Özet
For centuries, importance has been given to the development of implant materials so that people can live a better life. Metal, ceramic, polymer and composite materials are widely used as implant materials. The use of polymers is often preferred due to some important advantages. Some of these advantages of polymers are useful, processable and variety of materials and etc.. Despite these advantages of polymers, there is a need to develop such materials in order to be compatible with the nature of the implant material. For this reason, it is important to prepare composite mixtures containing polymer as an organic part and hydroxyapatite as an inorganic part. Hydroxyapatite has significant advantages, that is in the basic composition of the bone and also ensures environmental compatibility in bone growth due to the surface porosity. The compatibilizers are used to improve the compatibility of composite materials with the composite interface. Moreover, the use of nano additives is more effective in improving the mechanical properties of polymers, because it provides a wider surface area and better distribution than other additives. In order for these materials to be physically compatible, it is necessary to improve their mechanical and structural properties. The structure of materials are also aimed to have similar porosity and structural characteristics with the environment in which the material is. It is also required to have similar porosity and structural characteristics to the environment in which the material is located. However, the toxic waste that form on the body causes serious problems due to wear of the implant material. The side effects of these wastes should be controlled. For this reason, the development of new implant materials that are mechanically durable, biocompatible, environmentally similar to the material and harmless is of great importance.
In this thesis study, the chemical structure and melt flow values of commercially implants in jaw and skull surgeons were examined and then it was decided to study with high density polyethylene. Hydroxypatite and high density polyethylene were mixed in different formulations and the prepared mixtures were characterized by chemical and mechanical methods to prepare composite material. In order to increase the compatibility and mechanical strength of the mixture, high density polyethylene grafted with maleic anhydride-hydroxyapatite composite systems were prepared. It is aimed to increase both the mechanical strength and the compatibility between the organic-inorganic composite systems by adding poly (hedral oligomeric silsesquioxane) to high density polyethylene and hydroxyapatite composite systems. At the end of the experimental studies, it was found that the mechanical properties of the composite systems prepared using high density polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride-hydroxyapatite are close to those of commercial implants.
The body compatibility of these prepared materials was examined by cytotoxicity tests. As a result, it was determined that the toxic effects of high density polyethylene grafted with maleic anhydride composites by adding micro and nanosize hydroxyapatite have not been observed. It has been concluded that these prepared composite systems are potentially useful materials in bone tissue engineering for the future.
Künye
[1] A. Ridwan-Pramana, J. Wolff, A. Raziei, C. E. Ashton-James, and T. Forouzanfar, “Porous polyethylene implants in facial reconstruction: Outcome and complications,” J. Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1330–1334, 2015.
[2] S. Bertazzo, W. F. Zambuzzi, D. D. P. Campos, T. L. Ogeda, C. V. Ferreira, and C. A. Bertran, “Hydroxyapatite surface solubility and effect on cell adhesion,” Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 177–184, 2010.
[3] I. Ono, T. Tateshita, and T. Nakajima, “Evaluation of a high density polyethylene fixing system for hydroxyapatite ceramic implants,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 143–151, 2000.
[4] D. Samsudin, H. Ismail, N. Othman, and Z. A. Abdul Hamid, “Comparative study of glut palmitate salt and polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride compatibilizer on the properties of silica filled high-density polyethylene composites,” Polym. Test., vol. 52, pp. 104–110, 2016.
[5] M. Joshi and B. S. Butola, “Studies on nonisothermal crystallization of HDPE/POSS nanocomposites,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 45, no. 14, pp. 4953–4968, 2004.
[6] V. Migonney, Biomaterials. 2014.
[7] M. Wang and W. Bonfield, “Chemically coupled hydroxyapatite-polyethylene composites: Structure and properties,” Biomaterials, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1311–1320, 2001.
[8] M. Hashimoto, H. Takadama, M. Mizuno, and T. Kokubo, “Enhancement of mechanical strength of TiO2/high-density polyethylene composites for bone repair with silane-coupling treatment,” Mater. Res. Bull., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 515–524, 2006.
[9] S. Sánchez-Valdes, E. Ramírez-Vargas, M. C. Ibarra-Alonso, L. F. Ramos De Valle, J. Méndez-Nonell, F. J. Medellín-Rodríguez, J. G. Martínez-Colunga, S. Vazquez-Rodriguez, and R. Betancourt-Galindo, “Itaconic acid and amino alcohol functionalized polyethylene as compatibilizers for polyethylene nanocomposites,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 497–502, 2012.
[10] E. Yildirim and M. Yurtsever, “A comparative study on the efficiencies of polyethylene compatibilizers by using theoretical methods,” 2012.
[11] V. Chiono, S. Filippi, H. Yordanov, L. Minkova, and P. Magagnini, “Reactive compatibilizer precursors for LDPE/PA6 blends. III: Ethylene-glycidylmethacrylate copolymer,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2423–2432, 2003.
[12] N. Othman, H. Ismail, and M. Mariatti, “Effect of compatibilisers on mechanical and thermal properties of bentonite filled polypropylene composites,” Polym. Degrad. Stab., vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1761–1774, 2006.
[13] K. Bula and T. Jesionowski, “Effect of Polyethylene Functionalization on Mechanical Properties and Morphology of PE/SiO2 Composites,” Compos. Interfaces, vol. 17, no. 5–7, pp. 603–614, 2010.
[14] Suryadiansyah, H. Ismail, and B. Azhari, “Silica-filled polypropylene composites: The effect of ethylene diamine dilaurate and maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene on mechanical properties, water absorption, morphology, and thermal properties,” Polym. Compos., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1169–1176, 2008.
[15] J. Y. Wong and J. D. Bronzino, Edited by. 2007.
[16] R. M. Pilliar and I. W. Metals, Metallic Biomaterials. 2009.
[17] M. Niinomi, T. Narushima, and M. Nakai, Advances in Metallic Biomaterials.
[18] H. R. Rezaie, L. Bakhtiari, and A. Öchsner, Biomaterials and their applications. 2015.
[19] B. L. Seal, T. C. Otero, and A. Panitch, “Polymeric biomaterials for tissue and organ regeneration,” vol. 34, pp. 147–230, 2001.
[20] M. F. Maitz, “Applications of synthetic polymers in clinical medicine,” Biosurface and Biotribology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 161–176, 2015.
[21] S. Dumitriu, Polymeric Biomaterials, Revised and Expanded. CRC Press, 2001.
[22] P. J. Nolan, “Source : STANDARD HANDBOOK OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CHAPTER 23 STERILE MEDICAL DEVICE PACKAGE DEVELOPMENT,” Fed. Regist., pp. 1–34, 2004.
[23] E. Kaxiras, W. D. Callister, and D. G. Rethwisch, “Materials Science,” Comput. Sci. Eng. Chapter 14., vol. 3, no. 6, p. 960, 2014.
[24] P. Henrique, C. Camargo, K. G. Satyanarayana, and F. Wypych, “Nanocomposites : Synthesis , Structure , Properties and New Application Opportunities,” Mater. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–39, 2009.
[25] M. Xanthos, Functional Fillers for Plastics. 2010.
[26] S. W. Kuo and F. C. Chang, “POSS related polymer nanocomposites,” Prog. Polym. Sci., vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1649–1696, 2011.
[27] W. Jla, “( 12 ) United States Patent ( 45 ) Date of Patent : i,” vol. 2, no. 12, 2007.
[28] X. Zhang, Y. Huang, T. Wang, and L. Hu, “Effects of silsesquioxane coating structure on mechanical interfacial properties of carbon fibre/polyarylacetylene composites,” J. Mater. Sci., vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 5264–5271, 2007.
[29] H. K. Raut, S. S. Dinachali, A. Y. He, V. A. Ganesh, M. S. M. Saifullah, J. Law, and S. Ramakrishna, “Robust and durable polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane-based anti-reflective nanostructures with broadband quasi-omnidirectional properties,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 6, no. 6, p. 1929, 2013.
[30] B. K. Lee, N. G. Cha, L. Y. Hong, D. P. Kim, H. Tanaka, H. Y. Lee, and T. Kawai, “Photocurable silsesquioxane-based formulations as versatile resins for nanoimprint lithography,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 14915–14922, 2010.
[31] A. Fina, D. Tabuani, A. Frache, and G. Camino, “Polypropylene-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS) nanocomposites,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 46, no. 19 SPEC. ISS., pp. 7855–7866, 2005.
