Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDadaci, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorInce, Bilsev
dc.contributor.authorAltuntas, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorBitik, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorKamburoglu, Haldun Onuralp
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Hakan
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-12T06:49:12Z
dc.date.available2019-12-12T06:49:12Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0019-5413
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.185602
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964771/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/17125
dc.description.abstractBackground: The fingertip is the most frequently injured and amputated segment of the hand. There are controversies about defining clear indications for microsurgical replantation. Many classification systems have been proposed to solve this problem. No previous study has simultaneously correlated different classification systems with replant survival rate. The aim of the study is to compare the outcomes of fingertip replantations according to Tamai and Yamano classifications. Materials and Methods: 34 consecutive patients who underwent fingertip replantation between 2007 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed with respect to the Tamai and Yamano classifications. The medical charts from record room were reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 36.2 years. There were 30 men and 4 women. All the injuries were complete amputations. Of the 34 fingertip amputations, 19 were in Tamai zone 2 and 15 were in Tamai zone 1. When all the amputations were grouped in reference to the Yamano classification, 6 were type 1 guillotine, 8 were type 2 crush and 20 were type 3 crush avulsions. Results: Of the 34 fingertips, 26 (76.4%) survived. Ten (66.6%) of 15 digits replanted in Tamai zone 1 and 16 (84.2%) of 19 digits replanted in Tamai zone 2 survived. There were no replantation failures in Yamano type 1 injuries (100%) and only two failed in Yamano type 2 (75%). Replantation was successful in 14 of 20 Yamano type 3 injuries, but six failed (70%). The percentage of success rates was the least in the hybridized groups of Tamai zone 1-Yamano type 2 and Tamai zone 1-Yamano type 3. Although clinically distinct, the survival rates between the groups were not statistically significantly different. Conclusions: The level and mechanism of injury play a decisive role in the success of fingertip replantation. Success rate increases in proximal fingertip amputations without crush injury.
dc.relation.isversionof10.4103/0019-5413.185602
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleAssessment Of Survival Rates Compared According To The Tamai And Yamano Classifications In Fingertip Replantations
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.relation.journalIndian Journal of Orthopaedics
dc.contributor.departmentPlastik, Rekonstrüktif ve Estetik Cerrahi
dc.identifier.volume50
dc.identifier.issue4-Jan
dc.identifier.startpage384
dc.identifier.endpage389
dc.description.indexPubMed
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record