Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTutar, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorAltınöz, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorÇakıroğlu, Demet
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-30T12:41:59Z
dc.date.available2020-01-30T12:41:59Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1877-0428
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.072
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/21967
dc.description.abstractSeeking an answer for the questions such as when determining strategy, are the business managers only acting from the concern of being long dated, returning profit over the average and determining a position as regards the competitors in any cases or do they have any responsibility concerns like social responsibility or ethical responsibility? Since the primary objective of the business is to return profit and to continue its existence, then are the managers acting only with economic concerns and profit motive or do the variables like social sensitivity, voluntary sensitivity that have an impact upon its decisions have any effect for the realization of the aforesaid objectives of the managers? Are the sensitivity factors like social responsibility, social sensitivity, ethical and voluntary responsibility of the business managers necessary in terms of the continuation of the business' existence and considering as being possessed and highly regarded within the framework of the activities? Constitute the primary objective of this research. Another objective of the research is to draw attention for the requirement of acting as well within the scope of the ethical responsibility upon the strategic decisions under the market conditions where the businesses are tightly controlled by the internal and external environment. Free market conditions necessitate the consideration of the ethical responsibility and competitive strategy together. This is especially the requirement of the reputation management that has a place on the business management in the recent period. In keeping the assets of the businesses reputation insomuch as the profit is considered as a significant factor. According to the analysis results of those assumptions it is ascertained that there is a difference between ethical responsibility perceptions and competitive strategy perceptions of the managers. Furthermore, with regard to the results of the correlation analysis carried out, it is determined that there is a medium-level relation between the competitive strategy perceptions and ethical responsibility perceptions of the managers. (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility 7th International Strategic Management Conferencetr_TR
dc.language.isoentr_TR
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bvtr_TR
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.072tr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectLeadershiptr_TR
dc.subjectEthical strategytr_TR
dc.subjectStrategic leadershiptr_TR
dc.subjectEthical climatetr_TR
dc.subjectWork ethictr_TR
dc.subject.lcshSosyal bilimlertr_TR
dc.titlePerception of Managers As to the Ethical Responsibility and Competition Strategy: A Surveytr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecttr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalProceedings Of 7Th International Strategic Management Conferencetr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentBüro Yönetimi ve Yönetici Asistanlığıtr_TR
dc.identifier.volume24tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage1427tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage1435tr_TR
dc.description.indexWoStr_TR
dc.description.indexScopustr_TR
dc.fundingYoktr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster