Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorYolaçaner, Elif
dc.contributor.authorİnkaya, Nida Nur
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-14T12:56:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.date.submitted2023-12-26
dc.identifier.citation[1] Mutreja, R. and Kumar, P. Comparison of Antioxidant Properties of Pomegranate Peel Extract by Different Methods. in International Conference on Chemical, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (CABS-2015) Sept. 2015. [2] Rasera, G.B., de Camargo, A.C., and de Castro, R.J.S., Bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds using the standardized INFOGEST protocol: A narrative review, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2023 22(1): p. 260-286. [3] Wang, Y., Neilson, L.C., and Ji, S., Mindfulness through agency in health consumption: Empirical evidence from committed dietary supplement consumers, Journal of Consumer Affairs, 2023. [4] Djaoudene, O., Romano, A., Bradai, Y.D., Zebiri, F., Ouchene, A., Yousfi, Y., Amrane-Abider, M., Sahraoui-Remini, Y., and Madani, K., A global overview of dietary supplements: regulation, market trends, usage during the COVID-19 pandemic, and health effects, Nutrients, 2023 15(15): p. 3320. [5] Shahidi, F. and Ambigaipalan, P., Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: Antioxidant activity and health effects–A review, Journal of functional foods, 2015 18: p. 820-897. [6] Zhang, H. and Tsao, R., Dietary polyphenols, oxidative stress and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, Current Opinion in Food Science, 2016 8: p. 33-42. [7] Adebooye, O.C., Alashi, A.M., and Aluko, R.E., A brief review on emerging trends in global polyphenol research, Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2018 42(4): p. e12519. [8] Lopes, M., Coimbra, M.A., Costa, M.d.C., and Ramos, F., Food supplement vitamins, minerals, amino-acids, fatty acids, phenolic and alkaloid-based substances: An overview of their interaction with drugs, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2023 63(19): p. 4106-4140. [9] Gullon, B., Pintado, M.E., Pérez-Álvarez, J.A., and Viuda-Martos, M., Assessment of polyphenolic profile and antibacterial activity of pomegranate peel (Punica granatum) flour obtained from co-product of juice extraction, Food control, 2016 59: p. 94-98. [10] Rosenblat, M., Volkova, N., Coleman, R., and Aviram, M., Pomegranate Byproduct Administration to Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice Attenuates Atherosclerosis Development as a Result of Decreased Macrophage Oxidative Stress and Reduced Cellular Uptake of Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2006 54(5): p. 1928-1935. [11] Hadree, J., Shahidi, F., Mohebbi, M., and Abbaspour, M., Evaluation of Effects of Spray Drying Conditions on Physicochemical Properties of Pomegranate Juice Powder Enriched with Pomegranate Peel Phenolic Compounds: Modeling and Optimization by RSM, Foods, 2023 12(10): p. 2066. [12] Kaderides, K., Kyriakoudi, A., Mourtzinos, I., and Goula, A.M., Potential of pomegranate peel extract as a natural additive in foods, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2021 115: p. 380-390. [13] Salatino, A., Teixeira, É.W., and Negri, G., Origin and chemical variation of Brazilian propolis, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine, 2005 2: p. 33-38. [14] Almuhayawi, M.S., Propolis as a novel antibacterial agent, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2020 27(11): p. 3079-3086. [15] Aliyazıcıoglu, R., Sahin, H., Erturk, O., Ulusoy, E., and Kolayli, S., Properties of phenolic composition and biological activity of propolis from Turkey, International Journal of Food Properties, 2013 16(2): p. 277-287. [16] Sforcin, J.M., Propolis and the immune system: a review, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2007 113(1): p. 1-14. [17] Burdock, G., Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis), Food and Chemical toxicology, 1998 36(4): p. 347-363. [18] Özkök, A., Keskin, M., Tanuğur Samancı, A.E., Yorulmaz Önder, E., and Takma, Ç., Determination of antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds for basic standardization of Turkish propolis, Applied Biological Chemistry, 2021 64(1): p. 1-10. [19] Delgado, A.M., Issaoui, M., and Chammem, N., Analysis of main and healthy phenolic compounds in foods, Journal of AOAC International, 2019 102(5): p. 1356-1364. [20] Bravo, L., Polyphenols: Chemistry, Dietary Sources, Metabolism, and Nutritional Significance, Nutrition Reviews, 1998 56(11): p. 317-333. [21] Sagar, N.A., Pareek, S., Sharma, S., Yahia, E.M., and Lobo, M.G., Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Bioactive Compounds, Their Extraction, and Possible Utilization, Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 2018 17(3): p. 512-531. [22] Prabhu, S., Molath, A., Choksi, H., Kumar, S., and Mehra, R., Classifications of polyphenols and their potential application in human health and diseases, Int. J. Physiol. Nutr. Phys. Educ, 2021 6(1): p. 293-301. [23] Vermerris, W., Nicholson, R., Vermerris, W., and Nicholson, R., Families of phenolic compounds and means of classification, Phenolic compound biochemistry, 2006: p. 1-34. [24] Rosales, T.K.O. and Fabi, J.P., Valorization of polyphenolic compounds from food industry by-products for application in polysaccharide-based nanoparticles, Frontiers in Nutrition, 2023 10: p. 1144677. [25] Manach, C., Scalbert, A., Morand, C., Rémésy, C., and Jiménez, L., Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2004 79(5): p. 727-747. [26] Mattila, P., Hellström, J., and Törrönen, R., Phenolic Acids in Berries, Fruits, and Beverages, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2006 54(19): p. 7193-7199. [27] Chen, L., Cao, H., Huang, Q., Xiao, J., and Teng, H., Absorption, metabolism and bioavailability of flavonoids: A review, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2022 62(28): p. 7730-7742. [28] Smaoui, S., Hlima, H.B., Mtibaa, A.C., Fourati, M., Sellem, I., Elhadef, K., Ennouri, K., and Mellouli, L., Pomegranate peel as phenolic compounds source: Advanced analytical strategies and practical use in meat products, Meat science, 2019 158: p. 107914. [29] Huang, S., Zhang, C.-P., Wang, K., Li, G.Q., and Hu, F.-L., Recent advances in the chemical composition of propolis, Molecules, 2014 19(12): p. 19610-19632. [30] Lipińska, L., Klewicka, E., and Sójka, M., The structure, occurrence and biological activity of ellagitannins: a general review, Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria, 2014 13(3): p. 289-299. [31] Seeram, N.P., Lee, R., and Heber, D., Bioavailability of ellagic acid in human plasma after consumption of ellagitannins from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) juice, Clinica chimica acta, 2004 348(1-2): p. 63-68. [32] Sun, Y.-q., Xin, T., Xiao-ming, M., Xu, Z.-w., and Tian, W., In vitro and in vivo antioxidant activities of three major polyphenolic compounds in pomegranate peel: Ellagic acid, punicalin, and punicalagin, Journal of integrative agriculture, 2017 16(8): p. 1808-1818. [33] Osorio-Tobón, J.F., Recent advances and comparisons of conventional and alternative extraction techniques of phenolic compounds, Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2020 57: p. 4299-4315. [34] Alara, O.R., Abdurahman, N.H., and Ukaegbu, C.I., Extraction of phenolic compounds: A review, Current Research in Food Science, 2021 4: p. 200-214. [35] Büyüktuncel, E., Gelişmiş ekstraksiyon teknikleri I, Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Pharmacy, 2012(2): p. 209-242. [36] de Medeiros, T.D.M., Dufossé, L., and Bicas, J.L., Lignocellulosic substrates as starting materials for the production of bioactive biopigments, Food Chemistry: X, 2022 13: p. 100223. [37] Sarangi, P.K., Vivekanand, V., Mohanakrishna, G., Pattnaik, B., Muddapur, U.M., and Aminabhavi, T.M., Production of bioactive phenolic compounds from agricultural by-products towards bioeconomic perspectives, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023 414: p. 137460. [38] Chemat, F., Vian, M.A., and Cravotto, G., Green extraction of natural products: Concept and principles, International journal of molecular sciences, 2012 13(7): p. 8615-8627. [39] Herrero, M. and Ibañez, E., Green extraction processes, biorefineries and sustainability: Recovery of high added-value products from natural sources, The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2018 134: p. 252-259. [40] Sharma, M., Hussain, S., Shalima, T., Aav, R., and Bhat, R., Valorization of seabuckthorn pomace to obtain bioactive carotenoids: An innovative approach of using green extraction techniques (ultrasonic and microwave-assisted extractions) synergized with green solvents (edible oils), Industrial Crops and Products, 2022 175: p. 114257. [41] Kutlu, N., Yılmaz, M.S., İşci, A., and Şakıyan, Ö., Utilization of deep eutectic solvents in the extraction of bioactive compounds from food materials, NOHU J. Eng. Sci, 2021 10(2): p. 591-597. [42] Kyriakidou, A., Makris, D.P., Lazaridou, A., Biliaderis, C.G., and Mourtzinos, I., Physical properties of chitosan films containing pomegranate peel extracts obtained by deep eutectic solvents, Foods, 2021 10(6): p. 1262. [43] Pingret, D., Fabiano-Tixier, A.