M., Svike, M. ve Alksnis, G. (2014). Customer-oriented change management for ERP systems. (B. Rachev ve A. Smrikarov, Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies içinde (s.333-340).
Atay, L. ve Özdağoğlu, A. (2008). Analitik hiyerarşi süreci (AHS) yöntemiyle tedarikçi seçimini etkileyen faktörlerin önem düzeylerinin belirlenmesi: Otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Seyahat ve Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1/2), 38-61.
Aziz, N. F., Sorooshian, S. ve Mahmud, F. (2016). MCDM-AHP method in decision makings. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(11), 7217-7220.
Benedetti, A. (2017). Promoting library services with user-centered language. Libraries and the Academy, 17(2), 217-234.
Beer, M., Eisenstat, R. A. ve Spector, B. (1993). Why change programs don’t produce change. (C. Mabey ve B. Mayon White, Ed.), Managing Change içinde (s.99-108). Londra: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
Bell, S. J. ve Shank, J. (2004). The blended librarian: A bluprint for redefining the teaching and learning role of academic librarians. College & Research Libraries News, 65(7), 372-375.
Belton, V. ve Stewart T. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis; An Integrated Approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Benyon, D. (2019). Designing User Experience: A Guide to HCI, UX and Interaction Design. UK: Pearson.
Boughey, A. (2000). Implementing the ‘New Library: The People’s Network’ and the management of change. Aslib Proceedings, 52(4), 143-149.
Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F. ve Abrell, T. (2016). Design Thinking as Mindset, Process, and Toolbox. (W. Brenner ve F. Uebernickel, Ed.), Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice içinde (s.3-25). Cham: Springer.
Bridges, W. (2009). Managing transitions: Making the most of change. Londra: Nicholas Brealey.
Brindley, L. (2006). Re‐defining the library. Library Hi Tech, 24(4), 484-495.
Brisson Banks, C. V. (2009). Managing change and transitions: A comparison of different models and their commonalities. Library Management, 31(4/5), 241-252.
Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247.
Burdurlu, E. ve Ejder, E. (2003). Location choice for furniture industry firms by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. G.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(2), 369-373.
Butdee, S. ve Phuangsalee, P. (2019). Uncertain risk assessment modelling for bus body manufacturing supply chain using AHP and fuzzy AHP. Procedia Manufacturing, 30, 663-670.
Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977-1001.
By, R. T. (2005). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369-380.
Byamugisha, H. M. (2010). Digitizing library resources for new modes of information use in Uganda. (A. Katsirikou ve C. H. Skiadas, Ed.), Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries: Theory and Applications içinde (s.81-95). Singapore: World Scientific.
Cameron, E. ve Green, M. (2009). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools & techniques of organizational change. Londra: Kogan Page.
Carlsson, H. (2016). Library assessment and quality assurance - Creating a staff-driven and user-focused development process. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 11(2), 28-33.
Carrillo, E. ve Gregory, G. M. (2019). Change management in extremis: A case study. Journal of Access Services, 16(1), 21-33.
Chan, H. K., Sun, X. ve Chung, S. H. (2019). When fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process? Decision Support Systems, 125, 1-10.
Chen, Y. (2003). Application and development of electronic boks in an e-Gutenberg age. Online Information Review, 27(1), 8-16.
Choy, F.C. (2011). From library stacks to library-in-a-pocket: Will users be around? Library Management, 32(1/2), 62-72.
Colombo, A. W., Karnouskos, S., Yu, X., Kaynak, O., Luo, R. C., Shi, Y., Leitao, P., Ribeiro, L. ve Haase, J. (2021). A 70-year industrial electronics society evolution through industrial revolutions: The rise and flourishing of information and communication technologies. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 15(1), 115-126.
Connaway, L. S., Hood, E. M., Lanclos, D., White, D. ve Le Cornu, A. (2012). User-centered decision making: A new model for developing academic library services and systems. IFLA Journal, 39(1), 20-29.
Connaway, L. S., Ixchel M. F., Brannon, B., Cantrell, J., Cyr, C., Doyle, B., Gallagher, P., Lang, K., Lavoie, B., Mason, J. ve van der Werf. T. (2021). New Model Library: Pandemic Effects and Library Directions. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research.
Cox, J. (2021). The higher education environment driving academic library strategy: A political, economic, social and technological (PES) analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), s.1-11.
Cribb, G. (2010). Üniversite Kütüphanelerinde Yeni Nesil Pazarlama ve İletişim Stratejileri. (A. Yıldızeli, T. Çakmak, N. Özel, Ed.) ÜNAK 2010: Bilgi Yönetimi 2.0: Sosyal Ağlarda Bilgi Hizmetleri içinde (s.45-56). Erişim adresi: https://bit.ly/3YT2Dps
Crisostomo, A. S. I. ve Gustilo, R. C. (2019). Tourism: Asian Country Ranking Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2019 IEEE 11th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management, HNICEM 2019, 1-7.
Cynthia, O.U. (2020). Implementation of project evaluation and review technique (PERT) and critical path method (CPM): A comparative study.
de Castro Pardo, M., de la Fuente Cabrero, C., Laguna Sanchez, P. ve Perez Rodriguez, F. (2019). Combining AHP and goal programming in the context of the assessment of e-learning. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(3), 301-312.
Decker, E. N. (2021). Reaching academic library users during the COVID-19 pandemic: New and adapted approaches in Access services. Journal of Access Services, 18(2), 77-90.
Demir, G. (2017). Oldenburg’un üçüncü mekân paradigması bağlamında kütüphane mekânının sorgulanması. Bilgi Dünyası, 18(2), 195-223.
Dess, G. G. ve Picken, J. C. (2012). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 18-34.
Doucett, E. (2008). Creating your library brand: Communicating your relevance and value to your patrons. Chicago: American Library Association.
Dyer, J. S. (1990). Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 36(3), 249-258.
Ecevit Sarı, Z. ve Oktay Yılmaz, B. (2020). Endüstri 4.0 ortamında değişen iş ve mesleklerin Türkiye’de kadın istihdamına etkileri. Strategic Public Management Journal, 6(11), 54-76.
Eleren, A. (2006). Kuruluş yeri seçiminin analitik hiyerarşi süreci yöntemi ile belirlenmesi; deri sektörü örneği. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 405-416.
Erkan, H. (1998). Bilgi toplumu ve ekonomik gelişme. Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
Eva, N. ve Shea, E. (2018). Marketing libraries in an era of “fake news”. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 57(3), 168-171.
Farrow, J. (1997). Management of change: Technological developments and human resource issues in the information sector. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12(5), 319-324.
Galli, B. J. (2018). Change management models: A comparative analysis and concerns. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 46(3), 124-132.
Gerolimos, M. ve Konsta, R. (2008). Librarians’ skills and qualifications in a modern informational environment. Library Management, 29(8/9), 691-699.
Gewirtz, D. (29.05.2018). Technology that changed us: The 2000s, from iPhone to Twitter. Erişim adresi: https://www.zdnet.com/article/technology-that-changed-us-the-2000s/
Giesecke, J. ve McNeil, B. (2004). Transitioning to the Learning Organization. Library Trends 52(1), 54-67.
Giles, R. (1976). Lukasiewicz logic and fuzzy set theory. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 8(3), 313-327.
Graham, P. (2003). Mary Parker Follett prophet of management. Washington DC: Beard Books.
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ, 29(2), 75-91.
Gunapala, M., Montague, A., Reynolds, S. ve Vo Tran H. (2020). Managing change in university libraries in the 21st century: An Australian perspective. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 69(2), 191-214.
Gustafson, J. ve Widerlund, M. (2010). Strategy and Change Management: A Case Study of Akademiska Hus Vast. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Chalmers Teknoloji Üniversitesi, İsveç.
Halder, S.N. (2009). Multimodal roles of library and information science professionals in present era. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 1(6), 92-99.
Harbo, K. (2012). Getting to know library users’ needs: Experimental ways to user-centered library innovation. Liber Quarterly, 21(3/4), 367-385.
Harker, P. ve Vargas, L. G. (1990). Reply to ‘remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 36(3), 269-273.
Hayes, J. (2002). The theory and practice of change management. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Hempel, P. S. ve Martinsons, M. G. (2009). Developing international organizational change theory using cases from China. Human Relations, 62(4), 459-499.
Herz, İ. (2018). Mobilya Seçiminde Etkili Olan Kalite Faktörlerinin AHS ve TOPSİS Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi: Trabzon İli Örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Türkiye.
House, R. J. (1967) Management development. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
IFLA. (2002). The IFLA Internet Manifesto. Erişim adresi: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/faife/publications/policy-documents/internet-manifesto-en.pdf
IFLA. (2016). IFLA Guidelines for Continuing Professional Development: Principles and Best Practices. Erişim adresi: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cpdwl/guidelines/ifla-guidelines-for-continuing-professional-development.pdf
IFLA/UNESCO. (1994). Public Library Manifesto. Erişim adresi: https://www.ifla.org/publications/iflaunesco-public-library-manifesto-1994
Indrák, M. ve Pokorná, L. (2021). Analysis of digital transformation of services in a research library. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(1/2), 154-172.
Ipri, T. (2010). Introducing transliteracy: What does it mean to academic libraries?. College & Research Libraries News, 71(10), 543-567.
Ishizaka, A., Balkenborg D. ve Kaplan, T. (2011). Does AHP help us make a choice? An experimental evaluation. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(10), 1801-1812.
Lange, J. M. (1988). Public library users, nonusers, and type of library use. Public Library Quarterly, 8(1/2), 49-68.
Jantz, R. C. (2012). Innovation in academic libraries: An analysis of university librarians’ perspectives. Library and Information Science Research, 34(1), 3-12.
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., ve Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Massachusetts: MacArthur.
Kabak, M. ve Erdebilli, B. (2021). Giriş. (M. Kabak ve B. Erdebilli, Ed.). Bulanık Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri: MS Excel ve Software Çözümlü Uygulamalar içinde (s.2-12). Ankara: Nobel.
Kakırman Yıldız, A. (2009). Kütüphaneler için Değişim Yönetimi Modeli. Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Türkiye.
Kakırman Yıldız, A. (2010). Kütüphanelerde değişim yönetimi uygulamalarının CMML ve CMML-CS ile izlenmesi: Marmara Üniversitesi Merkez Kütüphanesi örneği. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 24(2), 258-284.
Kamila, K. (2009, Ekim). Managerial change for the survival of library and information centers in information and communication technology era. International Conference on Academic Libraries bildiriler kitabı içinde (s.314-320). Hindistan: Delhi Üniversitesi Erişim adresi: http://crl.du.ac.in/ical09/papers/index_files/ical-52_92_242_1_DR.pdf
Karakaş, S. (2018). Üniversite kütüphanesi kullanıcılarının beklentileri ve kullanıcı tatmini. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 1-2.
Kaur, R. (2018). Change management: A big solution to cope up with IT based culture in 21st century libraries. Library Progress (International), 38(1), 140-148.
Keseroğlu, H. S. (2019). Kütüphane üstüne bir deneme. (M. A. Akkaya ve H. Odabaş, Ed.), Bilgi Merkezleri: Kütüphaneler-Arşivler-Müzeler içinde (s.11-20). İstanbul: Hiper Yayın.
Kıyak, E. (2003). Bulanık Mantık Yöntemiyle Uçuş Kontrol Uygulamaları. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
Kim, J. A. (2017). User perception and use of the accademic library: A correlation analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43, 209-215.
Klain Gabbay, L. ve Shoham, S. (2017). How is the role of academic library workers perceived by both faculty members and library workers?. Libri, 67(4), 261-281.
Klugkist, A. C. (2001). Virtual and non-virtual realities: The changing roles of libraries and librarians. Learned Publishing, 14,197-204.
Kongar, E. (2001). Küresel terör ve Türkiye. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review. Erişim adresi: https://eoeleadership.hee.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/leading_change_why_transformation_efforts_fail.pdf
Kulak, O. ve Kahraman, C. (2005). Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences, 170, 191-210.
Kuunifaa, C. (2021). Sustainability and Reusing Buildings for Libraries: A Review of Selected Documents. (P. Hauke, K. Latimer ve R. Niess, Ed.). New Libraries in Old Buildings: Creative Reuse içinde (s.357-369). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Saur.
Kwiesielewicz, M. ve van Uden, E. (2004). Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the AHP. Computers & Operations Research, 31(5), 713-719.
Labarre, A. (1994). Kitabın tarihi. İstanbul: Yeni Yüzyıl Kitaplığı.
Lankes, R. D. (2012). Expect more: Demanding better libraries for today’s complex World. CA: CreateSpace.
Lankes, R. D. (2018). Why do we need a new library science. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 42(2), 338-343.
Lim, W. S. ve Yazdanifard, R. (2014). A multidimensional review on organizational change’s perspectives, theories, models and types of change: Factors leading to success or faliure organizational change. Global Perspective on Engineering Management, 3(2), 27-33.
Liu, Y. ve Yang, M. (2018). Analysis of passenger satisfaction for bus line based on analytic hierarchy process [J].DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, 292, 140-144. Erişim adresi: https://bit.ly/3EsuqFf
Lynch, B. P. ve Smith, K. R. (2001). The changing nature of work in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 62(5), 407-420.
Majeed, K., Bhatti, A. M., Nemati, A. R., Rehman, I. U. ve Rizwan, A. (2010). Can culture change with different leadership styles enhance the organizational performance? Research Journal of International Studies, 17, 102-132.
Malenfant, K. J. (2010), Leading change in the system of scholarly communication: a case study of engaging liaison librarians for outreach to faculty. College & Research Libraries, 71(1), 63-76.
Mammo Cherinet, Y. (2018). Blended skills and future roles of librarians. Library Management, 39(1/2), 93-105.
Marquez, J. J. ve Downey, A. (2016). Library Service Design: A LITA Guide to Holistic Insight and Improvement. MD: Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.
Maru, B. W. (2015). Application of the Mckinsey 7S Model in Strategy Implementation at the Kenya Revenue Authority. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Nairobi Üniversitesi, Nairobi.
Massis, B. E. (2013). 3D printing and the library. New Library World, 114(7), 351–354.
Mensah, M. ve Onyancha, O. B. (2021). A social media strategy for academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(6), 102462.
Mersand, S. (2021). The state of makerspace research: A review of the literature. TechTrends, 65, 174-186.
Midda, A. M., Khan, A., Khan, B. ve Mukherjee, S. (2009, Ekim). Changes of activities in academic library system in India. International Conference on Academic Libraries bildiriler kitabı içinde (s.321-325). Hindistan: Delhi Üniversitesi. Erişim adresi: http://crl.du.ac.in/ical09/papers/index.htm
Momoh, E. O. ve Folorunso, A. L. (2019). The evolving roles of libraries and librarians in the 21st century. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 2867. Erişim adresi: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2867
Morris, R. C. T. (1994). Toward a user-centered information service. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 20-30.
Mourfield, R. (2014). Organizational Change: A Guide to Bringing Everyone on Board. Lisans Tezi. Indiana Üniversitesi, ABD.
Mu, E. ve Pereyra Rojas, M. (2017). Practical decision making: An introduction to the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) using süper decisions v2. Cham: Springer.
Mullins, J. (2001). People-centered management in a library context. Library Review, 50(6), 305-309.
Munier, N. ve Hontoria, E. (2021). Uses and Limitations of the AHP Method: A Non-Mathematical and Rational Analysis. İsviçre: Springer Nature.
Mwaniki, P. W. (2018). Envisioning the future role of librarians: Skills, services and information resources. Library Management, 39(1/2), 2-11.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri: Nitel ve Nicel Yaklaşımlar 2. Boston: Pearson.
Newton, R. ve Dixon, D. (1999). New roles for information professionals: User education as a core Professional competency within the new information environment. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 40(3), 151-160.
Niemi Grundström, M. (2014). Developing, evaluating and managing library with agile methods. Library Management, 35(6/7), 481-485.
Noh, Y. (2010). A study on library 3.0 concept and its service model. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(4), 283-307.
Noh, Y. (2015). Imagining library 4.0: Creating a model for future libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 786-797.
Odunayo Amuda, H. ve Adeyinka, T. (2017). Application of social media for innovative library services in south-western Nigerian university libraries. Journal of Balkan Libraries Union, 5(2), 10-16.
Özenç Uçak, N. (2004). Değişen bilgi ortamının danışma hizmetine etkisi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 18(4), 407-417.
Özenç Uçak, N. (2008). Kütüphanecilik ve bilgi yönetimi literatüründe kullanıcı. Bilgi Dünyası, 9(1), 20-40.
Pan, N. F. (2008). Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method. Automation in Construction, 17(8), 958-965.
Petersen, H. J. ve Kooistra, B. R. (2019). Rethinking libraries in the book business. Public Library Quarterly,39(1), 1-25. 10.1080/01616846.2019.1604040
Petrescu, R., 2010. Organizational Change Process: Steps to a Successful Change. Annals of University of Craiova, Economic Sciences Series, 3(38), 197-202.
Petruni, A., Giagloglou, E., Douglas, E., Geng, J. Leva, M. C. ve Demichela, M. (2019). Applying analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to choose a human factors technique: Choosing the suitable human reliability analysis technique for the automative industry. Safety Science, 119, 229-239.
Phillips, A. L. (2014), What do we mean by library leadership? Leadership in LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science Education, 55(4), 336-344.
Pine, B. J. ve Gilmore, J. H. (2011). The Experience Economy. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Polat, Ö. (2021). Bilgi ve Belge Yönetimi Uzmanlığının Yetkinlikler Açısından Tanımlanması. Doktora Tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi, Türkiye.
Popescu, M., Corneanu, E., ve Helerea, E. (2010). Change management in the university library. (A. Katsirikou ve C. H. Skiadas, Ed.), Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries: Theory and Applications içinde (s.58-65). Singapore: World Scientific.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants, Part II: Do they really think differently) On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6.
Pryce Jones, L. (2018), How do academic libraries adapt within an ever increasing marketized higher education landscape? A comparison and analysis of university library mission statements in Germany and the UK. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(3/4), 286-309.
Pryor, M. G., Taneja, S., Humphreys, J., Anderson, D. ve Singleton, L. (2008). Challenges facing change management theories and research. Delhi Business Review, 9(1), 1-20.
Raharjo, H., Brombacher, A. C. ve Xie, M. (2008). Dealing with subjectivity in early product design phase: A systematic approach to exploit quality function deployment potentials. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), 253-278.
Ranganathan, S. R. (1931). The five laws of library science. Londra: Edward Goldston.
Reason, B., Lovlie, L. ve Flu, M. B. (2015). Service Design for Business: A Practical Guide to Optimizing the Customer Experience. NJ: Wiley.
Robertson, J. (2021). Part of the whole: Embedded librarianship in public libraries. Illionis Library Association, XXXIX(4), 6-9. Erişim adresi: https://www.ila.org/publications/ila-reporter/article/157
Rochlin, N. (2017). Fake news: Belief in post-truth. Library Hi Tech, 35(3), 386-392.
Roper Lowe, G. C. ve Sharp, J. A. (1990). The analytic hierarchy process and its application to an information technology decision. Journal Of The Operational Research Society, 41, 49-59.
Rosenbaum, D., More, E. ve Steane, P. (2017). A longitudinal qualitative case study of change in nonprofits: Suggesting a new approach to the management of change. Journal of Management and Organization, 23(1), 74-91.
Rosenbaum, D., More, E. ve Steane, P. (2018). Planned organisational change management: Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 286-303.
Rowley, J. (1999). What is knowledge management?. Library Management, 20(8), 416-420.
Russo, R. F. S. M. ve Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: A systematic review of literature. Information Technology and Quantitative Management (ITQM 2015), 55, 1123-1132.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process - What it is and how it is used. Mathl Modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176.
Saaty, T. L. (1990a). An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”. Management Science, 36(3), 259-268.
Saaty, T. L. (1990b). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9-26.
Saaty, T. L. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85-91.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
Saaty, T. L. (2012). Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. Pittsburg: RSW Publications
Saaty, T. L. ve Özdemir, M. S.(2014). How many judges should there be in a group? Ann. Data. Sci., 1(3-4), 359-368.
Saaty, T. L. ve Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. New York: Springer.
Saaty, T. L. ve Vargas, L. G. (2013). Decision making with the analytic network process: Economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunuties, costs and risks. New York: Springer.
Sadeh, T. (2007). Time for a change: New approaches for a new generation of library users. New Library World, 108(7/8), 307-316.
Sahli, F., Alidousti, S. ve Naghshineh, N. (2022). Branding in libraries: Identifying key requirements and dimensions to provide a conceptual model. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. Elektronik ön baskı. Erişim adresi: https://bit.ly/3xKAUeY
Samanlıoğlu, F., Taşkaya, Y. E., Gülen, U. C. ve Çokcan, O. (2018). A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS-based group decision-making approach to IT personnel selection. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(5), 1576-1591.
Sanches, T. (2018), Shrink to fit or prune to strengthen: Adapting the strategic plan in an academic library as response to environmental change. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(3/4), 310-325.
Saponaro, M. Z. ve Evans, G. E. (2019). Collection management basics. California: ABC-CLIO.
Satria, R. (2013). Change management strategy development in information systems/information technology using analytic hierarchy process. Proceedings of the The International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2013, 2(10) içinde. Kuala Lumpur: Creative Decisions Foundation Kuala Lumpur. Erişim adresi: http://isahp.org/uploads/74.pdf
Schlak, T. (2020). Futures thinking and library leadership. Journal of Library Administration, 60(8), 945-950.
Seale, M., Hicks, A. ve Nicholson, K. P. (2022). Toward a critical turn in library UX. Colloege & Research Libraries, 83(1), 6-24.
Shahrabi, B. (2012). The role of organizational learning and agility in change management in state enterprises: A customer-oriented approach. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 3(12), 2540-2547.
Shamiyeh, M. (2016). Designing from the Future. (W. Brenner ve F. Uebernickel, Ed.), Design Thinking for Innovation: Research and Practice içinde (s.193-219). Cham: Springer.
Shan, S. ve Shaheen, M. A. (2013). Change management in the information age: Approaches of academic library administrators in Pakistani universities’ libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice. (e-journal). Paper 1037. Erişim adresi: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1037
Shanker, S., Sharma, H. ve Barve, A. (2021). Assessment of risks associated with third-party logistics in restaurant supply chain. Benchmarking-An International Journal, 28(8), 2432-2464.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-77.
Sheu, J. B. (2000). A hybrid fuzzy-based approach for identifying global logistics strategies. Transportation Research, 40(1), 39-61.
Shonhe, L. (2017). Change Management Practices in the Implementation of Records Management Program: A Case Study of Tlokweng Land Board. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Botsvana Üniversitesi, Botsvana.
Shonhe, L. ve Jain, P. (2017). Information dissemination in the 21st century: The use of mobile Technologies. (N. Mnjama ve P. Jain, Ed.), Information and Knowledge for Competitiveness içinde (s.425-447). Gaborone: Department of Library and Information Studies-University of Botswana.
Siddiqui, S. T. (2017). A critical review of change management strategies and models. International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR). 5(4), 670-676.
Singh, K. K. ve Asif, M. (2019). Emerging trends and Technologies for digital transformation of libraries. IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology, 4(2), 41-43.
Soehner, C. B. (2014). Change management in libraries: An essential competency for leadership. Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences. Paper 14. Erişim adresi: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2059&context=iatul
Stoddard, M. M., Gillis, B. ve Cohn, P. (2019). Agile project management in libraries: Creating collaborative, resilient, responsive organizations. Journal of Library Administration, 59, 492-511.
Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. ve Cremer, D. M. (2018). Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 752-788.
Stueart, R. D. ve Moran, B. (2007). Library and Information Center Management. Greenwood Village, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Sweeney, R. T. (2005). Reinventing library buildings and services for the millenial generation. Library Administration & Managament, 19(4), 165-177.
Şahin, T., Ocak, S. ve Top, M. (2019). Analytic hierarchy process for hospital site selection. Health Policy and Technology, 8(1), 42-50.
Şen, Z. (2004). Mühendislikte Bulanık Mantık ile Modelleme Prensipleri. İstanbul: Su Vakfı Yayınları.
Tam, L. W. H. ve Robertson, A. C. (2002). Managing change: Libraries and information services in the digital age. Library Management, 23(8/9), 369-377.
Taherdoost, H. (2017). Decision making using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A step by step approach. International Journal of Economics and Management Systems, 2, 244-246.
Timor, M. (2010). Yöneylem Araştırması. İstanbul: Türkmen Kitabevi.
Tiryaki, F. ve Ahlatçıoğlu, B. (2009). Fuzzy portfolio selection using analytic hierarchy process. Information Science, 179(1-2), 53-69.
Tonta, Y. (2009). Dijital yerliler, sosyal ağlar ve kütüphanelerin geleceği. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 23(4), 742-768.
Topel, A. (2006). Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesinin Bulanık Mantık Ortamındaki Uygulamaları-Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Troll, D. A. (2002). How and why libraries are changing: What we know and what we need to know. Libraries and the Academy, 2(1), 99-123.
Türker, Y. A., Baynal, K. ve Türker, T. (2019). The evaluation of learning management systems bu using fuzzy AHP, fuzzy TOPSIS and an integrated method: A case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 195-218.
Vaidya, O. S. ve Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Jouranl of Operational Research, 169, 1-29.
Van Laarhoven, P. J. M. ve Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1-3), 229-241.
Wandi, C. (2019). Change management in public libraries: Seven recommendations from Copenhagen Libraries. Journal of Library Administration, 59(8), 915-926.
Wang, X. Y., Li, G., Tu, J. F., Khuyen, N. T. T. ve Chang, C. Y. (2021). Sustainable education using new communication technology: Assessment with analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Sustainabilty, 13(17), 9640.
WEF. (2018). The future of jobs report. Erişim adresi: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf
Welburn, J. (2021). Foreword.( L. S. Connaway, I. M. Faniel, B. Brannon, J. Cantrell, C. Cyr, B. Doyle, P. Gallagher, K. Lang, B. Lavoie, J. Mason, ve T. van der Werf, Ed.), New Model Library: Pandemic Effects and Library Directions içinde (s.iv-v). Dublin, OH: OCLC Research.
Wells, A. (2014). Agile management: Strategies for success in rapidly chaning times – An Australian University Library perspective. IFLA Journal, 40(1), 30-34.
Whitaker, R. (2007). Criticisms of the analytic hierarchy process: Why they often make no sense. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8), 948-961.
Whitmire, E. (2002). Academic library performance measures and undergraduates’ library use and educational outcomes. Library & Information Science Research, 24(2), 107-128.
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55.
Wirth, R. A. (2002). Models of Organizational Change and Development. Doktora Tezi. Walden Üniversitesi, ABD.
Wojcik, M. (2019). How to design innovative information services at the library? Library Hi Tech, 37(2), 138-154.
Wong, G. K. W., (2019). A tool for academic libraries to prioritize leadership competencies. College & Research Libraries, 80(5), 597-617.
Yılmaz, B. ve Cevher, N. (2015). Future of public libraries: Opinions of public librarians in Turkey. IFLA Journal, 41(4), 336-352
Yüksel, İ. ve Dağdeviren, M. (2007). Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis – A case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences, 177(16), 3364-3382.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
Zadeh, L. A. (1988). Fuzzy logic. Computer, 21(4), 83-93.
Zaugg, H. ve Rackham, S. (2016). Identification and development of patron personas for an academic library. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 17(2), 124-133.
Zhou, J. (2022). The role of libraries in distance learning during COVID-19. Information Development, 38(2), 227-238.
