Özet
Bayram, C., Investigation of the Relationship Between Selective Attention Skills and Speech Understanding in Traumatic Brain Injury Individuals, Hacettepe University Graduate School of Health Sciences Speech and Language Therapy Programme Master Thesis, Ankara, 2021. Disorders that occur in individuals due to traumatic brain injury are an important health problem and can cause serious problems in language, speech and cognitive skills. One of the cognitive impairments commonly seen in traumatic brain injury is attention disorder. Attention disorder can significantly affect an individual's speech and language skills. In our study, the relationship between selective attention skills and speech understanding in individuals with traumatic brain injury was investigated. Thirty severe brain injury and 30 healthy participants between the ages of 18-60 were included in the study. The Aphasia Language Assessment Test and Stroop Test performances of the participants were compared and the relationship between them was examined. In addition, the relationship between the coma duration of the participants with traumatic brain injury and the two tests applied was examined. In line with the sample we selected as a result of our study, it was observed that the selective attention skills of the participants with traumatic brain injury had lower performance than healthy participants, and no statistically significant difference was found between traumatic brain injury and healthy participants in terms of auditory comprehension skills. In addition, it was observed that selective attention skill affected auditory comprehension skill. Finally, no relationship was found between coma duration and selective attention and auditory comprehension skills. In line with our results, it is thought that the inclusion of selective attention skills in the therapy programs of individuals with traumatic brain injury will positively affect the language and speech therapy process in these individuals.
Künye
1. Kahn F, Amatya B, Judson R, Chung P, Truesdale M, Dip G, Elmalik A, Galea MP. Factors associated with long-term functional and psychological outcomes in persons with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabil Med.2016; 48: 442–448.
2. Bate AJ, Mathias JL, Crawford JR. Orienting of visual attention following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 2010; 23:3, 386-398.
3. Hinchliffe FJ, Murdoch BE, Chenery HJ, Baglioni AJ, Harding-Clark J. Cognitive-linguistic subgroups in closed-head injury. Journal of Brain Injury.1998: 12(5), 369–398.
4. Bontke CF, Boake C. Principles of brain injury rehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: WB Saunder. 1996; p. 1027-1051.
5. Granacher RP. Traumatic brain injury methods for clinical and forensic neuropsychiatric assessment third edition.
6. Rowley DA, Rogish M, Alexaander T, Kevin J. Cognitive correlates of pragmatic language comprehension in adult traumatic brain injury: Asystematic review and meta-analyses. Journal of Brain Injury. 2017;31(12): 1564-1574.
7. Sarno NT, Buonaguro A, Levita E. Characteristics of verbal impairment in closed head patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.1986;67: 400–5.
8. Yang FG, Fuller J, Khodaparasta N, Krawczyka DC. Figurative language processing after traumatic brain injury in adults: A preliminary study. Journal of Neuropsychologia.2010;48: 1923–1929.
9. Granacher RP. Traumatic Brain Injury: Methods for Clinical and Forensic Neuropsychiatric Assessment Second Edition. 2008:19-20.
10. Rousseauxa M, Ve´rigneauxa C, Kozlowskia O.An analysis of communication in conversation after severe traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Neurology. 2010;17: 922–929.
11. Peach RK, Shapiro LP. Cognition and acquired language disorders: An information processing approach. An imprint of Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2012.
12. De Luca R, Maggio MG, Maresca G, Latella D, Cannavò A, Sciarrone F, Lo Voi E, Accorinti M, Bramanti P, Calabrò RS. Improving cognitive function after traumatic brain injury: A clinical trial on the potential use of the semi-immersive virtual reality. Journal of Behavioural Neurology Volume 2019.
13. Karpuz S, Küçükşen S.Travmatik beyin hasarlı hastalarda rehabilitasyon sonuçları. Şişli Etfal Hastanesi Tıp Bülteni.2017; 51:3.
14. Geniş B, Hocaoğlu Ç.Travmatik beyin hasarının psikiyatrik yönü. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi 2019;22:472-486.
15. Azouvi P, Arnould A, Dromer E, Vallat-Azouvi C. Neuropsychology of traumatic brain injury: An expert overview. Revue neurologique 2017;173:461 – 472.
16. Tsao JW. Traumatic brain injury: A clinician’s guide to diagnosis, management, and rehabilitation. 2012:16.
17. Vural M, Berker E.Travmatik beyin yaralanmasında klinik tanı ve değerlendirme. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi 2012;8(53):59.
18. Zollman FS. Manual of traumatic brain injury management. Midwest Regional Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Center. 2011: 4.
19. Li X, Zhang Y, Li L, Zhao H, Du X. Attention is shaped by semantic level of event-structure during speech comprehension: an electroencephalogram study. Cogn Neurodyn 2017;11:467–481.
20. Groome D, Brace N, Edgar G, Edgar H, Eysenck M, Manly T, Ness H, Pike G, Scott S, Styles E. An introductıon to cognitive psychology: Processes and disorders Third Edition. 2014: 231-32,275.
21. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, and Loring DW.2004.Neuropsychological assessment. 4th Edition New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22. Belanger HG, Curtıss G, Demery JA, Lebowıtz BK, Vanderploeg RD. Factors moderating neuropsychological outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2005;11: 215–227.
23. Cassidy JD, CarrollLJ, Peloso PM, Borg J, von Holst H, Holm L, Kraus J, Coronado VG. Incıdence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatıc braın injury: results of the who collaboratıng centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Med 2004; Suppl. 43: 28–60.
24. Owens JA, Spitz G, Ponsford JL, Dymowski AR, Willmott C. An investigation of white matter integrity and attention deficits following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury.2018;32(6): 776-783.
25. Hoofien D, Gilboa A, Vakil E, Donovick PJ. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10?20 years later: a comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury. 2001; 15(3): 189-209.
26. Millis SR, Rosenthal M, Novack TA, Sherer M, Nick TG, Kreutzer JS, HighWMJr, Ricker JH. Long-term neuropsychological outcome after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2001;16(4):343-355.
27. Irwin PL, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes. 1998; 76(2):149–188.
28. Coelho CA. Cognitive-communication deficits following traumatic brain injury. In brain injury medicine: Principles and practice. Eds: Zasler ND, Katz DI, Zafonte RD, 895–910.New York, NY: Demos Medical Publishing.2007.
29. Review of Talmy L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Journal of the Linguistic Society of America.2000: Volume 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Volume 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.
30. Mishra RK. Interaction of language and visual attention: Evidence from production and comprehension. Progress in Brain Research.2009; 176.
31. Hruska CA, Alter K, Steinhauer K, Steube A.Can wrong prosodic information be mistaken by the brain? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000.
32. Magne C, Aste´sano C, Lacheret-Dujour A, Morel M, Alter K, Besson M .On-line processing of “pop-out” words in spoken French dialogues. J Cognit Neurosci . 2005;17(5):740–756.
33. Astheimer LB, Sanders LD. Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing. Biol Psychol. 2009; 80(1): 23–34.
34. Wo¨stmann M, Herrmann B, Maess B, Obleser J Lateralized alpha oscillations reflect attentional selection of speech in noise. PNAS. 2016;113(14):3873–3878.
35. Hopfinge JB, Luck SJ, Steven A.Selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuromagnetic studies. Hillyard Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.2004.
36. Karakaş S, Erdoğan E, Sak L, Soysal AŞ, Ulusoy T, Yüceyurt Ulusoy İ, Alkan S. Stroop Testi TBAG Formu: Türk kültürüne standardizasyon çalışmaları, güvenirlik ve geçerlik. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi 1999; 2:75-88.
37. Dagenbach D, Carr TH. Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. San Diego: Academic Press.1994.
38. Petersen SE and Posner MJ. The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;21(35): 73–89.
39. Pashler H, Moss S. How to saw the concept of attention in half without sacrificing the subject: Review of the psychology of attention. PSYCHE.1999; 5(13).
40. Wilson BA, Watson PC, Baddeley AD. Improvement or simply practice? The effects of 20 repeated assessments on people with and without brain injury. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2000;6: 469–79.
41. Jennings RJ, Coles MGH. Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and Automatic Nervous System approaches. New York, Allyn & Bacon.1991.
42. Irak M, Karakaş S. Yüksek ve düşük dikkat performansı gösteren bireylerin olay-ilişkili potansiyel ve gamma tepkileri. Klinik Psikiyatri 2002;5:169-176.
43. Smith EE, Kosslyn SM. Bilişsel psikoloji: Zihin ve beyin. Edt: Şahin M:Cognitive psychology: Mind and brain. 2019: 105.
44. Lavie N, De Fockert J. The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.2005; 12 (4):669-674.
45. Mathias JL, Wheaton P. Changes in attention and information-processing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology. 2007;21(2): 212–223.
46. Cummings JL, Mega MS. Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2003.
47. Crosson B, (2000). Systems that support language processes: Attention. In S. E. Nadeau LJ, Rothi G, Crosson B (Eds.), The science and practice of neuropsychology. Aphasia and lanaguage: Theory to practice (p. 372–398). Guilford Press.
48. Hula WD, McNeil MR, BC-NCD. Models of Attention and Dual-Task Performance as Explanatory Constructs in Aphasia. Semınars In Speech And Language. 2008;29: 3.
49. Ayora P, Janssen N, Dell'Acqua R, Alario F-X.Attentional requirements for the selection of words from different grammatical categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 2009; 35(5):1344-51.
50. Taube-Schıff M, Segalowitz N.Within-language attention control in second language processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.2005; 8(3):195–206.
51. Myachykov A, Posner M. Attention in Language. Neurobiology of Attention.2005:324-329.
52. Stierwalt JAG, Murray LL. Attention Impairment Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Semınars In Speech And Language.2002;23: 2.
53. Willmott C, Ponsford J, Hocking C, Schönberger M. Factors contributing to attentional impairments after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2009; 23(4): 424–432.
54. Hinchliffe FJ, Murdoch BE, Chenery H J. Towards a conceptualization of language and cognitive impairment in closed-head injury: use of clinical measures. Brain Injury. 1998; 12(2):109-132.
55. Peach RK. The cognitive basis for sentence planning difficulties and discourse after traumatic brain injury. Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 2013;22: 285–97.
56. Whelan BM, Murdoch BE, Bellamy N. Delineating communication impairments associated with mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2007; 22(3):192-7.
57. Mendez MF. Language. In Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, eds. D.B.Arciniegas, C.A.Anderson, and C.M.Filley, 174–83.Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 2013.
58. Zatorre RJ, Belin P, Penhune VB. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(1):37-46.
59. Vitello S, Warren JE, Devlin JT, Rodd JM. Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 8: 530.
60. Marini A, Galetto V, Zampieri E, Vorano L, Zettin M, Carlomagno S. Narrative language in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia. 2011; 49: 2904–10.
61. Göçer March E. Frechay afazi tarama testi: Türk nöroloji hastaları için bir standardizasyon çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 1996; 11(38):56-63.
62. Maviş İ, Colay K, Topbaş S, Tanrıdağ O. Gülhane Afazi Testi-2 (GAT-2)’nin Standardizasyon ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik Çalışması, , Turk J Neurol. 2007; 13(2): 89-98.
63. Atamaz F, ON AY, Durmaz B. Ege afazi testi: Testin tanımlanması ve normal kişilerdeki performansı. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg. 2007;53:5-10.
64. Afazi dil değerlendirme testi’nin geçerlik, güvenirlik ve standardizasyon çalışması. Toğram B, Maviş İ. Turk Nöroloji Dergisi 2012; 18:96-103.
65. Toğram B, Çıkan G, Duru H. İnmeli bireylerin üç türkçe afazi testindeki performansları arasındaki ilişki: Bir ölçüt geçerliği çalışması. Türk Nöroloji Dergisi. 2012; 19:15-22.