-S., and Chemat, F., Ultrasound-assisted extraction, Natural product extraction: principles and applications, 2013 21: p. 89. [44] Lavilla, I. and Bendicho, C., Fundamentals of ultrasound-assisted extraction, in Water extraction of bioactive compounds. 2017, Elsevier. p. 291-316. [45] Chemat, F., Rombaut, N., Sicaire, A.-G., Meullemiestre, A., Fabiano-Tixier, A.-S., and Abert-Vian, M., Ultrasound assisted extraction of food and natural products. Mechanisms, techniques, combinations, protocols and applications. A review, Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2017 34: p. 540-560. [46] Kumar, K., Srivastav, S., and Sharanagat, V.S., Ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) of bioactive compounds from fruit and vegetable processing by-products: A review, Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2021 70: p. 105325. [47] Khuri, A.I. and Mukhopadhyay, S., Response surface methodology, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2010 2(2): p. 128-149. [48] Baş, D. and Boyacı, İ.H., Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology, Journal of Food Engineering, 2007 78(3): p. 836-845. [49] Bezerra, M.A., Santelli, R.E., Oliveira, E.P., Villar, L.S., and Escaleira, L.A., Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry, Talanta, 2008 76(5): p. 965-977. [50] Costa, A.G.V., Garcia-Diaz, D.F., Jimenez, P., and Silva, P.I., Bioactive compounds and health benefits of exotic tropical red–black berries, Journal of functional foods, 2013 5(2): p. 539-549. [51] Rein, M.J., Renouf, M., Cruz‐Hernandez, C., Actis‐Goretta, L., Thakkar, S.K., and da Silva Pinto, M., Bioavailability of bioactive food compounds: A challenging journey to bioefficacy, British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013 75(3): p. 588-602. [52] Minekus, M., Marie, A., Alvito, P., Ballance, S., Bohn, T., Bourlieu, C., Carrière, F., Boutrou, R., Corredig, M., Dupont, D., Dufour, C., Egger, L., Golding, M., Karakaya, S., Kirkhus, B., Le Feunteun, S., Lesmes, U., Macierzanka, A., Mackie, A., and Brodkorb, A., A standardised static in-vitro digestion method suitable for food – an international consensus, Food & Function, 2014. [53] Brodkorb, A., Egger, L., Alminger, M., Alvito, P., Assunção, R., Ballance, S., Bohn, T., Bourlieu-Lacanal, C., Boutrou, R., and Carrière, F., INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion, Nature protocols, 2019 14(4): p. 991-1014. [54] Hur, S.J., Lim, B.O., Decker, E.A., and McClements, D.J., In vitro human digestion models for food applications, Food Chemistry, 2011 125(1): p. 1-12. [55] Dantas, A.M., Mafaldo, I.M., de Lima Oliveira, P.M., dos Santos Lima, M., Magnani, M., and Borges, G.d.S.C., Bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds in native and exotic frozen pulps explored in Brazil using a digestion model coupled with a simulated intestinal barrier, Food Chemistry, 2019 274: p. 202-214. [56] Bueno-Herrera, M. and Pérez-Magariño, S., Validation of an extraction method for the quantification of soluble free and insoluble bound phenolic compounds in wheat by HPLC-DAD, Journal of Cereal Science, 2020 93: p. 102984. [57] Xie, Y., Kosińska, A., Xu, H., and Andlauer, W., Milk enhances intestinal absorption of green tea catechins in in vitro digestion/Caco-2 cells model, Food Research International, 2013 53(2): p. 793-800. [58] Yu, J., Li, W., You, B., Yang, S., Xian, W., Deng, Y., Huang, W., and Yang, R., Phenolic profiles, bioaccessibility and antioxidant activity of plum (Prunus Salicina Lindl), Food Research International, 2021 143: p. 110300. [59] Mackie, A., Mulet-Cabero, A.