Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Kamu Değeri Analizi: Bakanlıkların Web Siteleri Üzerinden Bir Araştırma

Çolak, Tuncay

Göster/Aç

Yüksek Lisans Tezi (2.169Mb)

Tarih

2022-06-27

Yazar

Çolak, Tuncay

Ambargo Süresi

Acik erisim

Üst veri

Tüm öğe kaydını göster

Özet

Innovations in information and communication technologies have not only affected economic and social life, but also led to significant changes in the way public services are presented. With the development of technology, internet websites, which have an important place in daily life, have played a critical role in the delivery of public services. Many public services have started to be offered over the internet websites of public institutions and organizations, thus it is aimed to both reduce time and cost and improve the quality of the service provided. At this point, the websites of the ministries of the Republic of Turkey, one of the main centers of citizen-state interaction, have also become an important tool in terms of providing some public services in electronic environment. Evaluating the value and quality of the public service provided both electronically and face-to-face is an important issue that has been studied for a long time in the field of public administration. The concept of Public Value, which emerged as a recipe that offers alternative solutions to the deficiencies and problems that the New Public Management approach cannot compensate for in the field of administration, contributes to the evaluation of the value and quality of the public service by offering various suggestions and methods on how to produce value in public service delivery and how to evaluate the produced value. The phenomenon of public value came to the fore with the book titled “Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government” written by Mark H. Moore in 1995 and quickly gained popularity among academics and public administrators. However, more work is needed to measure and a clear definition of the concept of public value. In this direction, this study has been prepared in order to eliminate these deficiencies. In this study, the conceptual and theoretical framework of the phenomenon of public value is clearly discussed, and a proposal is presented on how to measure public value by developing a model for the measurement of public value. The websites of the ministries of the Republic of Turkey have been analyzed and evaluated in detail with web evaluation metrics and public values criteria, and it is aimed to contribute to the increase of the public value of the ministries’ websites by making the necessary suggestions in this regard.

Bağlantı

http://hdl.handle.net/11655/26459

Koleksiyonlar

Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü Tez Koleksiyonu [232]