66. Doğruöz NM, Maviş İ. Afazili vakalarda değerlendirme sonuçlarının analizi. Dil, Konuşma ve Yutma Araştırmaları Dergisi (DKYAD). 2018; 1(3).
67. Karalı FS, Ünsal EM, Savaş M, Maviş İ. Türkçede primer progresif afazinin görünümü: Bir olgu sunumu Dil, Konuşma ve Yutma Araştırmaları Dergisi (DKYAD). 2018; 1(3).
68. İnal Ö, Müjdeci B, Türkyılmaz MD. Afazili bireylerde afazi dil değerlendirme testi sonuçları ile ambulasyon düzeyi ve fonksiyonel bağımsızlık arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif çalışma. ACU Sağlık Bil Derg .2019; 10(4):598-603.
69. Maviş İ, Toğram B. Afazi dil değerlendirme testi (ADD) Kullanım Yönergesi.2009.
70. Türkeş N, Can H, Kurt M, Elmastaş Dikec B.İz sürme testi’nin 20-49 yaş aralığında türkiye için norm belirleme çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2015;26(3):189-96 .
71. Cangöz B, Karakoç E, Selekler K.İz sürme testi’nin 50 yaş üzeri türk yetişkin ve yaşlı örneklemi için standardizasyon çalışması, Turkish Journal of Geriatrics 2007; 10 (2): 73-82.
72. Karakaş S. BİLNOT bataryası el kitabı: Nöropsikolojik testler için araştırma ve Geliştirme Çalışmaları. 2. Baskı, Ankara: Eryılmaz Ofset. 2006.
73. Doğutepe Dinçer E, Karakaş S. Nöropsikolojik dikkat testleri arasındaki ilişkilerin modellenmesi. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni.2008;18:31-40.
74. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. George Peabody .Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1935;18, 643-662.
75. DeSoto MC, Fabiani M, Geary DC. When in doubt, do it both ways: Brain evidence of the simultaneous activation of conflicting motor responses in a spatial Stroop task. J Cog Neurosci. 2001;13:523-36.
76. Masaki H, Tanaka H, Takasawa N. Error-related brain potentials elicited by vocal errors. Neuroreport. 2001;12: 1851-5.
77. Alain C, McNeely HE, He Y . Neurophysiological evidence of error-monitoring deficits in patients with schizophrenia. Cereb Cortex. 2002;12: 840-846.
78. Hajcak G, Simons RF. (2002). Error-related brain activity in obsessive-compulsive undergraduates. Psychiatry Research. 2002; 110(1):63–72.
79. Lansbergen MM, van Hell E, Kenemans JL. Impulsivity and conflict in the stroop task: An ERP study. Journal of Psychophysiology. 2007; 21: 33-50.
80. Mager R, Bullinger AH, Brand S. Age-related changes in cognitive conflict processing: An event-related potential study. Neurobiol Aging. 2007;28: 1925-35.
81. Newman LA, Creer DJ, McGaughy JA. Cognitive control and the anterior cingulate cortex: how conflicting stimuli affect attentional control in the rat. J Physiol Paris. 2015;109(0): 95–103.
82. Burke DM, Light LL. Memory and aging: The role of retrieval processes. Psychol Bull.1981; 90: 513-46.
83. Glaser WR, Glaser MO. Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. J Exp Psychol Gen.1989;118 (1): 13-42.
84. Stuss DT, Benson DF. Neuropsychological studies of the frontal lobes. Psychol Bull.1984; 95(1):3-28.
85. Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary. New York. Oxford University Press. 1991.
86. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment, 3rd Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 1995.
87. Morton J, Chambers SM. Selective attentıon to words and colours quarterly journal of experimental psychology. 1973; 25:387-397.
88. Rohling, Faust, Beverly, Demakis. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: A meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.’s (2000, 2005) Systematic Reviews. American Psychological Association.2009; 23(1):20–39.
89. Norman RS, Shah MN, Turkstraa LS. Language Comprehension After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Speed. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2019; 28:1479–1490.