-I., and Torcello-Gómez, A., Simulating human digestion: Developing our knowledge to create healthier and more sustainable foods, Food & function, 2020 11(11): p. 9397-9431. [60] Li, C., Yu, W., Wu, P., and Chen, X.D., Current in vitro digestion systems for understanding food digestion in human upper gastrointestinal tract, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2020 96: p. 114-126. [61] Lucas-González, R., Viuda-Martos, M., Álvarez, J.A.P., and Fernández-López, J., Changes in bioaccessibility, polyphenol profile and antioxidant potential of flours obtained from persimmon fruit (Diospyros kaki) co-products during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion, Food chemistry, 2018 256: p. 252-258. [62] Inada, K.O.P., Silva, T.B.R., Lobo, L.A., Domingues, R.M.C.P., Perrone, D., and Monteiro, M., Bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds of jaboticaba (Plinia jaboticaba) peel and seed after simulated gastrointestinal digestion and gut microbiota fermentation, Journal of Functional Foods, 2020 67: p. 103851. [63] Dantas, A.M., Fernandes, F.G., Magnani, M., and da Silva Campelo Borges, G., Gastrointestinal digestion assays for evaluating the bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds in fruits and their derivates: an overview, Food Research International, 2023 170: p. 112920. [64] Zago, G.R., Gottardo, F.M., Bilibio, D., Freitas, C.P., Bertol, C.D., Dickel, E.L., and Santos, L.R.d., Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel lyophilized extract delays lipid oxidation in tuscan sausages, Ciência Rural, 2020 50. [65] Akhtar, S., Ismail, T., Fraternale, D., and Sestili, P., Pomegranate peel and peel extracts: Chemistry and food features, Food Chemistry, 2015 174: p. 417-425. [66] Gil-Martín, E., Forbes-Hernández, T., Romero, A., Cianciosi, D., Giampieri, F., and Battino, M., Influence of the extraction method on the recovery of bioactive phenolic compounds from food industry by-products, Food Chemistry, 2022 378: p. 131918. [67] Kennas, A. and Amellal-Chibane, H., Comparison of five solvents in the extraction of phenolic antioxidants from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel, The North African Journal of Food and Nutrition Research, 2019 3(5): p. 140-147. [68] Pagliarulo, C., De Vito, V., Picariello, G., Colicchio, R., Pastore, G., Salvatore, P., and Volpe, M.G., Inhibitory effect of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) polyphenol extracts on the bacterial growth and survival of clinical isolates of pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, Food chemistry, 2016 190: p. 824-831. [69] Kaderides, K., Papaoikonomou, L., Serafim, M., and Goula, A.M., Microwave-assisted extraction of phenolics from pomegranate peels: Optimization, kinetics, and comparison with ultrasounds extraction, Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2019 137: p. 1-11. [70] Sharayei, P., Azarpazhooh, E., Zomorodi, S., and Ramaswamy, H.S., Ultrasound assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel, Lwt, 2019 101: p. 342-350. [71] Singh, J.P., Kaur, A., Shevkani, K., and Singh, N., Composition, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of common Indian fruits and vegetables, Journal of food science and technology, 2016 53: p. 4056-4066. [72] Orak, H.H., Yagar, H., and Isbilir, S.S., Comparison of antioxidant activities of juice, peel, and seed of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) and inter-relationships with total phenolic, Tannin, anthocyanin, and flavonoid contents, Food Science and Biotechnology, 2012 21: p. 373-387. [73] Sforcin, J.M. and Bankova, V., Propolis: is there a potential for the development of new drugs?, Journal of ethnopharmacology, 2011 133(2): p. 253-260. [74] Bankova, V., Popova, M., and Trusheva, B., Propolis volatile compounds: chemical diversity and biological activity: a review, Chemistry Central Journal, 2014 8(1): p. 28. [75] Kara, Y., Can, Z., and Kolaylı, S., What should be the ideal solvent percentage and solvent-Propolis ratio in the preparation of Ethanolic Propolis extract?, Food Analytical Methods, 2022 15(6): p. 1707-1719. [76] Mountford-McAuley, R., Prior, J., and Clavijo McCormick, A., Factors affecting propolis production, Journal of Apicultural Research, 2023 62(1): p. 162-170. [77] Kekeçoğlu, M., Keskin, M., Birinci, C., Birinci, E., and Kolayli, S., Effects of honey bee race and season on propolis composition, Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021 27(3): p. 292-297. [78] Anjum, S.I., Ullah, A., Khan, K.A., Attaullah, M., Khan, H., Ali, H., Bashir, M.A., Tahir, M., Ansari, M.J., and Ghramh, H.A., Composition and functional properties of propolis (bee glue): A review, Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2019 26(7): p. 1695-1703. [79] El‐Guendouz, S., Lyoussi, B., and Miguel, M.G., Insight on propolis from mediterranean countries: Chemical composition, biological activities and application fields, Chemistry & biodiversity, 2019 16(7): p. e1900094. [80] Barth, O.M., Palynological analysis of geopropolis samples obtained from six species of Meliponinae in the Campus of the Universidade de Ribeirão Preto, USP, Brazil, Apiacta, 2006 41(2): p. 71-85. [81] Tugba Degirmencioglu, H., Guzelmeric, E., Yuksel, P.I., Kırmızıbekmez, H., Deniz, I., and Yesilada, E., A new type of Anatolian propolis: Evaluation of its chemical composition, activity profile and botanical origin, Chemistry & biodiversity, 2019 16(12): p. e1900492. [82] Guzelmeric, E., Ristivojević, P., Trifković, J., Dastan, T., Yilmaz, O., Cengiz, O., and Yesilada, E., Authentication of Turkish propolis through HPTLC fingerprints combined with multivariate analysis and palynological data and their comparative antioxidant activity, Lwt, 2018 87: p. 23-32. [83] Zhu, L., Zhang, J., Yang, H., Li, G., Li, H., Deng, Z., and Zhang, B., Propolis polyphenols: A review on the composition and anti-obesity mechanism of different types of propolis polyphenols, Frontiers in Nutrition, 2023 10: p. 511. [84] Ristivojević, P., Trifković, J., Andrić, F., and Milojković-Opsenica, D., Poplar-type propolis: Chemical composition, botanical origin and biological activity, Natural product communications, 2015 10(11): p. 1934578X1501001117. [85] Kolaylı, S., Birinci, C., Kara, Y., Ozkok, A., Samancı, A.E.T., Sahin, H., and Yildiz, O., A melissopalynological and chemical characterization of Anatolian propolis and an assessment of its antioxidant potential, European Food Research and Technology, 2023 249(5): p. 1213-1233. [86] Farooqui, T. and Farooqui, A.A., Apitherapy: therapeutic effects of propolis on neurological disorders, Neuroprotective Effects of Phytochemicals in Neurological Disorders, 2017: p. 335-358. [87] Celińska-Janowicz, K., Zaręba, I., Lazarek, U., Teul, J., Tomczyk, M., Pałka, J., and Miltyk, W., Constituents of propolis: Chrysin, caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, and ferulic acid induce PRODH/POX-dependent apoptosis in human tongue squamous cell carcinoma cell (CAL-27), Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2018 9: p. 336. [88] Kurek-Górecka, A., Keskin, Ş., Bobis, O., Felitti, R., Górecki, M., Otręba, M., Stojko, J., Olczyk, P., Kolayli, S., and Rzepecka-Stojko, A., Comparison of the antioxidant activity of propolis samples from different geographical regions, Plants, 2022 11(9): p. 1203. [89] Yolmeh, M. and Jafari, S.M., Applications of Response Surface Methodology in the Food Industry Processes, Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2017 10(3): p. 413-433. [90] Demir, T., AKPINAR, Ö., Haki, K., and Güngör, H., Nar Kabuğundan Antimikrobiyal ve Antioksidan Aktiviteye Sahip Fenolik Bileşiklerin Ekstraksiyon Koşullarının Optimizasyonu, Gıda, 2019 44(2): p. 369-382. [91] Kazemi, M., Karim, R., Mirhosseini, H., and Abdul Hamid, A., Optimization of pulsed ultrasound-assisted technique for extraction of phenolics from pomegranate peel of Malas variety: Punicalagin and hydroxybenzoic acids, Food Chemistry, 2016 206: p. 156-166. [92] Tabaraki, R., Heidarizadi, E., and Benvidi, A., Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) peel antioxidants by response surface methodology, Separation and Purification Technology, 2012 98: p. 16-23. [93] Magangana, T.P., Makunga, N.P., Fawole, O.A., and Opara, U.L., Processing Factors Affecting the Phytochemical and Nutritional Properties of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Peel Waste: A Review, Molecules, 2020 25(20): p. 4690. [94] Beretta, G., Granata, P., Ferrero, M., Orioli, M., and Facino, R., Standardization of antioxidant properties of honey by combination of spectrophotometric/fluorimetric assays and chemometrics, Analytica Chimica Acta - ANAL CHIM ACTA, 2005 533: p. 185-191. [95] Monter, A., Hernández-Falcón, T., Cruz-Cansino, N., Ramírez-Moreno, E., Alanis, E., Arias-Rico, J., and Ariza Ortega, J.A., Functional Properties, Total Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Purple Cactus Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) Waste: Comparison with Commercial Fibers, Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2019 