Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaşkıran, Aslıhan
dc.contributor.authorYemişçi Özkan, Müge
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorErdener, Sefik Evren
dc.contributor.authorKarataş, Hülya
dc.contributor.authorYüce, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorDalkara, Turgay
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-04T13:34:42Z
dc.date.available2020-02-04T13:34:42Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0039-2499
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020711
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/22014
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose-Reperfusion is the most significant determinant of good outcome after ischemic stroke. However, complete reperfusion often cannot be achieved, despite satisfactory recanalization. We hypothesized that microvascular protection was essential for achieving effective reperfusion and, hence, neuroprotection. To test this hypothesis, we have developed an in vivo model to differentially monitor parenchymal and vascular reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation. By comparing the ROS-suppressing effect of N-tert-butyl-alpha-phenylnitrone (PBN) with its blood-brain barrier impermeable analog 2-sulfo-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (S-PBN), we assessed the impact of vascular ROS suppression alone on reperfusion and stroke outcome after recanalization. Methods-The distal middle cerebral artery was occluded for 1 hour by compressing with a micropipette and then recanalized (n= 60 Swiss mice). ROS formation was monitored for 1 hour after recanalization by intravital fluorescence microscopy in pial vasculature and cortical parenchyma with topically applied hydroethidine through a cranial window. PBN (100 mg/kg) or S-PBN (156 mg/kg) was administered shortly before recanalization, and suppression of the vascular and parenchymal hydroethidine fluorescence was examined (n= 22). Microcirculatory patency, reperfusion, ischemic tissue size, and neurological outcome were also assessed in a separate group of mice 1 to 72 hours after recanalization (n= 30). Results-PBN and S-PBN completely suppressed the reperfusion-induced increase in ROS signal within vasculature. PBN readily suppressed ROS produced in parenchyma by 88%. S-PBN also suppressed the parenchymal ROS by 64% but starting 40 minutes later. Intriguingly, PBN and S-PBN comparably reduced the size of ischemic area by 65% and 48% (P> 0.05), respectively. S-PBN restored the microvascular patency and perfusion after recanalization, suggesting that its delayed parenchymal antioxidant effect could be secondary to improved microcirculatory reperfusion. Conclusions-Promoting microvascular reperfusion by protecting vasculature can secondarily reduce parenchymal ROS formation and provide neuroprotection. The model presented can be used to directly assess pharmacological end points postulated in brain parenchyma and vasculature in vivo. Visual Overview-An online visual overview is available for this article.tr_TR
dc.language.isoentr_TR
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinstr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020711tr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectNeurosciences & neurologytr_TR
dc.subjectCardiovascular system & cardiologytr_TR
dc.subject.lcshNörolojitr_TR
dc.titleImproving Microcirculatory Reperfusion Reduces Parenchymal Oxygen Radical Formation And Provides Neuroprotectiontr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalStroketr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentNörolojik ve Psikiyatrik Temel Bilimlertr_TR
dc.identifier.volume49tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue5tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage1267tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage1275tr_TR
dc.description.indexWoStr_TR
dc.description.indexScopustr_TR
dc.fundingYoktr_TR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record