Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorŞahiner, Mehmet Levent
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Ergun Baris
dc.contributor.authorÇöteli, Cem
dc.contributor.authorAytemir, Kudret
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-03T05:31:02Z
dc.date.available2021-06-03T05:31:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0066-782X
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20190138
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7020865/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/24065
dc.description.abstractBackground Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an alternative therapy for atrial fibrillation patients who have high embolic risk and contraindications to anticoagulant therapy. Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and mid-term outcomes of percutaneous LAA occlusion, including device-related thrombosis. Methods Sixty consecutive patients who had undergone percutaneous LAA occlusion with AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ device from September 2015 to March 2018 were enrolled. Patients were followed for 21 ± 15 months (median - 20 months, interquartile range - 9 to 27 months). The postprocedural assessment was done at the 1st, 6th, and 12th month. Patients were clinically evaluated, and transesophageal echocardiography was performed at each visit. We evaluated the condition of normality of variables using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. P-values < 0.05 were statistically significant. Results The most common indication for the procedure was major bleeding with anticoagulants (n: 53, 88.3%). The procedure was completed successfully in 59 (98.3%) patients. Periprocedural mortality was observed in one patient. Postprocedural antiplatelet treatment was planned as dual or single antiplatelet therapy or low-dose anticoagulant therapy in 52 (88.1%), 2 (3.4%), and 5 (8.5%) patients, respectively. We found no clinically significant cerebrovascular events, device-related thrombus, or embolization in any patient during the follow-up. Two (3.4 %) patients presented significant peri-device leak (>3 mm) at the 1st month evaluation, which disappeared at the 12th month follow-up. Conclusion We concluded that LAA occlusion using the Amulet™ LAA occluder can be performed with high procedural success and acceptable outcomes.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isversionof10.5935/abc.20190138
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 United States
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleLeft Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion With Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Device: Real Life Data With Mid-Term Follow-Up Results
dc.title.alternativeLeft Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion with AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ Device
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalArquivos Brasileiros De Cardiologia
dc.contributor.departmentKardiyoloji
dc.identifier.volume113
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.description.indexPubMed
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

Attribution 4.0 United States
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: Attribution 4.0 United States