Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.advisorKoruç, Ziya
dc.contributor.authorTuna, Nehir
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-08T06:43:02Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-05
dc.date.submitted2018-09-05
dc.identifier.citation1. Davis PA, Sime WE. Toward a psychophysiology of performance: Sport psychology principles dealing with anxiety. International Journal of Stress Management. 2005:12(4), 363-378. 2. Bertollo M, Bortoli L, Gramaccioni G, Hanin Y, Comani S, Robazza C. Behavioural and psychophysiological correlates of athletic performance: a test of the multi-action plan model. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 2013; 38(2), 91-99. 3. Sandweiss, JH, Wolf SL. Biofeedback and sport science. New York: Springer US; 1995. 4. Ash MJ, Zellner RD. Speculations on the use of biofeedback training in sport psychology. Landers DM, Christina RW, editors. Psychology of motor behavior and sport. Canada: Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1978. 5. Petruzzello SJ, Landers DM, Salazar W. Biofeedback and sport/exercise performance: Applications and limitations. Behavior Therapy. 1991; 22, 379- 392. 6. Chen JL, Yeh DP, Lee SD, Chen CC, Kuo TBJ, Kao CL ve arkadaşları. Parasympathetic Nervous Activity Mirrors Recovery Status in Weightlifting Performance After Training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2011; 25 (6), 1546-1552. 7. Demos JN. Getting started with neurofeedback. NY: W. W. Norton & Company; 2005. 8. Vernon DT. Can neurofeedback training enhance performance? An evaluation of the evidence with implications for future research. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 2005; 30(4), 347-364. 9. Olton DS, Noonberg AR. Biofeedback: Clinical Application in Behavioral Science. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Clifffs; 1980. 10. Vernon D, Egner T, Cooper N, Compton T, Neilands C, Sheri A et al. The effect of training distinct neurofeedback protocols on aspects of cognitive performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2003; 47(1):75–85. 11. Lubar, JF. Neurofeedback for the management of attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Schwartz MS (Ed.), Biofeedback: A practitioner’s guide, 2nd edition. New York. Guilford Press; 1999. 12. Monastra VJ, Lynn S, Linden M, Lubar JF, Gruzelier J, LaVaque TJ. Electroencephalographic biofeedback in the treatment of attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder. Applied Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005;30(2):95–114. doi: 10.1007/sl0484-005-4305-x. 13. Tinius, T.P., Tinius, K.A., 2000. Changes after EEG biofeedback and cognitive retraining in adults with mild traumatic brain injury and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J. Neurother. 2000;4:27–41. 14. Wilson VE, Peper E, Moss D. The mind room‟ in Italian soccer training: the use of biofeedback and neurofeedback for optimum performance. Biofeedback. 2011; 34:79-81. 15. Hill RW, Castro E. Getting rid of Ritalin. Charlottesvillle, VA: Hampton Roads Publishing Company; 2002. 16. Rostami R, Sadeghi H, Karami KA, Abadi MN, Salamati P. The Effects of Neurofeedback on the Improvement of Rifle Shooters' Performance. Journal of Neurotherapy. 2012; 16(4):264-269. 17. Egner T, Gruzelier JH. EEG Biofeedback of low beta band components: Frequency-specific effects on variables of attention and event-related brain potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2004;115(1):131–139. 18. Chapin T, Russell-Chapin L. Neurotherapy and neurofeedback: Brain-based treatment for psychological and behavioral problems. New York, NY: Routledge; 2014. 19. Hill DM, Shaw GA qualitative examination of choking under pressure in team sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2013; 14(1), 103-110. 20. Kao SC, Huang CJ, Hung TM. Neurofeedback Training Reduces Frontal Midline Theta and Improves Putting Performance in Expert Golfers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2013;26(3):271-286. 21. Moss D, Andrasik F. Biofeedback and Neurofeedback. Yucha CB, Montgomery D, editors. Evidence-based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback. Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback; 2008. 22. Strack BW, Linden MK, Wilson VS. Biofeedback and neurofeedback applications in sport psychology. Wheat Ridge: Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback; 2011. 23. Jasper HH. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1958; (10):370-375. 24. Coben R, Evans JR. Neurofeedback and Neuromodulation Techniques and Applications. Amerika: Academic Press; 201. 25. Schomer DL, Silva FHL. Niedermeyer’s Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. Oxford: University Press; 2011. 26. Sterman MB, Egner T. Foundation and practice of neurofeedback for the treatment of epilepsy. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2006; 31(1),21–35. 27. Gao T, Yu S, Shi X, Zhao C. Continuous Performance Tests Are Sensitive to ADHD in Adults but Lack Specificity. A review and critique for differential diagnosis. Chinese Journal of Child Health. 2001; 931,113-39. 28. Martens R. Burton D. Verlay RS. Bump LA ve Smith DE. "Development and Validation of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2". Martens H, Vealey RS ve Burton D editors. Competitive Anxiety in sport. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics; 1990. 29. Başer E, Uygulamalı spor psikolojisi. Bağırgan Yayınevi, Ankara; 1998, s:279-283. 30. Vohs KD, Baumeister RF. Understanding Self-Regulation. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD Editors Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press; 2004. 31. Dupee M, Werthner P, Forneris T. Perceived Outcomes of a Biofeedback and Neurofeedback Training Intervention for Optimal Performance: Learning to Enhance Self-Awareness and Self-Regulation With Olympic Athletes. The Sport Psychologist. 2016; 30 (4 ): 339-349. 32. Hanin YL. Emotion in sport. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics; 2000. 33. Anderson R, Hanrahan SJ, Mallett CJ. Investigating the optimal psychological state for peak performance in Australian elite athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2014; 26, 318-333. 34. Gardner FL, Moore ZE. Theoretical and Empirical Developments of the Mindfulness-Acceptance-Commitment (MAC) Approach to Performance Enhancement Clinical sport psychology. 2009;291-302. 35. Schwartz MS. Andrasik F. Biofeedback: A practitioner's guide. 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2016. 36. Heinrich H, Gevensleben H, Strehl U. Annotation: Neurofeedback - train your brain to train behaviour. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2007;48(1), 3-16. 37. Weimer M. Learning centered teaching: Five key changes to practice 2nd ed. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2013. 38. Green E, Green, A, Walters E. Voluntary control of internal states: Psychological and physiological. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 1970; 2, 1-26. 39. Thayer JF, Lane RD. A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2000;61,201- 216. 40. Mc Ewen, BSProtective and damaging effects of the mediators of stress and adaptation: Allostasis and allostatic load. Schulkin J. Editor. Allostasis, homeostasis, and the cost of physiological adaptation. New York, NY: Cambridge; 2004. 41. Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva. Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neuropsychology revised series: Volume 6 event-related desynchronization. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science;1999. 42. Carskadon MA, Dement WC. Normal human sleep: An overview.[Internet]. 