10. [96] Akdeniz, B., Sumnu, G., and Sahin, S., Microencapsulation of phenolic compounds extracted from onion (Allium cepa) skin, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2018 42(7): p. e13648. [97] Apak, R., Güçlü, K., Özyürek, M., and Karademir, S.E., Novel Total Antioxidant Capacity Index for Dietary Polyphenols and Vitamins C and E, Using Their Cupric Ion Reducing Capability in the Presence of Neocuproine:  CUPRAC Method, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2004 52(26): p. 7970-7981. [98] Bekdeşer, B., Bener, M., Önem, A.N., and Apak, R., Toplam Antioksidan Kapasite Tayini için CUPRAC Yöntemi Uygulama Föyü, Gıda Antioksidanları Ölçümü Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, 2014. [99] Cilek, B., Luca, A., Hasirci, V., Sahin, S., and Sumnu, G., Microencapsulation of phenolic compounds extracted from sour cherry pomace: effect of formulation, ultrasonication time and core to coating ratio, European Food Research and Technology, 2012 235(4): p. 587-596. [100] Malviya, S., Arvind, Jha, A., and Hettiarachchy, N., Antioxidant and antibacterial potential of pomegranate peel extracts, Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2014 51(12): p. 4132-4137. [101] Seyhan, S.A., DPPH antioksidan analizinin yeniden değerlendirilmesi, Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi, 2019 9(2): p. 125-135. [102] Liao, H., Dong, W., Shi, X., Liu, H., and Yuan, K., Analysis and comparison of the active components and antioxidant activities of extracts from Abelmoschus esculentus L, Pharmacognosy Magazine, 2012 8(30): p. 156. [103] Papillo, V.A., Vitaglione, P., Graziani, G., Gokmen, V., and Fogliano, V., Release of Antioxidant Capacity from Five Plant Foods during a Multistep Enzymatic Digestion Protocol, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2014 62(18): p. 4119-4126. [104] Živković, J., Šavikin, K., Janković, T., Ćujić, N., and Menković, N., Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of polyphenolic compounds from pomegranate peel using response surface methodology, Separation and Purification Technology, 2018 194: p. 40-47. [105] Machado, A.P.D.F., Sumere, B.R., Mekaru, C., Martinez, J., Bezerra, R.M.N., and Rostagno, M.A., Extraction of polyphenols and antioxidants from pomegranate peel using ultrasound: Influence of temperature, frequency and operation mode, International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2019 54(9): p. 2792-2801. [106] Ranjha, M.M.A.N., Amjad, S., Ashraf, S., Khawar, L., Safdar, M.N., Jabbar, S., Nadeem, M., Mahmood, S., and Murtaza, M.A., Extraction of polyphenols from apple and pomegranate peels employing different extraction techniques for the development of functional date bars, International Journal of Fruit Science, 2020 20(sup3): p. S1201-S1221. [107] Liu, Y., Kong, K.W., Wu, D.-T., Liu, H.-Y., Li, H.-B., Zhang, J.-R., and Gan, R.-Y., Pomegranate peel-derived punicalagin: Ultrasonic-assisted extraction, purification, and its α-glucosidase inhibitory mechanism, Food chemistry, 2022 374: p. 131635. [108] Özkök, A., Keskin, M., Samancı, A., Önder, E., and Takma, Ç., Characterization of propolis extracts prepared using different solvents at the different concentrations, Progress in Nutrition, 2021 23(3). [109] El Adaouia Taleb, R., Djebli, N., Chenini, H., Sahin, H., and Kolayli, S., In vivo and in vitro anti‐diabetic activity of ethanolic propolis extract, Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2020 44(7): p. e13267. [110] Keskin, M., ticari propolis ekstraktlarinin kalite parametreleri açisindan karşilaştirilmasi, Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi, 2019 19(1): p. 43-49. [111] Yusof, N., Munaim, M.A., and Kutty, R.V. The effects of different ethanol concentration on total phenolic and total flavonoid content in Malaysian propolis. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020. IOP Publishing. [112] Antolovich, M., Prenzler, P.D., Patsalides, E., McDonald, S., and Robards, K., Methods for testing antioxidant activity, Analyst, 2002 127(1): p. 183-198. [113] Capanoglu, E., Beekwilder, J., Boyacioglu, D., De Vos, R.C., and Hall, R.D., The effect of industrial food processing on potentially health-beneficial tomato antioxidants, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2010 50(10): p. 919-930. [114] Atayoglu, A.T., Sözeri Atik, D., Bölük, E., Gürbüz, B., Ceylan, F.D., Çapanoğlu, E., Atayolu, R., Paradkar, A., Fearnley, J., and Palabiyik, I., Evaluating bioactivity and bioaccessibility properties of the propolis extract prepared with l-lactic acid: An alternative solvent to ethanol for propolis extraction, Food Bioscience, 2023 53: p. 102756. [115] Mărghitaş, L.A., Dezmirean, D., Moise, A., Mihai, C.M., and Laslo, L., DPPH method for evaluation of propolis antioxidant activity, Bulletin USAMV, 2009 66: p. 253-258. [116] Myo, H. and Khat-Udomkiri, N., Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from coffee pulp using propylene glycol as a solvent and their antioxidant activities, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2022 89: p. 106127. [117] Fawole, O.A. and Opara, U.L., Stability of total phenolic concentration and antioxidant capacity of extracts from pomegranate co-products subjected to in vitro digestion, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2016 16(1): p. 1-10. [118] Ozdal, T., Ceylan, F.D., Eroglu, N., Kaplan, M., Olgun, E.O., and Capanoglu, E., Investigation of antioxidant capacity, bioaccessibility and LC-MS/MS phenolic profile of Turkish propolis, Food Research International, 2019 122: p. 528-536. [119] Bouayed, J. and Bohn, T., Exogenous antioxidants—Double-edged swords in cellular redox state: Health beneficial effects at physiologic doses versus deleterious effects at high doses, Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2010 3(4): p. 228-237. [120] Bouayed, J., Hoffmann, L., and Bohn, T., Total phenolics, flavonoids, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity following simulated gastro-intestinal digestion and dialysis of apple varieties: Bioaccessibility and potential uptake, Food chemistry, 2011 128(1): p. 14-21tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11655/35941
dc.description.abstractThis thesis aims to create added value by extracting phenolic compounds from pomegranate peel, a non-consumed waste product of the food industry, and to examine the bioaccessibility of propolis extracts, a valuable food supplement, and their mixtures. In the first part of the study, maceration and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods were tested for the extraction of phenolic compounds from pomegranate peel. In both methods, the independent variables were extraction time (hours for maceration, minutes for ultrasound-assisted extraction), extraction temperature (°C) and sample quantity/solvent volume (g/mL), while the dependent variables were total phenolic content (TPC) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC). Response surface methodology was applied for optimization in both methods. The optimum conditions for maceration were determined as follows: extraction time 3 h, extraction temperature 43°C and sample amount/solvent volume 1/30 g/mL. The responses obtained at these optimum conditions were 120.9 mg GAE/g dry weight (TPC), 60.6 mmol TE/kg dry weight (TACDPPH) and 1645.2 mmol TE/kg dry weight (TACCUPRAC). The optimum conditions for the ultrasound-assisted extraction method were determined as follows: extraction time 30 min, extraction temperature 41°C and sample amount/solvent volume 1/30 g/mL. The responses obtained at these these optimum conditions were 159.3 mg GAE/g dry weight (TPC), 64.3 mmol TE/kg dry weight (TACDPPH) and 4149.5 mmol TE/kg dry weight (TACCUPRAC). According to the results obtained from optimization studies, the ultrasound-assisted extraction method gave better results than maceration, especially in terms of duration and antioxidant capacity values. Therefore, in the second part of the study pomegranate peel extract obtained from ultrasound-assisted extraction method at optimum conditions was used in the in-vitro digestion application. TPC and TAC values obtained initial and during gastrointestinal digestion of 10% and 15% propolis extracts (70% v/v glycol) and 20% and 30% propolis extracts (70% v/v ethanol) samples were examined and 15% and 30% propolis extracts samples were selected to be used in mixtures according to the results. Pomegranate peel and propolis extracts were mixed in 1:1, 1:2 and 2:1 (v/v) ratios. TPC and TAC values of 10 samples, including pomegranate peel extract, 2 propolis (glycolic and ethanolic) extracts, 3 glycolic pomegranate-propolis extract mixtures, and 3 ethanolic pomegranate-propolis extract mixtures were determined initially and during in vitro digestion. The results were statistically evaluated using SPSS IBM-23. In general, it was determined that in most samples digested in-vitro, TPC and TAC values obtained after the stomach phase decreased, while both values increased after the intestinal phase. In the bioaccessibility study, it was observed that the use of pomegranate peel extract with propolis extract had a positive effect on bioaccessibility, and as the amount of pomegranate peel extract increased, the bioaccessibility of the mixtures increased.tr_TR
