dc.contributor.author | Demirsoz, Talat | |
dc.contributor.author | Misirlisoy, Mine | |
dc.contributor.author | Karanci, A. Nuray | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-10T11:32:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-10T11:32:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1300-2163 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5080/u23105 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11655/16007 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: This study aims to examine the effects of the induction of thought-action fusion (TAF) on appraisal process, by using an enhanced paradigm which integrates the favourable aspects of Sentence Completion Task (SCT) with Obsessive-Compulsive (OC)-like perseverative reasoning (PR) task. The study also aims to evaluate the effect of psychoeducation (PE) on alleviating the level of TAF-Induction experience. Method: A total of three groups were formed. The first group with high OC traits (47 participants), a second with low OC traits (70 participants) were the two analogue groups; and a third group composed of patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) (52 participants) were used. For induction of TAF, all participants were asked to construct a causal link between two OC-like feared situations in a perseverative fashion. Later, for alleviation, while half of the participants read psychoeducational information about TAF, the remaining half read information about stress. Appraisal processes regarding TAF-Likelihood and TAF-Morality components were assessed before and after enhanced paradigm, and after PE. Results: With the current methodology, the likelihood component of TAF could be obtained by the induction of experience. PE about TAF appeared to be effective only on TAF-likelihood component when compared to TAF-morality component. Contrary to the expectations, there was no difference between OCD group and the two analogue groups on TAF-Likelihood scores. In addition, also unexpectedly, participants in the analogue group having high OC traits had significantly higher scores on TAF-Morality compared to OCD group. Discussion: Clinical implications are discussed in the light of literature. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Turkiye Sinir Ve Ruh Sagligi Dernegi | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.5080/u23105 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | Psychiatry | |
dc.title | Düşünce-Eylem Kaynaşması Deneyiminin Oluşturulması ve
Düzeyinin Azaltılması Mümkün mü? | |
dc.title.alternative | Can Thought-Action Fusion Be Induced And Alleviated? | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
dc.relation.journal | Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi | |
dc.contributor.department | Ruh Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları | |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | |
dc.description.index | WoS | |
dc.description.index | Scopus | |
dc.description.index | Tr-Dizin | |