90. Fridriksson J, den Ouden DB, Hillis AE, Hickok G, Rorden C, Basilakos A, Yourganov G, Bonilha L.Anatomy of aphasia revisited.Brain. 2018; 141(3): 848–862.
91. Belmont A, Agar MAN, Azouvi P. Subjective fatigue, mental effort, and attention deficits after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2009;23(9) :939-944.
92. Bobba U, Munivenkatappa A, Agrawal A. Speech and language dysfunctions in patients with cerebrocortical disorders admitted in a neurosurgical unit. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019;14:87-9.
93. Carme Junqui P, Pujol J, Jurado AG, Moret J, Grofman J. The role Of prefrontal regions in the stroop task. Neuropsycholooia. 1995; 33(3):341-352.
94. Dao-Castellana MH ,Samson Y, Legault F, Martinot JL, Aubin H J ,Crouzel C, Feldman L, Barrucand D, Rancurel G, Anda AF. Syrotafrontal dysfunction in neurologically normal chronic alcoholic subjects: Metabolic and neuropsychological findings, psychological medicine. 1998;28(5):1039-1048.
95. Plebanek DJ, Sloutsky VM. Selective attention, filtering, and the development of working memory. Developmental Science. 2019;22:e12727.
96. Li X, Lu Y, Zhao H. How and when predictability interacts with accentuation in temporally selective attention during speech comprehension. Neuropsychologia. 2014;64:71–84.
97. Laurienti PJ, Field AS, Burdette JH, Maldjian JA, Yen YF, Moody DM. Dietary caffeine consumption modulates fMRI measures. Neuroimage. 2002;17(2):751-7.
98. Crottaz-Herbette S, Anagnoson RT , Menona V. Modality effects in verbal working memory: differential prefrontal and parietal responses to auditory and visual stimuli. NeuroImage. 2004; 21:340 – 351.
99. Shomstein S ,Yantis S.Control of attention shifts between vision and audition in human cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24(47):10702–10706.
100. Johnson JA, Zatorre RJ. Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates. Cerebral Cortex.2005;15(10):1609-1620.
101. Günster, Mirco, Mittag, Hans-Joachim,Wallenborn, Benjamin. Employment of new technıcal platforms for interactively visualizing statistical methods and statistical data.2013.
102. Salo J, Mäntymäki M. Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel. International Journal of Information Management. 2013; 33(2):282-290.
103. Akoğlu G, Acarlar F. Gelişimsel Dil Bozukluklarında Söz Dizimi Anlama ve Sözel Çalışma Belleği İlişkisinin İncelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 2014;29 (73), 89-103.
104. Chung S , Wang X, Fieremans E, Rath JF, Amorapanth P, Foo F-Y A , Morton CJ, Novikov DS , Flanagan SR , Lui YW. . Altered Relationship between working memory and brain microstructure after mild traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am JNeuroradiol. 2019;40(9):1438-1444.
105. Jolly AE, Scott GT, Sharp DJ, Hampshire AD. Distinct patterns of structural damage underlie working memory and reasoning deficits after traumatic brain injury. A journal of neurology 2020;143:1158–1176.
106. Dao-Castellana MH, Samson Y, LegaultF , Martinot JL, Aubin HJ ,Crouzel C, Feldman L, Barrucand D, Rancurel G, Féline A, Syrota A. Frontal dysfunction in neurologically normal chronic alcoholic subjects: metabolic and neuropsychological findings. Psychol Med. 1998;28(5):1039-48.
107. Gonzalez-Burgos L, Hernández-Cabrera JA, Westman E, BarrosoJ, Ferreira D. Cognitive compensatory mechanisms in normal aging: a study on verbal fluency and the contribution of other cognitive functions. AGING 2019; 11: 12.
108. Zgaljardic DJ, Oden KE, Dickson S, Plenger PM, Lambert ME, Miller R. Naming test of the neuropsychological assessment battery: Reliability and validity in a sample of patients with acquired brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2013; 28; 859–865.
