Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.advisorHuri, Gazi
dc.contributor.authorHakhverdiyev, Yasin
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-18T10:55:17Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.submitted2019-05-29
dc.identifier.citation1. Shin JJ, Hamamoto JT, Leroux TS, Saccomanno MF, Jain A, Khair MM, et al. Biomechanical analysis of Latarjet screw fixation: comparison of screw types and fixation methods. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2017;33(9):1646-53. 2. Boileau P, Gendre P, Baba M, Thélu C-É, Baring T, Gonzalez J-F, et al. A guided surgical approach and novel fixation method for arthroscopic Latarjet. Journal of shoulder elbow surgery. 2016;25(1):78-89. 3. Kazar B, Relovszky E. Prognosis of primary dislocation of the shoulder. J Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1969;40(2):216-24. 4. Lippitt S, Matsen F, research r. Mechanisms of glenohumeral joint stability. J Clinical orthopaedics. 1993(291):20-8. 5. Simonet WT, Cofield RH. Prognosis in anterior shoulder dislocation. The American journal of sports medicine. 1984;12(1):19-24. 6. Robinson CM, Howes J, Murdoch H, Will E, Graham C. Functional outcome and risk of recurrent instability after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in young patients. JBJS. 2006;88(11):2326-36. 7. Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry J-Y, Balg F, Ahrens P, Neyton L. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. JBJS. 2006;88(8):1755-63. 8. Drake R, Vogl AW, Mitchell AW. Gray's Anatomy Elsevier Health Sciences; 2009. 665-78 p. 9. Burkart AC, Debski RE. Anatomy and function of the glenohumeral ligaments in anterior shoulder instability. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007). 2002;400:32-9. 10. Turkel S, Panio M, Marshall J, Girgis F. Stabilizing mechanisms preventing anterior dislocation of the glenohumeral joint. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 1981;63(8):1208-17. 11. McMahon P, Dettling J, Sandusky M, Tibone J, Lee T. The anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament: Assessment of its permanent deformation and the anatomy of its glenoid attachment. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 1999;81(3):406-13. 12. Woo S, Debski R, Imhoff A, Patel P, Saito R, Warner J, et al. Soft tissue restraints around the glenohumeral joint. Shoulder Surgery Mosby. 1995:29-34. 13. O'Brien SJ, Schwartz RS, Warren RF, Torzilli PA. Capsular restraints to anterior-posterior motion of the abducted shoulder: a biomechanical study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 1995;4(4):298-308. 14. Cooper DE, Arnoczky S, O'brien S, Warren R, Dicarlo E, Allen A. Anatomy, histology, and vascularity of the glenoid labrum. An anatomical study. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 1992;74(1):46-52. 15. LINHART W, GROSSTERLINDEN L, HASSUNIZADEH B, JANSSEN A, SOMMERRFELDT D, DIMAKOPOULOS P, et al. HOWELL, SM, GALINAT, BJ: Th glenoid-labral socket. Clin Orthop. 1989;243:122-5. 16. Williams MM, Snyder SJ, Buford Jr D. The Buford complex—the “cord-like” middle glenohumeral ligament and absent anterosuperior labrum complex: a normal anatomic capsulolabral variant. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 1994;10(3):241-7. 17. Saha A. Dynamic stability of the glenohumeral joint. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1971;42(6):491-505. 18. Van de Bunt F, Pearl ML, Lee EK, Peng L, Didomenico P. Glenoid version by CT scan: an analysis of clinical measurement error and introduction of a protocol to reduce variability. Skeletal radiology. 2015;44(11):1627-35. 19. Wirth MA, Seltzer DG, Rockwood JC. Recurrent posterior glenohumeral dislocation associated with increased retroversion of the glenoid. A case report. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1994(308):98-101. 20. Dowdy PA, O'Driscoll SW. Recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The American journal of sports medicine. 1994;22(4):489-92. 21. Alexander S, Southgate DF, Bull AM, Wallace AL. The role of negative intraarticular pressure and the long head of biceps tendon on passive stability of the glenohumeral joint. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2013;22(1):94-101. 22. Mahiroğulları M, İşyar M, Çakmak S. Rotator manşet yırtıkları. TOTBİD dergisi. 2013;12:353–9. 23. Burkhart SS. Arthroscopic treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Clinical results and biomechanical rationale. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1991(267):45-56. 24. Huri G, Kaymakoglu M, Garbis NJEOR. Rotator cable and rotator interval: anatomy, biomechanics and clinical importance. 2019;4(2):56. 25. Rodosky MW, Harner CD, Fu FH. The role of the long head of the biceps muscle and superior glenoid labrum in anterior stability of the shoulder. The American journal of sports medicine. 1994;22(1):121-30. 26. Warner J, Micheli LJ, Arslanian LE, Kennedy J, Kennedy R. Scapulothoracic motion in normal shoulders and shoulders with glenohumeral instability and impingement syndrome. A study using Moiré topographic analysis. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1992(285):191-9. 27. Rockwood C, editor SUBLUXATION OF THE SHOULDER-CLASSIFICATION, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME; 1980: BRITISH EDITORIAL SOC BONE JOINT SURGERY 22 BUCKINGHAM STREET, LONDON …. 28. Thomas SC. An approach to the repair of avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments in the management of traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 1989;71(4):506-13. 29. Kuhn JE. A new classification system for shoulder instability. British journal of sports medicine. 2010;44(5):341-6. 30. Rowe C. Prognosis of Posterior subluxation of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg. 1956;38:957-77. 31. Rowe CR, Pierce DS, Clark JG. Voluntary dislocation of the shoulder: a preliminary report on a clinical, electromyographic, and psychiatric study of twenty-six patients. JBJS. 1973;55(3):445-60. 32. Krøner K, Lind T, Jensen J. The epidemiology of shoulder dislocations. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. 1989;108(5):288-90. 33. Morey VM, Porcellini G, Campi F, Paladini P, Merolla G. Anterior Traumatic Instability Without Glenoid Bone Loss. Arthroscopy: Springer; 2016. p. 457-71. 34. Taverna E, D’Ambrosi R. Anterior Traumatic Instability with Glenoid Bone Loss. Arthroscopy: Springer; 2016. p. 473-81. 35. Cutts S, Prempeh M, Drew S. Anterior shoulder dislocation. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2009;91(1):2-7. 36. Bankart AB. The pathology and treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder‐joint. British Journal of Surgery. 1938;26(101):23-9. 37. Hill HA, Sachs MD. The grooved defect of the humeral head: a frequently unrecognized complication of dislocations of the shoulder joint. J Radiology. 1940;35(6):690-700. 38. Hovelius L, Augustini B, Fredin H, Johansson O, Norlin R, Thorling J. Primary anterior dislocation of the shoulder in young patients: a ten-year prospective study. JBJS. 1996;78(11):1677-84. 39. Bost FC, Inman VT. The pathological changes in recurrent dislocation of the shoulder: a report of Bankart's operative procedure. JBJS. 1942;24(3):595-613. 40. Robinson C, Dobson R. Anterior instability of the shoulder after trauma. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 2004;86(4):469-79. 41. Handoll HH, Al‐Maiyah MA. Surgical versus non‐surgical treatment for acute anterior shoulder dislocation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004(1). 42. Boone JL, Arciero RA. First-time anterior shoulder dislocations: has the standard changed? British journal of sports medicine. 2010;44(5):355-60. 43. Rokito A, Namkoong S, Zuckerman J, Gallagher M. Open surgical treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability: an historical perspective and review of the literature. Part I. American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, NJ). 1998;27(11):723-5. 44. Green MR, Christensen KP. Arthroscopic versus open Bankart procedures: a comparison of early morbidity and complications. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 1993;9(4):371-4. 45. Petrera M, Patella V, Patella S, Theodoropoulos J. A meta-analysis of open versus arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2010;18(12):1742-7. 46. Gill TJ, Zarins B. Open repairs for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability. The American journal of sports medicine. 2003;31(1):142-53. 47. Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Petitto A, Neri MP, Iacono F, Visani A. Arthroscopic management of recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder: analysis of technical modifications on the Caspari procedure. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 1996;12(2):144-9. 48. Tauber M, Resch H, Forstner R, Raffl M, Schauer J. Reasons for failure after surgical repair of anterior shoulder instability. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2004;13(3):279-85. 49. Chuang T-Y, Adams CR, Burkhart SS. Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2008;24(4):376-82. 50. Magarelli N, Milano G, Sergio P, Santagada DA, Fabbriciani C, Bonomo L. Intra-observer and interobserver reliability of the ‘Pico’computed tomography method for quantification of glenoid bone defect in anterior shoulder instability. Skeletal radiology. 2009;38(11):1071-5. 51. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2000;16(7):677-94. 52. Yamamoto N, Muraki T, Sperling JW, Steinmann SP, Cofield RH, Itoi E, et al. Stabilizing mechanism in bone-grafting of a large glenoid defect. JBJS. 2010;92(11):2059-66. 53. Griffin JW, Brockmeier SF. Shoulder instability with concomitant bone loss in the athlete. Clinics in sports medicine. 2013;32(4):741-60. 54. Martetschläger F, Kraus TM, Hardy P, Millett PJ. Arthroscopic management of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone defects. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013;21(12):2867-76. 55. Forsythe B, Frank RM, Ahmed M, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Romeo AA, et al. Identification and treatment of existing copathology in anterior shoulder instability repair. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2015;31(1):154-66. 56. Balg F, Boileau P. The instability severity index score: a simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 2007;89(11):1470-7. 57. Griffith JF, Antonio GE, Yung PS, Wong EM, Yu AB, Ahuja AT, et al. Prevalence, pattern, and spectrum of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder dislocation: CT analysis of 218 patients. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008;190(5):1247-54. 58. Di Giacomo G, Itoi E, Burkhart SS. Evolving concept of bipolar bone loss and the Hill-Sachs lesion: from “engaging/non-engaging” lesion to “on-track/off-track” lesion. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2014;30(1):90-8. 59. Kurokawa D, Yamamoto N, Nagamoto H, Omori Y, Tanaka M, Sano H, et al. The prevalence of a large Hill-Sachs lesion that needs to be treated. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2013;22(9):1285-9. 60. Yamamoto N, Itoi E, Abe H, Minagawa H, Seki N, Shimada Y, et al. Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2007;16(5):649-56. 61. Latarjet M. Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. Lyon chirurgical. 1954;49(8):994-7. 62. Walch G, Boileau P. Latarjet-Bristow procedure for recurrent anterior instability. Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery. 2000;1(4):256-61. 63. Beran MC, Donaldson CT, Bishop JY. Treatment of chronic glenoid defects in the setting of recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2010;19(5):769-80. 64. Bhatia S, Frank RM, Ghodadra NS, Hsu AR, Romeo AA, Bach Jr BR, et al. The outcomes and surgical techniques of the Latarjet procedure. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2014;30(2):227-35. 65. Burkhart SS, De Beer JF, Barth JR, Criswell T, Roberts C, Richards DP. Results of modified Latarjet reconstruction in patients with anteroinferior instability and significant bone loss. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2007;23(10):1033-41. 