Özet
This thesis will analyse and re-evaluate some of the historical and systematic views of Weber, Bourdieu and Heidegger in the context of postmodern sociological debates. Postmodern social theory is characterized by a radical relativism based on the critique of the subject’s reason and language. In the study, we will try to develop a perspective on how Weber, Bourdieu and Heidegger can be read in the face of these postmodern theses. Firstly, as one of the founding fathers of modern sociology, Weber offers an extremely fruitful intellectual background in his rich insights to a unique synthesis of the value based spiritual romanticism of the German historicist tradition and the Neo-Kantian scientific objectivism. Secondly, Bourdieu is today one of the world's most referenced name between classical sociology and contemporary postmodern critique. Bourdieu’s "permanent” contribution is critically related to the reflective epistemological subject of overcoming habitus' practical theory, in his own words, in contrast to both “positivistic materialism” and “intellectualist idealism.” Bourdieu’s practical theory interrogates both deep French and German influences on him: Heidegger, Weber, Cassirer, Durkheim, Pascal, and Marx. Thirdly, Heidegger draws attention as the thinker who has made the strongest criticism or destruction of subjectivity and Nietzschean nihilism in twentieth century philosophy. Today in America and Europe, Heidegger is an extremely influential name in the ongoing postmodernism debates between the German hermeneutic tradition and the French poststructuralist historical-libidinal materialism. The objective here is to highlight the rediscovery of different horizons on some of the seminal works in this field, previously delineated mainly by T. R. Schatzki, H. L. Dreyfus and Gadamer. Consequently, this thesis presents a novel assessment of subjectivity, culture and globalization from a postmodern standpoint, with particular reference to the work of Weber, Bourdieu and Heidegger.
Künye
Abbott, O. (2020). The Self, Relational Sociology, and Morality in Practice [Palgrave Studies in Relational Sociology]. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Abecassis, J. I. (2008). L’Homme Machine: Pascal/ Bourdieu. Erişim: 08 Ağustos 2022, The Free University Ağ Sitesi: https://www.academia.edu/35985252/LHomme_Machine _in_Pascal_and_Bourdieu.
Abergel, D. C. (2023). The Three Fundamental Deceptions of Being and Time: Heidegger’s Phenomenology Revisited. Research in Phenomenology, 53, 207–221.
Agevall, O. ve Swedberg, R. (2016). The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts (2. Baskı). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Aho, K., Altman, M. ve Pedersen, H. (Ed.). (2024). The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Existentialism. Taylor & Francis.
Akarsu, B. (1986). Max Scheler (1874-1928): İnsan Olma Sorunu. İ. Kuçuradi̇ (Ed.), Türk Felsefe Araştırmalarında Ve Üniversite Öğretiminde Alman Filozofları içinde (s. 32-43). Ankara: Türki̇ye Felsefe Kurumu.
Akay, A. (1997). Postmodern Görüntü. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları.
Akay, A. (2010) Postmodernizmin ABC'si. İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
Alciati, R. (2022). If Theodicy is Always Sociodicy: Bourdieu and the Marxian Critique of Religion. G. Paolucci (Ed.), Bourdieu and Marx: Practices of critique içinde (s. 313-325). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Aldenhoff-Hübinger, R. ve Hanke, E. (2023). Max Weber, Mektuplar: Hayat, Siyaset ve Bilim (L. Sunar ve A. F. Ergün, Çev.). İstanbul: Albaraka Yayınları.
Alexander, J. (1982). Theoretical Logic in Sociology, the Classical Attempt at Theoretical Synthesis: Max Weber (3. Cilt). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Altman, M. E. (2009). Praxis and Theoria: Heidegger's "Violent" interpretation [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. University of South Florida.
Antonio, R. J. (2003). Review- Max Weber and Postmodern Theory: Rationalization versus Re-enchantment. Nicholas Gane, 2002. Contemporary Sociology, 32(5), 646-647.
Archer, M. (2010). Critical Realism and Relational Sociology: Complementarity and Synergy. Journal of Critical Realism, 9(2), 199–207.
Archer, M. (2015). Kolektif Düşünümsellik: İlişkisel Bir Örnek. C. Powell (Ed.), İlişkisel sosyoloji: Ontolojik ve teorik yönelimler (s. 225-251).
Archer, M. S. (2000). For Structure: Its Reality, Properties and Powers: A Reply to Anthony King. The Sociological Review, 48(3), 464–472.
Arlı, A. (2007). Klasik Sosyolojide Derin Revizyon: Pierre Bourdieu Sosyolojisi. Arlı, A., Çeği̇n, G., Göker, E., ve Tatlıcan, Ü. (Ed.), Ocak Ve Zanaat: Pierre Bourdieu Derlemesi, içinde (s. 131-160). İstanbul: İ̇leti̇şi̇m Yayınları.
Asiltürk, A. (2022). Mehmed İzzet’in (1891-1930) Ahlak Anlayışı [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. T.C. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya,
Aslan, U. V. (2016). Simmel’in Toplum ve Öznellik Kavramları Üzerine. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), (21), 197-216.
Aspers, P. (2010). Relational Ontology: Being and Order Out of Heidegger's Socioontology. J. Fuhse ve S. Mützel (Ed), Relationale soziologie içinde (s. 252-277). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Aspers, P. ve Corte, U. (2021). What is Qualitative in Research. Qualitative Sociology, 44, 599-608.
Aspers, P. ve Kohl, S. (2013). Heidegger and Socio-ontology: A Sociological Reading. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(4), 487–508.
Atkinson, W. (2010). Phenomenological Additions to the Bourdieusian Toolbox: Two Problems for Bourdieu, Two Solutions from Schutz. Sociological Theory, 28(1), 1–19.
Atki̇nson, W. (2012). Where Now for Bourdieu-Inspired Sociology?. Soci̇ology, 46(1), 167-173.
Atkinson, W. (2016). Beyond Bourdieu: From Genetic Structuralism to Relational. Phenomenology. UK-USA: Polity Press.
Atkinson, W. (2019). Bourdieu and After: A Guide to Relational Phenomenology. London ve New York: Routletge.
Ay, V. (2021) Nietzsche ve Heidegger’de Nihilizm Sorunu, Doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Babich, B. (1995). Heidegger's Philosophy of Science: Calculation, Thought, and Gelassenheit. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Babich, B. (2017). Hermeneutic Philosophies of Social Science: Introduction. B. Babich (Ed.), Hermeneutic Philosophies of Social Science içinde (s. 1-21). Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.
Backman, J. (2005). The Absent Foundation: Heidegger on the Rationality of Being. Philosophy Today, 49(5), 175-184.
Backman, J. (2010). The End of Action: An Arendtian Critique of Aristotle’s Concept of Praxis. M. Ojakangas (Ed.), Hannah Arendt: Practice, Thought and Judgement içinde (s. 28-47). Helsinki: Collegium.
Backman, J. (2016). Postmetaphysics and the Global Order: Radical Conservative Critiques of Globalization in Right Heideggerianism. Panel: Global Order in Conservative Political Thought since WWII, CEEISA-ISA 2016 Joint Conference, (s. 1-22). Ljubljana.
Backman, J. (2018). The One is Not – On the Fate of Unity in Post-Metaphysical Philosophy. Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory [JCRT], 17(3), 480-484.
Baert, P. (2017). Sosyal Bilimler Felsefesi: Pragmatizme Doğru. (Ü. Tatlıcan, Çev.). İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
Bagley, C., Sawyer, A. ve Abubaker, M. (2016). Dialectic Critical Realism: Grounded Values and Reflexivity in Social Science Research. Advances in Applied Sociology, 6, 400-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2016.612030
Baldwin, J. (2018). Sociology over Philosophy? Artificial Paradoxes? Derrida and Bourdieu, Ethical Subjectivity and the Gift. K. C. Baral ve R. Radhakrishnan (Ed.), Theory after Derrida: Essays in Critical Praxis içinde (s. 100-128). London ve New York: Routledge.
Bambach, C. (1992). Review- Guy Oakes, Weber and Rickert: Concept Formation in the Cultural Sciences. Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 1988. German Studies Review, 15 (1) 153-154.
Bambach, C. R. (1995). Heidegger, Dilthey and the Crisis of Historicism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bantas, H. (2012). Understanding Habermas: The Ideal Speech Community. Melbourne: The Reluctant Geek Publications.
Baran, A. G. ve Özsöz, C. (2013). Pratik, Kültür, Sermaye, Habitus ve Alan Teorileriyle Pierre Bourdieu Sosyolojisi. S. Suğur ve A. Görgün Baran (Ed.), Sosyolojide Yakın Dönem Gelişmeler, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını.
Baran, A. G. ve Suğur, S. (Ed.). (2012). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını.
Barrett, W. (1964). The Puzzle of Heidegger: The Late Heidegger. What is Existentialism? (2. Baskı) içinde (s. 113-125). New York: Grove Pres Inc.
Barrett, W. (2003). İrrasyonel İnsan: Varoluşçuluk Üzerine Bir İnceleme (S. Özer, Çev.). Ankara: Hece Yayınları.
Basaure, M. (2011). The Grammar of an Ambivalence: On the Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu in the Critical Theory of Axel Honneth. S. Susen ve S. Bryan (Ed.), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays içinde (s. 203-221). London, New York, Delhi: Turner Anthem Press.
Baş, M. F. (2023). Max Weber’in Protestan Ahlakı ve Kapitalizmin Ruhu: Bir Tahlil. İstanbul: Ketebe Yayınları.
Bauman, Z. (1978). Understanding as the Work of Life: Martin Heidegger. Hermeneutics and Social Science: Approaches to Understanding içinde (s. 172-193). London: Hutchinson.
Bauman, Z. (1989). Hermeneutics and Modern Social theory. D. Held ve J. B. Thompson (Ed.). Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics içinde (s. 34-55). Cambridge University Press.
Bauman, Z. (2002). Bir Postmodern Sosyoloji Var Mıdır?-[1988] H. Arslan (Ed.), Retorik, Hermeneutik Ve Sosyal Bilimler: İnsan Bilimlerinde Retoriğe Dönüş içinde (s. 105-125). İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
Bech, J. (2021). Spinoza’s Conatus Undoes Bourdieu’s Habitus. Conatus - Journal of Philosophy, 6(2), 131-152.
Beiser, F. C. (2011). Max Weber and the End of the Historicist Tradition. The German Historicist Tradition içinde (s. 511-567). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belgrano, M. (2022). The Oblivion of Beings. The Process of Immunization in Martin Heidegger's Philosophy. Studi̇a Hei̇deggeri̇ana, XI, 111-127.
Ben-Amittay, J. (1983). Siyasal Düşünceler Tarihi. (M. A. Kılıçbay, Çev.). Ankara: Savaş Yayınları.
Benhabi̇b, S. (1986). Critique, Norm and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Benhabi̇b, S. (2002). The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Pri̇nceton Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Benjamin, A. (2015). Towards a Relational Ontology: Philosophy's Other Possibility. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Benton, T. (2016). Sosyolojinin Felsefi Kökenleri: Kant, Durkheim, Weber, Marx (Ü. Tatlıcan, Çev.). İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
Bernasconi̇, R. (1989). Heidegger's Destruction of Phronesis. Southern Journal of Phi̇losophy, 28(1), 127-147.
Bernasconi, R. (2000). With What Must the Philosophy of World History Begin? On the Racial Basis of Hegel's Eurocentrism. Nineteenth-Century Contexts: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(2), 171-201.
Bernasconi, R. (2010). Fanon’s the Wretched of the Earth as the Fulfillment of Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reason. Sartre Studies International, 16(2), 36-47.
Bernstei̇n, R. J. (2009). Objektivizm ve Rölativizmin Ötesi: Bilim, Hermenoytik ve Praxis (F. Yılmaz, Çev.). İstanbul: Paradi̇gma Yayıncılık.
Berti, E. (2014). The Classical Notion of Person and Its Criticism by Modern Philosophy. Babich B. ve D. Ginev, (Ed.), The Multidimensionality of Hermeneutic Phenomenology içinde (s. 283-295). Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
Bhaskar, R. (2010). Plato etc.: Problems of Philosophy and Their Resolution (M. Hartwig, Çev.). London and New York: Routledge.
Bogart, R. W. (1977). A Critique of Existential Sociology. Soci̇al Research, 44(3), 502-528.
Bora, M. (2017). Reading Heidegger as an Immigrant, or 'Displacing Dasein': The Phenomenological Implications of Displacement. Doktora tezi. Royal Holloway, University of London, London.
Bora, M. (2019) A Heideggerian Reading of the Odyssey in the Context of Displacement Journey. İ. O. Akkın ve diğerleri (Ed.). International Symposium on Mythology: Proceedings Book: 2-5 Mayıs 2019 –Ardahan: Bildirler (s. 636-642) Ardahan: Pharmakon.
Bora, M. (2020). Koşmayan Ayakkabılar Hakkında Heideggerci Bir Soruşturma. Medeni̇yet ve Toplum Dergi̇si̇, 4(1), 43-55.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Preface. P. Rabinow (Ed.), Un Ethnologue au Maroc içinde (s. 11-14). Paris: Hachette.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice (R. Nice, Çev.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991a). The Peculiar History of Scientific Reason. Sociological Forum, 6(1), 3-26.
Bourdieu, P. (1991b). The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger (P. Collier, Çev.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (L. J. D. Wacquant, Çev.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Concluding Remarks: For a Sociogenetic Understanding of Intellectual Works. C. Craig, E. Lipuma ve M. Postone (Ed.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives içinde (s. 263-275). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). The Production and Reproduction of Legitimate Language. G. Raymond ve M. Adamson (Ed.), Language and Symbolic Power içinde (s. 43–65). Cambridge, MA: Harvard U.P.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Passport to Duke. Metaphilosophy, 28(4).
Bourdi̇eu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action [Raisons pratiques: Sur la théorie de l’action. 251 p. Paris: Seuil, 1994] Stanford, Cali̇forni̇a: Stanford Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Scattered Remarks. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 334-340.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations [1997] (R. Nice, Çev.). California: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity-[Editions Raison d’agir, 2001] (R. Nice, Çev.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bordieu, P. (2006a). Türkçe Baskıya Önsöz, Pratik Nedenler: Eylem Kuramı Üzerine (H. Uğur Tanrıöver, Çev.). içinde (s.7-8). İstanbul: Hil Yayın.