[32] U. S. Patent, “(12) Ulllted States Patent,” vol. 2, no. 12, 2013.
[33] D. T. Mehring and S. S. Waukesha, “United States Patent,” vol. 1, no. 12, 1997.
[34] C. Crowley, P. Klanrit, C. R. Butler, A. Varanou, M. Platé, R. E. Hynds, R. C. Chambers, A. M. Seifalian, M. A. Birchall, and S. M. Janes, “Surface modification of a POSS-nanocomposite material to enhance cellular integration of a synthetic bioscaffold,” Biomaterials, vol. 83, pp. 283–293, 2016.
[35] A. Bhattacharya and B. N. Misra, “Grafting : a versatile means to modify polymers Techniques , factors and applications,” vol. 29, pp. 767–814, 2004.
[36] B. H. Gregory, Polyethylene Film Extrusion: A Process Manual. Trafford Publishing, 2009.
[37] G. Moad, Synthesis of polyolefin graft copolymers by reactive extrusion, vol. 24, no. 1. 1999.
[38] M. Khaled, “Biocomposite Materials,” Compos. Their Appl., 2012.
[39] Y. Zhang, K. E. Tanner, N. Gurav, and L. Di Silvio, “In vitro osteoblastic response to 30 vol% hydroxyapatite-polyethylene composite,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. - Part A, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 409–417, 2007.
[40] C. Li, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “Melt grafting of maleic anhydride onto low-density polyethylene/polypropylene blends,” Polym. Test., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 191–195, 2003.
[41] M. Joshi and B. S. Butola, “Studies on nonisothermal crystallization of HDPE/POSS nanocomposites,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 45, no. 14, pp. 4953–4968, 2004.
[42] A. Fina, D. Tabuani, T. Peijs, and G. Camino, “POSS grafting on PPgMA by one-step reactive blending,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 218–226, 2009.
[43] D. N. Ungureanu, N. Angelescu, R. M. Ion, E. V. Stoian, and C. Z. Rizescu, “Synthesis and Characterization of Hydroxyapatite Nanopowders by Chemical Precipitation,” Recent Res. Commun. Autom. Signal Process. Nanotechnology, Astron. Nucl. Phys. , pp. 296–301, 2011.
[44] C. Li, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, “Melt grafting of maleic anhydride onto low-density polyethylene / polypropylene blends,” vol. 22, pp. 191–195, 2003.
[45] S. Raynaud, E. Champion, D. Bernache-Assollant, and P. Thomas, “Calcium phosphate apatites with variable Ca/P atomic ratio I. Synthesis, characterisation and thermal stability of powders,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1065–1072, 2002.
[46] G. J. E. Poinern, R. Brundavanam, X. T. Le, S. Djordjevic, M. Prokic, and D. Fawcett, “Thermal and ultrasonic influence in the formation of nanometer scale hydroxyapatite bio-ceramic,” Int. J. Nanomedicine, vol. 6, pp. 2083–2095, Sep. 2011.
[47] I. Ono, T. Tateshita, and T. Nakajima, “Evaluation of a high density polyethylene fixing system for hydroxyapatite ceramic implants.,” Biomaterials, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 143–51, 2000.
[48] M. Ghaemy and S. Roohina, “Grafting of Maleic Anhydride on Polyethylene in a Homogeneous Medium in the Presence of Radical Initiators,” Iran. Polym. J., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2003.
[49] D. Shi, J. Yang, Z. Yao, Y. Wang, H. Huang, W. Jing, J. Yin, and G. Costa, “Functionalization of isotactic polypropylene with maleic anhydride by reactive extrusion : mechanism of melt grafting,” vol. 42, 2001.
[50] E. Karaca, H. Kaplan Can, U. Bozkaya, and N. Özçiçek Pekmez, “Charge-Transfer Complex of p -Aminodiphenylamine with Maleic Anhydride: Spectroscopic, Electrochemical, and Physical Properties,” ChemPhysChem, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 2056–2065, 2016.
[51] M. Oleksy, K. Szwarc-Rzepka, M. Heneczkowski, R. Oliwa, and T. Jesionowski, “Epoxy Resin Composite Based on Functional Hybrid Fillers,” Materials , vol. 7, no. 8. 2014.
