Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.advisorİmer, Itır
dc.contributor.authorYankey, Ignatius Kobbina
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-04T08:47:03Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-30
dc.date.submitted2019-01-14
dc.identifier.citationBOOKS: Buah, F. K. (1998). A history of Ghana: Macmillan. Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Nardin, T., Paterson, M., . . . True, J. (2013). Theories of international relations: Palgrave Macmillan. Cristol, J. (2011). Liberalism: Oxford University Press. Dinar, S. (2007). International water treaties: Negotiation and cooperation along transboundary rivers: Routledge. Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (2013). International relations theories: Oxford University Press. Elhance, A. P. (1999). Hydropolitics in the Third World: Conflict and cooperation in international river basins: US Institute of Peace Press. Elhance, A. P. (2000). Hydropolitics: Grounds for despair, reasons for hope. International Negotiation, 5(2), 201-222. Falkenmark, M., Berntell, A., Jägerskog, A., Lundqvist, J., Matz, M., & Tropp, H. (2007). On the verge of a new water scarcity: a call for good governance and human ingenuity: Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI). Griffiths, M. (2007). International relations theory for the twenty-first century: an introduction: Routledge. Homer-Dixon, T., & Blitt, J. (1998). Ecoviolence: links among environment, population, and security: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Jackson, R., & Sørensen, G. (2013). Introduction to International Relations: theories and approaches (Fifth ed.): Oxford university press. Keohane, R. O. (2005). After hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy: Princeton University Press. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: Boston. Korab-Karpowicz, W. J. (2010). Political Realism in International Relations. [Wed May 24, 2017]. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Hobbes, T. (2006). Leviathan: A&C Black. Mirumachi, N. (2015). Transboundary Water Politics in the Developing World: Routledge. Mul, M., Obuobie, E., Appoh, R., Kankam-Yeboah, K., Bekoe-Obeng, E., Amisigo, B., . . . McCartney, M. (2015). Water resources assessment of the Volta River Basin (Vol. 166): International Water Management Institute (IWMI). Moravcsik, A. (1995). Liberal intergovernmentalism and integration: a rejoinder. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 33(4), 611-628. Petrella, R. (2001). The water manifesto: arguments for a world water contract: Zed Books. Rojas, G. A., & Iza, A. O. (2011). Governance of shared waters: Legal and institutional issues: IUCN, in collaboration with the IUCN Environmental Law Centre, Bonn, Germany. Stein, A. A. (2008). Neoliberal institutionalism. The Oxford handbook of International Relations, 201-221. Stein, A. A. (1990). Why nations cooperate: Circumstance and choice in International Relations: Cornell University Press. Sandole, D. J., & Van der Merwe, H. (1993). Conflict resolution theory and practice: Integration and application: Manchester University Press. Tesfaye, A. (2008). The Political Economy of the Nile Basin Regime in the Twentieth Century: Edwin Mellen Press. Turton, A., & Henwood, R. (2002). Hydropolitics in the Developing World: A Southern African perspective: IWMI. Viotti, P. R., & Kauppi, M. V. (2010). International Relations Theory (Fourth ed.): Longman Boston. Viotti, P. R., Kauppi, M. V., & Brooks, S. G. (2012). International relations theory: Longman Boston Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Relations. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 635-650. Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: identifying basins at risk. Water policy, 5(1), 29-60. Wolf, A. T. (1995). Hydropolitics along the Jordan River: Scarce water and its impact on the Arab-Israeli conflict (Vol. 99): United Nations University Press. Wolf, A. T. (2007). Shared waters: Conflict and cooperation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 32, 241-269. Zaelke, D. (2005). Making Law Work: Environmental Compliance and Sustainable Development 2 Vol. set. JOURNALS: Ashton, P. J. (2002). Avoiding conflicts over Africa's water resources. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 31(3), 236-242. Authority, V. R. (2006). Akosombo Hydro Power Plant. https://web.archive.org/web/20070808212849/http://www.vra.com:80/Power/akohy dro.html. Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World politics, 38(1), 226-254. Brown, A., & Matlock, M. D. (2011). A review of water scarcity indices and methodologies. White paper, 106, 19. Cooley, J. K. (1984). The war over water. Foreign policy(54), 3-26. Daddow, O. (2017). International Relations Theory: Sage. Dinar, S. (2002). Water, Security, Conflict, and Cooperation. SAIS Review, 22(2), 229- 253. Ferguson, Y. H., & Mansbach, R. W. (1988). The elusive quest: Theory and international politics: Univ of South Carolina Pr. Gleick, P. H. (1993). Water and Conflict - Fresh-Water Resources and International Security. International security, 18(1), 79-112. doi:Doi 10.2307/2539033 Godana, B. A. (1985). Africa's shared water resources. Legal and institutional aspects of the Nile, Niger and Senegal River systems: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc. Green, O. O., Cosens, B. A., & Garmestani, A. S. (2013). Resilience in transboundary water governance: the Okavango River Basin. Ecology and society, 18(2). Hensel, P. R., Mitchell, S. M., & Sowers, T. E. (2006). Conflict management of riparian disputes. Political Geography, 25(4), 383-411. Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International organization, 36(2), 185-205. Kibaroglu, A., & Maden, T. E. (2014). An analysis of the causes of water crisis in the Euphrates-Tigris river basin. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4(4), 347-353. Levy, M. A. (1995). Is the environment a national security issue? International security, 20(2), 35-62. Martin, A., Rutagarama, E., Cascão, A., Gray, M., & Chhotray, V. (2011). Understanding the co-existence of conflict and cooperation: Transboundary ecosystem management in the Virunga Massif. Journal of Peace Research, 48(5), 621-635. Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The false promise of international institutions. International security, 19(3), 5-49. Meissner, R. (2017). Paradigms and Theories Influencing Policies in the South African and International Water Sectors: PULSE³, A Framework for Policy Analysis: Springer. Mollinga, P. P. (2008). Water policy–water politics: Social engineering and strategic action in water sector reform. In Water politics and development cooperation (pp. 1-29): Springer. Opoku-Ankomah, Y., Dembélé, Y., Ampomah, B. Y., & Somé, L. (2006). Hydro-political assessment of water governance from the top-down and review of literature on local level institutions and practices in the Volta Basin (Vol. 111): IWMI. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C., Norgaard, R., & Policansky, D. (1999). Sustainability : Revisiting the commons: Local lessons ; global challenges (Vol. 284). Owusu, K., Waylen, P., & Qiu, Y. (2008). Changing rainfall inputs in the Volta Basin: implications for water sharing in Ghana. GeoJournal, 71(4), 201-210. Rahaman, M. M. (2009). Principles of transboundary water resources management and Ganges treaties: an analysis. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 25(1), 159-173. Robertson, K. C., & Eng, P. (2004). Design considerations for an international facility to promote cooperation between states sharing a common water resource: a feasibility study on the international water cooperation facility initiative. Rogers, P., & Hall, A. (2003). Effective water governance. Global water partnership technical committee (TEC) background paper 7. Global Water Partnership, Stockholm. In. Sadoff, C. W., & Grey, D. (2002). Beyond the river: the benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water policy, 4(5), 389-403. Salman, S. M. (2007). The Helsinki Rules, the UN Watercourses Convention and the Berlin Rules: perspectives on international water law. Water Resources Development, 23(4), 625-640. Sivakumar, B. (2011). Water crisis: from conflict to cooperation—an overview. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(4), 531-552. Uitto, J. I., & Duda, A. M. (2002). Management of transboundary water resources: lessons from international cooperation for conflict prevention. The Geographical Journal, 168(4), 365-378. Van Edig, A., Engel, S., & Laube, W. (2003). Ghana’s water institutions in the process of reform: from the international to the local level. Taken from Reforming Institutions for Sustainable Water Management, Neubert et al, ed. German Development Institute: Bonn, Germany. van de Giesen, N., Andreini, M., van Edig, A., & Vlek, P. (2001). Competition for water resources of the Volta Basin. IAHS Publication, 199-206. Varis, O., Tortajada, C., & Biswas, A. K. (2008). Management of transboundary rivers and lakes: Springer. Waltz, K. N. (1988). The origins of war in neorealist theory. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 615-628. Wester, P., Rap, E., & Vargas-Velázquez, S. (2009). The hydraulic mission and the Mexican hydrocracy: Regulating and reforming the flows of water and power. Water Alternatives, 2(3), 395-415. Wilner, A. S. (2009). Freshwater Scarcity and Hydropolitical Conflict: Between the Science of Freshwater and the Politics of Conflict. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 8(1). Wolf, A. T. (1998). Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water policy, 1(2), 251-265. Wolf, A. T. (2004). Regional water cooperation as confidence building: water management as a strategy for peace: Adelphi Research Berlin. Wolf, A. T., Kramer, A., Carius, A., & Dabelko, G. D. (2005). Managing water conflict and cooperation. State of the World 2005: redefining global security, 80-95. Yohannes, O. (2009). Hydro-politics in the Nile Basin: in search of theory beyond realism and neo-liberalism. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 3(1), 74-93. doi:10.1080/17531050802682788 Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 297-316. REPORTS: ADBG. (2018a). Burkina Faso Economic Outlook. Retrieved from Retrieved on 02/10/2018, from https://www.afdb.org/en/countries/west-africa/burkinafaso/burkina-faso-economic-outlook/ ADBG. (2018b). Ghana Economic Outlook. Retrieved from Accessed on 09/02/2018, from https://www.afdb.org/en/countries/west-africa/ghana/ Ampomah, B. Y., Adjei, B. A., & Youkhana, E. (2008). The transboundary water resources management regime of the Volta Basin. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/88367/1/579201295.pdf: Andreini, M., Giesen, N., Edig, A., Fosu, M., & Andah, W. (2000). Volta basin water balance. Retrieved from Zentrum für Entwicklungsforschung (ZEF) Center for Development Research: Barnett, J. (2000). Destabilizing the environment—conflict thesis. Review of International Studies, 26(2), 271-288. Barry, B., Obuobie, E., Andreini, M., Andah, W., & Pluquet, M. (2005). The Volta River Basin. Comparative study of river basin development and management. Rapport, IWMI, CAWMA. Béné, C. (2007). Diagnostic study of the Volta Basin fisheries: Part 1 overview of the fisheries resources. Boateng, E. A. (1966). A geography of Ghana: Cambridge UP. Braimah, L. (2003). Fisheries management plan for the Volta Lake. Report for the Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Directorate of Fisheries, Accra, Ghana. Goes, B. (2005). Pre-water audit for the Volta River Basin, West Africa. Ouagadougou, PAGEV Project and IUCN-BRAO. IIASA. (2013). Assessing the future of water. Retrieved from http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/resources/mediacenter/FeatureArticles/WaterMeeting-Report.en.html Jägerskog, A., & Zeitoun, M. (2009). Getting Transboundary Water Right: Theory and Practice for Effective Cooperation. Report Nr. 25. SIWI, Stockholm. Retrieved from Lautze, J., Barry, B., & Youkhana, E. (2006). Changing interfaces in Volta Basin water management: Customary, national and transboundary (No. 16). ZEF Working Paper Series. Ministry of Works and Housing. (1998). Ghana’s Water Resources, Management Challenges and Opportunities. Ministry of Works and Housing (Accra). Ministry of Water Resources, Works and Housing. (2007). Ghana National Water Policy. Ministry of Water Resources, Works and Housing, 1-79. Pavelic, P., Giordano, M., Keraita, B., Ramesh, V., & Rao, T. (2012). Groundwater availability and use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of 15 countries: International Water Management Institute (IWMI). Petit, O., & Baron, C. (2009). Integrated Water Resources Management: From general principles to its implementation by the state. The case of Burkina Faso. Paper presented at the Natural Resources Forum. Project, U.-G. V. (2013). Volta Basin Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis.UNEP/GEF/Volta/RR 4/2013. UN-SDG. (2015). Goal 6: Ensure access to water and sanitation for all. UN Sustainable Development Goals. SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES: Garane, A., Biney, C., & Belemlilga, E. (2017). The 1997 United Nations Convention on the Law of Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses: what contribution89 to the development of the Water Charter for the Volta Basin? Water International, 42(4), 360-371. doi:10.1080/02508060.2017.1315560 Hermann, S., Welsch, M., Segerstrom, R. E., Howells, M. I., Young, C., Alfstad, T., . . . Steduto, P. (2012). Climate, land, energy and water (CLEW) interlinkages in Burkina Faso: An analysis of agricultural intensification and bioenergy production. Paper presented at the Natural Resources Forum. Imer, C. S. (2009). Sınıraşan Sularımız ve Türk Dış Politikasına Etkileri Sosyal Bilimler ve Toplum Sorunları Sempozyumu. Paper presented at the 21 Yüzyılda Türkiye de Sosyal Bilimler, Yalova. Mirumachi, N., & Allan, J. A. (2007). Revisiting transboundary water governance: Power, conflict cooperation and the political economy. Paper presented at the Proceedings from CAIWA international conference on adaptive and integrated water management: Coping with scarcity. Basel, Switzerland. THESIS STUDIES: Amjad, U. Q. (1999). Water, Conflict, & Cooperation: Ramallah, West Bank. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech. Jacobs, I. (2006). The water war debate: swimming upstream or downstream in the Okavango and the Nile? , Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch. Jacobs, I. M. (2010). Norms and transboundary co-operation in Africa: the cases of the Orange-Senqu and Nile Rivers. University of St Andrews, Zain, M. (2007). Environmental Scarcity, Hydropolitics and the Nile. INTERNET SOURCES: Africa Water Facility. (2010). Case Study: AWF Support to the Creation of the Volta Basin Authority Project. Retrieved on 19/02/2018 from https://www.africanwaterfacility.org/en/newsresources/publications/publication/african-water-facility-support-for-the-creation-ofthe-volta-basin-authority-250/ Arbour, R., Thomson, R., & Zaky, A. (2018). Transboundary Water Management: Add Climate Change and Stir. Batchelor, C. (2007). Water governance literature assessment. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). http://www. iied. org/pubs/pdfs G, 2523. Bekoe, E. O., & Logah, F. Y. (2016). The impact of droughts and climate change on electricity generation in Ghana. Meteorology and Energy Security: Simulations, Projections, and Management, 163. Du Plessis, A. (2000). Charting the course of the water discourse through the fog of International Relations Theory. Africa Dialogue(2), 9-34 Gao, Y., & Margolies, A. (2009). Transboundary water governance in the Volta River Basin. In. Godfrey, M. M. (2012). Water Security and Management in Burkina Faso: How SocioPolitical and Cultural Complexities Affect Development. Hopp, J. F. (2011). Conflict, cooperation, and viability interstate water resources and domestic water use in the Middle East. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, Howe, L. (2010). Hydropolitics of the Nile river: conflict, policy, and the future. The US Mission in Afghanistan: Counterinsurgency and Provincial Reconstruction Teams, 30. Jacob D. Petersen-Perlman, Stefano, L. D., Sproles, E., & Wolf, A. T. (2017). Hydropolitics: Transboundary River Basins and Political Tensions. Sustainable Security, Oxford Research Group. Retrieved from https://sustainablesecurity.org/2017/07/13/hydropolitics-transboundary-riverbasins-and-political-tensions/ Jägerskog, A. (2003). Why states cooperate over shared water: The water negotiations in the Jordan River Basin. Linköping University Electronic Press, Jansky, L., Nakayama, M., & Pachova, N. I. (2007). Introduction: From domestic to international water security. International water security: Domestic threats and opportunities, 1-7. Keohane, R. O. (1982). The demand for international regimes. International organization, 36(2), 325-355. Lemoalle, J., & De Condappa, D. (2009). Atlas de l'eau du bassin de la Volta= Water atlas of the Volta Basin. In: CGIAR/CPWF; IRD. MacDonald, A. M., Bonsor, H. C., Dochartaigh, B. É. Ó., & Taylor, R. G. (2012). Quantitative maps of groundwater resources in Africa. Environmental Research Letters, 7(2), 024009. Matthews, M. (2013). The Volta Convention: An Effective Tool for Transboundary Water Resource Management in an Era of Impending Climate Change and Devastating Natural Disasters. Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y, 41, 273. MEE. (2001). Etat des lieux des ressources en eau du Burkina Faso et de leur cadre de gestion, Burkina Faso. Meiser, J. W. (2018). Introducing Liberalism in International Relations Theory. Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/18/introducing-liberalism-in-internationalrelations-theory/ Mirumachi, N. (2008). Domestic issues in developing international waters in Lesotho: Ensuring water security amidst political instability. International water security: Domestic threats and opportunities, 35-60.91 Rouyer, A. R. (2000). Turning water into politics; the water issue in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict/; Alwyn R. Rouyer. UNICEF. (2010). WASH in communities. Retrieved on 27/01/2018 from: https://www.unicef.org/ghana/wes.html User’s Guide Fact Sheet Series: Number 10, Theories of Resource Allocation. Retrieved from Accessed on 4/28/2018 from, https://www.unwatercoursesconvention.org/documents/UNWC-Fact-Sheet-10- Theories-of-Resource-Allocation.pdf UNICEF. (2010). WASH in communities. Retrieved from Retrieved on 27/01/2018 from: https://www.unicef.org/ghana/wes.html Warren, S. (2016). The Current Situation of Water Quality in Burkina Faso. Retrieved 24/01/2018 https://borgenproject.org/water-quality-in-burkina-faso/ Waterbury, J. (1979). The Hydropolitics of the Nile Basin. In: Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Yildirim, E., & Yildiz, D. (2014). Hydropolitics Newsletter. Hydropolitics Academy.tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/6050
dc.description.abstractThis thesis investigates the water relations between Ghana and Burkina Faso over the Volta Basin River from the Hydropolitical point of view. Water, an essential resource, is scarce. Ensuring water security is critical in socioeconomic development and the transformational agenda of every economy. The Volta River Basin States exploit the basin’s water resources to develop and sustain their economies. But there are “conflicting claims for a limited quantity and quality of water” between the two main riparian countries Ghana and Burkina Faso. To dichotomize this, Burkina Faso requires water for irrigation and Ghana needs water for hydropower generation, respectively, their key interest is to keep the water flowing. Through a qualitative research approach, this thesis looks at key issues and questions structured around the use of the basin, its historical development, the legal and institutional framework, population growth, economic and hydraulic developments. IR theory, thus, realism and liberalism, and the international doctrines and principles of shared water resources were applied. The study found that the historical role of water in national development, the colonial presence, hydraulic mission, cultural and sociopolitical needs, led to the development of the Hydropolitical relationship between both states. The governance of the basin has been on a need basis and has so far ensured the peaceful use of the resource. In water scarcity situation dispute becomes possible but in water abundance, there is cooperation. Also, it was found that population growth, economic and hydraulic developments combined with urbanization has affected water demand and has generated environmental concerns. The study concludes that, although there is a legal and institutional framework, there is a lack of commitment and inadequate financial resources that hinder long-term planning. To prevent possible future water-related conflicts, alternative energy sources should be developed and adequate attention should be given to wastewater management and groundwater development and management.tr_TR
dc.description.sponsorshipİbni Haldun Sosyal Bilimler Burs Programı-Yurtdışı Türkler ve Akraba Topluluklar Başkanlığıtr_TR
dc.description.tableofcontentsTABLE OF CONTENTS ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL..................................................................................i DECLARATION...................................................................................................................ii YAYIMLAMA VE FİKRİ MÜLKİYET HAKLARI BEYANI................. ...................................iii ETİK BEYAN.......................................................................................................................iv DEDICATON……………………………………………………………………………………….v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………...............................................................vi ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................vii ÖZET………………………………………………………………………………….................viii TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………………….....ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS…...........................................................................................xiii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES………………………………………….………………....xiv INTRODUCTION……….………………………………………...……………………….……....1 CHAPTER 1: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, LITERATURE REVIEW, THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND TRANSBOUNDARY WATER GOVERNANCE……………………………….…………………………………………………...9 1.1. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK…………….................................................…………...9 1.2.1. The Scarcity of Water Resources…...........................