dc.language.isoturtr_TR
dc.publisherFen Bilimleri Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectMaserasyontr_TR
dc.subjectUltrason-destekli ekstraksiyontr_TR
dc.subjectNar kabuğu ekstraktıtr_TR
dc.subjectPropolis ekstraktıtr_TR
dc.subjectİn-vitro sindirimtr_TR
dc.subject.lcshGıda mühendisliğitr_TR
dc.titleNar Kabuğu Fenolik Bileşiklerinin Ultrason-Destekli Ekstraksiyonu ve Nar Kabuğu-Propolis Ekstraktları Karışımının Biyoerişilebilirliğinin İncelenmesitr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetBu tez çalışmasında amaçlanan, gıda endüstrisinde atık bir ürün olan ve tüketilmeyen nar kabuğundan fenolik bileşiklerin ekstrakte edilerek katma değer oluşturulması ve değerli bir gıda takviyesi olan propolis ekstraktları ile karışımlarının biyoerişilebilirliğinin incelenmesidir. Çalışmanın ilk kısmında nar kabuğundan fenolik bileşenlerin ekstraksiyonu için maserasyon ve ultrason-destekli ekstraksiyon yöntemleri denenmiştir. Her iki yöntemde de bağımsız değişkenler ekstraksiyon süresi (maserasyon için saat, ultrason-destekli ekstraksiyon için dakika), ekstraksiyon sıcaklığı (°C) ve örnek miktarı/ çözücü hacmi (g/mL) iken, bağımlı değişkenler toplam fenolik madde miktarı (TFM) ile toplam antioksidan kapasite (TAK) olarak belirlenmiştir. İki yöntemde de yanıt yüzey metodolojisi ile optimizasyon uygulanmıştır. Buna göre, maserasyon için optimum koşullar, 3 saat ekstraksiyon süresi, 43 °C ekstraksiyon sıcaklığı ve 1/30 g/mL örnek miktarı/çözücü hacmi olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu koşullarda elde edilen yanıtlar ise, 120,9 mg GAE/g kuru ağırlık (TFM), 60,6 mmol TE/kg kuru ağırlık (TAKDPPH) ve 1645,2 mmol TE/kg kuru ağırlık (TAKCUPRAC) olarak tespit edilmiştir. Ultrason-destekli ekstraksiyon yöntemi optimum koşulları 30 dakika ekstraksiyon süresi, 41 °C ekstraksiyon sıcaklığı ve 1/30 g/mL örnek miktarı/çözücü hacmi olarak belirlenmiştir. Bu koşullara göre elde edilen yanıtlar, 159,3 mg GAE/g kuru ağırlık (TFM), 64,3 mmol TE/kg kuru ağırlık (TAKDPPH) ve 4149,5 mmol TE/kg kuru ağırlık (TAKCUPRAC) olarak tespit edilmiştir. Optimizasyon çalışmalarından elde edilen sonuçlara göre, ultrason-destekli ekstraksiyon yöntemi özellikle süre ve antioksidan kapasite değerleri açısından maserasyondan daha iyi sonuçlar vermiştir. Bu nedenle, çalışmanın ikinci bölümü olan in-vitro sindirim uygulamasında ultrason-destekli ekstraksiyon yönteminden optimum şartlarda elde edilen nar kabuğu ekstraktı kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada, %10 ve %15 propolis ekstraktları (%70 v/v glikol) ile %20 ve %30 propolis ekstraktları (%70 v/v etanol) örneklerinin başlangıç ve gastrointestinal sindirimi sırasında elde edilen TFM ve TAK değerleri incelenmiş ve sonuçlara göre karışımlarda kullanılmak üzere %15 ve %30 propolis ekstraktları örnekleri seçilmiştir. Nar kabuğu ve propolis ekstraktları 1:1, 1:2 ve 2:1 (v/v) oranlarında karıştırılmıştır. Nar kabuğu ekstraktı, 2 adet propolis (glikolik ve etanolik) ekstraktı, 3 glikolik nar-propolis ekstrakt karışımı ve 3 etanolik nar-propolis ekstrakt karışımı olmak üzere 10 adet numunenin başlangıçta ve in-vitro sindirim sırasındaki TFM ve TAK değerleri tespit edilmiştir. Sonuçlar SPSS IBM-23 programı kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Genel olarak, in-vitro sindirimi yapılan çoğu örnekte mide fazından sonra elde edilen TFM ve TAK değerlerinin azaldığı, bağırsak fazından sonra iki değerin de arttığı belirlenmiştir. Biyoerişilebilirlik çalışmasında, nar kabuğu ekstraktının propolis ekstraktı ile kullanılmasının biyoerişilebilirliği olumlu etkilediği ve nar kabuğu ekstrakt miktarı arttıkça karışımların biyoerişilebilirlik oranının attığı görülmüştür.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentGıda Mühendisliğitr_TR
dc.embargo.termsAcik erisimtr_TR
dc.embargo.lift2024-10-14T12:56:04Z
dc.fundingBilimsel Araştırma Projeleri KBtr_TR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record