Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKoektuerk, Buelent
dc.contributor.authorKoektuerk, Oezlem
dc.contributor.authorYorgun, Hikmet
dc.contributor.authorGuelker, Jan-Erik
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Cem
dc.contributor.authorGorr, Eduard
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Goekmen
dc.contributor.authorHorlitz, Marc
dc.contributor.authorBansmann, Paul Martin
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T05:31:03Z
dc.date.available2021-06-03T05:31:03Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214231
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499416/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/24068
dc.description.abstractPurpose Data on bonus freeze characteristics and their impact on complication rates and long-term clinical outcome are limited. Methods Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a 28 mm 2nd-generation cryoballoon (CB) was performed in 169 patients (pts). The isolation temperatures, time to isolation and minimal temperatures of the cryoapplications were documented. Results The study included 92 pts who received one bonus freeze after PVI in group I and 77 pts who did not receive a bonus freeze in group II. After a mean follow-up time of 19.0±8.6 months in group I and 16.4±7.5 months in group II, 67 of 92 pts (72.8%) and 49 of 75 pts available to follow up (65.3%; p = 0.221) were free of atrial tachyarrhythmia, respectively. Phrenic nerve palsy occurred in 5.4% of the pts in group I (5/92 pts) and 1.3% of the pts in group II (1/77 pts; p = 0.22). Both the mean nadir temperatures of the bonus freezes and mean nadir temperatures of the isolation freezes differed significantly between the recurrent and non-recurrent pts in group I. The predilection sites of the reconduction for both groups were the inferior aspect of the inferior pulmonary veins. Conclusion The impact of a bonus freeze on long-term clinical outcome was not significant for two reasons: 1) The necessity of a bonus freeze was low because the long-term clinical success rate without a bonus freeze was high; and 2) the majority of bonus freezes, especially at the predilection sites, such as the inferior PV, appeared to be ineffective.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionof10.1371/journal.pone.0214231
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United States
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleLong-Term Impact Of A Bonus Freeze On Clinical Outcome: Analysis Of Effective And Non-Effective Bonus Freezes In Cryoballoon Ablation
dc.title.alternativeLong-term impact of a bonus freeze on clinical outcome
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalPlos One
dc.contributor.departmentKardiyoloji
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.description.indexPubMed
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

Attribution 4.0 United States
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: Attribution 4.0 United States