Bourdieu, P. (2006b). Pratik Nedenler: Eylem Kuramı Üzerine (H. Uğur Tanrıöver, Çev.). İstanbul: Hil Yayın.
Bourdieu, P. (2007). Afterword (2. Baskı). P. Rabinow (Ed.), Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco içinde (s. 163-167). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2008). Sketch for a Self-Analysis, [Esquisse pour une auto-analyse-2004] (R. Nice, Çev.). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2014a). Seçilmiş Metinler [Choses dites-1987] (L. Ünsaldı, Çev.). Ankara: Heretik Yayıncılık.
Bourdieu, P. (2014b). Vive La Crise!: Sosyal Bilimde Heterodoksi İçin. G. Çeğin, E. Göker, A. Arlı ve Ü. Tatlıcan (Ed.), Ocak ve zanaat: Pierre Bourdieu Derlemesi içinde (s. 33-49). İstanbul: İletişim.
Bourdieu, P. (2016a). Sosyoloji Meseleleri (F. Öztürk vd. Çev.). Ankara: Heretik Yayınları.
Bourdieu, P. (2016b). Pascalca Düşünme Çabaları (P. B. Yalım, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
Bourdeu, P. (2018). Heideger’in Politik Ontolojisi (A. Sümer, Çev.). İstanbul: Monokl Yayınları.
Bourdieu, P. (2021a). Düşünümsel Sosyolojiye Davet. (N. Ökten, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Bourdieu, P. (2021b). Genel Sosyoloji: Collège de France Dersleri (1981-1983) (Z. Emirosmanoğlu, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Bourdeiu, P. (2023a). Bilimin Bilimi ve Düşünümsellik: Collège de France Dersleri 2000-2001 (L. Ünsaldı, Çev.). Ankara: Heretik Yayınları.
Bourdi̇eu, P. (2023b). Sosyolojiyi Düşünmek: Düşünümselliğe Dönüş (A. Sümer, Çev.). İ̇stanbul: Meti̇s.
Bourdieu, P. ve Eagleton, T. (1992). Doxa and Common life. D. Çamlıbel (Ed.), New Left Review, I/191 içinde (s. 407).
Bourdieu, P. ve Chartier, R. (2014). Sosyolog ve Tarihçi (Z. Karaca, Çev.). İstanbul: Açılım Kitap
Bourdieu, P. ve Wacquant, L. (2014). Düşünümsel Bir Antropoloji İçin Cevaplar (N. Ökten, Çev.), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Bowler, M. (2008). Heidegger and Aristotle: Philosophy as Praxis. London ve New York: Continuum.
Brogan, W. (1984). Heidegger's Interpretation of Aristotle: The Finitude of Being. Research in Phenomenology, 14, 249-258.
Brogan, W. (1989). A Response to Robert Bernasconi's “Heidegger's Destruction of Phronesis”. Southern Journal of Phi̇losophy, 28(1), 149-153.
Brogan, W. A. (2006). The Intractable Interrelationship of Physis and Techne. D. A. Hyland ve J. P. Manoussakis (Ed.), Heidegger and the Greeks: Interpretive Essays içinde (s. 43-56). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Brown, C. (2012). The Practice turn, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory? Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(3), 439–456.
Brubaker, R. (1984). The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber. London: Allen & Unwin.
Brubaker, R. (2017). Rasyonalitenin Sınırları: Max Weber’in Sosyal ve Ahlaki Düşüncesi Üzerine Bir Deneme (B. Tanıyan ve G. Çeğin, Çev.). Ankara: Phoenix.
Bruns, G. L. (1992). Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern. New Haven and London: Yale Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Bruun, H. H. (1972). Science, Values, and Politics in Max Weber’s Methodology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Bryan Portis, E. (2008). Reconstructing the Classics: Political Theory from Plato to Weber (3. Baskı). Washington, D.C: CQ Press.
Buch, A. ve Schatzki, T. R. (Ed.). (2018). Questions of Practice in Philosophy and Social Theory. Routledge.
Buchholz, L. (2016). What is a Global field? Theorizing Fields beyond the Nation-State. The Sociological Review Monographs, 64(2), 31–60.
Burger, T. (1976). Max Weber’s Theory of Concept Formation: History, Laws, and Ideal Types. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Cahil, K. M. (2016). The habitus, Coping Practices, and the Search for the Ground of Action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46(5), 498-524.
Capobianco, R. (2014). Heidegger’s way of being. Toronto-Buffalo-London: University of Toronto Press.
Capobianco, R. (2022a). The metaphysical and spiritual import of Heidegger’s readings of heraclitus. Erişim: 21 Mayıs 2022, https://www.academia.edu/89105915/The_ Metaphysical_and_Spiritual_Import_of_Heideggers_Readings_of_Heraclitus
Capobi̇anco, R. (2022b). Heidegger’s Being: The Shimmering Unfolding. Toronto, Buffalo, London: Uni̇versi̇ty of Toronto Press.
Carman, T. (2018). Review-Retrieving Realism. H. Dreyfus ve C. Taylor (Ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.-2015. Mind, (127) 506, 585–593.
Cary, P. (2011). The Inner Word Prior to Language: Augustine as Platonist Alternative to Gadamerian Hermeneutics,” Philosophy Today, 55(2), 192-198.
Cassirer, E. (1944). An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Cerbone, D. R. (2019). Ground, Background, and Rough Ground: Dreyfus, Wittgenstein, and Phenomenology. M. Burch, J. Marsh ve I. McMullin, (Ed.), Normativity, Meaning, and the Promise of Phenomenology içinde (s. 62-79). New York-Oxon: Routledge.
Cevi̇ri̇ci̇, S. (2020). Postmodern Düşüncede Temsil Krizi. İ̇stanbul: Dün Bugün Yarın Yayınları.
Chafetz, J. S. (1983). Gadamer, "Reason in the Age of Science" (Book Review). Social Science
Quarterly, 64(2), 430.
Colledge, R. J. (2022). Review Article of: Karsten Harries. The Antinomy of Being, Berlin /
Boston: de Gruyter GmbH, 2019. Erişim: 21 Ağustos 2024, Published at
Phenomenological Reviews (open access online): https://reviews.ophen.org /2022/08/15/ karsten-harries-the-antinomy-of-being/
Collins, R. (1986). Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collins, R. (2016). Heidegger: Katolik Modernizm Karşıtlığının Fenomenolojik Hareketle Kesişmesi (T. Göbekçin, Çev.). Felsefelerin Sosyolojisi: Entellektüel Değişimin Global Teorisi içinde (s. 863-868). Sakarya: Sakarya Üniversitesi Kültür yayınları.
Conway, D. (1997). Nietzsche’s Dangerous Game: Philosophy in the Twilight of the Idols. Cambri̇dge: Cambri̇dge Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Cottingham, J. (2015). Akılcılık (B. Gözkan, Çev.). İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları.
Coyne, R. (2015). Heidegger’s Confessions: The Remains of Saint Augustine in Being and Time and Beyond. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Crooks, J. (2002). Getting over nihilism: Nietzsche, Heidegger and the Appropriation of Tragedy. International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 9(1), 36-50.
Crossley, N. (2013). Pierre Bourdieu’s Habitus. T. Sparrow ve A. Hutchinson (Ed.), A History of Habit from Aristotle to Bourdieu içinde (s. 269-285). UK: Lexington Books.
Crothers, C. (2003). Heidegger's Reception within Sociology. Access: Contemporary Issues in Education, 22(1-2), 76–87.
Crowe, B. (2005). Dilthey’s Philosophy of Religion in the ‘Critique of Historical Reason: 1880-1910. Journal of the History of Ideas, 66, 265-283.
Crowe, B. (2006). To the Things Themselves: Heidegger, the Baden School, and Religion. New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Research, 6, 127-146.
Crowe, B. (2010). Faith and Value: Heinrich Rickert’s Theory of Religion. Journal of the History of Ideas, 71(4), 613-636.
Crowe, B. D. (2006). To the things themselves: Heidegger, the baden school, and religion. B. Hopkins ve S. Crowell (Ed.), The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy içinde (s. 127-145). London and New York: Routledge.
Crowell, S. (2000). Review Essay: What Gives? Getting Over the Subject, Continental Philosophy Review, 33, 93–105.
Crowell, S. (2020). Transcending Reason Heidegger’s Way. M. Burch ve I. McMullin, (Ed.), Transcending Reason: Heidegger on Rationality içinde (s. 17-52). USA-UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
Crowell, S. G. (2014). Günter Figal’s Objectivity: From Transcendental to Hermeneutical Phenomenology (and Back). Research in Phenomenology, 44, 121-134.
Culbertson, C. (2024). Gadamer and the Social Turn in Epistemology. Albany: Uni̇versi̇ty Of New York Press.
Çeğin, G. ve Göker, E. (Ed.). (2012). Tözcülüğün Tasfiyesi: İlişkisel Sosyolojide Temel Yaklaşımlar. İstanbul: Notabene Yayınları.
Çelebi, N. (1986). Bilim Sınıflandırmaları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, (3), 195-209.
Çetin, B. (2016). Pierre Bourdieu’nün Makro Ve Mikro Sosyal Teoriler Karşısındaki Konumu Yüksek Lisans tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.
Çiğdem, A. (2022). Bir İmkân Olarak Modernite: Weber ve Habermas. Ankara: Vulgus Yayınları.
Çüçen, A. K. (1997). Heidegger'de Varlık ve Zaman. Bursa: Asa Kitabevi.
Çüçen, A. (1999). Mantığın Kaynağı Problemi. Ankara İ̇lahi̇yat Fakültesi̇ Dergi̇si̇, XL, 83-94.
Dahlstrom, D. O. (2014). Günter Figal’s Objectivity: Some Critical Remarks. Research in Phenomenology, 44, 111-120.
Dahlstrom, D. O. (2015). Existential Socialization. H. Pedersen ve M. Altman (Ed.), Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology: Essays in Honor of Charles Guignon içinde (s. 329-346). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Dallmayr, F. R. (1982). The Theory of Structuration: A Critique. A. Giddens (Ed.), Profiles & Critiques in Social Theory içinde (s. 18-27). London: Macmillan Publishers Limited.
Dasgupta, S. ve Kivisto, P. (Ed.). (2014). Postmodernism in a Global Perspective. UK-USA: Sage Publications.
Dastur, F. (2006). Derrida and the Question of Presence. Research in Phenomenology, 36(1), 45-62.
Dastur, F. (2011). Derrida's Reading of Heidegger. D. O. Dahlstrom (Ed.), Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays içinde (s. 273-298). Cambridge University Press.
Dastur, F. (2013). Heidegger and the Question of the “Essence” of Language. J. Powell (Ed.), Heidegger and Language. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Davis, B. W. (2007). Heidegger and the Will: On the Way to Gelassenheit. Illi̇noi̇s: Northwestern Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Davis, B. W. (2016). Heidegger on the Way from Onto-Historical Ethnocentrism to East-West Dialogue. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 6(2016), 130–156.
Decoteau, C. L. (2016). The Reflexive Habitus: Critical Realist and Bourdieusian Social Action. European Journal of Social Theory, 19(3), 303-321.
Deketelaere, N. (2018). The Staging of Play: Jean-Luc Nancy on the Poetic Logic of Philosophy. Metodo, 6(1), 177-209.
DeLay, S. (2020) Before God: Exercises in Subjectivity. London. Rowman and Littlefield.
Deleuze, G. (1983). Nietzsche and Philosophy (H. Tomlinson, Çev.). London: Athlone Press.
Deleuze, G. ve Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. (B. Massumi, Çev.), Minneapolis: Minnesota Ünviversity Press.
Deleuze, G. ve Guattari, F. (1991). Felsefe Nedir? (T. Ilgaz, Çev.). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Demir, B. (2019). Olanak Kavramı Üzerine Bir Tartışma: Aristoteles ve Martin Heidegger, Yüksek Lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Demir, G. Y. (2007). Sosyal Bir Fenomen Olarak Dilin Belirsizliği, Doktora tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bursa.
Depelteau (Ed.). (2015). İlişkisel Sosyoloji: Ontolojik ve Teorik Yönelimler (Ö. Akkaya, Çev.), İstanbul: Phoenix Yayınları.
Depelteau, F. (2018). The Promises of the Relational Turn in Sociology. F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology içinde (s. 5-24). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Derman, J. (2008). Philosophy beyond the bounds of reason: The influence of Max Weber on the development of Karl Jaspers’s existenzphilosophie, 1909–1932. D. Chalcraft, vd. (Ed.), Max Weber matters: Interweaving past and present içinde (s. 55-71). England-USA: Ashgate.
Derrida, J. (1991). Of spirit: Heidegger and the question (G. Bennington ve R. Bowlby, Çev.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Descartes (1986). Metot üzerine konuşma. (M. Karasan Çev.). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
Dianteill, E. (2003). Pierre Bourdieu and the sociology of religion: A central and peripheral concern. Theory and Society, 32(5/6), 529-549.
Dikeçligil, B. (2005). Eski ve Yeni Sosyolojide Nedenselliğin Anlamı ve Ziya Gökalp'te Büyük Adam Sorununa Yeniden Bakış. İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 3(10), 39-58.
Dikeçligil, B. (2009). Sosyal Bilimler Epistemolojisinde Sorunların Kaynağı: Ontolojiyi Unutmak. Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(3), 47-67.
Ding, W. (2023). Review essay: A Daoist Heidegger. Journal of the Pacific Association for the Continental Tradition, 5, 113-121.
Doğan, N. (2016). “Kant ve Yeni Kantçılık Arasında Simmel’in Toplumsal Tahayyülü. Sosyoloji Divanı, 4(8), 73-86.
Donati, P. (2016). The ‘Relational Subject’ According to a Critical Realist Relational Sociology. Journal of Critical Realism, 15(4), 352-375.