Künye

Abanumy, A., Al-Badi, A., & Mayhew, P. (2005). E- Government Website Accessibility: In Depth Evalution of Saudi Arabia and Oman. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 99-106. Agere, S. (2000). Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives. Commenwealth Secretariat. Ahmet, G., & Alan, Ç. (2018). Türkiye'de Kamu Kurumlarının Bilgi Teknolojileri Kullanımındaki Yeri. Uluslararası El Ruha Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi, (s. 178-194). Şanlıurfa. Akçakaya, M. (2017). Geleneksel Kamu Yönetiminden Yeni Kamu Yönetimine Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininin Gelişimi. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(34). Aksakaloğlu, Y., & Akçakaya, M. (2021). Kamu Değeri Yaklaşımı’nın ‘Eleştirel Kuram’ Temeli. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 56(1), 272-289. Aktan, C. C. (2015). İdeal Devlet ve İyi Yönetim: Temel İlkeler, Kurallar ve Kurumlar. Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırma Dergisi, 7(1), 50-60. Alford, J., & Hughes, O. (2008). Public Value Pragmatism as the Next Phase of Public Management. The American Review of Public Administration, 130-148. Alford, J., & O' Flynn, J. (2008). Public value: a stocktake of a concept. Twelfth Annuan Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management. Brisbane. Alias, E. S., Idris, S. H., Ashaari, N. S., & Kasimin, H. (2011). Evaluating e-Government services in Malaysia Using the EGOVSAT model. In Proceedings of International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI), (s. 1-5). Bandung, Indonesia. Allison, R., Hayes, C., Cliodna, M., & Vicki, Y. (2019). A Comprehensive Framework to Evaluate Websites: Literature Review and Development of GoodWeb. JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 3(4). Altaqafi, T., Foster, S., & Rahim, M. (2018). Public value creation using social media applications for the local government context: A pilot case study. . Australasian Conference on Information Systems, ACIS 2018 Proceedings, (s. 1-12). Sydney, Australia. Altuntaş, Z., & Durdu, P. O. (2020). Web Sitesi Erişebilirlik Değerlendirmesi: Bir Bariyer Gezinti Çalışması. Sosyal Politikaları Çalışma Dergisi, 119-144. Andersen, K., Medaglia, R., Vatrapu, R., Henriksen, H., & Gauld, R. (2011). The Forgotten Promise of E-Government Maturity: Assessing Responsiveness in The Digital Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 439-445. Arnstein , S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. AIP Journal, 216-223. Aydın, M. D. (2007). Kamu Hizmetlerinde Bilgi Teknolojileri Uygulamaları: Fırsat ve Tehditler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(2), 295-322. Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. (2006). Data Triangulation and Web Quality Metrics: A case Study in E-government. İnformation Management, 43(6), 767-777. BBC. (2004). Building Public Value: Renewing the BBC for a Digital World. London: BBC. Beck Jorgensen, T., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values: An Inventory. Administration and Society, 39(3), 354-381. Behn, R. D. (2003). Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606. Benington, J. (tarih yok). Benington, J. (2009). Creating the Public In Order To Create Public Value? Intl Journal of Public Administration,, 32(3), 232-249. Benington, J. (2011). From Private Choice to Public Value? (J. B. Moore, Dü.) 31-51. Benington, J. (2015). Public Value as a Contested Democratic Practice. B. C. J. M. Bryson (Dü.) içinde, Creating Public Value in Practice (s. 29-47). NW, Suite 300: CRC Press. Benington, J., & Moore, M. (2011). From Private Choice to Public Value? J. Benington ve M. Moore. J. B. Moore (Dü.) içinde, Public Value: Theory and Practice (s. 31-51). Londra: Palgrave Macmillan. Bhattacharya, D., Gulla, U., & Gupta , M. P. (2012). E‐Service Quality Model for Indian Government Portals: Citizens' Perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 25(3), 246-271. Blaug, R., Horner, L., & Lekhi, R. (2006). Public Value, Politics and Public Management. London: The Work Foundation. Blaug, R., Horner, L., & Lekhi, R. (2006). Public Value, Politics and Public Management. London: The Work Foundation. Bozeman , B. (2002). Public-Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do”. Public Administration Review, 62(2). Bozeman, B. (2007). Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. . Washington: Georgetown University Press. Bozeman, B. (2009). Public Values Theory: Three Big Questions. International Journal of Public Policy, 4(5), 369-375. Bozeman, B., & Johnson, J. (2015). The political economy of public values: A case for the public sphere and progressive opportunity. American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 61-85. Bozeman, B., & Sarawitz, D. (2011). Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation. Minerva, 49, 1-23. Bracci, E., Gagliardo, E. D., & Bigoni, M. (2014). Performance management systems and public value strategy: A Case Study. Public Value Management, Measurement and Reporting, 3, 129-157. doi:10.1108/S2051-663020140000003006 Bretschneider, S., Choi, Y., Nabatchi, T., & O'Leary, R. (2015). Incentivizing Collaboration: An Experimental Analysis of Performance Information, Public Value Creation, and Public Values Promotion. B. C. J. M. Bryson (Dü.) içinde, Creating Public Value in Practice (s. 185-202). NW, Suite 300: CRC Press. Brookes, S., & Wiggan, J. (2009). Reflecting The Public Value of Sport: A Game of Two Halves? Public Management Review, 11(4), 401-420. Brown, P., Cherney, L., Warney, S., Abazie, U., Sarah Ball, L. E., Reeves, L. S., & Worsoe, H. (2019). Understanding Public Value Workshop: Report on Proceedings. Brisbane: The University of Queensland. Bryson, J., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2015). Creating Public Value in Practice. NW, Suite 300: CRC Press. Bryson, J., Crosby, B., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving Beyond Traditional Public Administration and The New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456. Buccoliero, L., & Bellio, E. (2010). Citizen Web Empowerment in European Municipalities. Journal of E- Governance, 33(4), 225-236. Byun, D., & Finnie, G. (2011). Evaluating Usability, User Satisfaction and Intention to Revisit for Successful E-Government Websites. Electronic Government an International Journal, 8(1), 1-19. Calhan, H. S., Karkın, N., Hasıloğlu, S. B., & Özgül, M. E. (2021). The Reflection of Public Values in Twitter Use of Metropolitan Municipalities: A Content Analysis Employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Information Polity, 26(4), 391-415. Cole, M., & Parston, G. (2006). Unlocking Public Value: A new Model for Achieving High Performance in Public Service Organization. U.S: : John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Colesca, S. E. (2007). An Assessment of The Quality of the Romanian Urban Websites. Informatica Economica, 11(2), 26-33. Cox, J., & Dale, B. G. (2002). Key Quality Factors in Web Site Design and Use: An Examination,. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(7). Criado, J. I., & Ramilo, M. C. (2003). E-Government in Practise: An Analysis of Website Orientation to the Citizens in Spanish Municipalities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(3), 191-218. Cwiklicki, M. (2016). Comparison of Public Value Measurement Frameworks. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 1(35), 20-31. doi:10.15678/ZP.2016.35.1.02 Çağıltay, K., & Durmuş, S. (2012). Kamu Kurumu Web Siteleri ve Kullanılabilirlik. M. Z. Sobacı, & M. Yıldız içinde, E- Devlet- Kamu Yönetimi ve Teknoloji İlişkisinde Güncel Gelişmeler (s. 293-323). Ankara: Nobel. Çelik, A., & Akca, H. (2021). Değer Odaklı Bir Yönetim Yaklaşımı: Kamu Değeri. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. Çelik, A., & Akça, H. (2021). Değer Odaklı Bir Yönetim Yaklaşımı: Kamu Değeri. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(28), 376-404. Çelik, T. (2014). İnternet Sitelerinin İçerik ve Kullanılabilirlik Kalitelerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 137-154. Çukurçayır, A. (2003). Çok Boyutlu Bir Kavram Olarak Yönetişim. M. Acar , & H. Özgür içinde, Çağdaş Kamu Yönetimi (s. 260). Ankara : Nobel. De Jong, J., Douglas, S., Sicilia, M., Radnor, Z., Noordegraaf, M., & Debus , P. (2017). Instruments of Value: Using the Analytic Tools of Public Value Theory in Teaching and Practice. Public Management Review, 19(5), 605-620. De Vries, M. S., & Kim, P. S. (2011). Introduction to value and virtue in public administration. M. S. De Vries, & P. S. Kim (Dü) içinde, Value and virtue in public administration: A comparative perspective (s. 1-17). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Demokaan, D. (2010). YÖNETİŞİMDE YENİ BİR BOYUT: E-YÖNETİŞİM. Türk İdare Dergisi(466), 70. Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving Rather Than Steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549-559. Domarkas, V., Laukaityte, A., & Maciukas, V. (2012). Lietuvos Respublikos Savivaldybiu˛ interneto svetainiui ˛ svystymo ˇ lygio vertinimas [Assessment of evelopment level of municipal websites of the republic of Lithuania]. Viesoji Politika ir Administravimas, 11(1), 23-36. Duguit, L. (1954). Kamu Hukuku Dersleri. ANKARA: AÜHF Yayını. Erten, Ş. (2021). Kamu Değeri: Tanımı ve Ölçülmesi Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 106. Eryılmaz, B. (2018). Kamu Yönetimi . İstanbul: Umuttepe. Eschenfelder, K. R., Beachboard, J. C., McClure, C. R., & Wyman, S. K. (1997). Assessing U.S. Federal Government Websites. Government Information Quarterly, 14(2), 173-189. European Commission. (2017). E-Government Benchmark Framework. Faulkner, N., & Kaufman, S. (2018). Avoiding Theoretical Stagnation: A Systematic Review and Framework for Measuring Public Value. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(1), 69-86. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12251 Fukumoto, E., & Bozeman, B. (2019). Public Values Theory: What is Missing? American Review of Public Administration, 49(6), 635-648. Gençosman, F. (2018). Kamu Değeri Yönetimi Bağlamında Kamu-Özel Ortaklıkları. Bursa: Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Guarini, E. (2014). Measuring Public Value in Bureaucratic Settings: Opportunities and Constraints. Public Value management, Measurement and Reporting, Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance, 3, 301-319. doi: 10.1108/S2051-663020140000003013 Güler, B. A. (2003). Yönetişim: Tüm İktidar Sermaye. Praksis. Hartley, J., Sancino , A., Bennister, M., & Resodihardjo, S. L. (2019). Leadership for Public Value: Political Astuteness as a Conceptual Link. Public Administration, 97, 239-249. Henriksson, A., Yi, Y., Frost, B., & Middleton, B. (2006). Evaluation instrument for e-government websites. Queensland, Australia. Hills, D., & Sullivan, F. (2006). Measuring Public Value 2: Practical Approaches. London: The Work Foundation. Holzer, M., & Kim, S. T. (2003, 2005, 2007, 2009). Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide: A Longitudinal Asssesment of Municipal Websites throughout the World. USA: United Nations and the American Society for Public Administration, National Center for Public Performance. Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management For All Seasons. Horan, T. A., Abhichandani, T., & Rayalu, R. (2006). Assessing User Satisfaction of E-Government Services: Development and Testing of Quality in Use Satisfaction with Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS). In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Islands. Huizing, E. K. (2000). The Content of Design Websites: An Emprical Study. Information and Management, 37(3), 123-134. Jha, R. (1998). Modern Public Economics. Londra: Routledge. Jorgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public Values: An Inventory. Administration and Society, 39(3), 354-381. Karkın, N. (2015). Kamu Değeri Kavramı ve Kamu Değeri Yönetiminin Kamu Yönetimi Kuramı Bağlamındaki Yeri. Ö. Köseoğlu, & M. Z. Sobacı içinde, Kamu Yönetiminde Paradigma Arayışları: Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği ve Ötesi (s. 252). Dora Yayıncılık. Karkın, N. (2015). Kamu Değeri Kavramı ve Kamu Değeri Yönetiminin Kamu Yönetimi Kuramı Bağlamındaki Yeri. Ö. Köseoğlu, & M. Z. Sobacı içinde, Kamu Yönetiminde Paradigma Arayışları (s. 249-272). Bursa: Dora. Karunasena, K., Deng, H., & Singh, M. (2011). Measuring the public value of e-government: A case study from Sri Lanka. Transforming Government People Process and Policy, 5(1), 81-99. Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating Public Value- An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. Londra: Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office. Kernaghan, K. (2003). Integrating values into public service: The values statement as centerpiece. Public, 63(6), 711-719. Kırışık, F., & Sezer, Ö. (2015). Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojilerinin (BİT) Kamu Politikası Oluşturma Sürecindeki Rolü. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(11), 199-2015. Kocaoğlu, B., & Saylam, A. (2015). Kamu değeri ve Yerel Yönetimler. H. H. Bircan, & B. Dilmaç içinde, Değerler Bilançosu. Konya: Çizgi Kitapevi. Kocaoğlu, B., & Saylam, A. (2015). Kamu Değeri ve Yerel Yönetimler. B. D. Hasan Hüseyin Bircan içinde, Değerler Bilançosu (s. 143-164). Konya: Çizgi Kitapevi. Köseoğlu, Ö., & Tuncer, A. (2014). Kamu Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yaklaşım Olarak Kamu Değeri: Kavramsal ve Kuramsal Açıdan Bir Tartışma. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 149. Kuk, G. (2002). The Digital Divide and Quality of Elektronik Service Delivery in Local Government in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quaterly, 20(4), 353-363. Lee, T. D., Geiller, S., & Lee, B. K. (2021). A validation of the modified democratic e-governance website evaluation model. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4). Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. (2006). A Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research. Information Science Journal, 9, 181-211. Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making., (s. In the Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37)). Meynhardt. (2009). Public Value Inside: What is Public Value Creation. Intl Journal of Public Administration,, 32(3), 192-219. Meynhardt, T., & Jasinenko, A. (2018). Measuring public value: Scale development and validation. XXII IRSPM Annual Conference, (s. 1-22). Edinburgh. Meynhardt, T., & Bartholomes, S. (2011). Composing Public Value: In Search of Basic Dimensions and Common Ground. International Public Management Journal, 189. Meynhardt, T., & Jasinenko, A. (2018). Measuring Public Value: Scale Development and Validation. XXII IRSPM Annual Conference, (s. 1-22). Edinburgh. Middleton, M. R. (2007). Approaches to Evaluation of Websites for Public Sector Services. Proceedings IADIS Conference on E-Society, (s. 279-284). Miranda, F. J., Sanguino, R., & Banegil, T. M. (2009). Quantitative Assessment of European Municipal Websites: Development and Use of An Evaluation Tool. Internet Research, 19(4), 425-441. Mirchandani, D. A., Johnson Jr, J., & Joshi, K. (2008). Perspectives of Citizens Towards E-government in Thailand and Indonesia: A multigroup Analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 425-441. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value- Strategic Management in Government. Londra: Harvard University Press. Moore, M. H. (2003). The Public Value Scorecard: A Rejoinder and an Alternative to “Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Non-profit Organizations” by Robert Kaplan. Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations Working Paper No. 18. Moore, M. H. (2007). Recognising Public Value: The challenge of Measuring Performance in Government. J. Wanna içinde, A passion for policy: Essays in public sector reform (s. 91-116). Canberra: ANU E-Press. Moore, M. H., & Moore, G. W. (2005). Creating Public Value Through State Arts Agencies. Minneapolis: Arts Midwest. Mulgan, G. (2019). Background: Searching for Value. G. Mulgan , J. Breckon, M. Tarrega, H. Bakshi, J. Davies, H. Khan, & A. Finnis içinde, Public Value: How Can It Be Measured, Managed and Grown? (s. 6-11). London: Nesta. Naci , K., & Janssen, M. (2014). Evaluating Websites Fom a Public Value Perspective: A Review of Turkish Local Government Websites. International Journal of Information Management, 34, 351-363. Nyaga, C., & Fink, D. (2009). Evaluating Web Site Quality: The value of a Multi Paradigm Approach. An International Journal, 16(2), 259-273. OECD. (2003). Promise and Problems of E-Democracy, Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement,. OECD Publishing. O'Flynn. (2007). From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 353-366. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming The Public Sector. ‎ Prentice Hall. Ökten, S. (2019). Kamu Değeri Yapımı Çerçevesinde Türkiye Radyo ve Televizyon Kurumu. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 8(4), 2394-2423. Ömürgönülşen, U. (2003). Kamu Sektörünün Yönetimi Sorununa Yeni Bir Yaklaşım: Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği. M. Acar , & H. Özgür içinde, Çağdaş Kamu Yönetimi (s. 3-43). Ankara: Nobel. Özer, M. A., & Önen, M. (2019). 200 Soruda Yönetim ve Kamu Yönetimi. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi. Öztaş, N. (2003). Karmaşıklık Bilimleri: Kaosun Kıyısında Bilim ve Yönetim. M. Acar, & H. Özgür içinde, Çağdaş Kamu Yönetimi (s. 45-74). Ankara: Nobel. Panapoulou, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2008). A Framework for Evaluating Web Sites of Public Authorities. Aslib Proceedings, 60(5), 517-546. Papadomichelaki, X., Magoutas, B., Halaris, C., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2006). A Review of Quality Dimensions in E-Government Services. M. A. Wimmer içinde, Electronic Government (s. 128-138). Berlin: Springer. Papi, L., Bigoni, M., Bracci, E., & Gagliorda, E. D. (2018). Measuring Public Value: A Conceptual and Applied Contribution to the Debate. Public Money and Management, 38(7), 503-510. doi:10.1080/09540962.2018.1439154 Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the Public Service,. Blackwell: Cambridge. Prachett, L., Wingfield, M., & Polat, R. K. (2006). Local Democracy Online: An Analysis of Local Government Websites in England and Wales. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(3), 75-92. Rhodes, R. A., & Wanna, J. (2007). The Limits to Public Value or Rescueing Responsible Government from the Platonic Guardians. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4), 406-421. Rodriguez, R., Estevez, E., Giullianelli, D., & Vera, P. (2009). Assessing e-Governance Maturity Through Municipal Websites – Measurement Framework and Survey Results., (s. 5-9). Sadioğlu, U., & Yıldız, M. (2007). Kamu Yönetimi İle Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri: Bir Bibliyografik Analiz. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(2), 325-359. Samaratunge, R., & Wijewardena, N. (2009). The Changing Nature of Public Values in Developing Countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4), 316. Saygılıoğlu, N., & Arı, S. (2003). Etkin Devlet, Kurumsal Bir Tasarı ve Politika . İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi Yayınları. Sayıştay Başkanlığı. (2006). (sayıştay başkanlığı, e Devlete Geçişte Kamu Kurumları İnternet Siteleri Performans Denetim Raporu,. Saylam, A. (2020). Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Merkezi Düzeyde E-Katılım: Bakanlıkların Web Siteleri Üzerinden Bir Araştırma. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23-37. Scoot, J. K. (2006). “E” the People: Do U.S. Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement? Public Administration Review, 66(3), 341-353. Selim, H. M. (2012). Content Evaluation Criteria for General Websites: Analysis and Comparison. International Journal of Online Marketing (IJOM), 2(3). Siar, S. V. (2005). E- Governance at the Local Government Level in Philippines: An Assessment of the City Government Websites. Philippine Journal of Development, 32(2), 135-168. Smith, A. G. (2001). Applying Evaluation Criteria to New Zealand Government Websites. International Journal of Information Management, 21, 137-149. Social Media Use in Local Government: an Australian Perspective. (2014). International Journal of Public Administration, 37(10), 666-675. Spano, A. (2014). How Do We Measure Public Value? From Theory to Practice. Public Value Management. Measurement and Reporting, Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance, 3, 353-373. doi:10.1108/S2051-663020140000003015 Steiner, P. O. (1974). Public Expenditure Budgeting. The Economics of Public Finance, 245. Stoker , G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative For Networked Governance? American Review of Public Administration, 41-57. Şaf, M. Y. (2015). Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Sektörünün Makroekonomik Etkileri: Uluslararası Karşılaştırma ve Türkiye Değerlendirmesi. Ankara: Kalkınma Bakanlığı . Talbot, C. (2008). Measuring Public Value: A Competing Values Approach. A paper for The Work Foundation. Try, D., & Radnor, Z. (2007). Developing an Understanding of Results-based Management Through Public Value Theory. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(7), 655-673. Turkel, E., & Turkel, G. (2016). Public value theory: reconciling public ınterests, administrative autonomy and efficiency. Review of Public Administration and Management, 4(2), 1. Verdegem, P., & Verleye, G. (2009). User-Centered E-Government in Practice: A Comprehensive Model for Measuring User Satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 487-497. W3C. (2008). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ adresinden alındı World Bank. (1989). Sub-Saharan Africa: from Crisis to Sustainable Growth. New York. Yang, K., & Ro, S. Y. (2007). E-Government for Better Performance: Promises, Realities, and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 1197-1217. Yaşar, İ. H., & Altıncık, H. (2018). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Bakanlıklarının Web Sitelerinin Halkla İlişkiler Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(55), 224-236. Yıldız , M., & Sobacı, M. Z. (2015). Kamu Politikası- Kuram ve Uygulama. Ankara: Adres Yayınları. Yıldız, M. (2003). ). Elektronik (e)- Devlet Kuram ve Uygulamasına Genel Bir Bakış ve Değerlendirme. M. Acar, & H. Özgür içinde, Çağdaş Kamu Yönetimi (s. 305-327). Ankara: Nobel. Yocco, V. S., Heimlich, J. E., & Edwards, P. (2009). Measuring Public Value: An Instrument and An Art Museum Case Study. Visitor Studies, 12(2), 152-163. doi:10.1080/10645570903203448 Yüksel, H. (2007). İnternet Sitelerinin Kalite Boyutlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 519-536. Zhou, Z. (2009). Evaluating Websites Using a Aractical Quality Model.