Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.advisorTopuz, Semra
dc.contributor.advisorTopuz, Semra
dc.contributor.authorBahrilli, Tanju
dc.contributor.authorBahrilli, Tanju
dc.contributor.authorBahrilli, Tanju
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-17T11:59:05Z
dc.date.available2018-01-17T11:59:05Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-16
dc.date.submitted2018-01-05
dc.identifier.citationKAYNAKÇA 1. Çerezci Ö AY, Canbulat N, Güdemez E.(Ed.). El Rehablitasyonu. 2013 ed. istanbul: Amerikan Hastanesi Yayınları, ; 2013 2013. 1-545 p. 2. Hatta T, Yamamoto N, Sano H, Itoi E. Comfort and acceptability of various immobilization positions using a shoulder external rotation and abduction brace. Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 2017;22(2):285-8. 3. Fusaro I, Orsini S, Sforza T, Rotini R, Benedetti MG. The use of braces in the rehabilitation treatment of the post-traumatic elbow. Joints. 2014;2(2):81-6. 4. Fayad F, Hanneton S, Lefevre-Colau MM, Poiraudeau S, Revel M, Roby-Brami A. The trunk as a part of the kinematic chain for arm elevation in healthy subjects and in patients with frozen shoulder. Brain research. 2008;1191:107-15. 5. Whittle MW. Chapter 2 - Normal gait. Gait Analysis (Fourth Edition). Edinburgh: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2007. p. 47-100. 6. Jacquelin Perry JMB. Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine. 2010;9(2):353-. 7. McNeill Alexander R. Energetics and optimization of human walking and running: the 2000 Raymond Pearl memorial lecture. American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council. 2002;14(5):641-8. 8. Umberger BR. Effects of suppressing arm swing on kinematics, kinetics, and energetics of human walking. Journal of biomechanics. 2008;41(11):2575-80. 9. Ortega JD, Fehlman LA, Farley CT. Effects of aging and arm swing on the metabolic cost of stability in human walking. Journal of biomechanics. 2008;41(16):3303-8. 10. Pontzer H, Holloway JHt, Raichlen DA, Lieberman DE. Control and function of arm swing in human walking and running. The Journal of experimental biology. 2009;212(Pt 4):523-34. 11. Wagenaar RC, van Emmerik RE. Resonant frequencies of arms and legs identify different walking patterns. Journal of biomechanics. 2000;33(7):853-61. 12. Ford MP, Wagenaar RC, Newell KM. Arm constraint and walking in healthy adults. Gait & posture. 2007;26(1):135-41. 13. Kubo M, Ulrich B. A biomechanical analysis of the 'high guard' position of arms during walking in toddlers. Infant behavior & development. 2006;29(4):509-17. 14. Rietdyk S. Anticipatory locomotor adjustments of the trail limb during surface accommodation. Gait & posture.23(3):268-72. 15. van der Krogt MM, Doorenbosch CA, Harlaar J. The effect of walking speed on hamstrings length and lengthening velocity in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Gait & posture. 2009;29(4):640-4. 16. Collins SH, Adamczyk PG, Kuo AD. Dynamic arm swinging in human walking. Proceedings Biological sciences. 2009;276(1673):3679-88. 17. Elftman H. Biomechanics of muscle with particular application to studies of gait. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 1966;48(2):363-77. 18. Herr H, Popovic M. Angular momentum in human walking. The Journal of experimental biology. 2008;211(Pt 4):467-81. 19. Park J. Synthesis of natural arm swing motion in human bipedal walking. Journal of biomechanics. 2008;41(7):1417-26. 20. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Jing B. Activity of upper limb muscles during human walking. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology. 2012;22(2):199-206. 21. Trehan SK, Wolff AL, Gibbons M, Hillstrom HJ, Daluiski A. The effect of simulated elbow contracture on temporal and distance gait parameters. Gait & posture. 2015;41(3):791-4. 22. Chapter 1 - A History of Splinting A2 - Fess, Elaine Ewing. In: Gettle KS, Philips CA, Janson JR, editors. Hand and Upper Extremity Splinting (Third Edition). Saint Louis: Mosby; 2005. p. 3-43. 23. Chapter 8 - Design Principles A2 - Fess, Elaine Ewing. In: Gettle KS, Philips CA, Janson JR, editors. Hand and Upper Extremity Splinting (Third Edition). Saint Louis: Mosby; 2005. p. 210-36. 24. Wong SKM. Classıfıcatıon Of Hand Splıntıng. Hand Surgery. 2002;07(02):209-13. 25. Zacchilli MA, Owens BD. Epidemiology of shoulder dislocations presenting to emergency departments in the United States. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2010;92(3):542-9. 26. Miller BS, Sonnabend DH, Hatrick C, O'Leary S, Goldberg J, Harper W, et al. Should acute anterior dislocations of the shoulder be immobilized in external rotation? A cadaveric study. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2004;13(6):589-92. 27. Hart WJ, Kelly CP. Arthroscopic observation of capsulolabral reduction after shoulder dislocation. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2005;14(2):134-7. 28. Longo UG, Loppini M, Rizzello G, Ciuffreda M, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Management of primary acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and quantitative synthesis of the literature. Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2014;30(4):506-22. 29. Itoi E, Kitamura T, Hitachi S, Hatta T, Yamamoto N, Sano H. Arm Abduction Provides a Better Reduction of the Bankart Lesion During Immobilization in External Rotation After an Initial Shoulder Dislocation. The American journal of sports medicine. 2015;43(7):1731-6. 30. Yücetürk A. EMG problems in the preoperative evaluation of obstetrical brachial plexus. Turkish J Hand and Microsurgery. 1996;4(5):21-4. 31. Itoi E, Sashi R, Minagawa H, Shimizu T, Wakabayashi I, Sato K. Position of immobilization after dislocation of the glenohumeral joint. A study with use of magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2001;83-A(5):661-7. 32. Meyns P, Bruijn SM, Duysens J. The how and why of arm swing during human walking. Gait & posture. 2013;38(4):555-62. 33. Eke-Okoro ST, Gregoric M, Larsson LE. Alterations in gait resulting from deliberate changes of arm-swing amplitude and phase. Clinical biomechanics. 1997;12(7-8):516-21. 34. Yizhar Z, Boulos S, Inbar O, Carmeli E. The effect of restricted arm swing on energy expenditure in healthy men. International journal of rehabilitation research Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation. 2009;32(2):115-23. 35. Bruijn SM, Meijer OG, Beek PJ, van Dieen JH. The effects of arm swing on human gait stability. The Journal of experimental biology. 2010;213(Pt 23):3945-52. 36. Dedieu P, Zanone PG. Effects of gait pattern and arm swing on intergirdle coordination. Human movement science. 2012;31(3):660-71. 37. Hanada E, Kerrigan DC. Energy consumption during level walking with arm and knee immobilized. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2001;82(9):1251-4. 38. Dreyfuss D, Elbaz A, Mor A, Segal G, Calif E. The effect of upper limb casting on gait pattern. International journal of rehabilitation research Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation. 2016;39(2):176-80. 39. DeVita P, Hong D, Hamill J. Effects of asymmetric load carrying on the biomechanics of walking. Journal of biomechanics. 1991;24(12):1119-29. 40. Zhang J, Zhang K, Feng J, Small M. Rhythmic Dynamics and Synchronization via Dimensionality Reduction: Application to Human Gait. PLoS Computational Biology. 2010;6(12):e1001033. 41. Nottrodt JW, Manley P. Acceptable loads and locomotor patterns selected in different carriage methods. Ergonomics. 1989;32(8):945-57. 42. Whittle MW. Gait Analysis: An Introduction: Elsevier Science; 2014. 43. Selim Yalçin; Nadire Berker GY. Yürüme Analizi. istanbul: 2001. 