dc.contributor.advisor | Kandemir Kocaaslan, Özge | |
dc.contributor.author | Balcı, Okancan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-23T07:47:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2022-12-26 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11655/29216 | |
dc.description.abstract | Online shopping has become very prevalent in average consumer’s daily life. Electronic
retailing comes with many conveniences for consumers. Being able to share information
about the purchased product is among these conveniences. This is done through writing
Online Consumer Reviews. Online Consumer Reviews can decrease consumer
uncertainty by providing information about the product quality. Furthermore, many
online retailers implemented a “helpfulness” feature to help potential customers find
valuable reviews easily. This creates an opportunity to find out what kind of
information tends to decrease the consumer uncertainty, in other words, what makes a
helpful review? To answer this question, consumer review data from BestBuy and
IMDb was scraped and transformed. Then the data was inquired in the light of Search
and Experience goods paradigm, Negativity Bias and Prospect Theory. Hypotheses
were tested by Tobit Regression. The results were both expected and unexpected. It was
found that information sharing for Search goods is very important and consumers need
more elaboration when a review is rated negatively. Additionally, reviews with negative
sentiments were found to be more helpful leading to the presence of Negativity Bias. On
the other hand, such strong support for Negativity Bias were not observed for
Experience goods. The implication of these results is that consumers should participate
in more both writing and voting reviews at least for Search Goods. This way consumers
can get the best quality products with respect to their budgets. Besides, this optimized
behavior might lead to increased social welfare because of the decreased information
asymmetry between producers and consumers. | tr_TR |
dc.language.iso | en | tr_TR |
dc.publisher | Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü | tr_TR |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Natural Language Processing | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Information Economics | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Behavioral Economics | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Web Scraping | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Online Consumer Reviews | tr_TR |
dc.subject.lcsh | İktisat tarihi ve iktisadi işlemler | tr_TR |
dc.title | Dealing with Consumer Uncertainty: Online Consumer Reviews and What makes them helpful? | tr_TR |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis | tr_TR |
dc.description.ozet | Çevrimiçi alışveriş ortalama bir tüketicinin hayatında her geçtiğimiz gün daha büyük bir pay almaya başladı. Elektronik alışverişin tüketicilere sağladığı en büyük faydalardan birisi de Çevimiçi Tüketici yorumlarıdır. Bu yorumlar yoluyla tüketici alacağı ürünün kalitesi hakkında alışverişi gerçekleştirmeden önce bilgi edinebilir. Bilgi edinmeyi kolaylaştırmak için bir çok elektronik satıcı sitelerinin yorum kısımlarında yorumun faydalı bulunup bulunmadığına dair "faydalı" ya da "faydasız" şeklinde butonlar yerleştirmiş bulunmakta. Bu "faydalılık" fasilitesi ne tipte bilginin tüketici belirsizliğini azalttığını bulma konusunda yol gösterici olabilir. Hangi yorumların faydalı hangilerinin faydasız olduğunun bulunması için bu tezde web kazıma teknikleri kullanıldı. Sonuç olarak elektronik mallar için tüketiciler arası bilgi paylaşımının tüketici belirsizliğini azalttığı saptandı. | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | İktisat | tr_TR |
dc.embargo.terms | Acik erisim | tr_TR |
dc.embargo.lift | 2023-01-23T07:47:12Z | |
dc.funding | Yok | tr_TR |