Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Matematiksel Yaratıcılıklarının Matematiksel Modelleme Sürecinde İncelenmesi
Özet
The purpose of this study was to investigate gifted middle school students’ individual
and collective creativity regarding mathematics as they engage in model eliciting
activities. The study also aimed at describing characteristics of model eliciting
activities that were better at revealing students’ mathematical creativity. Multiple
case study design was adopted. The participants were six students identified as
mathematically gifted, who were at 7 th and 8 th grades and attending to Science and
Art Center in Ankara. Purposive sampling method was used to select the
participants. Participants worked as a group of three and engaged in five model-
eliciting activities. This process and the models they produced as a group at the end
were examined in terms of mathematical creativity. In addition, each participant was
engaged in one, and the same model eliciting activity individually. This process and
the model each participant produced individually at the end of the activity were also
examined. Participants’ work and solutions as a group and as an individual
constituted the main source of data. Both group work and individual work were video
recorded. The written products (models, posters, diaries, etc.) that students
produced were also included in the data set. Individual creativity and collective
creativity regarding mathematics as students engage in model eliciting activities
were described and assessed in terms of the following components: Producing
ideas/solutions (fluency), producing different ideas (flexibility), making connections
among ideas, concepts, representations (making connections), and solutions’
progressivity (progressivity). On the other hand, students’ models were described
and assessed in terms of the following components: Mathematical quality,
generalizability, correctness of solutions (quality), and originality of solutions
(originality).
The findings of the study showed that groups exhibited different levels of
mathematical creativity as they engaged in different modeling activities. Besides, it
was observed that students discovered different mathematical structures,
ximathematical rules, and new information as they construct unknown mathematical
information in an interactive process. In addition, it was observed that students
produced products (i.e., models) that were considered as high quality and original
when they produced more and different type of ideas (i.e., thinking fluently and
flexible), produced solutions more progressively, and made more connections
among concepts and representations. Moreover, students’ individual work revealed
differences in terms of individual creativity. In particular, each student demonstrated
strengths on different aspects of creativity, which was revealed through group and
individual work.
Furthermore, two groups’ mathematical creativity assessed as a process and a
product were compared for each modelling activity. In this way, characteristics of
model eliciting activities that reveal creativity better were determined. Therefore,
results showed that model-eliciting activities that revealed mathematical creativity
better were the ones that were less structured, that were included implicit data and
a few variables in the problem statement, and that were perceived as challenging
by the students.