Dreher, J. ve Santos, H. (2017). Sociology and Phenomenology. Civitas –Revista de Ciências Sociais, 17(3), 385-388.
Dreyfus, H. (1980). Holism and Hermeneutics. Review of Metaphysics, 34(1), 3–24.
Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dreyfus, H. (1993). Heidegger on the Connection between Nihilism, Art, Technology, and Politics. C. Gui̇gnon (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger içinde (s. 289-316). Cambri̇dge Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Dreyfus, H. (2014a). Skilful Coping: Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Action and Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dreyfus, H. (2014b). Varlık ve İktidar-[1989] S. E. Er (Ed.), Heidegger Paris’te: Fransızların Heidegger Okuması (H. S. Erdem, Çev.) içinde (s. 215-248). İstanbul: Otonom Yayınları.
Dreyfus, H. (2017). Background Practices: Essays on the Understanding of Being. Oxford:
Oxford Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Dreyfus, H. ve Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (2. Baskı). Chicago; University of Chicago Press.
Dreyfus, H. ve Rabi̇now, P. (1993). Can There Be a Science of Existential Structure and Social
Meaning?. Calhoun, C., Li̇puma, E. ve Postone M. (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives içinde (s. 35-44). Chi̇cago: Uni̇versi̇ty Of Chi̇cago Press.
Duman M. (2009) The Growing Desert: Nihilism And Metaphysics in Martin Heidegger’s Thought, Doktora Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Eflatun (1966). Sofist (M. Karasan, Çev.). Ankara: MEB Yayınları.
Eflatun (1997). Mektuplar (İ. Şahinbaş, Çev.). İstanbul: M. E. B.
Ehrmantraut, M. (2010). Heidegger’s Philosophic Pedagogy. London, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Ekelund, B. K. (2000). Space, Time and John Gardner. N. Brown ve I. Szeman (Ed.), Pierrre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Sociology içinde (s. 215-240). London and New York: Rowman and Li̇ttlefi̇eld.
Eldred, M. (2010). Heidegger i̇le Marx'ın İlişkisi. Ö. Aktok ve M. Bal (Ed.), Heidegger içinde (s. 298-307). Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
Elliott, B. (2000). Heidegger and Aristotle on the Finitude of Practical Reason. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 31(2), 159-183.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281-317.
Emirbayer, M. (2012). İlişkisel Dönüş: Geçmiş, Şimdi ve Gelecek. G. Çeğin ve E. Göker (Ed.), Tözcülüğün Tasfiyesi: İlişkisel Sosyolojide Temel Yaklaşımlar içinde (s. 7-10). İstanbul: Notabene Yayınları.
Emirbayer, M. (2013). Relational Sociology as Fighting Words. C. Powell ve F. Dépelteau (Ed.), Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues içinde (s. 209–211). New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
Emirbayer, M. ve Mische, A. (1998). What is Agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.
Engelland, C. (2021). Inflecting ‘Presence’ and ‘Absence’: On Sharing the Phenomenological Conversation. C. Engelland (Ed.), Language and Phenomenology içinde (s. 273-295). New York: Routledge.
Erdoğan, U. (2023). Ötekinin Bilgisi: Weber'de Avrupa-Merkezciliğin Yapısökümü. Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Ergan, N. G. (1998). Mehmet İzzet'in Sosyolojik Görüşleri. Ankara: Bizim Büro Basımevi.
Escudero, J. A. (2021). Actualization (Vollzug). M. A. Wrathall, (Ed.), The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon içinde (s. 16-18). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Evangeliou, C. C. (2016). The Unifying Function of Nous in Aristotle’s Philosophy. Dia-Noesis: A Journal of Philosophy, (1), 39-59.
Fabi̇ani̇, J. (2021). Pierre Bourdieu: A Heroic Structuralism. Lei̇den, Boston: Bri̇ll.
Fairfield, P. (2018). Hermeneutical Pragmatism. P. Fairfield ve S. Geniusas, (Ed.), Relational Hermeneutics: Essays in Comparative Philosophy, içinde (s. 65-76). London: Bloomsbury Acedenmic.
Fairfield, P. ve Geniusas, S. (Ed.). (2018). Relational Hermeneutics: Essays in Comparative Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Farin, I. (2022). Heidegger’s Engagement with and Critique of Philosophical Anthropology. I. Farin ve J. Malpas, (Ed.), Heidegger and the Human, içinde (s. 7-46). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Farrugia, D. ve Woodman, D. (2015). Ultimate Concerns in Late Modernity: Archer, Bourdieu and Reflexivity. The British Journal of Sociology, 66(4), 626–644.
Fay, T. A. (1977). Heidegger: The Critique of Logic. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
Fernandez, A. V. (2024). Existential Phenomenology and Qualitative Research.. K. Aho, M. Altman ve A. H. Pedersen (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Existentialism içinde (s. 24-35). Routledge.
Ferrer, D. F. (2011) German Philosophers: Kant, Hegel, Schelling, Nietzsche, and
Heidegger. Erişim: 16 Haziran 2023, https://philarchive.org/rec/FERGPK
Figal, G. (2006). Heidegger’s Philosophy of Language in an Aristotelian Context: Dynamis meta logou. D. A. Hyland ve J. P. Manoussakis (Eds.), Heidegger and the greeks: Interpretive essays içinde (s. 83-92). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Figal, G. (2010). Objectivity: The Hermeneutical and Philosophy (D. G. Theodore, Çev.). Albany: State Uniersity of New York Press.
Filler, J. (2023). Heidegger, Neoplatonism, and the History of Being: Relation as Ontological Ground. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fish, K. (2013). Relational sociology and Historical Materialism: Three Conversation Starters. C. Powell ve F. Dépelteau (Ed.), Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues içinde (s. 27-44). New York: Palgrave and Macmillan.
Fish, K. (2015). İlişkisel Sosyoloji ve Tarihsel Materyalizm: Üç Diyalog Başlangıcı. C. Powel ve F. Depelteau (Ed.), (Ö. Akkaya, Çev.). İlişkisel Sosyoloji: Ontolojik ve Teorik Yönelimler içinde (s. 53-78). Ankara: Phoenix.
Forbes, R. P. (1975). The Problem of “Laissez-Faire” Bias in Weber's Concept of “Formal Rationality”. Sociological Analysis and Theory, 5(2), 219-236.
Fowler, B. (2009). The Recognition/Redistribution Debate and Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(1), 144–156.
Fowler, B. (2011). Pierre Bourdieu: Unorthodox Marxist? S. Susen ve B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays içinde (s.33-57). London, New York: Anthem Press.
Fowler, B. (2020). Pierre Bourdieu on Social Transformation, with Particular Reference to Political and Symbolic Revolutions. Theory and Society, 49, 439–463.
Fowler, B. (2024) Pierre Bourdieu vis-à-vis Martin Heidegger: The First ‘Conservative Revolution’, Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory, 52(1), 75-89.
Frank, M. (1983). The World as Will and Representation: Deleuze's and Guattari's Critique of Capitalism as Schizo-Analysis and Schizo-Discourse (D. Berger, Çev.). Telos, 57, 166-176.
Frank, M. (1989a). What is Neostructuralism? (S. Wilke ve R. Gray, Çev.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Frank, M. (1989b). Schelling’s Critique of Hegel and the Beginnings of Marxian Dialectics. Idealistic Studies, 19(3), 251-268.
Frank, M. (1992). Is Self-Consciousness a Case of présence à soi?: Towards a Meta Critique of the Recent French Critique of Metaphysics. A. Bowie (Ed.), Derrida: A Critical Reader içinde (s. 218-234). UK, USA: Blackwell.
Frank, M. (1993). Two Centuries of Rationality and Its “Postmodern” Radicalization. D. Freundlieb ve W. Hudson (Ed.), Reason and Its Other. UK: Berg Publishers.
Frank, M. (2002). Self–Consciousness and Self–Knowledge: On Some Difficulties with the Reduction of Subjectivity. Constellations, 9(3), 390-408.
Frank, M. (2004). The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism (E. Millán-Zaibert, Çev.). New York: SUNY Press,
Frank, M. (2007). The Universality Claim of Hermeneutics. J. Scott (Ed.), Weakening Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Gianni Vattimo içinde (s. 159-183). Montreal, Kingston, London: Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Frank, R. I. (2022). Sunuş. M. Weber, Antik Uygarlıkların Tarım Sosyolojisi (G. Karaca ve Ö. Balkılıç, Çev.). içinde (s. 11-45). Ankara: Fol Ki̇tap.
Fred, G. (2014). What Gives? Heidegger and Dreyfus on the Event of Community. M. Marder vd. (Ed.), Being Shaken: Ontology and the Event içinde (s. 122-153). Palgrave Macmillan.
Frère, B. (2011). Bourdieu’s Sociological Fiction: A Phenomenological Reading of Habitus. S. Susen ve B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays içinde (s. 247-270). London, New York, Delhi: Anthem Press.
Freundlieb, D. ve Hudson, W. (1993). Reason and Its Other: Some Major Themes. D. Freundlieb ve W. Hudson (Ed.), Reason and its other: Rationality in Modern German Philosophy and Culture içinde (s. 1-22). USA-UK: Berg Publishers, Inc.
Gadamer, H. G. (1979). Practical Philosophy as a Model of the Human Sciences. Research in Phenomenology, 9, 74-85.
Gadamer, H. G. (1983). Reason in the Age of Science (F. G. Lawrence, Çev.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (1999). On the Possibility of a Philosophical Ethics (1963). J. Weinsheimer (Ed.), Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics içinde (s. 18-36). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (2016). Heidegger and Sociology: Bourdieu and Habermas (1979/1985). P. Vandevelde ve A. Iyer (Ed.), Hermeneutics Between History and Philosophy: The Selected Writings of Hans-Georg Gadamer: Volume I içinde (s. 167-178). London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Gadamer, H. G. (2022). The Socratic Question and Aristotle (1990) (2. Cilt). P. Vandevelde ve A. Iyer, (Ed.), Ethics, Aesthetics and the Historical Dimension of Language: The Selected Writings of Hans-Georg Gadamer, London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Gagnon, Jean‐Paul (2011) An Interview with Professor David Held: Exploring the Concepts of Cosmopolitanism and Democracy. Journal of Democratic Theory, 1(1), pp. 1‐18.
Galt S. C. (1993). Review: Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gane, N. (2002). Max Weber and Postmodern Theory: Rationalization versus Re-Enchantment. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gane, N. (Ed.). (2004). The Future of Social Theory, London-New York: Continuum.
Gane, N. (2012). Max Weber and Contemporary Capitalism. UK-USA: Palgrave Macmillan,
Gelekçi, C. (2011). Prof. Dr. Mustafa E. Erkal’ın Çalışmalarında Kültür, Kültürel Kimlik ve Etniklik Kavramları. Sosyoloji Konferansları Dergisi, 43, 153-160.
Gelekçi, C. (2012). Zygmunt Bauman: Modernlik ve Postmodernlik. A. Görgün Baran ve S. Suğur (Ed.). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları içinde (s. 76-97). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Gerth, H. H. ve Mi̇lls, C. W. (1986). Giriş. H. H. Gerth ve C. W. Mi̇lls (Ed.), Max Weber. Sosyoloji Yazıları (T. Parla, Çev.). içinde (s. 2-75). İ̇stanbul: Hürri̇yet Vakfı Yayınları.
Giddens, A. (2005). Sosyoloji, Kısa Fakat Eleştirel Bir Giriş (H. Beşirli, Çev.). Ankara: Phoenix Yayınları.
Giddens, A. (2016). Sosyolojik Yöntemin Yeni Kuralları: Yorumcu Sosyolojilerin Pozitif bir Eleştirisi (Ü. Tatlıcan ve B. Balkız, Çev.). İstanbul: Sentez Yayıncılık.
Gimbel, E. W. (2016). Interpretation and Objectivity: A Gadamerian Reevaluation of Max Weber’s Social Science. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 72–82.
Glassman, R. M., (1985) Review -Turner, S. P. ve Factor, R. A. (1984). Max Weber and the Dispute over Reason and Value: A Study of Philosophy, Ethics, and Politics. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24(3), 338-340.
Glazebrook, T. (2001). Heidegger and Scientific Realism. Continental Philosophy Review, 34(4), 361–401.
Glazebrook, T. (Ed.) (2012). Heidegger on Science. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Goggin, W. E. ve Hannan, S. (2022). A Dramatic Loss of Self: Bataille’s Mystical Praxis. W. E. Goggin ve S. Hannan (Ed.), Mysticism and Materialism in the Wake of German Idealism içinde (s. 116-139). London and New York: Routledge.
Goggin, W. E. ve Hannan, S. (2022). Social Grace: Eckhart, Catherine of Siena, and Marx on Appropriation. W. E. Goggin ve S. Hannan (Ed.), Mysticism and Materialism in the Wake of German Idealism içinde (s. 95-115). London and New York: Routledge.
Golob, S. (2019). Was Heidegger a Relativist?. M. Kusch, K. Ki̇nzel, J. Stei̇zi̇nger ve A. N. Wi̇ldschut (Ed.), The Emergence of Relativism: German Thought from the Enlightenment to National Socialism içinde (s. 181-195). London and New York: Routledege.
Gonzalez, F. (2002). Dialectic as Philosophical Embarrassment: Heidegger's Critique of Plato's Method. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 40(3), 361-369.
Gonzalez, F. J. (2006). The Socratic Hermeneutics of Heidegger and Gadamer. S. Ahbel-Rappe ve R. Kamtekar, (Ed.), A Companion to Socrates içinde (s. 426-441). USA-UK-Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Gonzalez, F. J. (2008). And the Rest is Sigetik: Silencing Logic and Dialectic in Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie. Research in Phenomenology, 38, 358–391.
Gonzalez, F. J. (2022). Gadamer and Plato: An Unending Dialogue. G. Theodore ve Gert- J. van der Heiden (Ed.), The Gadamerian Mind içinde (s. 191-206). Oxon-New York: Routledge.
Gordon, P. E. (2012). German Existentialism and the Persistence of Metaphysics: Weber, Jaspers, Heidegger. J. Judaken ve R. Bernasconi (Ed.). Situating Existentialism: Key texts in Context içinde (s. 65- 88). New York: Columbia University Press.
Gordon, P. E. (2013). The Empire of Signs: Heidegger’s Critique of Idealism in Being and Time. M. A. Wrathall (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time içinde (s. 223-238). New York: Cambri̇dge Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Gordon, P. E. (2023). Heidegger ve Cassirer: Davos Tartışması –Avrupa düşüncesinde bölünme. (M. Özdemir, Çev.). Ankara: Hece Yayınları.
Gorski, P. S. (2013). Beyond the Fact/Value Distinction: Ethical Naturalism and the Social Sciences. Society, 50(6), 543–553.
Gorski, P. S. (2016). Just How Pascalian are the Pascalian Meditations? Critical Reflections on the Theological Unconscious of Bourdieusian Theory. Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review, 77(3), 280–296.
Gökalp, Z. (1989). Limni ve Malta Mektupları (1. Baskı). (F. A. Tansel, Çev.). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.
Gökalp, Z. (2005). Felsefe Dersleri-[1919-1921]. A. Utku ve E. Erbay (Ed.), Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
Gökalp, Z. (2010). Rıza Tevfik’in Felsefesi. R. Alpyağıl (Ed.), Türkiye'de bir Felsefe Geleneki Kurmaya Çalışmak: Feylesof Simalardan Seçme Metinler–I içinde (s. 614-621). İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık.
Gökalp, Z. (2014). Cemiyette Büyük Adamların Tesiri. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 1(2), 48-70.
Görkaş, İ. (2021). Mehmet İzzet’in Kayıp Eseri: Ahlak. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, 19(37), 549-590.
Graduate Programs with Continental Philosophy. (2011). Erişim: 22 Şubat 2015, https://www.spep.org/resources/graduate-programs
Grenfell, M. (2011). Bourdieu, Language and Linguistics. London, New York: Continium.
Grondin, J. (2009). L'ontologie est-elle politique? La question de la vérité dans la lecture de Heidegger par Bourdieu. Dans: Marie-Anne Lescourret éd., Pierre Bourdieu: Un philosophe en sociologie (pp. 119-144). Paris cedex 14: Presses Universitaires de France. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.lesco.2009.01.0119
Gurvitch, G. (1985). Sosyoloji ve Felsefe. K. Cangızbay, (Ed.), İ̇stanbul: Deği̇şi̇m Yayınları.
Güven, F. (2005). Madness and Death in Philosophy. Albany: State Uni̇versi̇ty of New York
Press.
Haar, M. (1988). Heidegger and the Nietzschean ‘Physiology of Art’. D. F. Krell ve D. W.
(Ed.), Exceedingly Nietzsche: Aspects of Contemporary Nietzsche Interpretation içinde (s. 13-30). London and New York: Routledge.
Haar, M. (1989). The Question of Human Freedom in the Later Heidegger. The Southern
Journal of Phi̇losophy, XXVIII, 1-15.
Haar, M. (1992). The Play of Nietzsche i̇n Derrida. D. Wood (Ed.), Derrida: A Critical
Reader içinde (s. 52-71). UK - USA: Blackwell Publi̇shers.
Haar, M. (1995). Critical Remarks on the Heideggerian Reading of Nietzsche. C. Macann
(Ed.), Critical Heidegger içinde (s. 121-133). London, New York: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1971). Toward a Rational Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. (T. McCarthy, Çev.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1990). The Undermining of Western Rationalism through the Critique of Metaphysics: Martin Heidegger. J. Habermas ve F. Lawrence (Ed.), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity-[1985] içinde (s. 131-160). Oxford: Polity Press.
Halewood, M. (2014). Rethinking the Social through Durkheim, Marx, Weber and Whitehead. UK, USA, Anthem Press,
¬Hanly, P. (2021). Between Heidegger and Novalis. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Hannan, S. (2012). To See Coming: Augustine and Heidegger on the arising and passing away of things. Medieval Mystical Theology, 21(1), 75-91.
Harrison, P. R. (1993). Bourdieu and the Possibility of a Postmodern Sociology. Thesis Eleven, 35(1), 36–50.
Hatab, L. J. (2015). Can We Drop the Subject? Heidegger, Selfhood, and the History of a Modern Word. H. Pedersen ve M. Altman (Ed.), Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology içinde (s. 13-30). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hatab, L. J. (2016). The Point of Language in Heidegger’s Thinking: A Call for the Revival of Formal Indication. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 6, 1–22.
Heidegger, M. (1965). The End of Thinking in the Form of Philosophy. Epoché, 14(2), 213-223.
Heidegger, M. (1962a). Author's Preface to the Seventh German Edition. J. Macquarrie ve E. Robinson (Ed.), Being and time. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Heidegger, M. (1962b). Being and Time (J. Macquarrie ve E. Robinson, Çev.). New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1967). What is a Thing? (W. B. Barton, V. Deutsch ve E. T. Gendlin, Çev.). Indiana-USA: Gateway Editions.
Heidegger, M. (1971). The Nature of Language. (P. D. Hertz, Çev.). On the Way to Language. New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. (1976). The Theological Dimension of 'the Problem of a Non-objectifying Thinking and Speaking in Today's Theology'-Some Pointers to Its Major Aspects (1964). J. G. Hart ve J. C. Maraldo (Ed.). The piety of thinking: Essays by Martin Heidegger içinde (s.22-31). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (1990). Lisan. (H. Yetimoğlu, Çev.). Yönelişler: Aylık Sanat ve Kültür Dergisi, 48, 43-58.
Heidegger, M. (1991). Giriş: Metafiziğin Temeline Geri Dönüş (1949)-(EINLEITUNG). (Y. Örnek, Çev.), Metafizik Nedir? Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu Yayını.
Heidegger, M. (1994). Basic Questions of Philosophy: Selected “Problems” of “Logic”. (R. Rojcewicz ve A. Schuwer, Çev.). Bloomi̇ngton: Indi̇ana Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Heidegger, M. (1995a). Kant's Doctrine of the Beautiful: Its Misinterpretation by Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. P. R. Sedgwick (Ed.), Nietzsche: A critical Reader. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Heidegger, M. (1995b). Profesör Heidegger 1933’te Neler Oldu? Der Spiegel’in Heidegger’le tarihi söyleşisi (2. Baskı). (T. Ilgaz, Çev.). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time (J. Stambaugh, Çev.). Albany: State University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2001a). Felsefenin Sonu Ve Düşünmenin Görevi-[1964]. (D. Kanıt, Çev.). Zaman Ve Varlık Üzerine içinde (s. 67-84). Ankara: A Yayınevi.
Heidegger, M. (2001b). Düşünme Ne Demektir? (Was Heisst Denken?). (O. Bekiroğlu, Çev.). Yolcular Seçki.
Heidegger, M. (2002a). Freiburg Üniversitesi Rektörüne Mektup 4 Kasım 1945 (A. Demirhan, Çev.). Heidegger ve Nazizm. Ankara: Vadi Yayınları.
Heidegger, M. (2002b). Hümanizm Üzerine Mektup-1947, Hümanizmin Özü. (A. Aydoğan, Çev.). İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık.
Heidegger, M. (2002c). The Essence of Human Freedom: An Introduction to Philosophy. (T. Sadler, Çev). Continuum.
Hei̇degger, M. (2002d). “Bizi Yalnızca Bir Tanrı Kurtarabilir”: Martin Heidegger İle Der Spiegel’in Söyleşisi. (A. Emirhan, Çev.). A. Demi̇rhan (Ed.), Heidegger ve Nazizm, içinde (s. 242-270). Ankara: Vadi̇ Yayınları.
Heidegger, M. (2002e) Off the Beaten Track. (J. Young ve K. Haynes, Çev.). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2008). Varlık Ve Düşünme. A. Aydoğan (Ed.), Heidegger içinde (s. 241-258). İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
Hei̇degger, M. (2010a). Kant’'ın Varlık Tezi. Ö. Aktok ve M. Bal (Ed.), Heidegger içinde (s. 76-106). Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
Hei̇degger, M. (2010b). The End of Thinking in the Form of Philosophy” (“On the Question
Concerning the Determination of the Matter for Thinking”)-[1965]. (R. Capobianco ve M. Göbel, Çev.). Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 14(2), 213-223.
Heidegger, M. (2011). Metafiziğe Giriş. (M. Keskin, Çev.). İstanbul: Avesta Yayınları.
Heidegger, M. (2012). Contributions to Philosophy (of the Event) [1936-1940]. (R. Rojcewicz ve D. Vallega-Neu, Çev.). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2013). The Event (R. Rojcewicz, Çev.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2014a). Metafiziğe Giriş (M. Keskin, Çev.). İstanbul: Avesta Yayınları.
Heidegger, M. (2014b). Metafiziğin [Felsefenin] Üstesinden Gelmek. (B. Akar, Çev.). S. E. Er (Ed.), Heidegger Paris’te: Fransızların Heidegger Okuması içinde (s. 427-456). İstanbul: Otonom Yayıncılık.
Hei̇degger, M. (2019). Düşünmek Ne Demektir? (İ. Turan, Çev.). İ̇stanbul: Dergah.
Heidegger, M. (2022). Kendileyiş (M. Toprak ve Ö. F. Peksöz, Çev.), İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları.
Heidegger, M. ve Cassirer, E. (2021). İnsan Nedir? Davos’ta Kant Üzerine Bir Kör Dövüşü-(Arbeitsgemeinschaft Tutanağı) (K. Hoşgör, Çev.). Ankara: Fol Yayınları.
Heilbron, J. (2014). Practical Foundations of Theorizing in Sociology: The Case of Pierre Bourdieu. C. Camic, N. Gross ve M. Lamont (Ed.), Social Knowledge in the Making içinde (s. 182–205). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hekman, S. J. (1983). Weber, the Ideal Type, and Contemporary Social Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hemming, L. P. (2013). Heidegger and Marx: A Productive Dialogue over the Language of Humanism. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Hennis, W. (1983). Max Weber's ‘Central Question’. Economy and Society, 12(2), 135-180.
Herskowi̇tz, D. M. (2021). Heidegger and His Jewish Reception. UK-USA: Cambri̇dge Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Hilgers, M. ve Mangez, E. (2015). Introduction to Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of social fields. M. Hilgers ve E. Mangez (Ed.), Bourdieu’s Theory of Social Fields: Concepts and Applications içinde (s. 1-36). London, New York: Routledge.
Hill, M. R. (1988). Sociology: A Brief but Critical Introduction by A. Giddens. Teaching Sociology, 16(3), 302-304.
Hi̇ndess, B. (1981). Humanism and Teleology in Sociological Theory. B. Hi̇ndess (Ed.), Sociological Theories of the Economy içinde (s. 157-190). London: The Macmi̇llan Press.
Hirst, P. (1975). The Uniqueness of the West. Economy And Soci̇ety, 4(4), 446-475.
Holli̇s, M. ve Nell, E. J. (1975). Rational Economic Man: A Philosophical Critique of Neo-Classical Economics. London: Cambri̇dge Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Honigsheim, P. (2003). The Unknown Max Weber. A. Sica (Ed.), New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.
Horkheimer, M. (1986). Akıl Tutulması. (O. Koçak, Çev.). İstanbul: Meti̇s Yayınları.
Hoy, D. C. (2009). The Time of Our Lives: A Critical History of Temporality. USA: MIT Press.
Hubert. D. ve Rabinow, P. (1993). Can There Be a Science of Existential Structure and Social Meaning? in C. Calhoun, E. Lipuma ve M. Postone (Ed.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives içinde (s. 35-44). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hutt, C. (2007). Pierre Bourdieu on the Verstehende Soziologie of Max Weber. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 19, 232-254.
Huttunen, R. ve Kakkori, L. (2020). Heidegger’s Theory of Truth and Its Importance for the Quality of Qualitative Research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(3), 600-616.
Incoronato, C. (2024). A Surprising Comparison: Althusser's Interpretation of Epicurus and Heidegger. SubStance, 53(1), 24-40.
Inwood, M. (1999). A Heidegger Dictionary. UK-USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Jacerme, P. (2008). The Thoughtful Dialogue Between Martin Heidegger and Jean Beaufret: A New Way of Doing Philosophy. D. Petti̇grew ve F. R. (Ed.), French Interpretations of Heidegger: An Exceptional Reception içinde (s. 59-72). Albany: State Uni̇versi̇ty of New York Press.
Janicaud, D. (1976). Heidegger and Method. Man and World, 9(2), 140-152.
Janicaud, D. (1978). Presence and Appropriation: Derrida and the Question of an Overcoming of Metaphysical Language. Research in Phenomenology, 8, 67-75.
Jaran, F. (2010). Heidegger’s Kantian Reading of Aristotle’s Theologike Episteme. The Review of Metaphysics, 63(3), 567-591.
Johnson, D. W. (2020). Relational Hermeneutics. Comparative and Continental Philosophy, 12(1), 1-4.
Jones, A. (1987). The Violence of Materialism in Advanced Industrial Society: An Eco-Sociological Approach. The Sociological Review, 35(1), 19-47.
Joseph Kockelmans, J. (2017). Toward an Interpretative or Hermeneutic Social Science. B. Babich (Ed.), Hermeneutic Philosophies of Social Science içinde (s. 25-49.). Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter
Kakkori, L. ve Huttunen, R. (2020). Heidegger’s Theory of Truth and its Importance for the Quality of Qualitative Research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(3), 600-616.
Kalaycı, N. (2001). Nietzsche’nin Modern Kültür Eleştirisi Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Yüksek Lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Kara, A. (2001). İktisat Kuramı ve İktisat Öğretimi. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 14(1), 83-87.
Kara, A. (2001). İktisat Kuramında Pozitivizm ve Postmodernizm. Ankara: Vadi Yayınları.
Karadeniz, S. (2013). Sosyolojiye Meydan Okuma: Hermeneutik Sosyoloji. Z. Kara (Ed.), Bauman Sosyolojisi. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Karagöz, E. Ö. (2003). Max Weber’de Anlayış Sosyolojisi ve Din Olgusu, Doktora tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
Karaman, Y. (2013). Mevcudiyet ve Zaman: Heidegger’in ousia Yorumu. FLSF (Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi), (15), 187-200.
