The Contrıbutıon Of Rapport Between Intervıewer And Respondent On Intervıew Qualıty From Non-Samplıng Error Perspectıve: 
Evidence from 2014 Research on Domestic Violence against 
Women in Turkey

Saraç, Melike

dc.contributor.advisor	Türkyılmaz, Ahmet Sinan
dc.contributor.author	Saraç, Melike
dc.date.accessioned	2021-10-21T12:36:37Z
dc.date.issued	2021-10
dc.date.submitted	2021-09-23
dc.identifier.citation	Alwin, D. F. (2007). Margins of Error: A Study of Reliability in Survey Measurement. John Wiley & Sons. Amaya, A., & Harring, J. R. (2017). Assessing the Effect of Social Integration on Unit Nonresponse in Household Surveys. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 5(4), 480-508. Amos, M. (2018). Interviewer Effects on Patterns of Nonresponse: Evaluating the Impact on the Reasons for Contraceptive Nonuse in the Indonesia and the Philippines DHS. Demographic Research, 39, 415-430. Ampt, E. S. (2001). Response Burden. In Jones, P. and P. R. Stopher (Ed.) Transport Survey Quality and Innovation, South Africa: Emerald Group Publishing. Anderson, R., Kasper, J., & Frankel, M. (1979). Total Survey Error: Applications to Improve Health Surveys. Jossey-Bass Publishers. Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). Amos 22 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS. Awang, Z. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS Graphic. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA. Awang, Z. (2012). Research Methodology and Data Analysis. UiTM Press. Bakker, B. F. (2012). Estimating the Validity of Administrative Variables. Statistica Neerlandica, 66(1), 8-17. Beaujouan, E. (2013). Counting How Many Children People Want: The Influence of Question Filters and Pre-codes. Demografia English Edition, 56(5), 35-61. Bell, S. M., McCallum, R. S., & Cox, E. A. (2003). Toward A Research-based Assessment of Dyslexia: Using Cognitive Measures to Identify Reading Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(6), 505-516. Bell, K., Fahmy, E., & Gordon, D. (2016). Quantitative Conversations: The Importance of Developing Rapport in Standardised Interviewing. Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 193-212. Belli, R. F., Lepkowski, J. M., & Kabeto, M. U. (2001). The Respective Roles of Cognitive Processing Difficulty and Conversational Rapport on the Accuracy of Retrospective Reports of Doctor’s Office Visits. In Seventh Conference on Health Survey Research Methods (p. 197). Belli, R. F., Lee, E. H., Stafford, F. P., & Chou, C. H. (2004). Calendar and Question-list Survey Methods: Association between Interviewer Behaviors and Data Quality. Journal of Official Statistics, 20(2), 185. Belli, R. F., Bilgen, I., & Al-Baghal, T. (2013). Memory, Communication, and Data Quality in Calendar Interviews. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 194-219. Bentley, M., Mattingly, T., Hough, C., & Bennet, C. (2003). Census Quality Survey to Evaluate Responses to the Census 2000 Question on Race: An Introduction to the Data. US Census Bureau. Berghdal, M., Ehling, M., Elvers, E., Földesi, E., Körner, T., Kron, A., ..., Zilhao, M. J. (2007). Handbook on Data Quality Assessment Methods and Tools. Ehling, Manfred Körner, Thomas. Berk, M. L., & Bernstein, A. B. (1988). Interviewer Characteristics and Performance on a Complex Health Survey. Social Science Research, 17(3), 239-251. Beullens, K., Loosveldt, G., Denies, K., & Vandenplas, C. (2016). Quality Matrix for the European Social Survey, Round 7. Leuven, Belgium: Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven. Retrieved September 3, 2020 (https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round7/methods/ESS7_quality_matrix.pdf). Biemer, P. P., & Lyberg, L. E. (2003). Introduction to Survey Quality (Vol. 335). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Biemer, P. P. (2009). Measurement Errors in Sample Surveys. Handbook of Statistics. 29, 281-315. Biemer, P. P. (2010). Total Survey Error: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 817-848. Biemer, P. P. (2011). Latent Class Analysis of Survey Error. John Wiley & Sons. Biemer P. P., Groves, R. M., Lyberg, L., Mathiowetz, N. & Sudman, S. (2011). Measurement Errors in Surveys. Wiley & Sons. Biemer, P. P. (2014). Processing of Survey Data. In Encylopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability. John Wiley & Sons. Biemer, P. P., & Trewin, D. (1997). A Review of Measurement Error Effects on the Analysis of Survey Data. Survey Measurement and Process Quality. 601-632. Biemer, P. P., Trewin, D., Berghdal, H., & Japec, L. (2014). A System for Managing the Quality of Official Statistics. Journal of Official Statistics, 30(3). Biemer, P. P., & Stokes, S. L. (2004). Approaches to the Modeling of Measurement Errors. Measurement Errors in Surveys, 485-516. Bilgen, I., & Belli, R. F. (2010). Comparison of Verbal Behaviors between Calendar and Standardized Conventional Questionnaires. Journal of Official Statistics, 26(3), 481. Blohm, M., Hox, J., & Koch, A. (2007). The Influence of Interviewers’ Contact Behavior on the Contact and Cooperation Rate in Face-to-Face Household Surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 97-111. Blom, A. G., & Korbmacher, J. M. (2013). Measuring Interviewer Effects in SHARE Germany. SHARE Working Paper Series, 3. Blom, A. G. (2012). Explaining Cross-Country Differences in Survey Contact Rates: Application of Decomposition Methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Statistics in Society, 175(1), 217-242. Blom, A. G., & Korbmacher, J. M. (2013). Measuring Interviewer Characteristics Pertinent to Social Surveys: A Conceptual Framework. Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 16. Blom, A. G., Leeuw, E. D., & Hox, J. (2010). Interviewer Effects on Nonresponse in the European Social Survey. MEA Discussion Paper No. 202-10. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley. Borgatta, E. F., & Bohrnstedt, G. W. (1980). Level of Measurement: Once Over Again. Sociological Methods & Research, 9(2): 147-160. Bottman, S. L., & Thornberry, O. T. (1992). Survey Design Features Correlates of Nonresponse. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Brackstone, G. (1999). Managing Data Quality in a Statistical Agency. Survey Methodology, 25(2), 139-149. Brancato, G., & Simeoni, G. (2008). Modelling Survey Quality by Structural Equation Models. In Proceedings of 2008 European Conference on Quality in Survey Statistics. Brown, R. V. (1967). Evaluation of Total Survey Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(2), 117-127. Brunton-Smith, I., Sturgis, P., & Leckie, G. (2017). Detecting and Understanding Interviewer Effects on Survey Data by Using a Cross-Classified Mixed Effects Location-Scale Model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 180, 551-568. Brüderl, J., Huyer-May, B., & Schmiedeberg, C. (2013). Interviewer Behavior and the Quality of Social Network Data. In Interviewers’ Deviations in Surveys. Impact, Reasons, Detection and Prevention, edited by P. Winkler, R. Porst, and N. Menold, 147-160. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press. Campanelli, P., Sturgis, P., & Purdon, S. (1997). Can You Hear Me Knocking? and Investigation into the Impact of Interviewers on Survey Response Rates. London, GB: National Centre for Social Research. Cannell, C. F., Oksenberg, L., & Converse, J. M. (1977). Striving for Response Accuracy: Experiments in New Interviewing Techniques. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 306-315. Cannell, C. F., Miller, P. V., & Oksenberg, L. (1981). Research on Interviewing Techniques. Sociological Methodology, 12, 389-437. Cappella, J. N. (1990). On Defining Conversational Coordination and Rapport. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 303-305. Carrol, R. J., Ruppert, D., Stefanski, L. A., Crainiceanu, C. M. (2006). Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton. Carton, A., & Loosveldt, G. (1998). Interviewer Selection and Data Quality in Survey Research. 1998 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, 934-939. Cassell, J., & Miller, P. (2007). Is It Self-administration If The Computer Gives You Encouraging Looks. Envisioning the Survey Interview of the Future. John Wiley & Sons. Cernat, A., & Vandenplas, C. (2020). An Evaluation of Mixture Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Detecting Social Desirability Bias. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smaa032 Conrad, F. G., & Schober, M. F. (2000). Clarifying Question Meaning in a Household Telephone Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(1), 1-28. Couper, M. P., & Groves, R. M. (1992). The Role of the Interviewer in Survey Participation. Survey Methodology, 18(2), 263-278. Crosby, P. B. (1980). Quality is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain. New York: McGraw-Hill. Dalenius, T., Hansen, M. H., & Pritzker, L. (1966). Non-sampling Errors in Census and Sample Surveys. US Census Bureau. Davis, R. E., Couper, M. P., Janz, N. K., Caldwell, C. H., & Resnicow, K. (2010). Interviewer Effects in Public Health Surveys. Health Education Research, 25(1), 14-26. De Castellarnau, A., & Revilla, M. (2017). Two Approaches to Evaluate Measurement Quality in Online Surveys: An Application Using the Norwegian Citizen Panel. Survey Research Methods, 11(4):415-433. De Keseredy, W. S., & Kelly, K. (1995). Sexual Abuse in Canadian University and College Dating Relationships: The Contribution of Male Peer Support. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 41-53. De Leeuw, E. D., Gideon, J. M., & Hox, J. J. (1996). The Influence of Data Collection Method on Structural Models: A Comparison of A Mail, A Telephone, and A Face-to-face Survey. Sociological Methods & Research, 24(4), 443-472. De Paulo, B. M., & Bell, K. L. (1990). Rapport Is Not So Soft Anymore. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 305-308. Dijkstra, W. (1987). Interviewing Style and Respondent Behavior: An Experimental Study of the Survey-interview. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(2), 309-334. Dillmann, D. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons. DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and Using Factor Scores: Considerations for the Applied Researcher. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(1), 20. Drachman, D., de Carufel, A., & Insko, C.A. (1978). The Extra Credit Effect in Interpersonal Attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 458-467. Durrant, G. B., Groves, R. M., Staetsky, L., & Steele, F. (2010). Effects of Interviewer Attitudes and Behaviors on Refusal in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(1), 1-36. Dykema, J., Lepkowski, J. M., & Blixt, S. (1997). The Effect of Interviewer and Respondent Behavior on Data Quality: Analysis of Interaction Coding in a Validation Study. Survey Measurement and Process Quality, 287-310. EU FRA (European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights). (2014). Violence against Women: An EU-Wide Survey: Survey Methodology, Sample and Fieldwork. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. EUROSTAT. (2000). Assessment of the Quality in Statistics. Luxembourg: General Standard Report. EUROSTAT. (2009). Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of European Union L. 284, 1. EUROSTAT. (2017). European statistics Code of Practice. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/ess/-/european-statistics-code-of-practice-revised-version-2017 Ferber. (1955). On the Reliability of Responses Secured in Sample Surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50 (271): 788-810. Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., Zamarron, M. D., & Ruiz, M. A. (2001). The Contribution of Socio-demographic Psychosocial Factors to Life Satisfaction. Ageing & Society, 21(1), 25-43. Flores-Macias, F., & Lawson, C. (2008). Effects of Interviewer Gender on Survey Responses: Findings from A Household Survey in Mexico. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(1), 100-110. Fowler Jr, F. J., & Mangione, T. W. (1990). Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-related Error (Vol. 18). Sage. Foucault, B. (2010). Non-verbal Correlates of Rapport in Face-to-face Survey Interviews: An Analysis of Interviewer Behavior. Paper presented at the 65th AAPOR annual conference, Chicago. Foucault, B., Aguilar, J., Miller, P. & Cassell, J. (2013). Behavioral Correlates of Rapport in Survey Interviews. Presentation at the Interviewer-Respondent Interaction Workshop. Boston, MA. García-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. (2005). WHO Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women. World Health Organization. GDSW & HUIPS. (2009). 2008 National Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey. General Directorate of Woman’s Status and Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. Ankara. GDSW, & HUIPS. (2015). 2014 National Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey. General Directorate of Woman’s Status and Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. Ankara. Gonzalez, M. E., Ogus, J. L., Shapiro, G., Tepping, B. J. (1975). Standards for Discussion and Presentation of Errors in Survey and Census Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 5-23. Goudy, W. J., & Potter, H. R. (1975). Interview Rapport: Demise of a Concept. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 39(4), 529-543. Graf, I. (2008). Respondent burden. In Paul J. Lavrakas (Ed.) Encyclopaedia of Survey Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Green, M. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2001). Comparing Telephone and Face-to-face Interviewing in terms of Data Quality: The 1982 National Election Studies Method Comparison Project. Health Survey Research Methods, 115-121. Gremler, D. D., & Gwinner, K. P. (2000). Customer-employee Rapport in Service Relationships. Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 82-104. Gribble, J. N., Miller, H. G., Rogers, S. M., & Turner, C. F. (2000). Interview Mode and Measurement of Sexual Behaviors: Methodological Issues. Journal of Sex Research, 36(1), 16-24. Griffin, D. H., & Hughes, T. R. (2013). Analysis of Alternative Call Parameters in the American Community Survey’s Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing. American Community Survey Research and Evaluation Report Memorandum Series ACS13-RER-11. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. Available at: https://www. census. gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2013/acs/2013_Griffin_02. pdf. Groves, R. M. (1987). Research on Survey Data Quality, Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 156-172. Groves, R. M. (1990). Theories and Methods of Telephone Surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 221-240. Groves, R. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Couper, M. P. (1992). Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey, Public Opinion Quarterly, 56(4), 475-495. Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey Methodology. Vol. 561. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Groves, R. M. (2004). Survey Costs and Survey Errors. New York. Groves, R. M., & McGonagle, K. A. (2001). A Theory-Guided Interviewer Training Protocol Regarding Survey Participation. Journal of Official Statistics, 17(2), 249. Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias, A Meta-Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72 (2), 167-189. Groves, R. M., Fowler Jr, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey Methodology. Wiley & Sons. Groves, R. M., & Lyberg, L. (2010). Total Survey Error: Past, Present, and Future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5): 849-879. Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. P. (2012). Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. John Wiley & Sons. Gubrium, J. F., Holstein, J. A., Marvasti, A. B., & McKinney, K. D. (2012). The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. USA: Sage. Hanmer, J., & Saunders, S. (1984). Well-founded Fear: A Community Study of Violence to Women. London: Hutchinson. Hansen, M., Hurwitz, W., & Pritzker, L. (1967). Standardization of Procedures for the Evaluation of Data: Measurement Errors and Statistical Standards in the Bureau of the Census. US Census Bureau. Hansen, M., Hurwitz, W., & Bershad, M. (1961). Measurement Errors in Censuses and Surveys. Bulletin of the Statistical Institute. 38 (2), 359-374. Hansen, K. M. (2007). The Effects of Incentives, Interview length, and Interviewer Characetristics on Response Rates in a CATI-study. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 112-121. Hill, R. J., & Hall, N. E. (1963). A Note on Rapport and the Quality of Interview Data. The South-western Social Science Quarterly, 247-255. Hodgetts D., & Stolte, O. (2014). Social Distance. In Teo (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology, Springer. Hoff, L. (1990). Battered Women As Survivors. London: Routledge. Holbrook, A. L., Green, M. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003). Telephone versus Face-to-face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(1), 79-125. Hoogendoorn, A. W., & Sikkel, D. (1998). Response Burden and Panel AGttrition. Journal of Official Statistics, 14(2), 189. Hox, J. (1994). Hierarchical Regression Models for Interviewer and Respondent Effects. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 300-318. Hox, J., & de Leeuw, E. (2002). The Influence of Interviewers’ Attitude and Behavior on Household Survey Nonresponse: An International Comparison. In Groves, Robert M., J. L. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, R. J. A. Little (Ed.) Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley. Hox, J., De Leeuw, E., Couper, M. P., Groves, R. M., De Heer, W., Kuusela, V., ... & Martin, J. (2002). The Influence of Interviewers’ Attitude and Behavior on Household Survey Nonresponse: An International Comparison. Survey Nonresponse, 103-120. Hughes, A., Chromy, J., Giacoletti, K., & Odom, D. (2002). Impact of Interviewer Experience on Respondent Reports of Substance Use. In Gfroerer, J., J. Eyerman and J. Chromy (Ed.) Redesigning an Ongoing National Household Survey: Methodological Issues, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Rockville: Office of Applied Studies. Hyman, H. (1954). Interviewing in Social Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Institute for Resource Development. (1990). An Assessment of DHS-I Data Quality. DHS Methodological Reports, No. 1., Maryland. International Monetary Fund. (2003). Data Quality Assessment Framework and Data Quality Program. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/dsbb/2003/eng/dqaf.htm Japec, L. (2008). Interviewer Error and Interviewer Burden. In Lepkowski, Tucker, Brick, De Leeuw, Japec, Lawrakas, Link, Sangster (Eds.), Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, (pp. 185-211). Wiley Series in Survey Methodology. Jäckle, A. (2008). Dependent Interviewing: Effects on Respondent Burden and Efficiency of Data Collection. Journal of Official Statistics, 24(3), 411. Jäckle, A., Lynn, P., Sinibaldi, J., & Tipping S. (2013). The Effect of Interviewer Experience, Attitudes, Personality and Skills on Respondent Co-operation with Face-to-Face Surveys. Survey Research Methods, 7(1), 1-15. Johnson, T. P., & Parsons J. A. (1994). Interviewer Effects on Self-reported Substance Use among Homeless Persons. Addictive Behaviors. 19: 83-93. Johnson, K., Grant, M., Khan, S., Moore, Z., & Armstrong, A. (2009). Fieldwork-related Factors and Data Quality in the Demographic and Health Surveys Program. DHS Analytical Studies No. 19., Calverton, Maryland, USA: ICF Macro. JSI. (2009). Evaluation of UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Round 3 (MICS 3) Final Report. Juran, J. M., & Gryna, F. M. (1980). Quality Planning and Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. Katz, D. (1942). Do Interviewers Bias Poll Results? Public Opinion Quaretrly, 6(2), 248-268. Kawashima, N., & Shiomi, K. (2007). Factors of the Thinking Disposition of Japanese High School Students. Social Behavior and Personality, 35(2), 187-194. Keller, S. D., Ware Jr, J. E., Bentler, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., ..., & Gandek, B. (1998). Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Test the Construct Validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in Ten Ccountries: Results from the IQOLA Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51(11), 1179-1188. Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: John & Wiley Sons. Koch, A., Blom, A., Stoop, I., & Kappelhof, J. W. (2009). Data Collection Quality Assurance in Cross-national Surveys: The example of the ESS. Methoden, Daten, Analysen (MDA), 3(2), 219-247. Korbmacher, J. M. (2014). Interviewer Effects on Respondents’ Willingness to Provide Blood Samples in SHARE. SHARE Working Paper Series, 20-2014. Kreuter, F., Couper, M., & Lyberg, L. (2010). The Use of Paradata to Monitor and Manage Survey Data Collection. In Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, American Statistical Association (pp. 282-296). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Kreuter, F. (2013). Facing the Nonresponse Challenge. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645(1):23-35. Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213-236. Krosnick, J. A., & Alwin, D. F. (1988). A Test of the Form-resistant Correlation Hypothesis: Ratings, Rankings, and the Measurement of Values. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 526-538. Laiho, J., & Hietaniemi, L. (2002). Quality Guidelines for Official Statistics. Statistics Finland. Lavin, D., & Maynard, D. W. (2001). Standardization versus Rapport: Respondent Laughter and Interviewer Reaction during Telephone Surveys. American Sociological Review, 66, 453-479. Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopaedia of Survey Research Methods. US: Sage Publications. Lesser, V. M., & Kalsbeek, W. D. (1992). Non-sampling Error in Surveys. Wiley. Lipman-Blumen, J. (1976). Toward a Homosocial Theory of sex roles: An explanation of the sex segregarion of social institutions. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1 (3, Part 2), 15-31.8 Lipps, O., & Pollien, A. (2011). Effects of Interviewer Experience on Components of Nonresponse in the European Social Survey. Field Methods, 23(2), 156-172. Liu, M., & Stainback, K. (2013). Interviewer Gender Effects on Survey Responses to Marriage-related Questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 606-618. Loosveldt, G. (1997). Interaction Characteristics of the Difficult-to-interview Respondent. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(4), 386-394. Loosveldt, G., Carton, A., & Billiet, J. (2004). Assessment of Survey Data Quality: A Pragmatic Approach Focused on Interviewer Tasks. International Journal of Market Research, 46(1), 65-82. Loosveldt, G., Carton, A., & Pickery, J. (2004). The Effect of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on Refusals in a Panel Survey. In Nonresponse in Survey Research, ZUMA Special, 4, Mannheim. Loosveldt, G., & Beullens, K. (2013). 'How Long Will It Take?' An Analysis of Interview Length in the Fifth Round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 7(2), 69-78. Lord, V. B., Friday, P. C., & Brennan, P. K. (2005). The Effects of Interviewer Characteristics on Arrestees’ Responses to Drug-Related Questions. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 1, 36-54. Lyberg, L. (2012). Survey Quality. Survey Methodology, 38 (2), 107-130. Macro International Inc. (1993). An Assessment of the Quality of Health Data in DHS-I Surveys (No. 2). Maddox, B. (2018). Interviewer-respondent Interaction and Rapport in PIAAC. Quality Assurance in Education, 26(2), 182-195. Mahalanobis, P. C. (1946). Recent Experiments in Statistical Sampling in Indian Statistical Institute. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series ‘A’, 109, 325-378. Martín-Fernández, M., Gracia, E., & Lila, M. (2019). Psychological Intimate Partner Violence against Women in the European Union: A Cross-national Invariance Study. BMC Public Health, 19: 1739. Martín-Fernández, M., Gracia, E., & Lila, M. (2020). Ensuring the Comparability of Cross-national Survey Data on Intimate Partner Violence against Women: A Cross-sectional, Population-based Study in the European Union. BMJ open, 10(3), e032231. Mierzwa, F. J., McCracken, R., Vandermaas-Peeler, R., & Tronnier, C. D. (2002). The Impact of Interviewer Characteristics on Survey Participation: Findings from NSCAW. Proceedings of the ASA Section on Survey Research Methods of the AAPOR 2002, 2343-2348. Mittereder, F., Durow, J., West, B. T., Kreuter, F., & Conrad, F. G. (2018). Interviewer–Respondent Interactions in Conversational and Standardized Interviewing. Field Methods, 30(1), 3-21. Moonie, S., Huang, X., & Sterling, D. A. (2009). Quality of Life Estimation with Structural Equation Modeling in School Aged Children with Asthma. Global Health Governance, 3(1), 1. Morton-Williams, J. (1993). Interviewer Approaches. Dartmouth. Narayan, S., & Krosnick, J. A. (1996). Education Moderates Some Response Effects in Attitude Measurement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(1), 58-88. Neter, J., & Waksberg, J. (1964). A Study of Response Errors in Expenditures Data from Household Interviews. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59(305), 18-55. Nicoletti, C., & Buck, N. (2004). Explaining Interviewee Contact and Cooperation in the British and German Household Panels. ISER Working Paper Series No. 2004-06. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing Women: A Contradiction In Terms. In Doing Feminist Research (eds. H. Roberts). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Oberski, D. L., & Satorra, A. (2013). Measurement Error Models with Uncertainty about the Error Variance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 20(3): 409-428. Office for National Statistics. (2016). Guidelines for Measuring Statistical Quality. Available at: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160106003751/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/method-quality/quality/guidelines-for-measuring-statistical-quality/index.html Olson, K., & Bilgen, I. (2011). The Role of Interviewer Experience on Acquiescence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(1), 99-114. Olson, K., & Peytchev, A. (2007). Effect of Interviewer Experience on Interview Pace and Interviewer Attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 273-286. O’Muircheartaigh, C., & Campanelli, P. (1998). The Relative Impact of Interviewer Effects and Sample Design Effects on Survey Precision. Journal of Royal Statistical Society A, 161, 63–77. O’Muircheartaigh, C., & Campanelli, P. (1999). A Multilevel Exploration of the Role of Interviewers in Survey Non-response. Journal of Royal Statistical Society A, 162 (3), 437–446. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2011). Quality Framework for OECD Statistical Activities. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/sdd/qualityframeworkforoecdstatisticalactivities.htm Pickery, J., Loosveldt, G., & Carton, A. (2001). The Effects of Interviewer and Respondent Characteristics on Response Behavior in Panel Surveys: A Multilevel Approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(1), 509-523. Pullum, T. W., Juan, C., Khan, N., & Staveteig, S. (2018). The Effect of Interviewer Characteristics on Data Quality in DHS Surveys. DHS Methodological Reports No. 24. Rockville, Maryland, USA: ICF. Read, B. (2019). Respondent Burden in a Mobile App: Evidence from A Shopping Receipt Scanning Study. Survey Research Methods, 13(1), 45-71. Rosen, B., Elvers., E. & Denell, C. (1994). Quality Definition and Recommendations for Quality Declarations of Official Statistics. Journal of Statistics Sweden. Sakshaug, J. W., Couper, M. P., Ofstedal, M. B., & Weir, D. R. (2012). Linking Survey and Administrative Records: Mechanisms of Consent. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 535-569. Sala, E., Burton, J., & Knies, G. (2012). Correlates of Obtaining Informed Consent to Data Linkage Respondent, Interview, and Interviewer characteristics. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(3): 414-439. Saraç, M., & Adalı, T. (2019). Interview Result Codes in DHS Surveys in Turkey: An Assessment Between 1993 And 2013. The Turkish Journal of Population Studies, 41(1), 52-67. Saraç, M. & Türkyılmaz, A. S. (2020). Exploring Factors to Build Rapport Between Interviewer and Respondent: Insights from the National Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey. Journal of Sociological Research, 23(2): 284-319. Saris, W. E., & Revilla, M. (2016). Correction for Measurement Errors in Survey Research: Necessary and Possible. Social Indicators Research, 127(3), 1005-1020. Saris, W. E., Andrews, F. M., Biemer, P. B., Groves, R. M., Lyberg, L. E., Mathiowetz, N. A., & Sudman, S. (1991). Measurement Errors in Surveys. John Wiley & Sons. Schaeffer, N. C., Dykema, J., & Maynard, D. W. (2010). Interviewers and Interviewing. Handbook of survey research, 2. Schober, M. F., Conrad, F. G., & Fricker, S. S. (2004). Misunderstanding Standardized Language in Research Interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(2), 169-188. Schober, M. F., & Conrad, F. G. (1997). Does Conversational Interviewing Reduce Survey Measurement Error?. Public Opinion Quarterly, 576-602. Scholtus, S., Bakker, B. F., & van Delden, A. (2015). Modeling Measurement Error to Estimate Bias in Administrative and Survey Variables. The Hague: Statistics Netherlands. Schwarz, N. (2007). Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 21(2), 277-287. Schwarz, N. E., & Sudman, S. E. (1996). Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research. Jossey-Bass/Wiley. Schwartz, M. D. (2000). Methodological Issues in the Use of Survey Data for Measuring and Characterizing Violence Against Women. Violence against Women, 6(8), 815-838. Singer, E., Frankel, M. R., & Glassman, M. B. (1983). The Effect of Interviewer Characteristics and Expectations on Response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 68-83. Sheatsley, P. B. (1951). The Art of Interviewing and A Guide to Interviewer Selection and Training. Research Methods in Social Relations, 2. Smith, T. W. (2011). Refining the Total Survey Error Perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(4), 464-484. Smith, M. D. (1987). The Incidence and Prevalence of Woman Abuse in Toronto. Violence and Victims, 2:33-47. Smith, M. D. (1994). Enhancing the Quality of Survey Data on Violence against Women: A Feminist Approach. Gender and Society, 8(1):109-127. Stoop, I. A. L., Billiet, J., Koch, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Improving Survey Response: Lessons Learned from the European Social Survey. UK: John Wiley & Sons. Stotland, E., & Patchen, M. (1961). Identification and Change in Prejudice and Authoritarianism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 250-256. Suchman, L., & Jordan, B. (1990). Interactional Troubles in Face-to-face Survey Interviews. Journal of the American statistical Association, 85(409), 232-241. Sun, H. (2014). Rapport and Its Impact on the Disclosure of Sensitive Information in Standardized Interviews (Doctoral dissertation). Sun, H., Conrad, F. G., & Kreuter, F. (2021). The Relationship Between Interviewer-Respondent Rapport and Data Quality. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 9(3): 429-448. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. UK: Pearson New International Edition. Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal Correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4), 285-293. Tortora, R. (2014). Respondent Burden, Reduction of. Wiley Stats Ref: Statistics Reference Online. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118445112.stat03360.pub2 Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge University Press. Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. (1998). Collecting Sensitive Information with Different Modes of Data Collection. Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection, 431-454. Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M. Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F.L. (1998). Adolescent Sexual Behaviour, Drug Use and Violence: Increased Reporting with Computer Survey Technology. Science, 280:867-873. UN Women (2016). Women and Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, UN Women. U. S. Office of Management and Budget (2002). Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Dissemination. Federal Register. Van der Zouwen, J., Dijkstra, W., & Smit, J. H. (2004). Studying Respondent‐Interviewer Interaction: The Relationship between Interviewing Style, Interviewer Behavior, and Response Behavior. Measurement Errors in Surveys, 419-437. Vercruyssen, A., Wuyts, C., & Loosveldt, G. (2017). The Effect of Sociodemographic (Mis)match betweeen Interviewer and Respondents on Unit and Item Nonresponse in Belgium. Social Science Research, 67, 229-238. Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent Class Modeling with Covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 450-469. Von Sanden, N., & Steel, D. (2008). Optimal Estimation of Interviewer Effects for Binary Response Variables through Partial Interpenetration (Working paper). Centre for Statistical and Survey Methodology, University of Wollongong. Voogt, R., & Saris, W. (2005). Mixed Mode Designs: Finding the Balance between Nonresponse Bias and Mode Effects. Journal of Official Statistics, 21(3): 367. Wagner, J., & Olson, K. M. (2018). An Analysis of Interviewer Travel and Field Outcomes in Two Field Surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 34(1): 211-237. Walby, S. (2006). Improving the statistics on violence against women. Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 22(3-4), 193-216. Walby, S., & Myhill, A. (2001). New Survey Methodologies in Researching Violence against Women. The British Journal of Criminology, 41(3): 502-522. Walby, S., & Towers, J. S. (2017). Measuring Violence to End Violence: Mainstreaming Gender. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(1), 11-31. Wang, J., Tolson, H., Chiang, T. L., & Huang, T. Y. (2010). An Exploratory Factor Analysis of Workplace Learning, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment in Small to Midsize Enterprises in Taiwan. Human Resource Development International, 13(2), 147-163. Weeks, M. F. & Moore, R. P. (1981). Ethnicity of Interviewer Effects on Ethic Respondents. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(2), 245-249. Weiss, C. H. (1968). Validity of Welfare Mothers' Interview Responses. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 32(4), 622-633. West, B. T., & Blom, A. G. (2017). Explaining Interviewer Effects: A Research Synthesis. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 5, 175-211. West, B. T., Conrad, F. G., Kreuter, F., & Mittereder, F. (2018). Can Conversational Interviewing Improve Survey Response Quality without Increasing Interviewer Effects?. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 181(1), 181-203. World Health Organization (WHO) (2001). Putting Women First: Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Research on Domestic Violence against Women. WHO Department of Gender and Women’s Health, WHO/FCH/GWH/01.1. Geneva: WHO Publications. Williams Jr, J. A. (1964). Interviewer-Respondent Intercation: A Study of Bias in the Information Interview. Sociometry, 27, 338-352. Williams Jr, J. A. (1968). Interviewer Role Performance: A Further Note on Bias in the Information Interview. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32(1), 287-294. Wilson, D. C., & Olesen, E. P. (2002). Perceived Race of Interviewer Effects in Telephone Interviews. Paper presented at the 57th AAPOR/WAPOR Conference. St. Pete Beach, USA. Wuyts, C., & Loosveldt, G. (2018). Interviewers’ Within Survey Workload: Measurement and Association with Task Effort and Performance. Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings. Vancouver, Canada. Wuyts, C., & Loosveldt, G. (2020). Measurement of Interviewer Workload within the Survey and an Exploration of Workload Effects on Interviewers’ Field Efforts and Performance. Journal of Official Statistics, 36(3), 561-588. Yang, M. L., & Yu, R. R. (2008). The Interviewer Effect When There Is An Education Gap with the Respondent: Evidence from A Survey on Biotechnology in Taiwan. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1321-1331.	tr_TR
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11655/25603
dc.description.abstract	The dissertation aims to introduce two latent constructs in surveys which are rapport between interviewer and respondent, and interview quality. The third main objective is to investigate rapport impact on interview quality. Furthermore, secondary objectives are to determine levels of rapport and interview quality, to reveal differences among women whose interviews were completed with high rapport according to selected characteristics, and to investigate effect of interviewer characteristics on interview quality. From quantitative perspective, sophisticated measurement models are utilized to achieve thesis objectives. Data set of Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey, which is a household survey conducted in 2014, is used for statistical analyses within the dissertation. The nationwide, cross-sectional, face-to-face survey was carried out by Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HUIPS) in collaboration with Turkish Republic Ministry of Family and Social Policies, the General Directorate on the Status of Women (GDSW). The Field Staff data set was constructed separately and merged with women data set. In the first stage of the thesis, rapport and interview quality operationalization were given with several models. Afterwards, all phases to reach final measurement models for latent constructs were discussed and, finally, rapport impact on interview quality was investigated on the basis of structural equation model. In the second stage of the results section, differences among women interviews in terms of high rapport according to selected characteristics were revealed based on significance levels. Lastly, interviewer characteristics’ impact on interview quality was investigated under the control of covariates, and influential interviewer characteristics on the likelihood of high interview quality were given. Operationalization of rapport and interview quality are found useful to make interpretations on survey related constructs which we cannot measure directly. Findings showed that timing and frequency of visits, socio-demographic and socio-economic similarity between interviewer and respondent, and dynamic interview factors contribute to measurement of rapport. Interviewer workload, respondent burden and response quality are detrimental factors on interview quality in a negative way. Not only factors behind rapport and interview quality, but also the impact of rapport on interview quality showed importance of interviewer recruitment, workload allocation, interviewer training, field management, and motivation.	tr_TR
dc.language.iso	en	tr_TR
dc.publisher	Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü	tr_TR
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	tr_TR
dc.rights	CC0 1.0 Universal	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/	*
dc.subject	Rapport	tr_TR
dc.subject	İnterviewer
dc.subject	Respondent
dc.subject	İnterview quality
dc.subject	Violence against women
dc.subject	Turkey
dc.subject.lcsh	Sosyoloji	tr_TR
dc.title	The Contrıbutıon Of Rapport Between Intervıewer And Respondent On Intervıew Qualıty From Non-Samplıng Error Perspectıve: Evidence from 2014 Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Turkey	tr_en
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis	tr_TR
dc.description.ozet	Bu tez, görüşmeci ve cevaplayıcı arasındaki uyum ile görüşme kalitesini tanımlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca, görüşmeci ve cevaplayıcı arasındaki uyumun görüşme kalitesine olan etkisinin incelenmesi de tezin temel amaçları arasındadır. Alt amaçlar ise görüşmeci ve cevaplayıcı arasındaki uyum ve görüşme kalitesinin düzeylerini belirlemek, yüksek görüşme uyumu ile tamamlanan kadın görüşmeleri arasındaki farklılıkları ortaya çıkarmak ve görüşmeci özelliklerinin görüşme kalitesi üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Nicel bir bakış açısı benimsenerek, karmaşık yapılı ölçüm modelleri tez kapsamında kullanılmıştır. Bu tezde veri kaynağı olarak 2014 yılında gerçekleştirilen ve bir hanehalkı örneklem araştırması olan Türkiye’de Kadına Yönelik Aile İçi Şiddet Araştırması’nın veri seti kullanılmıştır. Ülke temsiliyeti olan ve yüz yüze görüşmelerle tamamlanan hane halkı araştırması, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü ve Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı-Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü işbirliğiyle yürütülmüştür.Araştırmanın kadın veri seti ile ayrıca oluşturulan Saha Personeli veri seti birleştirilerek istatistiksel analizlerde kullanılmıştır. Tezin ilk aşamasında, görüşmeci ve cevaplayıcı arasındaki uyum ve görüşme kalitesi kavramları çeşitli modeller yardımıyla ölçülmüştür. Bu yapıları ölçmek için kurulan tüm alt modellerin sonuçları incelenmiş, ayrıca uyumun görüşme kalitesi üzerine etkisi yapısal eşitlik modellemesi tekniğiyle araştırılmıştır. Sonuç bölümünün ikinci aşamasında ise seçilen bazı özelliklere göre yüksek uyumla tamamlanan kadın görüşmeleri arasındaki farklılıklar, anlamlılık düzeyleri temel alınarak ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Son olarak, görüşmeci özelliklerinin görüşme kalitesine üzerine etkisi diğer değişkenlerin kontrolü altında incelenerek, yüksek kaliteli görüşme olasılığı üzerinde etkili olan görüşmeci özellikleri bulunmuştur. Görüşmeci ve cevaplayıcı arasındaki uyum ile görüşme kalitesinin tanımlanması, sosyal araştırmalarda doğrudan ölçülmesi mümkün olmayan kavramların ölçülmesi açısından yararlı olmuştur. Çalışmanın bulguları, görüşmelerin sıklığı ve zamanlaması, görüşmeci ve cevaplayıcı arasındaki benzerlik ve dinamik görüşme faktörlerinin uyum üzerinde etkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, görüşmeci iş yükü, cevaplayıcı yükü ve cevap kalitesi de görüşme kalitesi üzerinde olumsuz yönde etkili faktörler olarak bulunmuştur. Uyum ve görüşme kalitesini tanımlayan faktörler ile uyumun görüşme kalitesine etkisi görüşmeci seçimi, iş yükü dağılımı, eğitim ve saha yönetimi ile motivasyonunun önemini ortaya çıkarmıştır.	tr_TR
dc.contributor.department	Sosyal Araştırma Yöntemleri	tr_TR
dc.embargo.terms	Acik erisim	tr_TR
dc.embargo.lift	2021-10-21T12:36:37Z
dc.funding	Yok	tr_TR