Multiple Skleroz’lu Hastalara Verilen Psikoeğitimin Stresle Baş Etme Tarzları, Psikiyatrik Belirtiler ve Yaşam Kalitesine Etkisi

View/ Open
Date
2017-06-23Author
Seki Öz, Hilal
xmlui.mirage2.itemSummaryView.MetaData
Show full item recordAbstract
The research was conducted as an intervention study with a control-group design with pretest, post- test,
and three months later follow-up design in order to evaluate the effect of psychoeducation given to
MS patients on styles of coping with stress, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life. The sample of
this study consisted of 89 MS patients who were registered to the Ankara Branch of the MS Society of
Turkey and who agreed to participate in this study, 45 patients were randomly distributed to the
intervention group and 44 patients were randomly assigned to the control group. Nine of the patients
left out this study. 80 patients completed the study and 40 patients were in the control group and 40
patients were also in the control group. Psycho education program consisted of 120 minutes per a
week and it totally continued eight weeks. This program was applied in four different intervention
groups according to the content and objectives. No effects were given to the control group during the
same period. Data gathered by the help of applying the introductory information form, The Ways of
Coping Inventory, Brief Symptom Inventory, and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Scale-54 and also
pre-test, post-test and follow-up. Two-way ANOVA was used for repeated measures in the evaluation
of data, and further analysis was also done by Bonferroni test. As a result of the research, the
approaches of optimistic, self-confident and social support seeking from the way of coping with the
stress of the patients in the intervention group increased statistically significantly compared to before
psychoeducation, the unconfident and submissive approach decreased significantly (p <0.05). While
the mean scores of anxiety, depression and somatization decreased statistically from the psychiatric
symptoms, there was no significant change in the symptoms of negative self and hostility (p <0.05).
Also, physical and mental health totals, which are subscales of psycho educational quality of life of
the intervention group, increased statistically significantly (p <0.05).In the intervention group, these
effects continued in the follow-up measurement applied 3 months after the psycho education. There
was no statistically significant change in all subscales in the control group in the same period.
According to these findings, it is suggested that such psycho education programs should be commonly
used in order to effectively cope with the stress, improve their mental health and increase the quality
of life for MS patients.