Käufer, S. (2001). On Heidegger on Logic. Continental Philosophy Review, 34, 455–76.
Käufer, S. (2005). Logic. H. L. Dreyfus ve M. A. Wrathall (Ed.), A Companion to Heidegger içinde (s. 141-155). USA-UK: Blackwell Publi̇shi̇ng Ltd.
Keane, N. (2010). Interpreting Plato Phenomenologically: Relationality and Being in Heidegger's Sophist. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 41(2), 170-192.
Keane, N. (2016). The Continually Expanding Limits of Hermeneutics: Heidegger on Poetic Expression, Nature, and the Holy. Research in Phenomenology. 46(3), 349-368.
Kearney, R. (2021). My Way to Hermeneutics with Ricoeur and Friends: A Personal Testimony. Analecta Hermeneutica, 13. 4-14.
Kenaw, S. (2008). Hubert L. Dreyfus’s Critique of Classical AI and Its Rationalist Assumptions. Minds & Machines, 18, 227–238.
Kılıç, S. (2014). Heidegger’in Fundamental Ontolojisinde Varlığın Özdeşliği. Kaygı: Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi / Uludağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Journal of Philosophy, 23(23), 11-28.
Kılıç, Y. (2015). Hobbes, Locke ve Rousseau’da “Doğa Durumu” Düşüncesi. Temaşa: Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi, (2), 97-117.
Kim, K. M. (2018). Social Performance as Cultural Critique: Critical Theory beyond Bourdieu and Habermas. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 48(4), 455-474.
King, A. (1999a). Against Structure: A critique of Morphogenetic Social Theory. Sociological Review, 47(2), 199-227.
King, A. (1999b). The Impossibility of Naturalism: The Antinomies of Bhaskar’s Realism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29(3), 267-288.
King, A. (2000). Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘Practical’ Critique of the Habitus. Sociological Theory, 18(3), 417-433.
King, A. (2010). The Odd Couple: Margaret Archer, Anthony Giddens and British Social Theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 61, 253–260.
Kirkland, S. D. (2009). The Tragic Foundation of Aristotelian Ethics. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 30(2), 1-21.
Kirkland, S. D. (2017). On the Ontological Primacy of Relationality in Aristotle's Politics and the Birth of The Political Animal. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21(2), 401-420.
Kisiel, T. (1970). Science, Phenomenology, and the Thinking of Being. J. Kockelmans ve T. Kisiel (Ed.), Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Kisiel, T. (1982). Translator’s Introduction. Heidegger and the Tradition (W. Marx, Çev). Northwestern University Press.
Kisiel, T. (2002). Heidegger (1907-27): The transformation of the Categorial. A. Denker ve M. Heinz (Ed.), Heidegger's Way of Thought: Critical and Interpretative Signposts içinde (s. 84-100). New York & London: Continuum.
Kivisto P. ve Swatos, W. H. (1990). Weber and Interpretive Sociology in America. The Sociological Quarterly, 31(1), 149.163.
Kivisto, P. (1994). Toward an Antifoundational Yet Relevant Sociology: Can Gottdiener Have It Both Ways? The Sociological Quarterly, 35(4), 723–728.
Kivisto, P. (2014). Postmodernity as an Internal Critique of Modernity. S. Dasgupta ve P. Kivisto (Ed.), Postmodernism in a Global Perspective içinde (s. 92-115). SAGE Publications.
Kivisto, P. (Ed.). (2021). The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory. UK-USA: Cambridge University Press.
Knorr-Cetina, K. ve Cicourel, A. V. (Ed.). (1981). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and macro-Sociologies. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Knudsen, N. K. (2023). Heidegger's Social Ontology: The Phenomenology of Self, World, and Others. UK-USA: Cambridge University Press.
Kochan, J. (2017). Science as Social existence: Heidegger and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. UK: Open Book Publishers.
Kockelmans, J. (1970). Heidegger on the Essential Difference and Necessary Relationship between Philosophy and Science. J. Kockelmans ve T. Kisiel (Ed.), Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences. Evansyton: Northwestern University Press.
Kockelmans, J. (1985). Heidegger and Science. Lanham: University Press of America.
Kockelmans, J. J. (2017). Toward an Interpretative or Hermeneutic Social Science. B. Babich (Ed.), Hermeneutic Philosophies of Social Science içinde (s. 25-50). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.
Koçak Turhanoğlu, F. A. (2012). Bilim, Yöntem ve Toplumsal Araştırma. T. Gönç Savran (Ed.), Sosyolojide Araştırma Yöntem ve Teknikleri. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Kolb, D. (1991). Max Weber. The Critique of Pure Modernity: Hegel, Heidegger, and After, içinde (s. 9-11). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Kolb, D. (2000). The Particular Logic of Modernity. Hegel Bulletin, 21(1-2), 41-42.
Kolb, D. (2012). Hegel and Religion: Avoiding Double Truth, Twice. Hegel Bulleti̇n, 33, 71-87.
Kolko, G. (1959). A Critique of Max Weber's Philosophy of History. Ethi̇cs, LXX(1), 21-36.
Kotlu, E. (2007). Yapısalcı ve Post-Yapısalcı Sosyal Teoride Dil -(Sosyal Teoride Bir Model Olarak Dil), Doktora tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.
Kögler, H. H. (2011). Overcoming Semiotic Structuralism: Language and Habitus in Bourdieu. S. Susen ve B. S. Turner (Ed.), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays içinde (s. 271-299). London, New York, Delhi: Anthem Press.
Kögler, H. H. (2013). Unavoidable Idealizations and the Reality of Symbolic Power. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 27(3-4), 302-314.
Köker, L. (1984). Yokolmanın Eşiğinde Bir Fikir: iİlerleme. Toplum ve Bi̇li̇m, 27, 193-211.
Kuravsky, E. (2021). Neither Philosophy nor Theology: The Origin in Heidegger’s Earliest Thought. Open Theology, 7, 180–207.
Kuravsky, E. (2022). The Neo-Kantian Sources of Heidegger’s Overcoming of the Encounter Problem. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 12, 126–156.
Kuravsky, E. (2023). Thinking and the Danger of Insanity, Erişim: 12 Mart 2023, https://www.academia.edu/82189494/The_limits_of_reason_and_the_danger_of_insanity_Heideggers_overcoming_of_metaphysics,
Kuyaş, N. (1982). Çevirmenin Sunuşu. (N. Kuyaş, Çev.). Thomas Kuhn. Bilimsel Devrimlerin Yapısı içinde (s. 7-32). İstanbul: Alan Yayıncılık.
Küçük, Ö. (2020). Marx, Durkheim ve Weber’de Bilim, Etik Ve Siyaset Gerilimi Ve Sosyolojik Bireycilik: Klasik Sosyolojik Gelenekte Bir Diyalog Girişimi. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi / Journal of Sociological Research, 23(1), 94-129.
Küçük, Ö. (2022). Adorno’nun Diyalektik Meta-Eleştirisi Ve Bourdieu’nün Düşünümsel Sosyolojik Eleştirisi: Heidegger Eleştirileri Üzerinden Bir Karşılaştırma. İnsan ve Toplum, 12(1), 137-166.
Küçükalp, K. (2003). Nietzsche ve Postmodernizm. İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları.
Kütük, B. Ş. ve Şahin, M. (2017). Fizik Alanındaki Gelişmelerin Sosyolojiye Yansımaları: Pozitivizm. Sosyoloji Konferansları-Istanbul Journal of Sociological Studies, 56(2), 183-203.
Lahtinen, V. V. (2014). A Shared World – The Relationship between Pierre Bourdieu´s Social Ontology and Martin Heidegger´s Early Philosophy, Yüksek Lisans tezi, University of Helsinki.
Lambert, G. (2002). Deleuze and the Dialectic (a.k.a. Marx and Hegel). Strategies: Journal of Theory, Culture & Politics, 15(1), 73–83.
Lash, S. (1990). Modernization and Postmodernization in the Work of Pierre Bourdieu. Sociology of Postmodernism içinde (s. 237-265). New York: Routledge.
Lash, S. (2004). Scott Lash: Information is Alive. N. Gane (Ed.), The Future of Social Theory içinde (s. 91-108). London-New York: Continuum.
Lee R. ve Long, C. (2007). Nous and Logos in Aristotle. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie, 54(3), 348-367.
Li̇akos, D. (2019). Another Beginning? Heidegger, Gadamer, and Postmodernity. Epoché, 24(1), 221-238.
Liakos, D. (2021). Heidegger and Gadamer on the Modern Age: The Sun Setting in the Western Sky. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 11, 152–182.
Liang, L. ve Liu, S. (2018). Beyond the Manifesto: Mustafa Emirbayer and Relational Sociology. The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology, 395–411.
Loht, S. (2012). Heidegger’s Phenomenology of the Greek Gods. Philosophy Today, 56(4), 419-433.
Lough, J. W.H. (2006). Weber and the Persistence of Religion: Social Theory, Capitalism and the Sublime. London, New York: Routledge.
Löwith, K. (1982) Max Weber and Karl Marx. (T. Bottomore ve W. Outhwaite, Çev.). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Löwy, M. (2018). Demir Kafes: Max Weber ve Weberci Marksizm. (N. Çetinkaya, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Luchte, J. (2007). Martin Heidegger and Rudolf Carnap. Phi̇losophy Today, 51(3), 241-260.
Luft, S. (2015). The A Priori of Culture: Philosophy of Culture between Rationalism and Relativism. The Example of Levi-Strauss Structural Anthropology. J. T. Friedman ve S. Luft, (Ed.), The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer: A Novel Assessment içinde (s. 381-400). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Luft, S. (2022). Hegelianism in Windelband: Culture, Values, and History. G. Morrone ve R. R. Federico (Ed.), Neo-Kantianism and Cultural Sciences içinde (s. 91-104). Naples: Federico II University Press.
Lumsden, S. (2002). Deleuze, Hegel and the Transformation of Subjectivity. The Phi̇losophi̇cal Forum, 33(2), 143-158.
Lumsden, S. (2014). Self-Consciousness and the Critique of the Subject: Hegel, Heidegger, and the Poststructuralists. New York: Columbi̇a Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Lyotard, J. F. (1990). Heidegger and the Jews (A. Michel ve M. Roberts, Çev.). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Meder, M. ve Çeğin, G. (2011). Bourdieu’yü Okumak: Post-Pozitivist Bir Sosyolojinin İmkânı Üzerine. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 233-256.
MacAvoy, L. (2001). Overturning Cartesianism and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion: Rethinking Dreyfus on Heidegger. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 44(4), 455-480.
MacAvoy, L. A. (2018). Heidegger, Dreyfus, and the Intelligibility of Practical Comportment. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 50(1), 68–86.
Macpherson, C. B. (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. London: Oxford Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Magerski, C. (2005). The Consecrating Power of Symbolic Forms -From Cassirer's Philosophy of Symbolic Forms to Bourdieu's Sociology of Symbolic Forms. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 34(2), 112-127.
Maggee, B. (2000). Büyük Filozflar: Platon’dan Wittgenstein’a Batı Felsefesi (A. Cevizci, Çev.), İstanbul: Paradigma.
Maly, K. (1975). Subject, Dasein, and Disclosure. Research in Phenomenology, 5, 183-193.
Maly, K. (1993). Reading and Thinking: Heidegger and the Hinting Greeks. J. Sallis (Ed.), Reading Heidegger: Commemoration içinde (s. 221-240). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Maly, K. (2012). Okuma Ve Düşünme: Heidegger Ve Yunanlıların İzini Sürmek. (S. Kurtar, Çev.). Posseible Düşünme Dergisi, 1(1), 70-96.
Maly, K. (2013). Translators Introduction, Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann, Hermeneutics and Reflection: Heidegger and Husserl on the Concept of Phenomenology, (K. Maly, Çev.). içinde (s. xi-xxx ) Toronto–Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press.
Mangez, É. ve Liénard, G. (2015). The Field of Power and the Relative Autonomy of Social Fields: The Case of Belgium. M. Hilgers ve E. Mangez (Ed.), Bourdieu’s Theory of Social Fields: Concepts and Applications içinde (s. 183-198). London and New York: Routledge.
Mansfi̇eld, N. (2021). Öznellik: Freud’dan Haraway’e Benlik Kuramları. (E. O. Gezmiş, Çev.). İ̇stanbul: Babi̇l Ki̇tap.
Manterys, A. (2017). Relational Sociology Paradigms. Stanrzeczy [State of Affairs], 1(12), 67-94.
Marcuse, H. (1964) One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Routledge.
Matthews, B. (2007). Translator’s Introduction. F. W. J. Schelling (Ed.), The Grounding of Positive Philosophy içinde (s. 1-84). Albany: State University of New York Press.
McCarthy, G. E. (2017). Objectivity and the silence of reason: Weber, Habermas, and the Methodological Disputes in German Sociology (2. Baskı). Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Mcdonough, R. (2013). Referential Opacity and Hermeneutics in Plato’s Dialogue Form. Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, V(2), 251-278.
McDonough, R. (2014). Heidegger’s Ereignis and Wittgenstein on the Genesis of Language.
Open Journal of Phi̇losophy, 4(3), 416-431.
McGovern, M. (2000). Durkheim and Heidegger: Two Social Ontologies and Some Implications. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, 29(2), 105-120.
McGuirk, J. N. (2010). Husserl and Heidegger on Reduction and the Question of the Existential Foundations of Rational Life. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 18(1), 31-56.
McGuirk, J. (2016). Phenomenological Considerations of Habit: Reason, Knowing and Self-Presence in Habitual Action. Phenomenology and Mind, (6), 112–121.
McMullin, I. (2013). Time and the Shared World: Heidegger on Social Relations, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
McMullin, I. (2020). Rational Ideals and the Unity of Practical Agency: Kant’s Postulates of Practical Reason and Their Heideggerian Reconceptualization. M. Burch ve I. McMullin (Ed.), Transcending Reason: Heidegger on Rationality içinde (s. 187-210). London-New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Mengüşoğlu, T. (1983). Felsefeye Giriş [1958] (3. Baskı), İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Meštrović, S. G. (1998). Anthony Giddens: The Last Modernist. London: Routledge.
Meurs, P., Note, N. ve Aert, D. (2009). This World Without Another: On Jean-Luc Nancy and ‘la mondialisation. Journal of Critical Globalization Studies, 1(1), 31–46.
Meurs, P., Note, N. ve Aerts, D. (2011). The “Globe” of Globalization. Kritike, 5(2), 10-25.
Mitchell, A. (2002). Praxis and Gelassenheit: The “Practice" of the Limit. F. Raffoul ve D. Pettigrew (Ed.), Heidegger and Practical Philosophy içinde (s. 317-338). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Mitchell, A. (2014). Heidegger. F. Joseph, J. Reynolds ve A. Woodward (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Existentialism içinde (s. 300-305). London and New York: Bloomsbury.
Mitchell, A. J. (2020). A Brief History of Things: Heidegger and the Tradition. G. Figal vd. (Ed.), Paths in Heidegger’s Later Thought içinde (s. 227-242). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Mi̇ttleman, A. (1999). Leo Strauss and Relativism: The Critique of Max Weber. Reli̇gi̇on, 29, 15–27.
Mohr, J. W. (2013). Bourdieu’s Relational Method in Theory and in Practice: From Fields and Capitals to Networks and Institutions (and Back Again). F. Dépelteau ve C. Powell, (Ed.), Applying Relational Sociology: Relations, Networks, and Society içinde (s. 101-136). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mommsen, W. (1965). Max Weber's Political Sociology and His Philosophy of World History. International Social Science Journal, 17(1), 23-45.
Moore, I. A. (2019). Eckhart, Heidegger, and the Imperative of Releasement. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Moore, I. A. (2021). Memory and Mystical Detachment in Paul Celan's Eckhart-Poems. Essays in Medi̇eval Studi̇es, 37, 103-112.
Moore, I. A. (2024). Heidegger Syllabus (Graduate, Fall 2024), Loyola Marymount University. Erişim: 26 Ağustos 2024, https://www.academia.edu/68130006/Heidegger_Syllabus_ Graduate_Fall_2024_
Moran, D. (1985). Phenomenology and the Destruction of Reason. Irish Philosophical Journal, 2(1), 15–36.
Moran, D. (2020). Medieval Neoplatonism and the Dialectics of Being and Non-Being. A. LaZella ve R. A. Lee (Ed.), The Edinburgh Critical History of Middle Ages and Renaissance Philosophy içinde (s. 142-159). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Morrison, J. C. (1969). Heidegger's Criticism of Wittgenstein's Conception of Truth. Man and
World, 2(4), 551- 573.
Moss, G. S. (2019). Absolute Imagination: The Metaphysics of Romanticism. Soci̇al Imagi̇nari̇es, 5(1), 57-80.
Motta, M. (2014). Heidegger’s Philosophy of Disclosedness: A Relational Interpretation of Being and Time, Doktora tezi, University of Queensland.
Murchadha, F. Ó. (2002). Being as Ruination: Heidegger, Simmel, and the Phenomenology of Ruins. Phi̇losophy Today, 46, 10-17.
Murphy, D. J. (2005). The Rhetoric of ‘‘Unprincipled’’ Philosophy. A Critical Notice of Articulated Experiences: Towards a Radical Phenomenology of Contemporary Social Movements. The European Legacy, 10(4), 389–395.
Nasu, H. (2014). Alfred Schutz and a Hermeneutical Sociology of Knowledge. M. Staudigl ve G. Berguno, (Ed.), Schutzian Phenomenology and Hermeneutic Traditions içinde (s. 55–67). Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer.
Nelson, E. S. (2011). Self-Reflection, Interpretation, and Historical Life in Dilthey. H. U. Lessing, R. A. Makkreel ve R. Pozzo (Eds.), Recent Contributions to Dilthey’s Philosophy of the Human Sciences. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
Nelson, E. S. (2013). Heidegger and Carnap: Disagreeing about Nothing?. F. Raffoul ve E. S. Nelson (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger içinde (s. 151-155). New York: Bloomsbury Academi̇c.
Nelson, E. S. (2022). Heidegger, Formal Indication, and Sexual Difference. Eksi̇stenz: Phi̇losophi̇cal Hermeneuti̇cs and Intercultural Phi̇losophy, 1(1), 65-77.
Neuman, W. L. (2012). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri: Nitel ve Nicel Yaklaşımlar (5. Baskı). (S. Özge, Çev.). Ankara: Yayın Odası.
Nicholas, G. (2002). Max Weber and Postmodern Theory: Rationalization versus Re-Enchantment. New York: Palgrave.
Norrie, A. (2012). Who Is The Prince?: Hegel and Marx in Jameson and Bhaskar. Historical Materialism, 20(2), 75-104.
Norrie, A. (2013). Debate Hegel and Bhaskar. Journal of Critical Realism, 12(3), 359–376.
Nur, A. (2013). Bourdieu’s Habitus and Giddens’ structuration: Beyond the false dichotomies? Erişim: 14 Ocak 2021, https://www.academia.edu/10617839/Bourdieu_s_Habitus_and_ Giddens_Structuration_Beyond_the_False_Dichotomies
O’Byrne, A. (2003). Review-Heidegger and Practical Philosophy. F. Raffoul ve D. Pettigrew (Ed.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Continental Philosophy Review, 36(3), 344-350.
Oakes, G. (1990). Weber and Rickert: Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.
Oittinen, V. (2014). General Rationality Types and Concrete Philosophical Cultures: From Hegel to Max Weber. Transcultural Studies, 10(1), 41-52.
Okrent, M. (2013). Heidegger's Pragmatism Redux. A. Malachowski (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism içinde (s. 124-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Otto, E. (2021). Assyria and Israel: The Political Theory of the Book of Deuteronomy and Its Reception by Max Weber and Eric Voegelin. I. Carbajaso ve N. S. Muth. (Ed.), Israel and the Cosmological Empires of the Ancient Orient: Symbols and Order in Eric Voegelin's Order and History içinde (s. 223-232). Muni̇ch: Bri̇ll.
Outhwaite, W. (2016). Remarks on Simon Susen’s the Postmodern Turn in the Social Sciences. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29(4), 423.
Öğütle, V. S. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler Metodolojisinde “Birey(cilik)” Sorunsalı Metodolojik Bireyciliğin “Birey” Anlayışı ve Diğer Bireycilik Türleriyle Bağlantısı, Doktora tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir.
Öğütle, V. S. (2022). Failin ontolojisi: Sosyal bilimlerde Nedensellik ve Yönelimsellik. Ankara: Fol Yayınları.
Öğütle, V. S. (2023). Reasons and Causes: A Critical-Realist Phenomenological Analysis of Agency. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 54(4), 343-359.
Ökten, K. H. (2004). Heidegger Kitabı. İ̇stanbul: Agora Ki̇taplığı.
Ökten, N. (2018). Sosyolojide Pierre Bourdieu Etkisi. H. Etil ve M. Demir (Ed.), Türkiye’de Çağdaş Sosyoloji Konuşmaları içinde (s. 261-303). İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
Ökten, N., Mücen, B., Akçaoğlu, A. ve Saygın Öğütle, V. (2022). Yuvarlak Masa. T. Ulusoy ve H. Sevlü, (Ed.), Strata: İlişkisel Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (10), 9-25.
Örnek, Y. (2020). Mektuplardaki Felsefe: Arendt-Jaspers-Heidegger. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Özlem, D. (2001). Max Weber’de Bilim ve Sosyoloji [1990] (3. Baskı). İstanbul: İnkılap Yayınevi.
Özlem, D. (2018). Tarihselci Gelenek: Dilthey-Weber-Gadamer. İstanbul: Notos Kitap.
Öztürk, A. (Ed.). (2010). Postyapısalcılık. Ankara: Phoneix Yayınevi.
Pallotta, J. (2015). Bourdieu’s Engagement with Althusserian Marxism: The Question of the State. Actuel Marx, 58(2), 130-143.
Paolucci, G. (Ed.). (2022). Bourdieu and Marx: Practices of Critique, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Parra, J. D. (2019). Heidegger’s Nietzsche: European Modernity and the Philosophy of the Future. Lanham, Md: Lexi̇ngton Books.
Patomäki, H. (2002). From East to West: Emergent Global Philosophies – Beginnings of the End of Western Dominance? Theory, Culture & Society, 19(3), 89–111.
Paul Hemming, L. (2013). Heidegger and Marx: A Productive Dialogue over the Language of Humanism. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Peone, D. (2021). Ethical Negativity: Hegel on the True Infinite. I. U. Dalferth, T. W. Kimball ve M. Siebeck (Ed.), The Meaning and Power of Negativity içinde (s 191-206). Tübingen.
Peter Gordon, E. (2012). German Existentialism and the Persistence of Metaphysics: Weber, Jaspers, Heidegger. J. Judaken ve R. Bernasconi, (Ed.), Situating Existentialism: Key Texts in context içinde (s. 65- 88). New York: Columbia University Press.
Philipse, H. (2002). Questions of Method: Heidegger and Bourdieu. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 2, 275-298.
Pinto, L. (2015). The Field: A Leibnizian Perspective in Sociology. M. Hilgers ve E. Mangez (Ed.), Bourdieu’s Theory of Social Fields: Concepts and Applications içinde (s. 102-117). London and New York: Routledge.
Pippin, R. (1997). Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pi̇ppi̇n, R. (2024). The Culmination: Heidegger, German Idealism, and the Fate of Philosophy. Chi̇cago and London: The Uni̇versi̇ty of Chi̇cago Press.
Polt, R. (2017). Martin Heidegger (B. Özkul, Çev.), B. S. Turner ve A. Elliott (Ed.), Çağdaş Toplum Kuramından Portreler [2001] içinde (s. 21-36). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Polt, R. (2020). A Running Leap into the There: Heidegger’s Running Notes on Being and Time. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 41(1), 55-71.
Polt, R. (2021). Logic (Logik). M. A. Wrathall, (Ed.), The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon içinde (s. 468-471). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Portis, E. B. (2008). Reconstructing the Classics: Political Theory from Plato to Weber (3. Baskı). Washington, D.C: CQ Press.
Powell, C. ve Dépelteau, F. (Ed.). (2015). İlişkisel Sosyoloji: Ontolojik ve Teorik Yönelimler (Ö. Akkaya, Çev.). Ankara: Phoenix.
Pöggeler, O. (1982). Heidegger und die Hermeneutische Theologie. E. Jüngel (Ed.), Verifikationen: Festschrift für Gerhard Eberling içinde (s. 481). Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr Verlag.
Protevi, J. (1999a). Some Remarks on Modernity and Post-modernism and/or Post-structuralism. Erişim: 12 Ocak 2013, http://www.protevi.com/john/DG/PDF/ Remarks_on_Modernity _and_Post-Modernism.pdf
Protevi, J. (1999b). Post-Structuralism. S. Glendinning, (Ed.), The Edinburgh Encyclopedia of Continental Philosophy içinde (s. 581-592). Edinburgh University Press.
Protevi, J. (2000). A problem of Pure Matter: Fascist Nihilism in a Thousand Plateaus. K. A. Pearson ve D. Morgan (Ed.), Nihilism now: Monsters of Energy, içinde (s. 167-188). London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Rabinow, P. ve Sullivan, W. M. (Ed.). (1979). Interpretive Social Science: A Reader.
Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.
Rabinow, P. ve Sullivan, W. M. (Ed.). (1987). Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press.
Rabi̇now, P. ve Sulli̇van, W. M. (Ed.). (2017). Toplum Bilimlerinde Yorumcu Yaklaşım (T. Parla, Çev.). İ̇stanbul: Deni̇z Yayınları.
Radloff, B. (2009). Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Globalisation. Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy / Revue Canadienne de Philosophie Continentale, 13(2), 146-162.
Raffoul, F. (2020). Thinking the Event. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Raffoul, F. ve Pettigrew, D. (Ed.). (2002). Heidegger and Practical Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Raffoul, F. ve Nelson, E. S. (2013). Editors’ Introductıon. F. Raffoul ve E. S. Nelson (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Heidegger içinde (s. 1-11). New York: Bloomsbury Academi̇c.
Rahkonen, K. (2011). Bourdieu and Nietzsche: Taste as a Struggle. S. Susen ve B. S. Turner, (Ed.), The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays içinde (s. 125-144). London, New York: Anthem Press.
Rahkonen, K. (2019). Bourdieu ve Nietzsche: Mücadele Olarak Beğeni. S. Susen ve S. B. Turner (Ed.), (A. K. Gülen, Çev.). Pierre Bourdieu’nün Mirası: Eleştirel Söylemler içinde (s. 151-172). Ankara: Phoenix.
Rauch, M. F. ve Schneider, N. (2019). Of peremption and Insurrection: Reiner Schürmann’s Encounter with Michel Foucault in Reiner Schürmann. M. F. Rauch ve N. Schneider, (Ed.), Tomorrow the Manifold: Essays on Foucault, Anarchy, and the Singularization to Come içinde (s. 151-181). Zurich: Diaphanes.
Raulet, G. (2005). Critical Cosmology: On Nations and Globalization: Philosophical Essay. Maryland, USA: Lexington Books.
Redding, P. (2006). Pierre Bourdieu: From Neo-Kantian to Hegelian Critical Social Theory. R. Sinnerbrink, J. P. Deranty, N. H. Smith ve P. Schmiedgen (Ed.), Critique Today içinde (s. 183-204). Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Rehmann, J. (2013). Max Weber: Modernisation as Passive Revolution: A Gramscian Analysis
(M. Henniger, Çev.). Brill, Leiden and Boston,
Rehmann, J. (2017). İdeoloji Teorileri: Yabancılaşma ve Boyun Eğme Güçleri (Ş. Alpagut, Çev.). İstanbul: Yordam Kitap.
Richardson, W. J. (1962). Heidegger and the Origin of Language. International Philosophical Quarterly, 2(3), 404-416.
Ringer, F. (1997). Max Weber's Methodology the Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. London: Harvard University Press.
