Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHernández-Ramírez, Laura C.
dc.contributor.authorGabrovska, Plamena
dc.contributor.authorDénes, Judit
dc.contributor.authorStals, Karen
dc.contributor.authorTrivellin, Giampaolo
dc.contributor.authorTilley, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorFerraù, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorEvanson, Jane
dc.contributor.authorEllard, Sian
dc.contributor.authorGrossman, Ashley B.
dc.contributor.authorRoncaroli, Federico
dc.contributor.authorGadelha, Mônica R.
dc.contributor.authorKorbonits, Márta
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-10T11:14:35Z
dc.date.available2019-12-10T11:14:35Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0021-972X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-1869
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4570169/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/15158
dc.description.abstractContext: Familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) due to aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene mutations is an autosomal dominant disease with incomplete penetrance. Clinical screening of apparently unaffected AIP mutation (AIPmut) carriers could identify previously unrecognized disease. Objective: To determine the AIP mutational status of FIPA and young pituitary adenoma patients, analyzing their clinical characteristics, and to perform clinical screening of apparently unaffected AIPmut carrier family members. Design: This was an observational, longitudinal study conducted over 7 years. Setting: International collaborative study conducted at referral centers for pituitary diseases. Participants: FIPA families (n = 216) and sporadic young-onset (≤30 y) pituitary adenoma patients (n = 404) participated in the study. Interventions: We performed genetic screening of patients for AIPmuts, clinical assessment of their family members, and genetic screening for somatic GNAS1 mutations and the germline FGFR4 p.G388R variant. Main Outcome Measure(s): We assessed clinical disease in mutation carriers, comparison of characteristics of AIPmut positive and negative patients, results of GNAS1, and FGFR4 analysis. Results: Thirty-seven FIPA families and 34 sporadic patients had AIPmuts. Patients with truncating AIPmuts had a younger age at disease onset and diagnosis, compared with patients with nontruncating AIPmuts. Somatic GNAS1 mutations were absent in tumors from AIPmut-positive patients, and the studied FGFR4 variant did not modify the disease behavior or penetrance in AIPmut-positive individuals. A total of 164 AIPmut-positive unaffected family members were identified; pituitary disease was detected in 18 of those who underwent clinical screening. Conclusions: A quarter of the AIPmut carriers screened were diagnosed with pituitary disease, justifying this screening and suggesting a variable clinical course for AIPmut-positive pituitary adenomas.
dc.relation.isversionof10.1210/jc.2015-1869
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleLandscape Of Familial Isolated And Young-Onset Pituitary Adenomas: Prospective Diagnosis In Aip Mutation Carriers
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
dc.contributor.departmentİç hastalıkları
dc.identifier.volume100
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.startpageE1242
dc.identifier.endpageE1254
dc.description.indexPubMed


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record