Akciğer Kanserinde Günlük Yaşam Aktiviteleri ve Yaşam Kalitesinin Çok Boyutlu Değerlendirilmesi
View/ Open
Date
2019Author
Şahin, Hamide
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-emb
6 ayxmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item recordAbstract
Şahin H, Multidimensional Evaluation of Activities of Daily Living and Quality
of Life in Lung Cancer, Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Health
Sciences Thesis in Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, Ankara, 2019. Activities of
daily living (ADL) in patients with lung cancer have been defined with rates between
13-49%. Besides, the most affected activities in ADL are defined by patients as
personal care, walking-transfers, housework, shopping and weight lifting In this
context, assessment of ADL in lung cancer and identification of problems in ADL
are important. In literature review, it was observed that only the scales were used to
obtain data based on the evaluation of ADL in lung cancer patients. The aim of the
study was to evaluate the ADL in lung cancer patients with a performance-based
protocol, to compare the ADL evaluation results in lung cancer patients with healthy
controls and investigate how the ADL were affected in lung cancer patients. Twentytwo patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer, who had completed adjuvant
treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy 6 months ago, and 22 healthy
individuals with similar physical and demographic characteristics were included in
the study. Physical and demographic characteristics of the subjects were recorded.
Pulmonary function of the subjects was measured using spirometer, functional
capacity was measured using 6 minute walk test (6MWT), skeletal muscle strength
was measured using hand held dynamometer. The ADL was evaluated using
Londrina protocol. EORTC-QLQ c30 questionnaire was used for quality of life. As a
result of the study, lung function, 6MWT, knee extensors, shoulder abductors,
shoulder flexors, elbow flexors and hand grip strength were significantly lower in
patients with lung cancer (p<0.05). The total time spent in ADL was significantly
longer on lung cancer patients than those of healthy controls (p<0.05). There was no
significant difference in quality of life between the two groups (p>0.05). There was a
correlation between the duration of completion of the Londrina protocol and the 6
MWT (p<0.05). As a result, daily living activities of lung cancer patients are
affected. Patients with lung cancer perform their daily life activities in a longer
period than individuals with similar physical characteristics. The Londrina protocol
is an effective and objective method for assessing ADL in patients with lung cancer.
Objective assessment of ADL in patients with lung cancer will guide the
determination of physiotherapy and rehabilitation programs.