Rivera, J. (2023). Phenomenology, Givenness, Mystery: Dilating Subjectivity. Religions, 14, 1-13.
Robbi̇ns, D. (2012). French Post-War Social Theory: International Knowledge Transfer. London, Californi̇a: Sage.
Robbi̇ns, D. (2016). Reading Bourdieu Phenomenologically. D. Robbi̇ns (Ed.), The Anthem Companion to Pierre Bourdieu içinde (s. 19-47). UK -USA: Anthem Press.
Robbi̇ns, D. (2019). The Bourdieu Paradigm: The Origins and Evolution of an Intellectual Social Project. Manchester: Manchester Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Roberts, J. (2013). Dialectic and Post-Hegelian Dialectic (Again): Žižek, Bhaskar, Badiou. Journal of Critical Realism, 12(1), 72–98.
Rockmore, T. (1992a). Irrationalism: Lukacs and the Marxist View of Reason. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Rockmore, T. (1992b). On Heidegger's Nazism and Philosophy. Berkeley: Uni̇versi̇ty of Cali̇forni̇a Press.
Rodrigo P. (2011). The Dynamic of Hexis in Aristotle's Philosophy. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42(1), 6-17.
Romano, C. (2020). Beyond the Linguistic Turn? Language and Expressive Forms in the Work of Charles Taylor. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 108(4), 547-564.
Roth, G. (1968). Introduction. G. Roth ve C. Wi̇tti̇ch (Ed.), Max Weber. Economy and Society içinde (s. xxvii-clv). New York: Bedni̇ni̇ster Press.
Ruggieri, D. (2017). Georg Simmel and the “Relational Turn”: Contributions to the Foundation of the Lebenssoziologie since Simmel. Simmel Studies, 21(1), 43-71.
Runciman, W. G. (1972). A Critique of Max Weber’s Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sabine, G. H. (1973). A History of Political Theory. Hi̇nsdale: Dryden Press.
Sachs, C. B. (2011). What is To Be Overcome? Nietzsche, Carnap, and Modernism as the Overcoming of Metaphysic. Hi̇story of Phi̇losophy Quarterly, 28(3), 303-318.
Sadler, T. (1995). Nietzsche: Truth and Redemption -Critique of the Postmodernist Nietzsche. London: The Athlone Press.
Sadler, T. (1996). Heidegger and Aristotle: The Question of Being. London: Athlone.
Sağlam, S. (2008). Ziya Gökalp. M. Ç. Özdemir (Ed.), Türkiye’de Sosyoloji–İsimler–Eserler -I içinde (s. 161–219). Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
Salice, A. ve Schmid, H. B. (Ed.). (2016). The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality: History, Concepts, Problems. New York: Springer.
Salli̇s, J. (1997). Double Truths: An Interview with John Sallis. Man And World, 30, 107-114.
Sallis, J. (2013). The Logic of Thinking. J. Powell (Ed.), Heidegger and Language içinde (s. 86-101). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
San, C. (1971) Max Weber’de Hukukun ve Meşru Otoritenin Sosyolojik Analizi. Ankara: AİTİA Yayınları.
Schalow, F. (1986). Toward a Concrete Ontology of Practical Reason in Light of Heidegger's Lectures on Human Freedom. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 17(2), 155-165.
Schalow, F. (2001). Heidegger and the Quest for the Sacred: From Thought to the Sanctuary of Faith”. Dordrecht: Spri̇nger.
Schalow, F. (2002). Freedom, Finitude, and The Practical Self: The Other Side of Heidegger's Appropriation of Kant. F. Raffoul ve D. Pettigrew (Ed.), Heidegger and Practical Philosophy içinde (s. 29-41). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Scharff, R. C. (2002). Comte after Positivism. UK-USA: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T. K. (1997). Practices and Actions: A Wittgensteinian Critique of Bourdieu and Giddens. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27, 283-308.
Schatzki̇, T. (2002). Book Review: Bourdieu: A Critical Reader-[1999]. Phi̇losophy of the Soci̇al Sci̇ences, 32(3), 445-449.
Schatzki, T. R. (2006) Review: Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(4), 496-507.
Schatzki, T. R. (2007). Early Heidegger on Sociality. H. Dreyfus ve M. A. Wrathall (Ed.), A Companion to Heidegger içinde (s. 233-247). Oxford, UK & Cambridge: Blackwell.
Schatzki, T. (2017). Multiplicity in Social Theory and Practice Ontology. M. Jonas ve B. Littig (Ed.). Praxeological Political Analysis içinde (s. 17–34). Abingdon: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. R. (2018). Theory and Conceptual Centrality in Bourdieu. Anthropological Theory, 18(4) 502–508.
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. ve von Savigny, E. (Ed.). (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.). (1981). The Philosophy of Karl Jaspers. La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company.
Schinkel, W. (2007). Sociological Discourse of the Relational: The Cases of Bourdieu & Latour. The Sociological Review, 55(4), 707-729.
Schmi̇d, H. B. (2009). Plural Action: Essays in Philosophy and Social Science. Spri̇nger.
Schmid, H. B. ve Thonhauser, G. (Ed.). (2017). From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory. Switzerland: Springer.
Schmidt, D. J. (2001). Strategies for a possible Reading. C. E. Scott, vd. (Ed.), Companion to Heidegger’s contributions to philosophy. Indiana University Press.
Schonfeld, E. (2014). Thinking Subjectivity after Heidegger: A Phenomenology of Plato’s Concept of the Soul. C. Schmidt, M. Mack ve A. R. German (Ed.), Post-Subjectivity içinde (s. 183-199). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Schrift, A. D. (2000). Nietzsche, Foucault, Deleuze, and the Subject of Radical Democracy. C. Boundas (Ed.), Angelaki, Special Issue, 5(2), 151-161.
Schrift, A. D. (2004). Nietzsche, Foucault, Deleuze ve Radikal Demokrasinin Öznesi. Futuristika. Erişim: 14 Ocak 2022, https://futuristika.org/alan-d-schrift-nietzsche-foucault-deleuze-ve-radikal-demokrasinin-oznesi/
Schrijvers, J. (2023). For the Time Being: Heidegger’s Final Words in Vorläufiges I-IV. Diakrisis: Yearbook of Theology and Philosophy, 6, 9–37.
Schroeder, R. (1996). Max Weber ve Kültür Sosyolojisi-[1992] (M. Küçük, Çev.). Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
Schürmann, R. (1992). Riveted to a Monstrous Site: On Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie. T. Rockmore ve J. Margolis (Ed.), The Heidegger case: On philosophy and politics içinde (s. 313–330). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Schürmann, R. (2019). On Constituting Oneself an Anarchistic Subject. M. F. Rauch ve N. Schneider (Ed.), Tomorrow the Manifold: Essays on Foucault, Anarchy, and the Singularization to Come içinde (s. 7-30). Zurich: Diaphanes.
Schwieler, E. (2022). Aporias of Translation: Literature, Philosophy. Switzerland: Springer.
Seidel, G. J. (1999). Heidegger’s Last God and the Schelling Connection. Laval Théologique et Philosophique, 55(1), 85-98.
Seidman, S. (1986). Is There Theoretical Growth in Sociology? Comment on Wagner and Berger. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 164-168.
Selberg, A. K. (2021). Politics and Truth: Heidegger, Arendt and the Modern Political Lie. Stockholm: Printed by Elanders.
Sheehan, T. (1993). Reading a Life: Heidegger and Hard Times. C. Guignon (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger içinde (s. 70-96). Cambridge University Press.
Sheehan, T. (1998). Nihilism: Heidegger / Jünger / Aristotle. B. C. Hopki̇ns (Ed.), Phenomenology: Japanese and American Perspectives içinde (s. 273-316). Kluwer Academi̇c Publi̇shers.
Sheehan, T. (2002). Heidegger ve Naziler. A. Demirhan (Ed.), Heidegger ve Nazizim içinde (s.10-38). Ankara: Vadi Yayınları.
Sheehan, T. (2009). Heidegger: The Man and the Thinker. UK: Routledge.
Sheehan, T. (2020). Hiding in Plain Sight: Κίνησις at the Core of Heidegger’s Work (Prolegomenon). Bolletino Filosofico, 25, 280-291.
Sheehan, T. (2022). Method: Phenomenology. Erişim: 12 ŞUBAT 2022, https://www.academia.edu/79095632/BEING_AND_TIME_7_HEIDEGGER_ ON_PHENOMENOLOGY
Sheehan, T. (2023a). Rewriting Heidegger. Differenz: Revista Internacional de Estudios Heideggerianos y sus Derivas Contemporáneas, 10(9), 167-193.
Sheehan, T. (2023b). Some Prolegomena to Heidegger’s being and time. Erişim: 12.07. 2023, www.academia.edu
Sheehan, T. (2023c). Heidegger’s Being and Time: Paraphrased and Annotated. Erişim: 10.08.2023, https://www.academia.edu/86124529/BEING_and_TIME_PARAPHRASED _INTRODUCTION_docx
Sheehan, T. (yakında çıkacak makale.). The Reception of Heidegger's Phenomenology in the United States. M. B. Ferri (Ed.), The Reception of Heidegger's Phenomenology in North America. Dordrecht, New York: Springer. Erişim: 01.11.2024, https://www.academia.edu/26545151/THE_RECEPTION_OF_HEIDEGGERS_PHENOMENOLOGY_IN_THE_UNITED_STATES
Shusterman R. (Ed.), (1999). Bourdieu: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sica, A. (2003). Max Weber’s Methodologies: Interpretation and Critique. Contemporary Sociology, 32(4), 523-524.
Sica, A. (2016). Max Weber Invents Himself. A. Sica (Ed.), The Anthem Companion to Max Weber içinde (s. 1-25). UK, USA: Anthem Press.
Sica, A. (2017). Max Weber: A Comprehensive Bibliography. London and New York: Routledge.
Sica, A. (2021). What is a Classic? Variations on an Ancient Theme (1. Cilt). P. Kivisto (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory içinde (s. 24-44). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sikka, S. (2018). The Staus of Reason. Heidegger, Morality and Politics: Questioning the Shepherd of Being içinde (s. 185-215). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sinnerbrink, R. (1997). Active Slaves and Reactive Masters? Deleuze's Anti-Dialectical Nietzsche. Social Semiotics, 7(2), 147-160.
Sinnerbrink, R. (2010). Goodbye Lenin? Žižek on Neoliberal Ideology and Post-Marxist Politics. International Journal of Žižek Studies, 4(2).
Sinnerbrink, R., Deranty, J. P. D., Smith, N. ve Schmiedgen, P. (Ed.). (2006). Critique Today (3. Cilt). Boston: Brill.
Slama, P. (2018). L'intentionnalité sociale chez le jeune Heidegger et Max Weber. S. Camilleri, G. Fagniez ve C. Gauvry (Ed.), Heideggers Hermeneutik der Faktizität. Die Grundbegriffe içinde (s. 200-221). Berlin: Bautz.
Slama, P. (2022). Heidegger on Americanism, after Carl Schmitt and Max Weber: United States as a Figure of a Historical Transcendental. J. Rogove ve P. d’Oriano (Ed.), Heidegger and His Anglo-American Receptions içinde (s. 311-330). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sluga, H. (1995). Heidegger's Crisis: Philosophy and Politics in Nazi Germany. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.
Smith, G. B. (1996). Nietzsche, Heidegger, and the Transition to Postmodernity. Chi̇cago: Uni̇versi̇ty Of Chi̇cago Press.
Smith, G. B. (2020). Review Essay: What gives? Getting over the Subject, Continental Philosophy Review, 33, 93–105.
Smith G. B. (2020) José Daniel Parra: Heidegger’s Nietzsche: European Modernity and the
Philosophy of the Future. (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2019. Pp. 224.). The Review of Politics, 82(3), 508-510. doi:10.1017/S0034670520000261
Smith, P. ve Riley, A. (2016). Kültürel Kurama Giriş [2009]. (S. Güzelsarı ve İ. Gündoğdu, Çev.). İstanbul: Dipnot Yayınları.
Snook, I. (1990). Language, Truth and Power: Bourdieu’s Ministerium. R. Harker vd. (Ed.), An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu: The Practice of Theory içinde (s. 160–179). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stambaugh, J. (1974). Time and Dialectic in Hegel and Heidegger. Research in Phenomenology, 4, 87-97.
Stauth, G. (1992). Nietzsche, Weber, and the Affirmative Sociology of Culture. European Journal of Sociolgy, 33(2).
Stauth, G. ve Turner, B. S. (2005). Nietzsche'nin Dansı, [1988] (2. Baskı). (M. Küçük, Çev.), Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
Styhre, A. (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin K. Cetina ve E. von Savigny (Ed.), London and New York: Routledge.
Suğur, N. (2012). Sosyolojik Yöntemde Klasik ve Yeni Dönem Tartışmaları. T. G. Şavran, (Ed.), Sosyolojide Araştırma Yöntem ve Teknikleri içinde (s. 32-63). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Sunar, İ. (1979) Düşün ve Toplum. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları.
Sunar, İ. (1999). Düşün ve Toplum. Ankara: Doruk Yayıncılık.
Sunar, L. (2012). Marx ve Weber’de Doğu Toplumları. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
Susen, S. (2013). Bourdieusian Reflections on Language: Unavoidable Conditions of the Real Speech Situation. Social Epistemology, 27(3-4), 199–246.
Susen, S. (2015). The Postmodern Turn in the Social Sciences. Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Susen, S. (2016). The Sociological Challenge of Reflexivity in Bourdieusian Thought. D. Robbins, (Ed.), The Anthem Companion to Pierre Bourdieu içinde (s. 49-93). London: Anthem Press.
Susen, S. (2017a). Hermeneutic Bourdieu. L. Adkins, C. Brosnan ve S. Threadgold (Ed.), Bourdieusian Prospects içinde (s. 132-159). UK: Routledge.
