1916 Kırgız Ayaklanması (Ürkün) Merkezli Tarih Yazıcılığı: Sovyet ve Kırgız Yaklaşım
Özet
Avtandil TAALAİBEK UULU, 1916 Kyrgyz Uprising (Ürkün) Centered
Historiography: Soviet And Kyrgyz Approach, Master’s Thesis, Hacettepe University,
Ankara, 2018
The 20th century has been a very active period for Central Asia as well as for many other
countries and nations of the world. In this period, the Central Asian governments were
fighting with the great powers of the world, both for their struggle with unanalyzable
efforts, and for the pursuit of their own interests or land.
The movement has been subject to different explanations and interpretations in every
period since 1916, is one of the leading critical issues of Kyrgyzstan history, where the
historical importances, values, and periodical approaches of the subject review are reexamined and handled with an objective point of view.
The purpose of this study is to reveal the differences and similarities by analyzing the
related sources and research works.
Firstly, related sources and examined under subheadings of literary works on the artifacts
of the documents and the events of the 1916 national struggle were included. Then, the
views of the Russian managers about the national struggle movement on the subject and
the research works taken in the first years of the theater period (1917-1937) were
examined. And the first scientific investigations in Kyrgyzstan were attempted to analyze
the studies on the incident of 1916. And the first scientific investigations in Kyrgyzstan
were attempted to analyze the studies on the incident of 1916. The third section consists
of three subsection of this chapter, the study of the 1916 national struggle in Kyrgyzstan
in the work of Turkish researchers was examined. The second and third sub-titles of this
section were dealt with in the Western and Turkish Worlds. In the end, the demolition of
the Soviet Socialist Republic in 1991 to the day of the 1916 national struggle, and also
the memories of the persons participating in the national struggle were explained. And
general evaluation of the research works and the suggestions are presented as conclusion
