Classification Criteria For Autoinflammatory Recurrent Fevers
View/ Open
Date
2019Author
Gattorno, Marco
Hofer, Michael
Federici, Silvia
Vanoni, Federica
Bovis, Francesca
Aksentijevich, Ivona
Anton, Jordi
Ignacio Arostegui, Juan
Barron, Karyl
Ben-Cherit, Eldad
Brogan, Paul A.
Cantarini, Luca
Ceccherini, Isabella
De Benedetti, Fabrizio
Dedeoglu, Fatma
Demirkaya, Erkan
Frenkel, Joost
Goldbach-Mansky, Raphaela
Gul, Ahmet
Hentgen, Veronique
Hoffman, Hal
Kallinich, Tilmann
Kone-Paut, Isabelle
Kuemmerle-Deschner, Jasmin
Lachmann, Helen J.
Laxer, Ronald M.
Livneh, Avi
Obici, Laura
Ozen, Seza
Rowczenio, Dorota
Russo, Ricardo
Shinar, Yael
Simon, Anna
Toplak, Natasa
Touitou, Isabelle
Uziel, Yosef
van Gijn, Marielle
Foell, Dirk
Garassino, Claudia
Kastner, Dan
Martini, Alberto
Sormani, Maria Pia
Ruperto, Nicolino
Paediat, Eurofever Registry
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item recordAbstract
Background Different diagnostic and classification criteria are available for hereditary recurrent fevers (HRF)-familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD) and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS)-and for the non-hereditary, periodic fever, aphthosis, pharyngitis and adenitis (PFAPA). We aimed to develop and validate new evidence-based classification criteria for HRF/PFAPA. Methods Step 1: selection of clinical, laboratory and genetic candidate variables; step 2: classification of 360 random patients from the Eurofever Registry by a panel of 25 clinicians and 8 geneticists blinded to patients' diagnosis (consensus >= 80%); step 3: statistical analysis for the selection of the best candidate classification criteria; step 4: nominal group technique consensus conference with 33 panellists for the discussion and selection of the final classification criteria; step 5: cross-sectional validation of the novel criteria. Results The panellists achieved consensus to classify 281 of 360 (78%) patients (32 CAPS, 36 FMF, 56 MKD, 37 PFAPA, 39 TRAPS, 81 undefined recurrent fever). Consensus was reached for two sets of criteria for each HRF, one including genetic and clinical variables, the other with clinical variables only, plus new criteria for PFAPA. The four HRF criteria demonstrated sensitivity of 0.94-1 and specificity of 0.95-1; for PFAPA, criteria sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 0.93, respectively. Validation of these criteria in an independent data set of 1018 patients shows a high accuracy (from 0.81 to 0.98). Conclusion Eurofever proposes a novel set of validated classification criteria for HRF and PFAPA with high sensitivity and specificity.