Evaluation Of Dentinal Tubule Penetration Depth And Push-Out Bond Strength Of Ah 26, Bioroot Rcs, And Mta Plus Root Canal Sealers In Presence Or Absence Of Smear Layer

Date
2018Author
Aktemur Türker, Sevinç
Uzunoğlu, Emel
Purali, Nuhan
- Citations
- PubMed - Citation Indexes: 13
- Captures
- Mendeley - Readers: 78
publications
26
supporting
3
mentioning
29
contrasting
0
26
3
29
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item recordAbstract
Background. This study compared the effect of smear layer on the penetration depth and push-out bond strength of various root canal sealers. , Methods. A total of 90 extracted human mandibular premolars were assigned into 2 groups: smear layer preserved and smear layer removed. Then the roots were further divided into 3 subgroups according to the sealer tested: AH 26, BioRoot RCS and MTA Plus. Obturation was performed with gutta-percha and the relevant sealer was mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B. Three 1-mm-thick slices were obtained from the mid-third area of each root. Two slices were selected for the push-out test and the remaining slice was used to calculate the dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage. , Results. The retention of MTA Plus and BioRoot RCS was higher than that of AH 26 when the smear layer was preserved (P<0.05). BioRoot RCS showed the lowest penetration depth when the smear layer was removed (P<0.05). , Conclusion. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers had a limited effect on their adhesion to root canal wall.
URI
https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.046https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368950/
http://hdl.handle.net/11655/19063