Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authordeSouza, Nandita M.
dc.contributor.authorAchten, Eric
dc.contributor.authorAlberich-Bayarri, Angel
dc.contributor.authorBamberg, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorBoellaard, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorClement, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorFournier, Laure
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, Ferdia
dc.contributor.authorGolay, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorHeussel, Claus Peter
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Edward F.
dc.contributor.authorManniesing, Rashindra
dc.contributor.authorMayerhofer, Marius E.
dc.contributor.authorNeri, Emanuele
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, James
dc.contributor.authorOguz, Kader Karli
dc.contributor.authorPersson, Anders
dc.contributor.authorSmits, Marion
dc.contributor.authorvan Beek, Edwin J. R.
dc.contributor.authorZech, Christoph J.
dc.contributor.authorRadiology, European Soc
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T05:51:21Z
dc.date.available2021-06-03T05:51:21Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1869-4101
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0764-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/24145
dc.description.abstractObserver-driven pattern recognition is the standard for interpretation of medical images. To achieve global parity in interpretation, semi-quantitative scoring systems have been developed based on observer assessments; these are widely used in scoring coronary artery disease, the arthritides and neurological conditions and for indicating the likelihood of malignancy. However, in an era of machine learning and artificial intelligence, it is increasingly desirable that we extract quantitative biomarkers from medical images that inform on disease detection, characterisation, monitoring and assessment of response to treatment. Quantitation has the potential to provide objective decision-support tools in the management pathway of patients. Despite this, the quantitative potential of imaging remains under-exploited because of variability of the measurement, lack of harmonised systems for data acquisition and analysis, and crucially, a paucity of evidence on how such quantitation potentially affects clinical decision-making and patient outcome. This article reviews the current evidence for the use of semi-quantitative and quantitative biomarkers in clinical settings at various stages of the disease pathway including diagnosis, staging and prognosis, as well as predicting and detecting treatment response. It critically appraises current practice and sets out recommendations for using imaging objectively to drive patient management decisions.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/s13244-019-0764-0
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United States
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectClinical decision making
dc.subjectImaging biomarkers
dc.subjectQuantitation
dc.subjectStandardisation
dc.titleValidated Imaging Biomarkers As Decision-Making Tools In Clinical Trials And Routine Practice: Current Status And Recommendations From The Eiball* Subcommittee Of The European Society Of Radiology (Esr)
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalInsights Into Imaging
dc.contributor.departmentRadyoloji
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

Attribution 4.0 United States
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: Attribution 4.0 United States