Türkiye ve Singapur Matematik Ders Kitaplarının İstatistik Konularında Çoklu Temsillere Göre Karşılaştırılması
View/ Open
Date
2024Author
Şahin
Şahin, Busenur
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-emb
Acik erisimxmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item recordAbstract
Textbooks are the most basic material of the education and training process. In fact,
international comparative studies have proven that there is a positive relationship between
students' academic success and textbooks. In addition, in today's world where information
or data can be easily accessed, the importance of the ability to draw meaningful conclusions
from existing data has increased. In this respect, the content covered with statistics topics
in mathematics textbooks, which constitute the necessary infrastructure for high school
students' data analysis, and the representations of this content in different countries have
become a matter of curiosity. In this study, Singapore, which is frequently mentioned with
its success in mathematics education in the international arena, and Turkey were compared
according to the use of multiple representations in statistics topics in high school
mathematics textbooks. The data collected from 7 books used in mathematics courses at
the high school level in Turkey and Singapore were examined with the document analysis,
and the multiple representations used and the transitions between representations were
coded and analyzed. At the end of the study, it was determined that both countries used
verbal representations the most in statistics education, and it was seen that they frequently
included situations related to daily life. Although the rate of using algebraic representations
in Turkish books on statistics is slightly higher than in Singapore, it has been found that
Singapore books are richer in terms of visual and technological representations. In both
countries, the transition from verbal to algebraic was the most common transition between
representations. In addition, it has been found that transitions between different
representations are more frequent in Singapore books, while this situation is limited in
Turkey. While it is often encountered in Singapore books where all types of representations
are associated with each other, it is noteworthy that it is not encountered in Turkish books.