2011 [Erişim Tarihi 7 Ekim 2017]. Erişim adresi: http://www.psychology.uiowa.edu/faculty/blumberg/Course_Dosc/Seminar .2008/Readings/Carskadon.2000.pdf . 43. Hardt JV, Kamiya J. Anxiety change through electroencephalographic alpha feedback seen only in high anxiety subjects. Science. 1978;7;201(4350):79– 81. 44. Gunkelman JD, Johnstone J. Neurofeedback and the brain. J Adult Dev. 2005;12:93–8. 45. Othmer S. A rationale for neurofeedback training.[Internet].2001 [Erişim Tarihi 11 Kasım 2107]. Erişim adresi http://www.eeginfo.com/research/articles/general_10.htm. 46. Gevensleben H, Holl B, Albrecht B, Schlamp D, Kratz O, Studer P, et al. Distinct EEG effects related to neurofeedback training in children with ADHD: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Psychophysiol. Elsevier B.V.; 2009;74(2):149–57. 47. Fuchs T, Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Gruzelier JH, Kaiser J, Neurofeedback treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: a comparison with methylphenidate. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback. (in press). 2003. 48. Kouijzer MEJ, De Moor JMH, Gerrits BJL, Buitelaar JK, Van Schie HT. Long-term effects of neurofeedback treatment in autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2009; 3: 496–501. 49. Doppelmayr M, Nosko H, Pecherstorfer T, Fink A. An attempt to increase cognitive performance after stroke with neurofeedback. Biofeedback. 2007; 35(4):126–130. 50. Kotchoubey B, Strehl U, Uhlmann C, Holzapfel S, Koenig M, Froescher W, Birbaumer N. Modification of slow cortical potentials in patients with refractory epilepsy: a controlled outcome study. Epilepsia. 2001; 42: 406–41. 51. Scott WC, Kaiser D, Othmer S, Sideroff SI. Effects of an EEG biofeedback protocol on a mixed substance abusing population. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2005;31:455–69. 52. Othmer S, Othmer SF. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder — The Neurofeedback Remedy. Biofeedback. 2009;37(1):24–31. 53. Raymond J, Varney C, Parkinson LA, Gruzelier JH. The effects of alpha=theta neurofeedback on personality and mood. Cognitive Brain Research. 2005; 23(2–3): 287–292. 54. Stokes D a, Lappin MS. Neurofeedback and biofeedback with 37 migraineurs: a clinical outcome study. Behav Brain Funct. 2010;6(9):1–10. 55. Kayiran S, Dursun E, Ermutlu N, Dursun N, Karamursel S. Neurofeedback in fibromyalgia syndrome. Agri. 2007;19(3):47–53. 56. Hammond DC. What Is Neurofeedback? J Neurother Investig Neuromodulation, Neurofeedback Appl Neurosci. 2007;10(4):25. 57. Seferoğlu F. Nöro-geribildirim Antrenmanının Bilişsel ve Duyu-Motor Beceriler üzerine Etkisinin İncelenmesi. [Doktora tezi]. Akdeniz Üniversitesi; 2016. 58. Soutar R., Longo R. Doing Neurofeedback: An Introduction. Miami: ISNR Research Foundation; 2011. 59. Chan SYS. Neurofeedback: Challenges, Applications, and Opportunities for Education. (Masters thesis). Canada: University of Simon Fraser; 2015. 60. Egner T, Gruzelier JH. Learned self-regulation of EEG frequency components affects attention and event-related brain potentials in humans. NeuroReport, 2001,12:4155-4159. 61. Basar E, Basar-Eroglu C, Karakas S, Schurmann M. Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2001;39:241-248. 62. Klimesch W, Schimke H, Schwaiger J. Episodic and semantic memory: An analysis in the EEG theta and alpha band. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 1994;91:428-441. 63. Kirk IJ. Frequency modulations of hippocampal theta by the supramammillary Nucleus, and other hypothalamo-hippocampal interactions: Mechanisms and functional implications. Neuroscience & Biobehavioural Reviews. 1998;22(2):291-302. 64. Lubar JF, Lubar JO. Neurofeedback assessment and treatment for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Evans JR & Arbarbanel A. Eds., Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1999. 65. Sterman MB, Howe RC. Cortical-subcortical EEG correlates of suppressed motor behavior during sleep and waking in the cat. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992; 32, 681–695. 66. Hoedlmoser K, Pecherstorfer T, Gruber G, Anderer P, Doppelmayr M, Klimesch W, et al. Instrumental conditioning of human sensorimotor rhythm (12-15 Hz) and its impact on sleep as well as declarative learning. Sleep. 2008;31(10):1401–8. 67. Lubar JF, Shouse MN. EEG and behavioral changes in a hyperkinetic child concurrent with training of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR): a preliminary report. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1976;1: 293–306. 68. Howe RC, Sterman MB. Cortical-subcortical EEG correlates of suppressed motor behavior during sleep and waking in the cat. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1972;32: 681–695. 69. Mann CA, Sterman MB, Kaiser DA. Suppression of EEG rhythmic frequencies during somato-motor and visuo-motor behavior. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1996;23:1–7. 70. Rasey HW, Lubar JF, McIntyre A, Zoffuto AC, Abbott PL. EEG Biofeedback for theenhancement of attentional processing in normal college students. Journal of Neurotherapy, 1996;1(3):15–21. 71. Leins U, Goth G, Hinterberger T, Klinger C, Rumpf N, Strehl U. Neurofeedback for children with ADHD: A comparison of SCP and Theta=Beta protocols. Applied P1sychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2007;32(2):73–88. 72. Vernon D, Egner T, Cooper N, Compton T, Neilands C, Sheri A et al. The effect of training distinct neurofeedback protocols on aspects of cognitive performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2003; 47(1):75–85. 73. Lubar, JF. Neurofeedback for the management of attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorders. Schwartz MS (Ed.), Biofeedback: A practitioner’s guide, 2nd edition. New York. Guilford Press; 1995. 74. Zaichkowsky LD & Takenaka K. Optimizing arousal level. Singer RN, Murphey M, Tennant LK. (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology. New York: Macmillan; 1993. 75. Zaichkowsky LD & Fuchs CZ. Biofeedback-assisted self-regulation for stress management in sports. Hackfort D & Spielberger CD (Eds.),Anxiety in Sports: An International Perspective. New York. Hemisphere;1989. 76. Blumenstein B, Bar-Eli M, Tenenbaum G. The augmenting role of biofeedback: Effects of autogenic, imagery, and music training on physiological indices and athletic performance. J Sports Sci. 1995;13: 343-354. 77. Haufler A, Spalding T, Hatfield B. Neuro-cognitive activity during a self- paced visuospatial task: comparative EEG profiles in marksmen and novice shooters. Biological Psychology. 2000; 53,2(3):131-160. 78. Kericka S, McDowell Kaleb The role of the left temporal region under the cognitive motor demands of shooting in skilled marksmen. Biological PsychologyVolume 58, Issue 3, December 2001, Pages 263-277. 79. Faridnia M, Shojaei M, Rahimi A. The effect of neurofeedback training on the anxiety of elite female swimmers. Annals of Biological Research, 2012, 3 (2):1020-1028. 80. Tanis CJ. The Effects of Heart Rhythm Variability Biofeedback with Emotional Regulation on the Athletic Performance of Women Collegiate Volleyball Players [Dissertation]. Minnesota: Capella University; 2008. 81. Bar-Eli M. Biofeedback as applied psychophysiology in sport and exercise: conceptual principles for research and practice. Blumenstein B, Bar-Eli M, Tenenbaum G (Eds), Brain and Body in Sport and Exercise: Biofeedback Applications in Performance Enhancement. Chichester UK. Wiley; 2002. 82. Beauchamp MK, Harvey RH, Beauchamp PH. An integrated biofeedback and psychological skills training program for Canada’s olympic short-track speedskating team. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 2012; 6:67-84. Human Kinetics, Inc. 83. Suinn RM. Imagery rehearsal applications to performance enhancement. The Behavior Therapist. ;1985;8:155-159. 84. Maier (Max, D.T. (n.d.). Wired for Victory. Can a bunch of electrodes and a computer screen help you swim faster, sink your putts, and swish your free throws?2011[ErişimTarihi19Aralık2017].Erişim Adresi:www.mensvogue.com. 85. Planatov V.General Theory of Athletes’ Preparation in Olympic Sports. Kiev Visha Shkola; 1997. 86. Bar-Eli M, Blumenstein B. Performance enhancement in swimming: the effect of mental training with biofeedback. J Sci Med Sport 2004;7:4:454-464. 87. Pusenjak N, Grad TM. Can biofeedback training of psychophysiological responses enhance athletes’ sport performance? A practitioner’s perspective. The Phys. and Sportsmedicine. 2015;43(3):287-299. 88. Blumenstein B, Orbach I. The road to Olympic medals. Edmonds WA, & Tenenbaum G. (Eds.), Case studies in applied psychophysiology: Neurofeedback and biofeedback treatments for advances in human performance Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. 89. Edmonds WA, The 400-meter sprinter who ran too fast. Edmond WA, Tenenbaum G (Eds.), Case studies in applied psychophysiology: Neurofeedback and biofeedback treatments for advances in human performance Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. 90. Paul M, Ganesan S, Sandhu JS, Simon JV. Effect of sensory motor rhythm neurofeedback on psycho-physiological electro-encephalographic measures and performance of archery players. Ġbnosina Journal Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. 2012; 4:32-39. 91. Wilson VE, Peper E, Moss D. The mind room‟ in Italian soccer training: the use of biofeedback and neurofeedback for optimum performance. Biofeedback. 2011; 34:79-81. 92. Keihani M, Mirifar A, Hashemian P, Farrokhi A. The effect of neurofeedback training on competitive state-anxiety track and field athletics. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health 2013; 15(3): 225-32. 93. Cheng MY, Huang CJ, Chang YK, Koester D, Schack T, Hung TM. Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback enhances golf putting performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2015; 37(6), 626-636. 94. Logemann, H. A., Lansbergen, M. M., Van Os, T. W., Böcker, K. B., & Kenemans, J. L. (2010). The effectiveness of EEG-feedback on attention, impulsivity and EEG: a sham feedback controlled study. Neuroscience letters. 479(1), 49-53. 95. Dekker MK, Van den Berg, BR, Denissen AJ, Sitskoorn MMVan Boxtel, GJ Feasibility of eyes open alpha power training for mental enhancement in elite gymnasts. Journal of sports sciences. 2014:32(16), 1550-1560. 96. Rostami R, Sadeghi H, Karami KA, Abadi MN, Salamati P. The Effects of Neurofeedback on the Improvement of Rifle Shooters' Performance. Journal of Neurotherapy. 2012; 16(4):264-269. 97. Ring C, Cooke A, Kavussanua M, Intryrea DM, Masters R. Investigating the efficacy of neurofeedback training for expediting expertise and excellence in sport. Psychology of Sport and ExerciseVolume 2015;16(1):118-127. 98. Koruç Z. CSAI-2’nin Türkçe Uyarlaması. 5. Spor Bilimleri Kongresi. Ankara: Hacettepe Universitesi; 1998. 99. Cattell, P. The measurement of intelligence of infants and young children. New York: Basic Books; 1940. 100. Mandryk RL, Atkins MS. A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction withplay technologies. Int. J. Human- Computer Studies. 2007;65:329-347. 101. Zinsser N, Bunker LK, Williams JM. Cognitive techniques for improving performance and building confidence. In J.M. Williams (Ed.), Applied Sport Psychology: Personal growth to peak performance (5th Ed.). McGraw-Hill College, 2006.tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/5197
dc.description.abstractTuna N. The Effect of Mental Training with Biofeedback on Performance in Athletes. Hacettepe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, M.Sc. Thesis in Sport Sciences and Technology Program, Ankara, 2018. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between neural feedback training and the archers’ performance. After applying all intervention two groups compared in terms of archery performance. Participants (N=30) were in İzmir Metropolitan Municipality Archery Team (18.33±2.41 years) participated in the study. The two groups were divided into two groups as experiment and control considering the view of the coach. All participants were applied to performance test (2x36=72 arrows) attention test and anxiety inventory and EEG baseline measurement. In addition, EEG-Biofeedback data were obtained. A 20-session sensory motor retention activity augmentation session was performed in the experimental group. After a baseline measurement participants are assessed on and at heir performance test (36x2=72 arrows) whether experimentel group have been improved on their archery performance or not. ANOVA (2x2), t-test, normality test and Wilcoxon test was performed in data analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of performance results, physical anxiety and self-confidence scores of the anxiety (CSAI-2) inventory, teta, beta values of the EEG-BGB record, and subscale scores of the IVA-2 test (p>0.05). It was observed that the shot performance scores of the experimental group were higher than the shooting scores of the control group. In addition, cognitive anxiety of pre-test and post-test groups showed that the cognitive anxiety level were lower in the experimental than control group and there was a significant difference between the pretest post-test interaction of the experimental group in the intragroup analyzes and the [F(1,28)=9.35;p=0.00;p2=0.250], [F(1,28)=4.44;p=0.044;p2=0,137] thus, the athlete could focus better and ignore the external factor. In addition, it shows that DMR values in the post test of individuals in the experimental group are higher [F (1,28)=6.91;p=0.01;p2=0.198]. Increase in DMR values have shown that archers are able to focus attention, and learn to control their own physiology. In the visual focus subscale of the IVA-2 attention test, there was difference between the measurements and groups intercaction is [F(1,28)=8.79;p=0.006;p2=0.239] A significant difference of between groups indicated that archers can facilitate focusing skill of the during shooting.en
dc.description.tableofcontentsONAY SAYFASI iii YAYIMLAMA VE FİKRİ MÜLKİYET HAKLARI BEYANI iv ETİK BEYAN v TEŞEKKÜR vi ÖZET vii ABSTRACT viii İÇİNDEKİLER ix SİMGELER VE KISALTMALAR xii ŞEKİLLER xiii TABLOLAR xiv 1. GİRİŞ 1 1.1 Araştırmanın Amacı 4 1.2 Problemler 4 1.3 Denenceler 5 1.4 Sınırlılıklar 6 1.5 Tanımlar 6 1.6 Araştırmanın Önemi 8 2. GENEL BİLGİLER 9 2.1 Kuramsal Yaklaşım 9 2.1.1 Psikofizyoloji ve Öz-Düzenleme 9 2.1.2 Öz- Düzenlemenin Nörovisseral Bütünleşme Modeli 11 2.1.3 Elektroensefalografi (EEG) 11 2.1.4 Öğrenmede EEG Frekans Bantları ve Davranışsal Bağlantılar 12 2.2 EEG-Biyolojik Geribildirimin Tarihçesi 12 2.2.1 EEG-BGB Sistemi 13 2.2.2 EEG-BGB Parametreleri 15 2.2.3 EEG Frekans Bileşenleri 18 2.2.4 EEG-BGB Protokolleri 21 2.3 EEG Frekans Bantlarının Karakteristik Özellikleri: Dinamik ve Çok Boyutlu 22 2.4 Performans ve Dikkatin DMR ile İlişkisi 23 2.5 Spor Bilimleri Alanında Yapılan EEG-BGB Çalışmaları 25 3. GEREÇ ve YÖNTEM 38 3.1 Araştırma Deseni 38 3.2 Araştırma Grubu 38 3.3 Veri Toplama Araçları 39 3.4 İşlem Yolu 43 3.4.1 Deneysel Uygulamalar 44 3.5 Verilerin Analizi ve İstatistiksel Testler 49 4. BULGULAR 50 4.1. Deney ve Kontrol Gruplarının Ön Test Verileri Arasındaki Fark 50 4.2. Kaygı Ölçeği Dikkat Testi, EEG-BGB Kaydı, Atış Performans Puanlarının Ön Test Son Test Tanımlayıcı İstatistikleri 51 4.3. Kaygı Ölçeği, Dikkat Testi, EEG-BGB Kaydı, Atış Performans Puanlarının Normallik Sonuçları 52 4.4. Atış Performanslarına İlişkin İstatistik Analiz Bulguları 53 4.5. CSAI-2 Kaygı Ölçümlerine İlişkin İstatistik Analiz Bulguları 53 4.6. EEG-BGB Kayıt Ölçümlerine İlişkin İstatistik Analiz Bulguları 55 4.7. IVA-2 Dikkat Testi Ölçümlerine İlişkin İstatistik Analiz Bulguları 57 4.8. Deney ve Kontrol Gruplarının Ortalama DMR Değerleri 60 5. TARTIŞMA ve YORUM 61 5.1. Performans Sonuçlarına Göre Tartışma ve Yorumlar 61 5.2. Yarışma Kaygısı ve EEG-BGB Bulgularına İlişkin Tartışma ve Yorumlar 63 5.3. EEG-BGB Bulgularına İlişkin Tartışma ve Yorumlar 64 5.4. IVA-2 Dikkat Testi Sonuçlarına İlişkin Tartışma ve Yorumlar 65 6. SONUÇ ve ÖNERİLER 69 6.1 Sonuç 69 6.2 Öneriler 71 7. KAYNAKLAR 73 8. EKLER 83 EK- 1: Tez Çalışması ile İlgili Etik Kurul Onayı 83 EK- 2: Deney Grubunun 20 Seanslık DMR Aktivitesi Trend Raporu 84 EK- 3: Aydınlatılmış Onam Formu 99 EK-4: Performans Puanlama Formu 101 EK-5: Dijital Makbuz ve Orjinallik Ekran Çıktısı 102 9. ÖZGEÇMİŞ 103tr_TR
dc.language.isoturtr_TR
dc.publisherSağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjecteeg-biyolojik geribildirimtr_TR
dc.subjectdmr aktivitesi
dc.subjectperformans
dc.subjectokçuluk
dc.subjectdikkat
dc.titleBiyolojik Geri Bildirimle Zihinsel Antrenman Programının Sporcuların Performansına Etkisitr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisen
dc.description.ozetTuna N. Biyolojik Geri bildirimle Zihinsel Antrenman Programının Sporcuların Performansına Etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Spor Bilimleri ve Teknolojisi Programı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara, 2018. Bir zihinsel antrenman yöntemi olarak kullanılan sinirsel geribildirim uygulamasının okçularda fiziksel antrenman ile birlikte sağlanan EEG-Biyolojik geribildirim uygulamasının sporcuların performanslarının artışına yardımcı bir yöntem olup olmadığını araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi Okçuluk Takımından yaş ortalaması (18,33±2,41) yıl olan 30 sporcu katılmıştır. Sporcular, antrenör görüşü dikkate alınarak deney ve kontrol olarak 2 gruba ayrılmışlardır. Bu 2 gruba çalışmadan önce performanslarını belirlemek amacıyla 72 ok atışı yaptırılmış, kaygı düzeylerini belirlemek için kaygı ölçeği ve dikkat, odaklanma puanları için de dikkat testi kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca kaygı, dikkat, odaklanma ve kas kontrolü gibi zihinsel ve fiziksel durumlarını sayısal olarak tespit etmek için de EEG-BGB kayıtları alınmıştır. Deney grubuna 10 haftalık 20 seanslık DMR aktivitesi eğitimi verilmiştir. Deney ve kontrol grubundan tekrar aynı ölçümler alınmıştır. Veri analizinde atış performansları açısından t testi, normallik testi, Wilcoxon ve ANOVA (2x2) testleri kulanılmıştır. Hata payı 0,05 olarak alınmıştır. Bulgularda, performans, bedensel ve öz-güven ölçek puanları, teta, beta değerleri ve IVA-2 dikkat testinin görsel odaklanma dışındaki alt ölçek puanları bakımından gruplar arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı bir fark yoktur (p>0,05). Kaygı (CSAI-2) ölçeğinin bilişsel ve bedensel kaygı puanlarında grup ve ölçüm etkileşimi arasında anlamlı fark vardır sırasıyla; [F(1,28)=9,35;p=0,00; 2=0,250], [F(1,28)=4,44;p=0,044; 2=0,137]. Duyusal motor aktivite değeri için grup ve ölçüm etkileşimindeki fark istatististiksel açıdan anlamlıdır [F(1,28)=6,91;p=0,01; 2=0,198]. IVA-2 dikkat testinin alt ölçeklerinden olan Görsel odaklanma alt boyutlarının test puanlarına ölçümler arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmuştur [F(1,28)=8,79;p=0,006;np2=0,239. Sonucda, sporcu daha iyi odaklanabilmiş ve dışşal etmenleri göz ardı edebilmiş ve okçulukta yayın gerilmesi ve sırasında kas kontrolünün kontrol etmeyi öğrenmişlerdir.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentSpor Bilimleri ve Teknolojisitr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID10210963tr_TR
dc.embargo.terms6 aytr_TR
dc.embargo.lift2019-04-12T06:43:03Z


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster