Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTopcu Ali, Orkun
dc.contributor.authorAkalin, Ferda Alev
dc.contributor.authorSahbazoglu, Kemal Burak
dc.contributor.authorYamalik, Nermin
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Kamer
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorTözüm, Tolga Fikret
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-13T07:50:17Z
dc.date.available2019-12-13T07:50:17Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn2029-283X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2014.5205
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4115597/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/18836
dc.description.abstractObjectives Nitrosative stress plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. The aim of this study is to analyze the gingival crevicular fluid and saliva nitrite and nitrate levels in periodontally healthy and diseased sites. Material and Methods A total of 60 individuals including, 20 chronic periodontitis and 20 gingivitis patients and 20 periodontally healthy controls participated in the present study. Probing depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, gingival index and plaque index were assessed, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and saliva samples were obtained from the subjects, including 480 GCF samples and 60 unstimulated whole saliva samples. Nitrite and nitrate were analyzed by Griess reagent. Results Total GCF nitrite levels were higher in gingivitis and periodontitis groups (1.07 [SD 0.62] nmol and 1.08 [SD 0.59] nmol) than the control group (0.83 [SD 0.31] nmol) (P < 0.05) but did not differ significantly between gingivitis and periodontitis groups (P > 0.05). The difference in GCF nitrate level was not significant among the control, gingivitis and periodontitis groups (7.7 [SD 2.71] nmol, 7.51 [SD 4.16] nmol and 7.38 [SD 1.91] nmol). Saliva nitrite and nitrate levels did not differ significantly among three study groups. Saliva nitrate/nitrite ratios were higher in periodontitis and gingivitis groups than the control group. A gradual decrease in nitrate/nitrite ratio in GCF was detected with the presence of inflammation. Conclusions It may be suggested that nitrite in gingival crevicular fluid is a better periodontal disease marker than nitrate and may be used as an early detection marker of periodontal inflammation, and that local nitrosative stress markers don’t show significant difference between the initial and advanced stages of periodontal disease.
dc.relation.isversionof10.5037/jomr.2014.5205
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleNitrite And Nitrate Levels Of Gingival Crevicular Fluid And Saliva In Subjects With Gingivitis And Chronic Periodontitis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.relation.journalJournal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research
dc.contributor.departmentGıda Mühendisliği
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.description.indexPubMed


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record