Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGörduysus, Melahat
dc.contributor.authorKüçükkaya, Selen
dc.contributor.authorBayramgil, Nursel Pekel
dc.contributor.authorGörduysus, Mehmet Ömer
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-16T06:34:46Z
dc.date.available2019-12-16T06:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn2234-7658
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.3.216
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4534726/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/19067
dc.description.abstractObjectives To evaluate the effects of copolymer of acrylic acid and maleic acid (Poly[AA-co-MA]) and calcium hypochlorite (Ca(OCl)2) on root canal dentin using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Materials and Methods Twenty-four single-rooted teeth were instrumented and the apical and coronal thirds of each root were removed, leaving the 5 mm middle thirds, which were then separated into two pieces longitudinally. The specimens were randomly divided into six groups and subjected to each irrigant for 5 min as follows: G1, Ca(OCl)2; G2, Poly(AA-co-MA); G3, Ca(OCl)2 + Poly(AA-co-MA); G4, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); G5, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); G6, NaOCl+EDTA. The specimens were prepared for SEM evaluation. Smear layer, debris and erosion scores were recorded by two blinded examiners. One image from G3 was analyzed with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) on suspicion of precipitate formation. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests. Results G1 and G4 showed the presence of debris and smear layer and they were statistically different from G2, G3, G5 and G6 where debris and smear layer were totally removed (p < 0.05). In G1 and G4, erosion evaluation could not be done because of debris and smear layer. G2, G3 and G5 showed no erosion, and there was no significant difference between them. G6 showed severe erosion and was statistically different from G2, G3 and G5 (p < 0.05). EDS microanalysis showed the presence of Na, P, and Ca elements on the surface. Conclusions Poly(AA-co-MA) is effective in removing the smear layer and debris without causing erosion either alone or with Ca(OCl)2.
dc.relation.isversionof10.5395/rde.2015.40.3.216
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleEvaluation Of The Effects Of Two Novel Irrigants On Intraradicular Dentine Erosion, Debris And Smear Layer Removal
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.relation.journalRestorative Dentistry & Endodontics
dc.contributor.departmentEndodonti
dc.identifier.volume40
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage216
dc.identifier.endpage222
dc.description.indexPubMed


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record