…………………………………10 1.2.2. Water as a means of Conflict…………............................…………………….………..12 1.2.3. Water as a Means of Cooperation……...........................…………….…….………….14 1.2.4. Coexistence of Conflict and Cooperation over Water…..........................……………16 1.2.5. Water Resource and Governance…………………………….....................................18 1.3. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK.……………………………..........................................19 1.3.1. REALISM…………………………............................……………………………………20 1.3.1.1. Structural Realism ……………………………………………….………………..........21 1.3.1.2. Realism and Neorealism on Water Resources…………..…...................................21 1.3.2. LIBERALISM AND NEOLIBERALISM……………………….............………..............23 1.3.2.1. Neo-Liberal Institutionalism………………………………….................................... 25 1.3.2.2. Liberalists and Neoliberalist on Water Resources……………................................ 27 1.4. DOCTRINES, PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES…………………………………………………………………...................28 1.4.1. The Community of Interest…………………..............................................................29 1.4.2. The Prior Appropriation (Prior Use) .......................................………………………..29 1.4.3. The Limited Territorial Sovereignty …………........................………………………...30 1.4.4. The Obligation not to Cause a Significant Damage or Harm....................................30 1.4.5. Principles of Notification, Consultation and Negotiation……....................................30 1.4.6. The Principle of Equitable and Reasonable Utilization……......................................31 1.4.7. Peaceful Settlement of Disputes…………………………….......................................31 CHAPTER 2: BRIEF OVERVIEW OF GHANA AND BURKINA FASO SOCIOPOLITICAL STRUCTURE AND THE DESCRIPTION OF THE VOLTA BASIN 2.1. THE SOCIO-POLITICAL STRUCTURE OF GHANA AND BURKINA FASO…….......32 2.1.1. Ghana’s Political Structure………....................................…………………...….…..32 2.1.2. Ghana’s Demographical Structure…………...........................................................33 2.1.3. Ghana’s Economic Structure……...……………......................................................33 2.1.4. Burkina Faso’s Political Structure…………...…………............................................34 2.1.5. Burkina Faso’s Demographic Structure……………....................................….........35 2.1.6. Burkina Faso’s Economic Structure…………………...............................................35 2.2. OVERVIEW OF THE VOLTA BASIN……………………………..............................36 2.2.1. Bio-Physical Characteristics………………..……...................................................36 2.2.2. Hydrology…………………………….......................................................................37 2.2.2.1. The Oti River …………………………………..……........................................37 2.2.2.2. The Lower Volta…………………………………..……………………………...37 2.2.2.3. The Black Volta……………..........................………...………………………..37 2.2.2.4. The White Volta River……....................…………………...…………………..37 2.2.3. Climatic Conditions……………………………………..............................................38 2.2.4. Rainfall…………………………………………....................……………………….…38 2.2.5. Fishing and Livestock Rearing………………...…………........................................40 CHAPTER 3: GHANA’S WATER RELATIONS WITH BURKINA FASO: HYDROPOLITICAL STAND POINT…………...................................................................42 3.1. FINDINGS.....................................…………………………..........................................42 3.1.1. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSBOUNDARY RELATIONS BETWEEN GHANA-BURKINA FASO….........................................................................…….…42 3.1.1.1. The Pre-Colonial Era; Water Use, Conflict and Cooperation………………...…42 3.1.1.2. The Colonial Era—The Creation of Ghana and Burkina Faso (Britain vs. France Influence); Water Use, Conflict and Cooperation….........……….…....43 3.1.1.3. The End of Colonial Influence (Post-Colonialism); Water Use, Conflict and Cooperation.......................................................................................................44 3.1.2. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND THE CREATION OF THE VBA...............................................................……………45 3.1.2.1. Ghana and Burkina Faso: National Water Resources Management……………..45 3.1.2.2. Conflicts and Cooperative Efforts: Transboundary Relations............................