Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHayani, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorFilali Baba, Yassir
dc.contributor.authorHökelek, Tuncer
dc.contributor.authorOuazzani Chahdi, Fouad
dc.contributor.authorMague, Joel T.
dc.contributor.authorSebbar, Nada Kheira
dc.contributor.authorKandri Rodi, Youssef
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T09:15:00Z
dc.date.available2021-06-03T09:15:00Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2056-9890
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019012283
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6775731/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/24438
dc.description.abstractThe title compound consists of a 1,2-di­hydro­quinoline-4-carboxyl­ate unit with 2-chloro­ethyl and propynyl substituents, where the quinoline moiety is almost planar and the propynyl substituent is nearly perpendicular to its mean plane. In the crystal, the mol­ecules form zigzag stacks along the a-axis direction through slightly offset π-stacking inter­actions between inversion-related quinoline moieties, which are tied together by inter­molecular C—HPrpn­yl⋯OCarbx and C—HChlethy⋯OCarbx (Prpnyl = propynyl, Carbx = carboxyl­ate and Chlethy = chloro­eth­yl) hydrogen bonds., The title compound, C15H12ClNO3, consists of a 1,2-di­hydro­quinoline-4-carb­oxyl­ate unit with 2-chloro­ethyl and propynyl substituents, where the quinoline moiety is almost planar and the propynyl substituent is nearly perpendicular to its mean plane. In the crystal, the mol­ecules form zigzag stacks along the a-axis direction through slightly offset π-stacking inter­actions between inversion-related quinoline moieties which are tied together by inter­molecular C—HPrpn­yl⋯OCarbx and C—HChlethy⋯OCarbx (Prpnyl = propynyl, Carbx = carboxyl­ate and Chlethy = chloro­eth­yl) hydrogen bonds. The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H⋯H (29.9%), H⋯O/O⋯H (21.4%), H⋯C/C⋯ H (19.4%), H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H (16.3%) and C⋯C (8.6%) inter­actions. Hydrogen bonding and van der Waals inter­actions are the dominant inter­actions in the crystal packing. Computational chemistry indicates that in the crystal, the C—HPrpn­yl⋯OCarbx and C—HChlethy⋯OCarbx hydrogen bond energies are 67.1 and 61.7 kJ mol−1, respectively. Density functional theory (DFT) optimized structures at the B3LYP/ 6–311 G(d,p) level are compared with the experimentally determined mol­ecular structure in the solid state. The HOMO–LUMO behaviour was elucidated to determine the energy gap.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionof10.1107/S2056989019012283
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United States
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleCrystal Structure, Hirshfeld Surface Analysis And Inter­Action Energy And Dft Studies Of 2-Chloro­Ethyl 2-Oxo-1-(Prop-2-Yn-1-Yl)-1,2-Di­Hydro­Quinoline-4-Carboxyl­Ate
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalActa Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
dc.contributor.departmentFizik Mühendisliği
dc.identifier.volume75
dc.identifier.issuePt 10
dc.description.indexPubMed
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 United States