Ankara İli Çankaya İlçesi Dikmen Semtinde Çalışmakta Olan Taksi Şoförlerinde Emniyet Kemeri Kullanma Davranışının Geliştirilmesine Yönelik Bir Müdahale Çalışması
View/ Open
Date
2019Author
Tufan, Merve
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-emb
Acik erisimxmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item recordAbstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intervention to improve the
seatbelt the knowledge, ideas and behaviors of taxi drivers serving in taxi ranks
located in Dikmen, Çankaya district of Ankara province. There are two stages of this interventional research and there is no control group in the research. 342 people
participated in the first phase of the study which was conducted in April 2019 by
means of a data collection form consisting of fifty-two questions. After this stage,
brochures were given to the participants at three different times within the scope
of the five-month and posters were hung at the taxi ranks. 339 people took the first
brochure, 336 people took the second brochure, and 335 people took and read the
third brochure. All the participants stated that they saw the posters hanged at the
taxi ranks. Following the intervention, the second assessment study was completed
in October 2019. In the second stage, 339 out of 342 people who participated in the
first stage were reached. At this stage, 27 questions were included in the data
collection form. “Knowledge score” was calculated by making use of the questions
in the data collection forms for ease of calculation and interpretation. While the
correct answers were assigned 1 point, the wrong or ‘’I do not know’’ answers were
assigned 0 point. The highest possible score for the participants who answered all
questions correctly was 14 points. In this research, knowledge, ideas, and behaviors
related to the use of seatbelts and the change of some related factors were
examined. During the statistical analysis of the data of the research; Mcnemar and
Wilcoxon tests were used to interpret the pre-intervention and post-intervention
comparisons and levels were considered statistically significant. When the change in
the knowledge points of the participants was examined, it was found that the mean
score increased from 6.1±2.8 to 10.8±1.9 after the intervention. The difference
between the median score points before and after the intervention was statistically
vi
significant (p<0.001). In the study, some of the participants' opinions were also
changed. For example, ’Seatbelt warning signal should be in every vehicle’
proposition increased from %71.1 to % 84.4 after the intervention (p<0.001). In the
study, an increment was observed in the frequency of the seatbelt wearing
behaviors of the participants. The frequency of using a seatbelt was %17.4 in the
commercial vehicle and %21.5 in the private vehicle before the intervention. The
frequency of always using the seatbelt after the intervention has increased to 49.0%
in commercial vehicles and %37.8 in private vehicles. A statistically significant
difference was found between pre- and post-intervention in both commercial and
private vehicles (p<0.001). At the beginning of the study, 65% of the suggestions
made by 11.5% of the participants to improve seat belt use behavior were on
educational intervention. As a result, 91.4% of the participants stated that they
found the study useful and this indicates that such trainings are important steps to
improve health. In this context, the establishment of programs with the
multidisciplinary approach of public authorities and professional organizations such
as the Ministry of Health and the General Directorate of Security can provide
success in future improvements. Community participation encouragement should
also be a key component while proceeding.