109. LeBlanc J, Guise E, Champoux M, Couturier C, Lamoureux J, Marcoux J, Maleki M, Feyz M. (2014) Acute evaluation of conversational discourse skills in traumatic brain injury. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2014;16(6): 582-593.
110. Majerus S. Language repetition and short-term memory: an integrative framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013;7:357.
111. Martin N, Minkina I, Kohen FP, Kalinyak-Fliszar M. Assessment of linguistic and verbal short-term memory components of language abilities in aphasia. J Neurolinguistics. 2018; 48: 199–225.
112. Fuster JM. Inferotemporal units in selective visual attention and short-term memory. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1990; 3:64.
113. Herrero JL, Nikolaev AR, Raffone A, van Leeuwen C Selective attention in visual short-term memory consolidation. NeuroReport. 2009;20(7):652-656.
114. Tabet S, LeBlanc J, Frenette LC, Seresova A, Laberge-Poirier A, Alturki AY, Marcoux J, Maleki M, de Guise E. Early reading comprehension and speed of reading impairments in individuals with uncomplicated and complicated mild traumatic brain injury, Journal of Communication Disorders. 2020;88: 106047.
115. Moore M, Griffiths S, Fickas S. An evaluation of reading comprehension of expository text in adults with traumatic brain injury.2014.
116. Yılmaz B, Köse E, Korkut Ş.Hacettepe Üniversitesi ve Bilkent Üniversitesi Öğrencilerinin Okuma Alışkanlıkları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Türk Kütüphaneciliği. 2009;23(1): 22-51.
117. Commodari E, Guarnera M. Attention and reading skills. Perceptualand Motor Skills. 2005;100:375-386.
118. Stevensa C, Bavelier D. The role of selective attention on academic foundations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2012;2S:30– S48.
119. Honan CA, McDonald S, Gowland A, Fisher A, Randall RK. Deficits in comprehension of speech acts after TBI: The role of theory of mind and executive function. Brain & Language. 2015;150:69–79.
120. Kothari S, DiTommaso C. Prognosis after severe traumatic brain injury: a practical evidence-based approach. Brain Injury Medicine. 2nd Edition.
121. Katz DI, Alexander MP. Traumatic brain injury. Predicting course of recovery and outcome for patients admitted to rehabilitation. Arch Neurol 1994; 51(7):661-70.
122. BG, Wade SL, Kirkwood MW, Brown TM, Stancin T, Taylor HG. Online problem-solving therapy for executive dysfunction after child traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics 2013;132(1):e158-66.
123. Ponsford J, Willmott C. Rehabilitation of nonspatial attention. In: Ponsford J, editor. Cognitive and behavioral rehabilitation. New York: The Guilford Press; 2004.
124. Mathias J, Wheaton P. Changes in attention and informationprocessing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology. 2007;21(2):212–23.
125. Draper K, Ponsford J. Cognitive functioning and outcome 10 years following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2008;22(5):618–25.
126. Lewis FD, Horn GJ. Traumatic brain injury: analysis of functional deficits and posthospital rehabilitation outcomes. J Spec Operations Med. 2013;13(3):56–61.
127. Olver JH, Ponsford JL, Curran CA. Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. Brain Inj. 1996;10(11):841–48.
128. Liotti M, Mayberg HS. The role of functional neuroimaging in the neuropsychology of depression. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001;23: 121-136.
129. Barceló F, Periáñez JA, Knight RT. Think differently: a brain orienting response to task novelty. Neuroreport. 2002;28;13(15):1887-92.
130. Markela-Lerenc J, Ille N, Kaiser S, Fiedler P. Prefrontal-cingulate activation during executive control: which comes first? Cognitive Brain Research 2004;18(3):278-87.
131. Bijl J, Sauvageau M, Thompson A, Sauvageau G. High incidence of proviral integrations in the Hoxa locus in a new model of E2a-PBX1-induced B-cell leukemia. Genes Dev 2005;19(2):224-33.
132. Bokura H, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi S. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 43:967–975.
133. SA, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Neuroimaging of marijuana smokers during inhibitory processing: a pilot investigation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005;23(1):107-18.