44. Li Y, Wang W, Crompton RH, Gunther MM. Free vertical moments and transverse forces in human walking and their role in relation to arm-swing. The Journal of experimental biology. 2001;204(Pt 1):47-58. 45. Balaban B. Yürüme Analizi: Temel Kavramlar Ve Uygulama. ankara: Güneş Kitapevi; 2009. 304-8 p. 46. Lamoth CJ, Beek PJ, Meijer OG. Pelvis-thorax coordination in the transverse plane during gait. Gait & posture. 2002;16(2):101-14. 47. Ballesteros MLF, Buchthal F, Rosenfalck P. The pattern of muscular activity during the arm swing of natural walking. Acta Physiologica. 1965;63(3):296-310. 48. Zehr EP, Duysens J. Regulation of arm and leg movement during human locomotion. The Neuroscientist. 2004;10(4):347-61. 49. Cole MJ, Durham S, Ewins D. An evaluation of patient perceptions to the value of the gait laboratory as part of the rehabilitation of primary lower limb amputees. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2008;32(1):12-22. 50. Ülger Ö, Şener G, Bayramlar K, Topuz S. Thromboanjitis obliterans nedeni ile ampute olan hastalarda farklı fizyoterapi yaklaşımlarının karşılaştırılması. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2011;22:65-73. 51. Del Pilar Duque Orozco M, Abousamra O, Church C, Lennon N, Henley J, Rogers KJ, et al. Reliability and validity of Edinburgh visual gait score as an evaluation tool for children with cerebral palsy. Gait & posture. 2016;49:14-8. 52. Lord S, Halligan P, Wade D. Visual gait analysis: The development of a clinical assessment and scale1998. 107-19 p. 53. Harris GF, Wertsch JJ. Procedures for gait analysis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1994;75(2):216-25. 54. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı TCME. Ortopedik Protez Ve Ortez Yürüme Analizi - 2. Ankara, 2011. 55. Hurkmans HL, Bussmann JB, Benda E, Verhaar JA, Stam HJ. Techniques for measuring weight bearing during standing and walking. Clinical biomechanics. 2003;18(7):576-89. 56. Orlin MN, McPoil TG. Plantar pressure assessment. Physical therapy. 2000;80(4):399-409. 57. Gage JR. An overview of normal walking. Instructional course lectures. 1990;39:291-303. 58. Zehr EP, Duysens J. Regulation of arm and leg movement during human locomotion. The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry. 2004;10(4):347-61. 59. Punt M, Bruijn SM, Wittink H, van Dieen JH. Effect of arm swing strategy on local dynamic stability of human gait. Gait & posture. 2015;41(2):504-9. 60. GAGE JR, Deluca PA, Renshaw TS. Gait Analysis: Principles and Applications. Emphasis on Its Use in Cerebral Palsy. JBJS. 1995;77(10):1607-23. 61. Yavuzer G. Three-dimensional quantitative gait analysis. 62. Trimble MH, Koceja DM. Modulation of the triceps surae H-reflex with training. The International journal of neuroscience. 1994;76(3-4):293-303. 63. Springer BA, Marin R, Cyhan T, Roberts H, Gill NW. Normative Values for the Unipedal Stance Test with Eyes Open and Closed. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy. 2007;30(1):8-15. 64. Magee DJ, Sahrmann S, Moore KL. Orthopedic physical assessment 2nd ed. 1992. 65. Uzun S, Alpkaya U, Hayran O, Akarcay V. Yaşlıların Fiziksel Kapasitelerinin Ve Yaşam Kalitelerinin Değerlendirilmesi. 66. Saadet Otman NK. Tedavi Hareketlerinde Temel Değerlendirme Prensipleri. Ankara: : Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Yayınları; 2015. 67. Barbieri FA, Santos PC, Lirani-Silva E, Vitorio R, Gobbi LT, van Dieen JH. Systematic review of the effects of fatigue on spatiotemporal gait parameters. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2013;26(2):125-31. 68. Otman AS DH, Sade A. Egzersiz Tedavisinde Temel Prensipler ve Yöntemler. Ankara: Sinem Offset Ltd; 1998. 69. Painter J. Occupational Therapy Manual for Evaluation of Range of Motion and Muscle Strength: 589 pp., by Donna Latella and Catherine Meriano, Softcover, ring bound, ISBN 0 7668 3627 4, 2003, Thomson, Delmar Learning, www. thomsonrights. com, $76.95. Taylor & Francis; 2008. 70. Noble JW, Prentice SD. Adaptation to unilateral change in lower limb mechanical properties during human walking. Experimental brain research. 2006;169(4):482-95. 71. Uysal* HH. Ortopedi ve Travmatolojide Ortez Kullanımı. Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Birliği Derneği Dergisi. 2009;8(1-2):43-9. 72. Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013. 73. Geoffrey C, Plous. US. RESEARCH RANDOMIZER 2017 [updated 2017]. şubat 27:[Available from: https://www.randomizer.org/. 74. Hayran M. Sağlık araştırmaları için temel istatistik: Omega Araştırma; 2011. 75. Shafeie M, Manifar S, Milosevic M, McConville KM. Arm movement effect on balance. Conference proceedings : Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference. 2012;2012:4549-52. 76. Mirelman A, Bernad-Elazari H, Nobel T, Thaler A, Peruzzi A, Plotnik M, et al. Effects of Aging on Arm Swing during Gait: The Role of Gait Speed and Dual Tasking. PloS one. 2015;10(8):e0136043. 77. Stephenson JL, Lamontagne A, De Serres SJ. The coordination of upper and lower limb movements during gait in healthy and stroke individuals. Gait & posture. 2009;29(1):11-6. 78. Behrman AL, Teitelbaum P, Cauraugh JH. Verbal instructional sets to normalise the temporal and spatial gait variables in Parkinson's disease. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 1998;65(4):580-2. 79. Romkes J, Peeters W, Oosterom AM, Molenaar S, Bakels I, Brunner R. Evaluating upper body movements during gait in healthy children and children with diplegic cerebral palsy. Journal of pediatric orthopedics Part B. 2007;16(3):175-80. 80. Arellano CJ, Kram R. The effects of step width and arm swing on energetic cost and lateral balance during running. Journal of biomechanics. 2011;44(7):1291-5. 81. Frykberg GE, Johansson GM, Schelin L, Hager CK. The Arm Posture Score for assessing arm swing during gait: an evaluation of adding rotational components and the effect of different gait speeds. Gait & posture. 2014;40(1):64-9. 82. Bruijn SM, Meijer OG, van Dieen JH, Kingma I, Lamoth CJ. Coordination of leg swing, thorax rotations, and pelvis rotations during gait: the organisation of total body angular momentum. Gait & posture. 2008;27(3):455-62. 83. Son K, Park J, Park S. Kinematic Analysis of the Neck and Upper Extremities During Walking in Healthy Young Adults2011. 305–12 p. 84. Agresta C, Ward CR, Wright WG, Tucker CA. The effect of unilateral arm swing motion on lower extremity running mechanics associated with injury risk. Sports biomechanics. 2017:1-10. 85. Pijnappels M, Kingma I, Wezenberg D, Reurink G, van Dieen JH. Armed against falls: the contribution of arm movements to balance recovery after tripping. Experimental brain research. 2010;201(4):689-99. 86. McAndrew Young PM, Dingwell JB. Voluntary changes in step width and step length during human walking affect dynamic margins of stability. Gait & posture. 2012;36(2):219-24. 87. Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Brockmann K, Gilster R, Koch A, Stolze H. Asymmetry of arm-swing not related to handedness. Gait & posture. 2008;27(3):447-54. 88. Hirsch MA, Westhoff B, Toole T, Haupenthal S, Krauspe R, Hefter H. Association between botulinum toxin injection into the arm and changes in gait in adults after stroke. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2005;20(8):1014-20. 89. Esquenazi A, Mayer N, Garreta R. Influence of botulinum toxin type A treatment of elbow flexor spasticity on hemiparetic gait. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2008;87(4):305-10; quiz 11, 29. 90. Long JT, Groner JB, Eastwood DC, Dillingham TR, Grover P, Harris GF. Implications of Arm Restraint on Lower Extremity Kinetics During Gait. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine. 2011;3(5):200-6. 91. Crowe A, Samson MM. 3-D analysis of gait: The effects upon symmetry of carrying a load in one hand. Human movement science. 1997;16(2):357-65. 92. Yang HS, Atkins LT, Jensen DB, James CR. Effects of constrained arm swing on vertical center of mass displacement during walking. Gait & posture. 2015;42(4):430-4. 93. Hodt-Billington C, Helbostad JL, Vervaat W, Rognsvag T, Moe-Nilssen R. Changes in gait symmetry, gait velocity and self-reported function following total hip replacement. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2011;43(9):787-93.tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/4184
dc.description.abstractBahrilli T. The effect of using in different positions of upper extremity splint on temporo-spatial characteristics of gait. Hacettepe University, Institute of Health Sciences, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Program, Master Thesis, Ankara, 2018. This study was planned to investigate the effect of fixation of dominant upper extremity in different positions on gait parameters in healthy subjects. The mean age was 25.94 ± 4.48 years, the mean body mass index was 25.66 ± 4.23 kg/m² with characteristics; 23 of the individuals were male (61%) and 15 were female (39%), a total of 38 healthy individuals participated. All of the individuals were right dominant and in order to fix the upper extremity in individuals, a splint was used that unilaterally supports the shoulder and elbow joints in certain positions. Shoulder joint adduction and 60° internal rotation (P1); shoulder joint adduction and in 30° external rotation (P2); shoulder joint 30° abduction and 60° external rotation (P3), shoulder joint in 90° abduction (P4), and elbow joint in all positions in 90° flexion, the forearm and wrist were fixed in the neutral position. In a total of 5 positions, with four different splint positions and without splint, the individuals walked at their own speeds for at least 5 minutes with randomization of positions and they were evaluated by GAITRite the computerized walkway. After the walking analysis, the questionnaire was applied with the compliance and comfort of splint. Step length, stride length, step width, toe in angle, single leg support time, walking speed and cadence variables were obtained with GAITRite. The walking speed, cadence and step lengths decreased in all positions compared to the without splint position; step width, right single leg support time and toe in angle were increased in all positions compared to the without splint position walking (p<0.05). As a result of comparing the bilateral walking variables of individuals in each of the splint positions, findings of walking asymmetry were obtained especially in P1, P2 and P4. As a result, it was determined that restriction of arm swing by the upper extremity of fixed with a splint at any position affected walking. Our study suggests that restraining arm swing by fixing the upper extremity at any position affects walking and therefore that changes in gait parameters should be considered when establishing a clinical decision-making and rehabilitation program in situations where splinting be performed.tr_TR
dc.description.tableofcontentsONAY SAYFASI iii YAYIMLAMA VE FİKRİ MÜLKİYET HAKLARI BEYANI iv ETİK BEYAN SAYFASI v TEŞEKKÜR vi ÖZET vii ABSTRACT viii İÇİNDEKİLER ix SİMGELER VE KISALTMALAR xi ŞEKİLLER xii TABLOLAR xiii 1. GİRİŞ 1 2. GENEL BİLGİLER 4 2.1. Üst Ekstremite Atelleri ve Özellikleri 4 2.1.1. Atellemenin Amaçları 5 2.1.2. Atel Kullanım Pozisyonları 6 2.2. Kol Salınımının Kısıtlanması 8 2.3. Yürüyüş 9 2.3.1. Yürüyüş Döngüsü 9 2.3.2. Yürüyüş Döngüsüne Ait Fazlar 10 2.3.3. Yürüyüş Fazları Sırasında Kol Salınımı 15 2.3.4. Yürüyüşün Zaman- Mesafe Karakteristikleri 16 2.4. Yürüyüş Analizi 18 2.4.1. Yürüyüş Analizinin Sınırlılıkları 21 2.4.2. Yürüyüşün Devamlılığını Sağlayan Belirleyici Koşullar 22 2.4.3. Yürüyüş Hareketine Katılan Eklem, Kas ve Bağlar 22 2.4.4. Vücut Ağırlık Merkezi 23 2.4.5. Statik Denge 23 2.4.6. Dinamik Denge 24 3. BİREYLER ve YÖNTEM 25 3.1. Bireyler 25 3.2. Yöntem 26 3.2.1. Değerlendirme 28 3.2.2. Çalışma Tipi 34 3.2.3. Atel pozisyonları 34 3.2.4. Değerlendirme Yaparken Dikkat Edilmesi Gerekenler 36 3.3. İstatistiksel Analiz 37 4. BULGULAR 38 4.1.Yürüyüş Değerlendirmesi Bulguları 38 4.2.Atelin Kullanıldığı Pozisyonlarda Yürüyüş Parametrelerinin İkili Karşılaştırılmaları 44 4.3. Yürüyüşün Bilateral Parametrelerinin Her Pozisyonda Karşılaştırılması 45 4.4. Atel Kullanımına Ait Anket Sonuçları 50 5. TARTIŞMA 52 5.1.Yürüyüş Hızı ve Kadans Değişimleri 52 5.2. Adım Uzunluğu ve Çift Adım Uzunluğundaki Değişimler 55 5.3. Adım Genişliği, Tek bacak üzerinde durma Süresi ve Ayak Açısı Değişimleri 56 5.4.Yürüyüş Asimetrisi 58 6. LİMİTASYONLAR 60 7. SONUÇ ve ÖNERİLER 61 8.KAYNAKÇA 63 9.EKLER Ek-1: Değerlendirme Formu Ek-2: New York Postür Değerlendirmesi Ek-3: Aydınlatılmış Onam Formu Ek-4: Tez Etik Kurul Onayıtr_TR
dc.language.isoturtr_TR
dc.publisherSağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectAteltr_TR
dc.subjectYürüyüş Analizitr_TR
dc.subjectKol Salınımıtr_TR
dc.subjectAtel Pozisyonlarıtr_TR
dc.titleÜst Ekstremite Atelinin Farklı Pozisyonlardaki Kullanımının Yürüyüşün Zaman Mesafe Karakteristiklerine Etkisitr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetBahrilli T. Üst ekstremite atelinin farklı pozisyonlardaki kullanımının yürüyüşün zaman mesafe karakteristiklerine etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Fizik tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Programı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara, 2018. Bu çalışma, sağlıklı bireylerde dominant üst ekstremitenin farklı pozisyonlarda sabitlenmesinin yürüyüş parametreleri üzerine etkilerini araştırmak amacıyla planlandı. Çalışmaya yaş ortalaması 25,94±4,48 yıl, vücut kütle indeksi ortalaması 25,66±4,23 kg/m² olan, 23’ü erkek (% 61), 15’i kadın (%39) toplam 38 sağlıklı birey katıldı. Bireylerin tamamı sağ dominant olup sağ üst ekstremitenin 4 farklı pozisyonda sabitlenmesine olanak sağlayan bir atel kullanıldı. Pozisyonlar; omuz eklemi addüksiyon ve 60° iç rotasyonda (P1), omuz eklemi addüksiyon ve 30° dış rotasyonda (P2), omuz eklemi 30° abdüksiyon ve 60° dış rotasyonda (P3) ve omuz eklemi 90° abdüksiyonda (P4) ve tüm pozisyonlarda dirsek eklemi 90° fleksiyonda, önkol ve el bileği nötralde olacak şekilde sabitlendi. Dört farklı atel pozisyonunda ve atelsiz olmak üzere toplam 5 pozisyonda, pozisyonların randomizasyonu ile bireyler 5 dk kendi hızlarında yürüdüler ve sonra GAITRite bilgisayarlı yürüyüş yolu ile değerlendirildiler. Bireylere yürüyüş analizi sonrası atelin uyumu ve rahatlığı ile anket uygulaması yapıldı. GAITRite ile adım uzunluğu, çift adım uzunluğu, adım genişliği, ayak açısı, tek bacak üzerinde durma süresi, yürüyüş hızı ve kadans değişkenleri elde edildi. Değerlendirme sonuçları karşılaştırıldığında atelsiz yürüyüşe göre tüm atel pozisyonlarında yürüyüş hızı, kadans ve adım uzunluklarının azaldığı; adım genişliği, tek bacak üzerinde durma süresi ve ayak açısının arttığı belirlendi (p<0,05). Pozisyonların her birinde bireylerin bilateral yürüyüş değişkenlerinin karşılaştırılması sonucunda, özellikle P1, P2 ve P4’te yürüyüş asimetrisine ait bulgular elde edildi. Çalışmamız, üst ekstremitenin herhangi bir pozisyonda sabitlenmesi ile kol salınımının kısıtlanmasının yürüyüşü etkilediğini ve bu nedenle atel uygulanması gereken durumlarda klinik karar verme ve rehabilitasyon programının oluşturulmasında yürüyüş parametrelerindeki değişimlerin dikkate alınması gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentFizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyontr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID10177322tr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID10177322tr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster