HEMODİYALİZ SÜRECİNDE MİKROPLASTİK VARLIĞININ VE MARUZİYET DÜZEYİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Tıp Fakültesi
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Gümüşkemer İ.: Assessment of Microplastic Presence and Exposure Level
During Hemodialysis; Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine (HÜTF),
Department of Internal Medicine Residency Thesis; Ankara, 2026.
Objective: This study aims to simultaneously characterize the presence of
microplastics across four sequential sampling points in a hemodialysis water
purification chain, as well as in pre- and post-dialysis blood samples from the same
patients, using five complementary analytical methods.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational pilot study,
conducted at Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Hospital in collaboration with
Bilkent University UNAM, enrolled 6 hemodialysis patients. Water samples were
collected at four points (municipal supply, post-purification, dialysis inlet, and dialysis
outlet water) across three independent sessions; blood samples were obtained pre- and
post-dialysis from each patient. Analytical evaluation comprised dynamic light
scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Nile Red fluorescence
microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR);
the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for statistical assessment.
Results: Dynamic light scattering analysis of the hemodialysis water
purification chain revealed a consistent directional particulate pattern: a marked
decrease following the purification stage and the highest values at the dialysis outlet.
This pattern was reproduced without exception across all three sessions [Friedman
χ²(3) = 8.200; p = 0.042; Kendall’s W = 0.911]; the mean hydrodynamic diameter
increased ~208% and ~61% across two separate sampling sessions. SEM documented
dominant fibrous morphology with accompanying fragmented and granular particles
in all six patients; Nile Red fluorescence microscopy identified hydrophobic
particulate structures in pre- and post-dialysis samples across all patients. Raman
spectroscopy and FT-IR demonstrated independent convergence at ~1,100 cm⁻¹ in all
water and blood samples; additional FT-IR bands (~2,848, ~2,915, ~2,960 cm⁻¹)
matched the characteristic polyethylene (PE) infrared signature. FT-IR revealed
vii
consistent PE- and polyethylene terephthalate (PET)-compatible differential spectral
patterns in pre- and post-dialysis isolates from all six patients. Blood DLS analysis
yielded a pre-dialysis median of 1,292.76 d.nm [interquartile range: 1,123.40–
1,487.13] and a post-dialysis median of 1,078.87 d.nm [IQR: 910.23–1,304.00].
Intensity-based size distribution curves demonstrated that the small-particle
population observed pre-dialysis was largely replaced by larger-sized components
post-dialysis, a pattern consistent with membrane-derived particulate contribution
and/or aggregation mechanisms. The Wilcoxon test did not reach statistical
significance (W = 5.0; p = 0.313); however, a moderate effect size was observed (r =
0.471; Cohen’s d_z = 0.526), and post-hoc power analysis indicated that
approximately 33 patients would be required for 80% statistical power.
Conclusion: This first integrated pilot study to simultaneously examine the
hemodialysis water purification chain and blood samples from the same patients using
five analytical methods documented a particulate size increase at the dialysis outlet
despite reverse osmosis purification, and a consistent PE/PET-compatible particulate
burden in hemodialysis patient blood both before and after dialysis. These findings
provide a systematic framework for updating hemodialysis biosafety standards to
encompass plastic-derived contaminants, evaluating safer alternative polymer
materials, and designing adequately powered, outcome-focused studies specific to this
patient population.