Susen, S. (2017b). Reflections on Patrick Baert’s the Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual. S. Susen ve P. Baert (Ed.), The Sociology of Intellectuals: After the Existentialist Moment içinde (s. 1-122). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Susen, S. (2020). Sociology in the Twenty-First Century: Key Trends, Debates, and Challenges. UK-USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
Susen, S. ve Turner, B. S. (2019). Pierre Bourdieu’nün Mirası Üzerine İlk Düşünceler. S. Susen ve B. S. Turner (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu’nün Mirası: Eleştirel Söylemler (A. K. Gülen, Çev.) içinde (s. 7-24). Ankara: Phoenix Yayınevi.
Sven, E. (2002). Max Weber’s Methodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Svenungsson, J. (2022). Reappraising Weber’s Disenchantment Narrative: (Second) Thoughts about the Re-Sacralization of Nature and Matter. Eco-Ethica, 10, 25–42.
Swartz, D. L. (2022). Simgesel İktidar, Siyaset ve Entelektüeller: Pierre Bourdieu’nün Siyaset Sosyolojisi. (E. Gurbanova ve C. Sili, Çev.). Ankara: Fol Yayınları.
Swedberg R. ve Agevall, O. (2016). The Max Weber Dictionary: Key Words and Central Concepts (2. Baskı). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Şaylan, G. (2009). Postmodernizm. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
Taminiaux, J. (1987). Poiesis and Praxis in Fundamental Ontology. Research in Phenomenology, 17(1), 137–169.
Taş, K. (2011). Sosyal Bilim Paradigmaları Açısından Sosyolojik Metodoloji. İstanbul: Rağbet Yayınları.
Tatlıcan, Ü. ve Çeğin, G. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde İki Farklı Realizm: Pierre Bourdieu’nün Epistemolojisi Ve Eleştirel Realizm. Ü. Tatlıcan (Ed.), Sosyoloji ve Sosyal Teori Yazıları içinde (s. 323-357). İstanbul: Sentez Yayıncılık.
Tenbruck, F. (1986). The Problem of Thematic Unity in the Works of Max Weber. British Journal of Sociology, 31, 316–51.
The Heidegger Circle. (t.y.). Erişim: 14 Haziran 2023, https://heidegger-circle.org/about/
Thompson, E. (1986). Planetary Thinking / Planetary Building: An Essay on Martin Heidegger and Nishitani Keiji. Philosophy East and West, 36(3), 235-252.
Thomson, I. (2003). The Philosophical Fugue: Understanding the Structure and Goal of Heidegger's Beiträge. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 34(1), 57-73.
Thomson, I. D. (2011). Heidegger, Art, and Postmodernity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, I. (2012). Heidegger: Ontoteoloji / Teknoloji ve Eğitim Politikaları. (H. Arslan, Çev.). İ̇stanbul: Paradi̇gma.
Thomson, I. (2021). Nothing (Nichts). M. A. Wrathall (Ed.), The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon içinde (s. 520-528). Cambridge: United Kingdom; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Times Higher Education (2019). World University Rankings 2019. Erişim: 19 Haziran 2022, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2019/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats
Timur, T. (2007). Pierre Bourdieu’nün sosyoloji kavgası ve marksizm. Marksizm, İnsan Ve Toplum: Balibar, Sève, Althusser, Bourdieu içinde (s. 215-251). İstanbul: Yordam Kitap.
Tonner, P. (2008). Haecceitas and the Question of Being: Heidegger and Duns Scotus. Kri̇ti̇ke, 2(2), 146-154.
Toteff, C. A. (2002). Max Weber as Philosopher: The Jaspers-Rickert Confrontation. Max Weber Studi̇es, 3(1), 15-32.
Turner, B. S. (1984). Marks ve Oryantalizmin Sonu. (H. Ç. Keskinok, Çev.). İstanbul: Kaynak Yayınları.
Turner, B. S. (1987). State, Science and Economy in Traditional Society. The Bri̇ti̇sh Journal of Soci̇ology, xxxviii(1), 1-23.
Turner, J. H., Beeghley, L. ve Powers, C. H. (2012). The Emergence of Social Theory (7. Baskı). Los Angeles and London: Sage.
Turner, S. (1986). The Search for a Methodology of Social Science: Durkheim, Weber and the Nineteenth-Century Problem of Cause, Probability and Action. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Turner, S. (1999). Review: An Interpretation of Weber's Methodological Writings. Max Weber's Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. F. Ringer (Ed.), Minerva, 37(4), 409-411.
Turner, S. P. ve Factor, R. A. (2006). Max Weber and the Dispute over Reason and Value: A Study in Philosophy, Ethics, and Politics, [First Published in 1984]. London, New York: Routledge.
Uluocak, Ş. (2012). Doğa Bilimleri Kültür Bilimleri Ayrımında Sosyolojik Açıdan Kuramlaştırma Sürecinin Tartışılması. İstanbul: Kum Saati Yayınları.
Ungureanu, C. (2013). Bourdieu and Derrida on Gift: Beyond ‘‘Double Truth’’ and Paradox. Human Studi̇es, 36, 393-409.
Urban, W. J. (2011). Re-Reading Hegel: Meaning and Subjectivity in the Phenomenology of Spirit. Erişim: 03 Mayıs 2023, https://www.academia.edu/1123469/re-reading_hegel_meaning_and_subjectivity_in_the_phenomenology_of_spirit
Ülken, H. Z. (1936). 20. Asır Filozofları. İstanbul: Kanaat Kitabevi.
Ülken, H. Z. (1968). Varlık ve Oluş. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
Ülken, H. Z. (1979) Türkiye’de Çağdaş Düşünce Tarihi, İstanbul: Ülken Yayınları.
Ülner, F. B. (2001) Yapısalcılıkta ve Yapısalcılık Sonrasında Hegel, Doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Ünal, A. Z. (2004). Sosyal Tabakalaşma Bağlamında Pierre Bourdieu'nün Kültürel Sermaye Kavramı, Doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Ünsaldı, L. ve Ural, H. (2015). Bütüncül Bir Çalışma ve Zihin Pratiği Olarak Bourdieu’den “Parçalı” Bourdieu’lere. Modus Operandi: İlişkisel Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 193-224.
Vallega, A. (2001). Beyng-Historical Thinking. C. E. Scott, S. M. Schoenbohm, D. Vallega-Neu ve A. Vallega (Ed.), Companion to Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy içinde (s. 48-65). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Vallega-Neu, D. (2001). Poietic Saying. C. E. Scott, S M. Schoenbohm, D. Vallega-Neu ve A. Vallega, (Ed.), Companion to Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy içinde (s. 66-80). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Van der Loo, H. ve van Reijen, W. (2003). Modernleşmenin Paradoksları: Sosyolojik Bir Yaklaşım. (K. Canatan, Çev.). İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları.
Van Reijen, W. (1988). The Dialectic of Enlightenment Read as Allegory. (J. Bleicher, G. Stauth ve B. S. Turner, Çev.). Theory Culture & Society içinde (5. Cilt, s. 409-429). London: SAGE.
Van Reijen, W. (2006). Aydınlanmanın Diyalektiği'ni Alegori Olarak Okumak. H. E. Bağçe
(Ed.), Frankfurt Okulu içinde (s. 167-188). Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları.
Vandenberghe, F. (1999). The Real is Relational: An Epistemological Analysis of Pierre Bourdieu's Generative Structuralism. Sociological Theory, 17(1), 32-67.
Vandenberghe, F. (2010). Immanent Transcendence in Georg Simmel’s Sociology of Religion. Journal of Classical Sociology, 10(1), 5–32.
Vandenberghe, F. (2018). The Relation as Magical Operator: Overcoming the Divide between Relational and Processual [-interactionist-p.37] Sociology. F. Dépelteau ve P. Macmillan (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology içinde (s. 35-57). Switzerland.
Varela, C. R. (2009). Science for Humanism: The Recovery of Human Agency. Routledge
Volpi, F. (1992). Dasein as Praxis: The Heideggerian Assimilation and the Radicalization of the Practical Philosophy of Aristotle (2. Cilt). C. Macann, (Ed.), Martin Heidegger: Critical Assessments. Routledge.
Von Herrmann, F. W. (2013). Hermeneutics and Reflection: Heidegger and Husserl on the Concept of Phenomenology, (K. Maly, Çev.). Toronto–Buffalo –London: University of Toronto Press.
Wacquant, L. (2018). Four Transversal Principles for Putting Bourdieu to Work. T. Medvetz ve J. J. Sallaz, (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu içinde (s. 645-653). New York: Oxford University Press.
Wacquant, L. ve Akçaoğlu, A. (2017). Practice and Symbolic Power in Bourdieu: The View from Berkeley. Journal of Classical Sociology, 17(1), 37–51.
Wagner, D. G. ve Berger, J. (1985). Do Sociological Theories Grow? American Journal of Sociology, 90(4), 697-728.
Wallace, R. A. ve Wolf, A. (2018). Çağdaş Sosyoloji Kuramları: Klasik Geleneğin Geliştirilmesi. L. Elburuz ve M. R. Ayas, Çev.). Ankara: DoğuBatı Yayınları.
Wang, H. J. (2021). Heidegger’s Ontology of Practice. Academia Letters, 3318, 1-3.
Warnke, G. (1985). Hermeneneutics and the Social Sciences: A Gadamerian Critique of Rorty. Inquiry, 28, 339-357.
Warnke, G. (2018). Hermeneutics and Democracy. Research in Phenomenology, 48, 447–455.
Watkin, C. (2017) Explaining Derrida with Diagrams 1: Différance, 28 Haziran 2023,
https://christopherwatkin.com/2017/02/27/explaining-derrida-with-diagrams-1-
differance/
Webb, D. (2000). Continuity and Difference in Heidegger’s Sophist. The Southern
Journal of Phi̇losophy, XXXVIII, 145-169.
Webb, D. (2009). Heidegger, Ethics and the Practice of Ontology. London, New York:
Conti̇nuum.
Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: The Free Press.
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. G. Roth ve C. Wittich (Ed). New York: The Free Press.
Weber, M. (1985). Protestan Ahlakı ve Kapitalizmin Ruhu. (T. Parla, Çev.). İstanbul: Hi̇l Yayın.
Weber, M. (1986). Sosyoloji Yazıları. (T. Parla, Çev.). İstanbul: Hürri̇yet Vakfı Yayınları.
Weber, M. (2011). Meslek Olarak Bilim. H. H. Gert ve C. W. Mills (Ed.). Sosyoloji Yazıları. (T. Parla, Çev.). İstanbul: Deniz Yayınları.
Weber, M. (2012). Kültür Bilimlerinin Mantığı Üzerine Eleştirel İncelemeler. (V. Saygın Öğütle, Çev.). Sosyal Bilimlerin Metodolojisi içinde (s. 179-75). İstanbul: Küre Yayınları.
Weberman, D. (2001). Heidegger's Relationalism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 9(1), 109-122.
Weidler, M. (2018). Heidegger’s Style: On Philosophical Anthropology and Aesthetics. London and New york: Bloomsbury Academic.
Weik, E. (2010). Research Note -Bourdieu and Leibniz: Mediated Dualisms. The Sociological Review, 58(3), 486-496.
Weiner, J. F. (2001). Tree Leaf Talk: A Heideggerian Anthropology. Oxford and New York: Berg Press.
Wei̇nstei̇n, D. ve Wei̇nstei̇n, M. A. (1993). Postmodern(ized) Simmel. London and New York: Routledge.
Westerlund, F. (2014) Heidegger and the Problem of Phenomenality, Doktora Tezi, University of Helsinki, Department of Philosophy, History and Art Studies, Helsinki.
Wi̇dder, N. (2003). Thought after Dialectics: Deleuze’s Ontology of Sense. The Southern Journal Of Phi̇losophy, XLI, 451-476.
Wilkerson, D. (t.y.). Friedrich Nietzsche (1844—1900), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Erişim: 10. 08 2023, https://iep.utm.edu/nietzsch/
Windelband, W. (1980). History and Natural Science (G. Oakes, Çev.). History and Theory, 1, 165-185.
Withy, K. (2022). The Resonant Principle of Reason. F. Casati ve D. Dahlstrom, (Ed.), Heidegger on Logic içinde (s. 221-239). UK-USA: Cambridge University Press.
Woessner, M. (2017). Hermeneutic Communism: Left Heideggerianism’s Last Hope? S. Mazzini ve O. Glyn-Williams (Ed.), Making Communism Hermeneutical: Reading Vattimo and Zabala içinde (s. 35-48). Springer.
Woli̇n, R. (2004). The Seduction of Unreason, The Intellectual Romance with Fascism: From Nietzsche to Postmodernism. Pri̇nceton: Pri̇nceton Uni̇versi̇ty Press.
Wolin, R. (2005). What is Heideggerian Marxism? R. Wolin ve J. Abromeit (Ed.), Herbert Marcuse's Heideggerian marxism. Lincoln, London: University of Nebraska Press.
Woodward, A. (2002). Nihilism and the Postmodern in Vattimo's Nietzsche. Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy, 6, 51-67.
Woodward, A. (2009). Nihilism in Postmodernity: Lyotard, Baudrillard, Vattimo. Colorado: The Davies Group, Publishers.
Wrathall, M. A. (2006). The Revealed Word and World Disclosure: Heidegger and Pascal on the Phenomenology of Religious Faith. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 37(1), 75-88.
Wrathall, M. A. (2021). Adaptation (Ereignis). M. A. Wrathall, (Ed.), The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon içinde (s. 19-30). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Yıldırım, A. F. (Ed.). (2022) Postmodern Fragmanlar: Postmodernizm Üzerine Notlar. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
Yılmaz, F. (2009). Rasyonalite: İktisat Özelinde Bir Tartışma. İstanbul: Paradigma Yayıncılık.
Young, J. (2018). German Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: Weber to Heidegger. London and New York: Routledge.
Yu, K. W. (2017). From Mythos to Logos: Jean-Pierre Vernant, Max Weber, and the Narrative of Occidental Rationalization. Modern Intellectual Hi̇story, 14(2), 477–506.
Zahavi, D. (2003). How to Investigate Subjectivity: Natorp and Heidegger on Reflection. Continental Philosophy Review, 36(2), 155-176.
Zimmerman, M. E. (1990). Heidegger's Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics, and Art. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