66. Shah AA, Butler RB, Romanowski J, Goel D, Karadagli D, Warner JJ. Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure. JBJS. 2012;94(6):495-501. 67. Boileau P, Mercier N, Roussanne Y, Thélu C-É, Old J, Surgery R. Arthroscopic Bankart-Bristow-Latarjet procedure: the development and early results of a safe and reproducible technique. J Arthroscopy. 2010;26(11):1434-50. 68. Hovelius L, Sandström B, Olofsson A, Svensson O, Rahme H. The effect of capsular repair, bone block healing, and position on the results of the Bristow-Latarjet procedure (study III): long-term follow-up in 319 shoulders. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2012;21(5):647-60. 69. Lafosse L, Boyle S. Arthroscopic latarjet procedure. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2010;19(2):2-12. 70. Horner NS, Moroz PA, Bhullar R, Habib A, Simunovic N, Wong I, et al. Open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedures for the treatment of shoulder instability: a systematic review of comparative studies. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2018;19(1):255. 71. Cunningham G, Benchouk S, Kherad O, Lädermann A. Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2016;24(2):540-5. 72. Randelli P, Fossati C, Stoppani C, Evola FR, De Girolamo L. Open Latarjet versus arthroscopic Latarjet: clinical results and cost analysis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2016;24(2):526-32. 73. Boileau P, Thélu C-É, Mercier N, Ohl X, Houghton-Clemmey R, Carles M, et al. Arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet combined with Bankart repair restores shoulder stability in patients with glenoid bone loss. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2014;472(8):2413-24. 74. Nourissat G, Nedellec G, O’Sullivan NA, Debet-Mejean A, Dumontier C, Sautet A, et al. Mini-open arthroscopically assisted Bristow-Latarjet procedure for the treatment of patients with anterior shoulder instability: a cadaver study. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2006;22(10):1113-8. 75. Boileau P, Bicknell RT, El Fegoun AB, Chuinard C. Arthroscopic Bristow procedure for anterior instability in shoulders with a stretched or deficient capsule: the “belt-and-suspenders” operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2007;23(6):593-601. 76. Butt U, Charalambous CP. Complications associated with open coracoid transfer procedures for shoulder instability. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2012;21(8):1110-9. 77. Griesser MJ, Harris JD, McCoy BW, Hussain WM, Jones MH, Bishop JY, et al. Complications and re-operations after Bristow-Latarjet shoulder stabilization: a systematic review. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2013;22(2):286-92. 78. Provencher MT, Aman ZS, LaPrade CM, Bernhardson AS, Moatshe G, Storaci HW, et al. Biomechanical Comparison of Screw Fixation Versus a Cortical Button and Self-tensioning Suture for the Latarjet Procedure. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018;6(6):2325967118777842. 79. Bonnevialle N, Thélu CE, Bouju Y, Vogels J, Agout C, Duriez P, et al. Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with double-button fixation: short-term complications and learning curve analysis. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2018;27(6):e189-e95. 80. Montgomery SR, Katthagen JC, Mikula JD, Marchetti DC, Tahal DS, Dornan GJ, et al. Anatomic and biomechanical comparison of the classic and congruent-arc techniques of the Latarjet procedure. The American journal of sports medicine. 2017;45(6):1252-60. 81. Weppe F, Magnussen RA, Lustig S, Demey G, Neyret P, Servien E. A biomechanical evaluation of bicortical metal screw fixation versus absorbable interference screw fixation after coracoid transfer for anterior shoulder instability. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2011;27(10):1358-63. 82. Westerhoff P, Graichen F, Bender A, Halder A, Beier A, Rohlmann A, et al. In vivo measurement of shoulder joint loads during activities of daily living. Journal of biomechanics. 2009;42(12):1840-9. 83. Ahmad CS, Gardner TR, Groh M, Arnouk J, Levine WN. Mechanical properties of soft tissue femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The American journal of sports medicine. 2004;32(3):635-40. 84. Kamelger FS, Onder U, Schmoelz W, Tecklenburg K, Arora R, Fink C. Suspensory fixation of grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of 3 implants. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2009;25(7):767-76. 85. Mazzocca AD, Burton KJ, Romeo AA, Santangelo S, Adams DA, Arciero RA. Biomechanical evaluation of 4 techniques of distal biceps brachii tendon repair. The American journal of sports medicine. 2007;35(2):252-8. 86. Petre BM, Smith SD, Jansson KS, de Meijer P-P, Hackett TR, LaPrade RF, et al. Femoral cortical suspension devices for soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study. The American journal of sports medicine. 2013;41(2):416-22.tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/7557
dc.description.abstractHAKHVERDİYEV Y. The Comparison of Biomechanical Strength of Various Fixation Techniques in Latarjet Procedure – A Cadaver Study, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Thesis, Ankara, 2019. Shoulder dislocations are one of the most frequently encountered problems in orthopaedics and traumatology practice. Latarjet procedure is widely used if capsulolabral repair fails and a major glenoid defect exists. Coracoid fixation with screws was discussed in detail in the current literature, but there is not enough data about biomechanical features of endobutton fixation technique, which was recently defined. In our study, biomechanical strengths of two 3.5 mm partial threaded cannulated screws technique and endobutton fixation technique were compared in 10 cadaver shoulders. Cadavers were randomized into two groups. The muscles and soft tissues around the scapula were dissected carefully, preserving the conjoint tendon (short head of biceps and coracobrachialis muscle tendons). Anteroposterior radius of glenoid was measured and a 25% bony defect was created in anteroinferior rim of the glenoid. Coracoid process was transferred from its original location into the bony defect area of the glenoid. In the first study group, the coracoid process was fixed with 2 3.5 mm cannulated partial threaded screws. An endobutton was used to fix the coracoid process in the second study group. All samples was subjected to a mechanical tensile test in anteroinferior direction. Fixation failure criteria was determined as rupture of tendon-bone interface, >5 mm disintegration of the fixed coracoid process, failure of endobutton, breakage of cannulated screws and fracture of coracoid process. Rupture of tendon-bone interface, breakage of screws and failure of endobutton was not observed in any sample but >5 mm disintegration and fracture of coracoid process was observed as fixation failure criteria in the study. The results were compared using a force-strength graph. Maximum and minimum forces that the screw construct can resist were 533.93 N and 102.85 N, respectively. The mean force was measured as 295.21 N and the median value was 257.59 N. In the endobutton group, maximum and minimum forces were 270.17 N and 74.10 N, respectively. Mean value was 133.23 N and the median 87.06 N. As a result, screw fixation is biomechanically superior to endobutton fixation technique.tr_TR
dc.description.tableofcontentsTEŞEKKÜR iii ÖZET iv ABSTRACT vi İÇİNDEKİLER viii SİMGELER VE KISALTMALAR x ŞEKİLLER DİZİNİ xi TABLOLAR DİZİNİ xiii 1. GİRİŞ VE AMAÇ 1 1.1. Çalışmanın amacı 1 1.2. Çalışmanın hipotezi 2 2. GENEL BİLGİLER 3 2.1. Omuz Anatomisi 3 2.2. Omuz Biyomekaniği 8 2.3. Omuz instabilitesi sınıflandırması 13 2.4. Anterior Omuz İnstabilite Tedavisi 15 2.4.1. Glenoid Kemik Defekti Eşlik Etmeyen Anterior Travmatik İnstabiliteler 15 2.4.2. Glenoid Kemik Defektinin Eşlik Ettiği Aneterior Travmatik İnstabiliteler 17 2.4.3. On-track ve Off-track kavramları 20 2.4.4. Latarjet prosedürü 22 2.4.5. Cerrahi Teknik (Düğme dikiş kullanımı) 24 3. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM 30 3.1. Hazırlık ve Ameliyatların Gerçekleştirilmesi 30 3.2. Biyomekanik inceleme 42 3.3. İstatistiksel analiz 43 4. BULGULAR 44 5. TARTIŞMA 47 6. SONUÇ 52 7. KAYNAKLAR 53 EK- ETİK KURUL ONAYI 63tr_TR
dc.language.isoturtr_TR
dc.publisherTıp Fakültesitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectOmuz instabilitesitr_TR
dc.subjectArtroskopik Latarjet prosedürütr_TR
dc.subjectGlenoid kemik defektitr_TR
dc.titleLatarjet Prosedüründe Kullanılan Fiksasyon Tekniklerinin Dayanıklığının Biyomekanik Test Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması - Kadavra Çalışmasıtr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetHAKHVERDİYEV Y. Latarjet Prosedüründe Kullanılan Fiksasyon Tekniklerinin Dayanıklığının Biyomekanik Test Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması – Kadavra Çalışması, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi Ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara, 2019. Omuz çıkıkları ortopedi ve travmatoloji pratiğinde sıkça karşılaşılan sorunlardan biridir. Tekrarlayan omuz çıkıklarının tedavisinde kapsülolabral onarımlar başarısız olduğunda ve glenoidde kemik defekti oluştuğunda Latarjet prosedürü uygulanmaktadır. Artroskopik Latarjet prosedüründe korakoid fiksasyonu için vida kullanılması literatürde sıkça ele alınmıştır. Korakoid fiksasyonu için endobutton (düğme dikiş) kullanımı tarif edilse de, literatürde bu fiksasyonun biyomekanik dayanıklığı ile ilgili az sayıda çalışma vardır. Çalışmamızda Latarjet prosedüründe korakoid fiksasyonu için kullanılan 3.5 mm parsiyel yivli kanüle kortikal vida ile titanyum düğme implantı fiksasyonunun biyomekanik test sonuçları karşılaştırıldı. Çalışmaya 10 kadavranın omuz spesimeni dahil edildi. Örnekler randomize olarak 2 eşit gruba ayrıldı. Korakoid çıkıntıya yapışan konjoint tendon (biseps kasının kısa başı ve korakobrakiyalis kası) korunacak şekilde skapula ve etrafındakı yumuşak dokular, tendon ve kaslar diseksiyon ile uzaklaştırıldı. Her spesimenin glenoid anteroposterior çapı ölçülerek glenoid anteiroinferiorunda glenoidin anterioposterior çapının %25’i büyüklüğünde kemik defekti oluşturuldu. Korakoid çıkıntı testere yardımıyla osteotomize edildi ve glenoid anteriorunda oluşturulan defekte transfer edildi. Birinci gruptaki örnekler 2 adet 3.5 mm parsiyel yivli kanüle kortikal vidalar kullanılarak, ikinci gruptaki örnekler ise titanyum düğme implantı kullanılarak fikse edildi. Tüm örnekler konjoint tendon ve glenoidden asılarak skapula gövdesine göre 45 derecelik anterior ve inferior yönde çekme testine tabi tutuldu. Tendon ve kemik birleşmesindeki kopmalar, vida kırılması, titanyum düğme impantı kopması, fikse edilen korakoid çıkıntı parçasının 5 mm’den fazla ayrışması, korokoid parçasının kırılması gibi sonuçlar fiksasyon başarısızlık ölçütleri olarak kabul edildi. Hiçbir örnekte tendon ve kemik birleşkesinde kopma, vida kırılması ve titanyum düğme impantı yetmezliği saptanmazken korakoidin 5mm’den fazla glenoidden ayrışması ve korakoid çıkıntıda kırılma başarısızlık ölçütleri olarak tespit edildi. Kuvvet uzama grafileri oluşturularak sonuçlar karşılaştırıldı. Vida kullanılan örnekler arasında başarısızlığın görüldüğü maksimum kuvvet değeri 533,93 N, minimum değer ise 102,85 N olarak saptandı. Ortalama değer ise 295,21 N olarak hesaplandı. Vida örnekleri arasında başarısızlık görüldüğü ortanca kuvvet değeri ise 257,59 N olduğu saptandı. Düğme dikiş kullanılan örnekler arasında başarısızlığın görüldüğü maksimum kuvvet değeri 270,17 N, minimum değer ise 74,10 N olarak saptandı. Ortalama değer ise 133,23 N olarak hesaplandı. Düğme dikiş örnekleri arasında başarısızlık görüldüğü ortanca kuvvet değeri ise 87,06 N olduğu saptandı. Sonuç olarak vida ile fiksasyonunun titanyum düğme implantına göre biyomekanik olarak daha dayanıklı olduğu gösterildi.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentOrtopedi ve Travmatolojitr_TR
dc.embargo.termsAcik erisimtr_TR
dc.embargo.lift2019-06-18T10:55:17Z
dc.subtypemedicineThesis


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess