Tamamlayıcı ve İntegratif Müdahalelerin Erişkin Yoğun Bakım Hastalarında Ağrı ve Deliryum Yönetimi Üzerindeki Etkileri: Sistematik Derleme ve Meta Analiz Çalışması
View/ Open
Date
2024Author
Sivri Dağlı, Sabahat
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-emb
6 ayxmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item recordAbstract
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to
systematically synthesize randomized controlled trials in which complementary and integrative
interventions applied for pain and delirium management in intensive care patients and to examine
the effects of these methods on pain and delirium. In the study, using the keywords “critical care,
complementary therapies, alternative therapies, pain, delirium, randomised controlled study” and
their combinations in line with the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terminology, the researchers
independently searched eight databases including Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials
(CENTRAL), Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost / CINAHL Complete, Springer Link,
ScienceDirect and Ovid MEDLINE until 27 April 2024 without a year limitation. A total of 24
randomized controlled trials examining the effects of complementary and integrative interventions
on pain (n=13) and delirium (n=11) in intensive care unit patients were included in the systematic
review and meta-analysis. The quality assessment of the studies was performed by two
independent researchers and evaluated using “RoB 2: Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for
Randomized Trials (RoB 2)”. According to the meta-analysis results of the included studies,
complementary and integrative interventions had a significant and large effect on pain in intensive
care patients (g = 0.977, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.403 to -0.552; p < 0.001) and a
significant and reducing effect on delirium (OR = 0.522, 95% CI = 0.316 to 0.865; p = 0.012). In
line with the forest plot and indicators related to statistical tests, heterogeneity between the
individual studies included in the analysis was found to be high for both pain (I2 = 89.27%; p =
0.000) and delirium (I2 = 91.45%; p < 0.001) variables. According to the results of the variance
meta-analysis in which individual interventions were used as moderators, it was determined that
music intervention was more effective in reducing pain intensity (g = -0.799, 95% confidence
interval (CI) = -1.523 to -0.075; p = 0.001) and exercise intervention was more effective in reducing
the incidence of delirium (OR = 0.353, 95% CI = 0.218-0.571; p = 0.000). In line with the findings
obtained as a result of this study, it is recommended to plan and implement more randomized
controlled studies in which complementary and integrative interventions to be applied to intensive
care patients to provide pain and delirium management are diversified and conducted on large
sample groups with multidisciplinary team understanding and multicenter research. This study was
registered in the PROSPERO database with the number ID=CRD42018102914.