…46 3.1.2.3. The Role of Regional and International Organisations………………….………….47 3.1.2.4. The Volta Basin Authority…………………………………………….………...………49 3.1.2.5. Transboundary Level: The Code of Conducts……….......................………………50 3.1.2.6. International Doctrines, Principles and Practices Relating to the use of the Basin..50 3.1.2.7. Challenges of the Existing Legal Framework concerning the Basin……………….51 3.1.3. WATER SITUATION IN GHANA AND BURKINA FASO…..……………..…………..52XI 3.1.3.1. Water Situation in Ghana ………………………………………………………………52 3.1.3.2. The Water Situation in Burkina Faso…………………………………………….……53 3.1.3.3. Water Quality and Quantity in the Basin…………………………….……….………..55 3.1.3.4. The General Water Scarcity, Security in the Basin………………………….……….56 3.1.4. POPULATION, ECONOMIC AND HYDRAULIC DEVELOPMENT….............….57 3.1.4.1. Population Growth and Economic Development…………………………………57 3.1.4.2. Hydraulic Development…………………………..…………………………………58 CHAPTER 4: ANALYSIS, DISCUSSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS....................................60 4.1. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS.…………………………………………………………60 4.1.1. Research Question 1: ……………………………………………………………………60 4.1.2. Research Question 2: …………………………………………………….……………..64 4.1.3. Research Question 3: ………………………………………………....…..…………….67 4.1.4. Research Question 4: …………………………………………………………..……….69 4.2. IMPLICATIONS…………...…………………………….………………………….........…71 4.2.1. Theoretical Implications of Ghana’s Water Relations with Burkina Faso.…….…....71 4.2.2. The Practical Sense Implications ………………………………………….…………….74 CONCLUSION……………………………………………………………………………………78 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………….………………………..………………………………….83tr_TR
dc.language.isoentr_TR
dc.publisherSosyal Bilimler Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectHydropolitics
dc.subjectTransboundary
dc.subjectConflict
dc.subjectCooperation
dc.subjectCoexistence of Conflict and Cooperation
dc.subjectVolta River Basin
dc.subjectRealism
dc.subjectLiberalism
dc.subjectGhana and Burkina Faso
dc.titleGhana’s Water Relations With Burkina Faso: Hydropolitical Standpointtr_en
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetBu tez, Gana ve Burkina Faso arasındaki Volta Nehri Havzası üzerindeki su ilişkilerini hidropolitik açıdan incelemektedir. Temel bir kaynak olan su kıt bir kaynaktır. Su güvenliğinin sağlanması sosyoekonomik gelişimde ve her ekonominin dönüşümsel gündeminde kritik öneme sahiptir. Volta Nehri Havzası Devletleri, ekonomilerini geliştirmek ve sürdürülebilirliği sağlamak için havzanın su kaynaklarını kendi çıkarlarına yönelik kullanmaktadır. Fakat iki ana kıyıdaş ülke Gana ve Burkina Faso arasında “sınırlı miktardaki ve düşük kalitedeki su için çakışan talepler’’ söz konusudur. Bunu iki gruba ayırmak gerekirse, Burkina Faso suya sulama için ihtiyaç duymakta, Gana ise hidroelektrik üretimi için ihtiyaç duymaktadır, asıl meseleleri suyun akmaya devam etmesini sağlamaktır. Nitel bir araştırma yaklaşımı ile bu tez havzanın kullanımı, tarihsel gelişimi, yasal ve kurumsal çerçevesi, nüfus artışı, ekonomik ve hidrolik gelişmeler çevresinde şekillenen temel konuları ve sorunları göz önünde bulundurmaktadır. Uluslararası İlişkiler teorisi, yani, realizm ve liberalizm ve ortak su kaynaklarına yönelik uluslararası doktrinler ve ilkeler uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışma, suyun milli kalkınmadaki tarihsel rolü, sömürge varlığı, hidrolik misyon, kültürel ve sosyopolitik ihtiyaçların her iki devlet arasında hidropolitik bir ilişkinin gelişmesine yol açtığını ortaya koymaktadır. Havza yönetimi ihtiyaç temelinde oluşturulmuş ve şu ana kadar kaynağın barışçıl kullanımını sağlamıştır. Su kıtlığı durumunda anlaşmazlıklar muhtemel, ancak su bolluğunda ise işbirliği vardır. Ayrıca, nüfus artışı, kentleşmeyle beraber ekonomik ve hidrolik gelişmelerin su talebini etkilediği ve çevresel kaygılar doğurduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma şu sonuca ulaşmıştır; yasal ve kurumsal bir çerçeve mevcut olmasına rağmen, uzun vadeli planlamayı engelleyen bir taahhüt eksikliği ve mali kaynakların yetersizliği söz konuşur. Suya ilişkin gelecekteki olası çatışmaları önlemek amacıyla, alternatif enerji kaynakları geliştirilmeli ve atık su yönetimi ile yeraltı suyunun geliştirilmesi ve yönetimi için gereken dikkat gösterilmelidir.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUluslararası İlişkilertr_TR
dc.contributor.authorID10231811tr_TR
dc.embargo.termsAcik erisimtr_TR
dc.embargo.lift2019-03-04T08:47:03Z


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster