Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEl, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorKaraışık Soysal, Merve
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-11T13:48:40Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-05-13
dc.identifier.citationAngle, E., Classification Of Malocclusion. Dental Cosmos. 1899, Philadelphia. 2. Başçiftçi, F., Et Al., Konya Yöresi Okul Çocuklarında Ortodontik Maloklüzyonların Prevelansının Araştırılması: Epidemiyolojik Çalışma. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, 2002. 15(2): P. 92-98. 3. Sayin, M. And H. Türkkahraman, Malocclusion And Crowding In An Orthodontically Referred Turkish Population. The Angle Orthodontist, 2004. 74(5): P. 635-639. 4. Proffit, W.R., H.W. Fields Jr, And D.M. Sarver, Contemporary Orthodontics. 2006: Elsevier Health Sciences. 5. Pancherza, H., Dentofacial Orthopedics Or Orthognathic Surgery: Is It A Matter Of Age? American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2000. 117(5): P. 571-574. 6. Bishara, S.E. And W. Saunders, Textbook Of Orthodontics. 1st Ed. 2001, Philadelphia: Saunders Company. 326-366. 7. Mcnamara Jr, J.A., Components Of Class II Malocclusion In Children 8–10 Years Of Age. The Angle Orthodontist, 1981. 51(3): P. 177-202. 8. Rosenblum, R.E., Class II Malocclusion: Mandibular Retrusion Or Maxillary Protrusion? The Angle Orthodontist, 1995. 65(1): P. 49-62. 9. RENFORE, E., A Study Of The Facial Patterns Associated With Class I, Class II, Division 1, And Class II, Division 2 Malocclusions. Angle Orthod, 1948. 18: P. 12-15. 10. Http://Myoresearch.Com/Orthodontics/. 11. Das, U. And D. Reddy, Treatment Effects Produced By Preorthodontic Trainer Appliance In Patients With Class II Division I Malocclusion. Journal Of Indian Society Of Pedodontics And Preventive Dentistry, 2010. 28(1): P. 30. 12. Oliveirajr, E., Et Al., Cephalometric Assessment Of Patients After Treatment With Trainer Positioners-T4K. J Br Orthod Orthop Facial, 2005. 10: P. 179-85. 13. Ramirez-Yañez, G. And F. Paulo, Early Treatment Of A Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion With The Trainer For Kids (T4K): A Case Report. Journal Of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2008. 32(4): P. 325-329. 14. Usumez, S., Et Al., The Effects Of Early Preorthodontic Trainer Treatment On Class II, Division 1 Patients. The Angle Orthodontist, 2004. 74(5): P. 605-609. 15. Quadrelli, C., Et Al., Early Myofunctional Approach To Skeletal Class II. Mondo Ortodontico, 2002. 27(2): P. 109-122. 16. Ramirez-Yañez, G., Et Al., Dimensional Changes In Dental Arches After Treatment With A Prefabricated Functional Appliance. Journal Of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2007. 31(4): P. 279-283. 17. Yagci, A., Et Al., The Effects Of Myofunctional Appliance Treatment On The Perioral And Masticatory Muscles In Class II, Division 1 Patients. World J Orthod, 2010. 11(2): P. 117-22. 18. Čirgić, E., H. Kjellberg, And K. Hansen, Treatment Of Large Overjet In Angle Class II: Division 1 Malocclusion With Andresen Activators Versus Prefabricated Functional Appliances—A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial. European Journal Of Orthodontics, 2016. 38(5): P. 516-524. 19. Baume, L.J. And S.C. Maréchaux, Uniform Methods For The Epidemiologic Assessment Of Malocclusion: The Development Of Basic Methods By The World Health Organization And The Fédération Dentaire Internationale. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1974. 66(2): P. 121-129. 20. Blair, E.S., A Cephalometric Roentgenographic Appraisal Of The Skeletal Morphology Of Class I, Class II, Div. 1, And Class II, Div. 2 (Angle) Malocclusions. The Angle Orthodontist, 1954. 24(2): P. 106-119. 21. Jarabak, J.R. And J. Fizzell, Technique And Treatment With Light-Wire Edgewise Appliances, Ed. 2, St. Louis,, The CV Mosby Company, 1972. 22. Broadbent, B.H., A New X-Ray Technique And Its Application To Orthodontia: The Introduction Of Cephalometric Radiography. The Angle Orthodontist, 1981. 51(2): P. 45-66. 23. Steiner, C.C., Cephalometrics For You And Me. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1953. 39(10): P. 729-755. 24. Staley, R., Etiology And Prevalence Of Malocclusion In: Bishara SE, Editor. Textbook Of Orthoodntics. 2001, Philadelphia WB Saunders. P. 86-336. 25. Onyeaso, C.O., Prevalence Of Malocclusion Among Adolescents In Ibadan, Nigeria. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2004. 126(5): P. 604-607. 26. Thilander, B., Et Al., Prevalence Of Malocclusion And Orthodontic Treatment Need In Children And Adolescents In Bogota, Colombia. An Epidemiological Study Related To Different Stages Of Dental Development. European Journal Of Orthodontics, 2001. 23(2): P. 153-168. 27. Haynes, S., The Prevalence Of Malocclusion In English Children Aged 11-12 Years. Trans Eur Othod Soc, 1970: P. 89-98. 28. Celikoglu, M., S. Akpinar, And I. Yavuz, The Pattern Of Malocclusion In A Sample Of Orthodontic Patients From Turkey. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2010. 15(5): P. E791-6. 29. Gelgör, İ.E., A.İ. Karaman, And E. Ercan, Prevalence Of Malocclusion Among Adolescents In Central Anatolia. European Journal Of Dentistry, 2007. 1(3): P. 125. 30. Rübendüz , M., Overjet Ve Angle Sınıflaması Arasındaki Ilişkilerin Değerlendirilmesi. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi, 2002. 15: P. 28-35. 31. Arslan, S.G. And M.H. Atay, Son Dört Yılda Kliniğimize Başvuran Hastalardaki Ortodontik Anomalilerin Angle Sınıflamasına Göre Dağılımları: Retrospektif Çalışma. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, 2003: P. 30,31-35. 32. Gülyurt, M., Kliniğimize Müracaat Eden Ve Tedavi Edilen Hastaların Anomalilere Göre Dağılımı Ve Koruyucu Ortodontik Tedavi Gerekliliği. Oral Dergisi, 1985: P. 9-11. 33. Smith, R.A., The Etiology Of Angle Class II Division I Malocclusion. The Angle Orthodontist, 1939. 9(1): P. 15-19. 34. Graber, T.M., The “Three M's”: Muscles, Malformation, And Malocclusion. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1963. 49(6): P. 418-450. 35. Lundstrom, A., Tooth Size And Occlusion In Twins, Basel, 1948. Brit Dent J, 1949. 871297. 36. Bishara, S.E. Class II Malocclusions: Diagnostic And Clinical Considerations With And Without Treatment. In Seminars In Orthodontics. 2006. Elsevier. 37. Infante, P., An Epidemiologic Study Of Finger Habits In Preschool Children, As Related To Malocclusion, Socioeconomic Status, Race, Sex, And Size Of Community. ASDC Journal Of Dentistry For Children, 1976. 43(1): P. 33. 38. Friman, P. And B. Schmitt, Thumb Sucking In Childhood: Guidelines For The Pediatrician. Clinical Pediatrics, 1989. 28(43): P. 438-440. 39. Larsson, E., The Effect Of Finger-Sucking On The Occlusion: A Review. The European Journal Of Orthodontics, 1987. 9(1): P. 279-282. 40. Pădure, H., A. Negru, And D. Stanciu, The Class II/1 Anomaly Of Hereditary Etiology Vs. Thumb-Sucking Etiology. Journal Of Medicine And Life, 2012. 5(2): P. 239. 41. Dimberg, L., Et Al., Prevalence Of Malocclusion Traits And Sucking Habits Among 3-Year-Old Children. Swed Dent J, 2010. 34(1): P. 35-42. 42. Fränkel, R., Concerning Recent Articles On Fränkel Appliance Therapy. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1984. 85(5): P. 441-445. 43. Graber, T.M., T. Rakosi, And A.G. Petrovic, Dentofacial Orthopedics With Functional Appliances. 1997: Mosby Incorporated. 44. Ülgen, M., Ortodonti: Anomaliler, Sefalometri, Etiloji, Büyüme Ve Gelişim, Tanı. 2000: Yeditepe Üniversitesi. 45. Crouse, U., M. Laine-Alava, And D. Warren, Nasal Impairment In Prepubertal Children. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2000. 118(1): P. 69-74. 46. Souki, B.Q., Et Al., Prevalence Of Malocclusion Among Mouth Breathing Children: Do Expectations Meet Reality? International Journal Of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2009. 73(5): P. 767-773. 47. Straub, W.J., Malfunction Of The Tongue: Part I. The Abnormal Swallowing Habit: Its Cause, Effects, And Results In Relation To Orthodontic Treatment And Speech Therapy. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1960. 46(6): P. 404- 424. 48. Shetty, S. And A. Munshi, Oral Habits In Children--A Prevalence Study. Journal Of The Indian Society Of Pedodontics And Preventive Dentistry, 1998. 16(2): P. 61-66. 49. Solow, B. And A. Tallgren, Head Posture And Craniofacial Morphology. American Journal Of Physical Anthropology, 1976. 44(3): P. 417-435. 50. Fröhlich, F.J., Changes In Untreated Class II Type Malocclusions. The Angle Orthodontist, 1962. 32(3): P. 167-179. 51. Bishara, S.E., P. Bayati, And J.R. Jakobsen, Longitudinal Comparisons Of Dental Arch Changes In Normal And Untreated Class II, Division 1 Subjects And Their Clinical Implications. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1996. 110(5): P. 483-489. 52. Uysal, T., Et Al., Dental And Alveolar Arch Widths In Normal Occlusion, Class II Division 1 And Class II Division 2. The Angle Orthodontist, 2005. 75(6): P. 941-947. 53. Haas, A.J., Palatal Expansion: Just The Beginning Of Dentofacial Orthopedics. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1970. 57(3): P. 219-255. 54. Harvold, E., Some Biologic Aspects Of Orthodontic Treatment In The Transitional Dentition. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1963. 49(1): P. 1-14. 55. Elsasser, W.A. And W.L. Wylie, The Craniofacial Morphology Of Mandibular Retrusion. American Journal Of Physical Anthropology, 1948. 6(4): P. 461- 474. 56. Pancherz, H., K. Zieber, And B. Hoyer, Cephalometric Characteristics Of Class II Division 1 And Class II Division 2 Malocclusions: A Comparative Study In Children. The Angle Orthodontist, 1997. 67(2): P. 111-120. 57. Harris, J.E., C.J. Kowalski, And G.F. Walker, Discrimination Between Normal And Class II Individuals Using Steiner's Analysis. The Angle Orthodontist, 1972. 42(3): P. 212-220. 58. Gilmore, W.A., Morphology Of The Adult Mandible In Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion And In Excellent Occlusion. The Angle Orthodontist, 1950. 20(3): P. 137-146. 59. Carter, N.E., Dentofacial Changes In Untreated Class II Division 1 Subjects. British Journal Of Orthodontics, 1987. 14(4): P. 225-234. 60. Henry, R., A Classification Of Class II, Division I Malocclusion. The Angle Orthodontist, 1957. 27(2): P. 83-92. 61. Hunter, W.S., The Vertical Dimensions Of The Face And Skeletodental Retrognathism. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1967. 53(8): P. 586-595. 62. Karlsen, A.T., Craniofacial Morphology In Children With Angle Class II-1 Malocclusion With And Without Deepbite. The Angle Orthodontist, 1994. 64(6): P. 437-446. 63. Björk, A., Prediction Of Mandibular Growth Rotation. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1969. 55(6): P. 585-599. 64. Maj, G. And F.P. LUCCHESE, The Mandible In Class II, Division 2. The Angle Orthodontist, 1982. 52(4): P. 288-292. 65. Arvystas, M.G., Nonextraction Treatment Of Severe Class II, Division 2 Malocclusions: Part 1. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1990. 97(6): P. 510-521. 66. Maj, G., C. Luzi, And P. Lucchese, A Cephalometric Appraisal Of Class II And Class III Malocclusions. The Angle Orthodontist, 1960. 30(1): P. 26-34. 67. Kessel, S.P., The Rationale Of Maxillary Premolar Extraction Only In Class II Therapy. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1963. 49(4): P. 276-293. 68. Coben, S.E., The Biology Of Class II Treatment. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1971. 59(5): P. 470-487. 69. Fisk, G., Culbert Mr, Grainger Rm, Hemrend B And Moyers R. The Morphology And Physiology Of Distocclusion. Am J Orthod, 1953. 35: P. 3-12. 70. Drelich, R.C., A Cephalometric Study Of Untreated Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion1. The Angle Orthodontist, 1948. 18(3): P. 70-75. 71. Altemus, L.A., Frequency Of The Incidence Of Malocclusion In American Negro Children Aged Twelve To Sixteen. The Angle Orthodontist, 1959. 29(4): P. 189-200. 72. Rothstein, T. And C. Yoon-Tarlie, Dental And Facial Skeletal Characteristics And Growth Of Males And Females With Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion Between The Ages Of 10 And 14 (Revisited)—Part I: Characteristics Of Size, Form, And Position. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2000. 117(3): P. 320-332. 73. Hitchcock, H.P., A Cephalometric Description Of Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1973. 63(4): P. 414-423. 74. Demir, A., T. Uysal, And F. Başçiftçi, Sınıf II Maloklüzyonun Iskeletsel Ve Dental Karakteristiğinin Belirlenmesi. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi 2005: P. 18: 205-214. 75. Kerr, W.J.S. And I. Ford, The Variability Of Some Craniofacial Dimensions. The Angle Orthodontist, 1991. 61(3): P. 205-210. 76. Riedel, R.A., The Relation Of Maxillary Structures To Cranium In Malocclusion And In Normal Occlusion. The Angle Orthodontist, 1952. 22(3): P. 142-145. 77. Bacon, W., Et Al., The Cranial Base In Subjects With Dental And Skeletal Class II. The European Journal Of Orthodontics, 1992. 14(3): P. 224-228. 78. Giuntini, V., Et Al., Glenoid Fossa Position In Class II Malocclusion Associated With Mandibular Retrusion. The Angle Orthodontist, 2008. 78(5): P. 808- 812. 79. Craig, C.E., The Skeletal Patterns Characteristic Of Class I And Class II, Division I Malocclusions In Norma Lateralis. The Angle Orthodontist, 1951. 21(1): P. 44-56. 80. Faltin Jr, K., Et Al., Long-Term Effectiveness And Treatment Timing For Bionator Therapy. The Angle Orthodontist, 2003. 73(3): P. 221-230. 81. Fränkel, R., The Treatment Of Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion With Functional Correctors. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1969. 55(3): P. 265-275. 82. Von Bremen, J. And H. Pancherz, Efficiency Of Early And Late Class II Division 1 Treatment. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2002. 121(1): P. 31-37. 83. Barton, S., P.A. Cook, And F.L.D. Institute, Predicting Functional Appliance Treatment Outcome In Class II Malocclusions–A Review. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1997. 112(3): P. 282-286. 84. Pancherz, H. And U. Hägg, Dentofacial Orthopedics In Relation To Somatic Maturation: An Analysis Of 70 Consecutive Cases Treated With The Herbst Appliance. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1985. 88(4): P. 273-287. 85. O’Brien, K., Et Al., Effectiveness Of Early Orthodontic Treatment With The Twin-Block Appliance: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Part 1:Dental And Skeletal Effects. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2003. 124(3): P. 234-243. 86. Tulloch, J.C., C. Phillips, And W.R. Proffit, Benefit Of Early Class II Treatment: Progress Report Of A Two-Phase Randomized Clinical Trial. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998. 113(1): P. 62-74. 87. Arat, M., Et Al., Time Factors In Functional Treatment Of Skeletal Class II. Informationen Aus Orthodontie Und Kieferorthopadie: Mit Beitragen Aus Der Internationalen Literatur, 1988. 20(3): P. 363. 88. Proffit, W.R. And J.C. Tulloch, Preadolescent Class II Problems: Treat Now Or Wait? American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2002. 121(6): P. 560-562. 89. King, G.J., Et Al., The Timing Of Treatment For Class II Malocclusions In Children: A Literature Review. The Angle Orthodontist, 1990. 60(2): P. 87-97. 90. Baccetti, T., L. Franchi, And L.H. Kim, Effect Of Timing On The Outcomes Of 1- Phase Nonextraction Therapy Of Class II Malocclusion. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2009. 136(4): P. 501-509. 91. Gianelly, A.A., One-Phase Versus Two-Phase Treatment. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1995. 108(5): P. 556-559. 92. Burden, D., An Investigation Of The Association Between Overjet Size, Lip Coverage, And Traumatic Injury To Maxillary Incisors. The European Journal Of Orthodontics, 1995. 17(6): P. 513-517. 93. Järvinen, S., Incisal Overjet And Traumatic Injuries To Upper Permanent Incisors: A Retrospective Study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 1978. 36(5- 6): P. 359-362. 94. Bauss, O., J. Röhling, And R. Schwestka-Polly, Prevalence Of Traumatic Injuries To The Permanent Incisors In Candidates For Orthodontic Treatment. Dental Traumatology, 2004. 20(2): P. 61-66. 95. Calişkan, M. And M. Türkün, Clinical Investigation Of Traumatic Injuries Of Permanent Incisors In Izmir, Türkiye. Dental Traumatology, 1995. 11(5): P. 210-213. 96. Graber, T., R. Vanarsdall, And K. Vig, Orthodontics Current Principles And Techniques. 2005: P. 493-577. 97. Proffit, W.R., Diagnosis And Treatment Planning In Orthodontics. Orthodontics-Current Principles And Techniques, 1985: P. 3-100. 98. Pfeiffer, J.-P. And D. Grobéty, Simultaneous Use Of Cervical Appliance And Activator: An Orthopedic Approach To Fixed Appliance Therapy. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1972. 61(4): P. 353-373. 99. Ferreira, F., Novel Approaches For Class II Malocclusion Treatment Using Myofunctional Orthodontics Therapy: A Systematic Review. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci, 2017. 4(7): P. 503-507. 100. Ahn, E.S., Et Al., Oropharyngeal Airway Three-Dimensional Changes After Treatment With Myobrace In Class II Retrognathic Children. Iran J Public Health, 2017. 46(2): P. 265-267. 101. Luppanapornlarp, S. And L.E. Johnston Jr, The Effects Of Premolar-Extraction: A Long-Term Comparison Of Outcomes In “Clear-Cut” Extraction And Nonextraction Class II Patients. The Angle Orthodontist, 1993. 63(4): P. 257- 272. 102. Proffit, W.R., C. Phillips, And N. Douvartzidis, A Comparison Of Outcomes Of Orthodontic And Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment Of Class II Malocclusion In Adults. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1992. 101(6): P. 556-565. 103. Ülgen, M., Ortodontik Tedavi Prensipleri. 1993. 104. Kingsley, N.W., A Treatise On Oral Deformities As A Branch Of Mechanical Surgery. 1880: D. Appleton. 105. Bishara, S.E. And R.R. Ziaja, Functional Appliances: A Review. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1989. 95(3): P. 250- 258. 106. Proffit, W., Treatment Of Skeletal Problems In Preadolescent Children. Contemporary Orthodontics, 1986: P. 354-398. 107. Andresen, V., K. Häupl, And L. Petrik, Funktionskieferorthopädie. 1957: Barth. 108. Andresen, V., Beitrag Zur Retention. Z. Zahnaerztl. Orthop, 1910. 3: P. 121-5. 109. Herbst, E., Dreissigjährige Erfahrungen Mit Dem Retentions-Scharnier. Zahnärztl Rundschau, 1934. 43: P. 1515-1524. 110. BALTERS, W., Ergebnis Der Gesteuerten Selbestheiling Von Kieferothopadischen Anomalien. Dtsch. Zahnaerztl., 1960. 15: P. 241. 111. Frankel, R., The Theoretical Concept Underlying The Treatment With Function Correctors. Trans Eur Orthod Soc, 1966. 9: P. 223-250. 112. Clark, W., The Twin Block Technique A Functional Orthopedic Appliance System. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1988. 93(1): P. 1-18. 113. Pancherz, H., The Modern Herbst Appliance. Dentofacial Orthopedics With Functional Appliances. 2nd Ed., St. Louis: Mosby-Yearbook, 1997: P. 336- 366. 114. Vargervik, K. And E.P. Harvold, Response To Activator Treatment In Class II Malocclusions. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1985. 88(3): P. 242-251. 115. Mcnamara, J.A. And D.S. Carlson, Quantitative Analysis Of Temporomandibular Joint Adaptations To Protrusive Function. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1979. 76(6): P. 593- 611. 116. Rabie, A., T. She, And U. Hägg, Functional Appliance Therapy Accelerates And Enhances Condylar Growth. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2003. 123(1): P. 40-48. 117. Williams, S. And B. Melsen, Condylar Development And Mandibular Rotation And Displacement During Activator Treatment: An Implant Study. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1982. 81(4): P. 322-326. 118. Gibbs, S.J., Effective Dose Equivalent And Effective Dose: Comparison For Common Projections In Oral And Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, And Endodontology, 2000. 90(4): P. 538-545. 119. Benkert, K., The Effectiveness Of Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy In Improving Dental Occlusion. The International Journal Of Orofacial Myology: Official Publication Of The International Association Of Orofacial Myology, 1997. 23: P. 35-46. 120. Maria De Felício, C., Et Al., Otologic Symptoms Of Temporomandibular Disorder And Effect Of Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy. CRANIO®, 2008. 26(2): P. 118-125. 121. Homem, M.A., Et Al., Effectiveness Of Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy In Orthodontic Patients: A Systematic Review. Dental Press J Orthod, 2014. 19(4): P. 94-9. 122. Angle, E.H., Treatment Of Malocculsion Of The Teeth. 1907: SS White Dental Manufacturing Company. 123. Klocke, A., H. Korbmacher, And B. Kahl-Nieke, Influence Of Orthodontic Appliances On Myofunctional Therapy. Journal Of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopädie, 2000. 61(6): P. 414-420. 124. Toronto, A., Long-Term Effectiveness Of Oral Myotherapy. The International Journal Of Oral Myology, 1975. 1(4): P. 132-136. 125. Tartaglia, G.M., Et Al., Non-Invasive 3D Facial Analysis And Surface Electromyography During Functional Pre-Orthodontic Therapy: A Preliminary Report. Journal Of Applied Oral Science, 2009. 17(5): P. 487-494. 126. Moyers, R.E., Handbook Of Orthodontics. 1988: Year Book Medical Pub. 127. Kaya, D., Kocadereli İ. Myofonksiyonel Tedaviler Ve Trainer Uygulamaları. SÜ Dişhek Fak Der, 2008. 17: P. 66-74. 128. Little, R.M., R.A. Riedel, And J. Artun, An Evaluation Of Changes In Mandibular Anterior Alignment From 10 To 20 Years Postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1988. 93(5): P. 423-8. 129. Shapiro, P.A., Stability Of Open Bite Treatment. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2002. 121(6): P. 566-568. 130. Ramirez-Yañez, D.G.O., Insights Into Orthodontic Treatment. Dental Asia, 2006. 131. Quadrelli, C., V. Ghiglione, And M. Gheorgiu, Releationship Between Posture, Dysfunctions Of The Of The Soft Tissiues Of The Stomatognatic Apparatus, Respiration And Occlusion In Early Treatment Of Skeletal II . XVI National Congress Sido, 2001. 132. Kanao, A., M. Mashiko, And K. Kanao, Application Of Functional Orthodontic Appliances To Treatment Of “Mandibular Retrusion Syndrome”. Japanese Journal Of Clinical Dentistry For Children, 2009: P. 74-7. 133. Boucher, C., Et Al., Benefits Of Using A Trainer T4K® Myofunctional Appliance After Rapid Palatal Expansion: A Prospective Study On Thirteen Patients. Journal Of Dentofacial Anomalies And Orthodontics, 2008. 11(1): P. 30-44. 134. Tripathi, N.B. And S.N. Patil, Treatment Of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion With Myofunctional Trainer System In Early Mixed Dentition Period. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2011. 12(6): P. 497-500. 135. Satygo, E., A. Silin, And G. Ramirez-Yañez, Electromyographic Muscular Activity Improvement In Class II Patients Treated With The Pre-Orthodontic Trainer. Journal Of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2014. 38(4): P. 380-384. 136. Uysal, T., Et Al., Influence Of Pre-Orthodontic Trainer Treatment On The Perioral And Masticatory Muscles In Patients With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion. The European Journal Of Orthodontics, 2012. 34(1): P. 96-101. 137. Stockfisch, H., The Principles And Practice Of Dentofacial Orthopaedics. 1995: Quintessence Publishing Company. 138. Fränkel, R., Possibilities Of A Late Basal Development Of The Mandible Through The Rearrangement Of The Bite By Means Of A Functional Regulator. Deutsche Stomatologie, 1971. 21(3): P. 198. 139. Cheney, E.A., Factors In The Early Treatment And Interception Of Malocclusion. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1958. 44(11): P. 807-826. 140. Cheney, E.A., Treatment Planning And Therapy In The Mixed Dentition. American Journal Of Orthodontics, 1963. 49(8): P. 568-580. 141. Rossi, R., M. Mortara, And E. Boccaccio, Preventive Orthodontics And The Use Of Oral Screens. Parodontologia E Stomatologia (Nuova): Organo Ufficiale Dell'arpa Italiana, Della Societa Italiana Jonoforesi Stomatologica E Della Accademia Ligustica Di Stomatologia, 1984. 23(3 Suppl 3): P. 191-192. 142. Bergersen, E., The Eruption Guidance Myofunctional Appliances: How It Works, How To Use It. The Functional Orthodontist, 1984. 1(3): P. 28-9, 31-5. 143. Janson, G., Et Al., Occlusal Changes Of Class II Malocclusion Treatment Between Fränkel And The Eruption Guidance Appliances. The Angle Orthodontist, 2004. 74(4): P. 521-525. 144. Bergersen, E., The Eruption Guidance Myofunctional Appliance: Case Selection, Timing, Motivation, Indications And Contraindications In Its Use. The Functional Orthodontist, 1985. 2(1): P. 17. 145. Janson, G., Et Al., Treatment Stability With The Eruption Guidance Appliance. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2007. 131(6): P. 717-728. 146. Janson, G.R., Et Al., Eruption Guidance Appliance Effects In The Treatment Of Class II, Division 1 Malocclusions. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2000. 117(2): P. 119-129. 147. Keski-Nisula, K., Et Al., Orthodontic Intervention In The Early Mixed Dentition: A Prospective, Controlled Study On The Effects Of The Eruption Guidance Appliance. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2008. 133(2): P. 254-260. 148. Myrlund, R., Et Al., One Year Treatment Effects Of The Eruption Guidance Appliance In 7-To 8-Year-Old Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. European Journal Of Orthodontics, 2014. 37(2): P. 128-134. 149. Proffit, W., Lingual Pressure Patterns In The Transition From Tongue Thrust To Adult Swallowing. Archives Of Oral Biology, 1972. 17(3): P. 555-563. 150. Sakuda, M., Study Of The Lip Bumper. J Dent Res, 1970. 49: P. 677. 151. Schwab, R.J., Upper Airway Imaging. Clinics In Chest Medicine, 1998. 19(1): P. 33-54. 152. Cheesman, K., Anatomy Of The Naso-And Oropharynx. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 2008. 9(7): P. 277-279. 153. Seiden A, Et Al., Otolaringoloji Temel Bilgiler. 2003: P. 177-178,207. 154. Hiyama, S., Et Al., Effects Of Maxillary Protraction On Craniofacial Structures And Upper-Airway Dimension. The Angle Orthodontist, 2002. 72(1): P. 43-47. 155. Oktay, H. And E. Ulukaya, Maxillary Protraction Appliance Effect On The Size Of The Upper Airway Passage. The Angle Orthodontist, 2008. 78(2): P. 209- 214. 156. Mamandras, A. And L. Magli, Orthodontic Treatment Of A Pseudo-Class III Malocclusion. A Case Report. Journal (Canadian Dental Association), 1984. 50(10): P. 779. 157. Ricketts, R.M., Forum On The Tonsil And Adenoid Problem In Orthodontics Respiratory Obstruction Syndrome. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1968. 54(7): P. 495-507. 158. Linder-Aronson, S., Adenoids. Their Effect On Mode Of Breathing And Nasal Airflow And Their Relationship To Characteristics Of The Facial Skeleton And The Denition. A Biometric, Rhino-Manometric And Cephalometro- Radiographic Study On Children With And Without Adenoids. Acta Oto- Laryngologica. Supplementum, 1970. 265: P. 1. 159. Martin, S., Et Al., The Effect Of Age, Sex, Obesity And Posture On Upper Airway Size. European Respiratory Journal, 1997. 10(9): P. 2087-2090. 160. Johnston, C. And A. Richardson, Cephalometric Changes In Adult Pharyngeal Morphology. The European Journal Of Orthodontics, 1999. 21(4): P. 357- 362. 161. MCNAMARA JR, J.A., Influence Of Respiratory Pattern On Craniofacial Growth. The Angle Orthodontist, 1981. 51(4): P. 269-300. 162. Akcam, M.O., T.U. Toygar, And T. Wada, Longitudinal Investigation Of Soft Palate And Nasopharyngeal Airway Relations In Different Rotation Types. The Angle Orthodontist, 2002. 72(6): P. 521-526. 163. Ucar, F.I. And T. Uysal, Orofacial Airway Dimensions In Subjects With Class I Malocclusion And Different Growth Patterns. The Angle Orthodontist, 2011. 81(3): P. 460-468. 164. Joseph, A.A., Et Al., A Cephalometric Comparative Study Of The Soft Tissue Airway Dimensions In Persons With Hyperdivergent And Normodivergent Facial Patterns. Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 1998. 56(2): P. 135-139. 165. De Freitas, M.R., Et Al., Upper And Lower Pharyngeal Airways In Subjects With Class I And Class II Malocclusions And Different Growth Patterns. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2006. 130(6): P. 742-745. 166. Flores-Blancas, A.P., M.J. Carruitero, And C. Flores-Mir, Comparison Of Airway Dimensions In Skeletal Class I Malocclusion Subjects With Different Vertical Facial Patterns. Dental Press Journal Of Orthodontics, 2017. 22(6): P. 35-42. 167. Memon, S., M. Fida, And A. Shaikh, Comparison Of Different Craniofacial Patterns With Pharyngeal Widths. Journal Of The College Of Physicians And Surgeons Pakistan, 2012. 22(5): P. 302. 168. Celikoglu, M., Et Al., Comparison Of Pharyngeal Airway Volume Among Different Vertical Skeletal Patterns: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. The Angle Orthodontist, 2014. 84(5): P. 782-787. 169. Wang, T., Et Al., A Three Dimensional Study Of Upper Airway In Adult Skeletal Class II Patients With Different Vertical Growth Patterns. Plos One, 2014. 9(4). 170. Grauer, D., Et Al., Pharyngeal Airway Volume And Shape From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: Relationship To Facial Morphology. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2009. 136(6): P. 805- 814. 171. Chung, K.R., Et Al., Timely Relocation Of Mini-Implants For Uninterrupted Full-Arch Distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010. 138(6): P. 839-49. 172. Kerr, W.J.S., The Nasopharynx, Face Height, And Overbite. The Angle Orthodontist, 1985. 55(1): P. 31-36. 173. MERGEN, D.C. And R.M. JACOBS, The Size Of Nasopharynx Associated With Normal Occlusion And Class II Malocclusion. The Angle Orthodontist, 1970. 40(4): P. 342-346. 174. Muto, T., A. Yamazaki, And S. Takeda, A Cephalometric Evaluation Of The Pharyngeal Airway Space In Patients With Mandibular Retrognathia And Prognathia, And Normal Subjects. International Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2008. 37(3): P. 228-231. 175. Alves Jr, M., Et Al., Evaluation Of Pharyngeal Airway Space Amongst Different Skeletal Patterns. International Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2012. 41(7): P. 814-819. 176. Kirjavainen, M. And T. Kirjavainen, Upper Airway Dimensions In Class II Malocclusion: Effects Of Headgear Treatment. The Angle Orthodontist, 2007. 77(6): P. 1046-1053. 177. Oh, K.-M., Et Al., Three-Dimensional Evaluation Of The Relationship Between Nasopharyngeal Airway Shape And Adenoid Size In Children. The Korean Journal Of Orthodontics, 2013. 43(4): P. 160-167. 178. El, H. And J.M. Palomo, Measuring The Airway In 3 Dimensions: A Reliability And Accuracy Study. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010. 137(4): P. S50. E1-S50. E9. 179. Jena, A.K., S.P. Singh, And A.K. Utreja, Sagittal Mandibular Development Effects On The Dimensions Of The Awake Pharyngeal Airway Passage. The Angle Orthodontist, 2010. 80(6): P. 1061-1067. 180. Trenouth, M.J. And D.J. Timms, Relationship Of The Functional Oropharynx To Craniofacial Morphology. The Angle Orthodontist, 1999. 69(5): P. 419- 423. 181. Ceylan, I. And H. Oktay, A Study On The Pharyngeal Size In Different Skeletal Patterns. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1995. 108(1): P. 69-75. 182. Zhong, Z., Et Al., A Comparison Study Of Upper Airway Among Different Skeletal Craniofacial Patterns In Nonsnoring Chinese Children. The Angle Orthodontist, 2010. 80(2): P. 267-274. 183. Restrepo, C., Et Al., Oropharyngeal Airway Dimensions After Treatment With Functional Appliances In Class II Retrognathic Children. Journal Of Oral Rehabilitation, 2011. 38(8): P. 588-594. 184. Zhou, L., Z. Zhao, And D. Lu, The Analysis Of The Changes Of Tongue Shape And Position, Hyoid Position In Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion Treated With Functional Appliances (FR-I). Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi= Huaxi Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi= West China Journal Of Stomatology, 2000. 18(2): P. 123-125. 185. Lin, Y.-C., H.-C. Lin, And H.-H. Tsai, Changes In The Pharyngeal Airway And Position Of The Hyoid Bone After Treatment With A Modified Bionator In Growing Patients With Retrognathia. Journal Of Experimental & Clinical Medicine, 2011. 3(2): P. 93-98. 186. Murat Özbek, M., Et Al., Oropharyngeal Airway Dimensions And Functional- Orthopedic Treatment In Skeletal Class II Cases. The Angle Orthodontist, 1998. 68(4): P. 327-336. 187. Tsuiki, S., Et Al., Functional Contribution Of Mandibular Advancement To Awake Upper Airway Patency In Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Sleep And Breathing, 2007. 11(4): P. 245-251. 188. Maspero, C., Et Al., Upper Airway Obstuction In Class II Patients. Effects Of Andresen Activator On The Anatomy Of Pharingeal Airway Passage. Cone Beam Evalution. Stomatologija, 2015. 17(4): P. 124-130. 189. Xiang, M., Et Al., Changes In Airway Dimensions Following Functional Appliances In Growing Patients With Skeletal Class II Malocclusion: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. International Journal Of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2017. 97: P. 170-180. 190. Isidor, S., Et Al., Three-Dimensional Evaluation Of Changes In Upper Airway Volume In Growing Skeletal Class II Patients Following Mandibular Advancement Treatment With Functional Orthopedic Appliances. The Angle Orthodontist, 2018. 88(5): P. 552-559. 191. Rizk, S., V.P. Kulbersh, And R. Al-Qawasmi, Changes In The Oropharyngeal Airway Of Class II Patients Treated With The Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance. The Angle Orthodontist, 2015. 86(6): P. 955-961. 192. Hänggi, M.P., Et Al., Long-Term Changes In Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions Following Activator-Headgear And Fixed Appliance Treatment. The European Journal Of Orthodontics, 2008. 30(6): P. 598-605. 193. Godt, A., Et Al., Changes In Upper Airway Width Associated With Class II Treatments (Headgear Vs Activator) And Different Growth Patterns. The Angle Orthodontist, 2011. 81(3): P. 440-446. 194. Yassaei, S., Z. Bahrololoomi, And M. Sorush, Changes Of Tongue Position And Oropharynx Following Treatment With Functional Appliance. Journal Of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2007. 31(4): P. 287-290. 195. Enöz, M., H. Yanardağ, And M. Güven, OSAS'lı hastaların üst solunum yollarının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan teknikler. 196. Hilberg, O., Objective Measurement Of Nasal Airway Dimensions Using Acoustic Rhinometry: Methodological And Clinical Aspects. Allergy, 2002. 57: P. 5-39. 197. Hoffstein, V., N. Zamel, And E.A. Phillipson, Lung Volume Dependence Of Pharyngeal Cross-Sectional Area In Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea. American Review Of Respiratory Disease, 1984. 130(2): P. 175-178. 198. Kamal, I., Acoustic Pharyngometry Patterns Of Snoring And Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients. Otolaryngology--Head And Neck Surgery, 2004. 130(1): P. 58-66. 199. Higgs, B., Et Al., Measurement Of Pleural Pressure With Esophageal Balloon In Anesthetized Humans. Anesthesiology, 1983. 59(4): P. 340-343. 200. Arai, Y., Et Al., Development Of A Compact Computed Tomographic Apparatus For Dental Use. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 1999. 28(4): P. 245- 248. 201. Alsufyani, N., C. Flores-Mir, And P. Major, Three-Dimensional Segmentation Of The Upper Airway Using Cone Beam CT: A Systematic Review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2012. 41(4): P. 276-284. 202. Guijarro-Martínez, R. And G. Swennen, Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography Imaging And Analysis Of The Upper Airway: A Systematic Review Of The Literature. International Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2011. 40(11): P. 1227-1237. 203. Ghoneima, A. And K. Kula, Accuracy And Reliability Of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography For Airway Volume Analysis. The European Journal Of Orthodontics, 2011. 35(2): P. 256-261. 204. Li, H.-Y., Et Al., Use Of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scan To Evaluate Upper Airway Patency For Patients Undergoing Sleep-Disordered Breathing Surgery. Otolaryngology—Head And Neck Surgery, 2003. 129(4): P. 336-342. 205. Tokunaga, K., Et Al., a novel technique for the determination of body fat by. International Journal Of Obesity, 1983. 7: P. 445. 206. Gungor, A.Y., Et Al., Cephalometric Comparison Of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients And Healthy Controls. European Journal Of Dentistry, 2013. 7(1): P. 48. 207. Alsufyani, N.A., Et Al., Cone Beam Computed Tomography Registration For 3- D Airway Analysis Based On Anatomic Landmarks. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology And Oral Radiology, 2014. 118(3): P. 371-383. 208. Martins, L.S., Et Al., Airway Volume Analysis: Is There A Correlation Between Two And Three-Dimensions? European Journal Of Orthodontics, 2017. 40(3): P. 262-267. 209. Lenza, M., Et Al., An Analysis Of Different Approaches To The Assessment Of Upper Airway Morphology: A CBCT Study. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 2010. 13(2): P. 96-105. 210. Holmberg, H. And S. Linder-Aronson, Cephalometric Radiographs As A Means Of Evaluating The Capacity Of The Nasal And Nasopharyngeal Airway. Am J Orthod, 1979. 76(5): P. 479-90. 211. Malkoc, S., Et Al., Reproducibility Of Airway Dimensions And Tongue And Hyoid Positions On Lateral Cephalograms. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2005. 128(4): P. 513-516. 212. Aboudara, C., Et Al., Comparison Of Airway Space With Conventional Lateral Headfilms And 3-Dimensional Reconstruction From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2009. 135(4): P. 468-479. 213. Willems, G., Et Al., Prevalence Of Dentofacial Characteristics In A Belgian Orthodontic Population. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2001. 5(4): P. 220-226. 214. Iwata, T., Effects Of A Prefabricated Functional Appliance In The Early Mixed Dentition Period. Pediatr Dent Care, 2016. 1(1): P. 104. 215. Idris, G., M.Y. Hajeer, And A. Al-Jundi, Soft-And Hard-Tissue Changes Following Treatment Of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion With Activator Versus Trainer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. European Journal Of Orthodontics, 2019. 41(1): P. 21-28. 216. Pujar, P. And S.M. Pai, Effect Of Preorthodontic Trainer In Mixed Dentition. Case Reports In Dentistry, 2013. 2013. 217. Enacar, A., Kecik, D. , Açık Kapanışın Myofonksiyonel Tedavisinde Pre Orthodontic Trainer Uygulaması: Olgu Sunumu. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi., 2009. 22: P. 248-255. 218. Phelan, A., Et Al., Longitudinal Growth Changes In Subjects With Open-Bite Tendency: A Retrospective Study. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2014. 145(1): P. 28-35. 219. Beckmann, S., Et Al., Alveolar And Skeletal Dimensions Associated With Lower Face Height. American Journal Of Orthodontics And Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998. 113(5): P. 498-506. 220. Takagi, Y., Et Al., Postural Change Of The Hyoid Bone Following Osteotomy Of The Mandible. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1967. 23(5): P. 688-692. 221. Durzo, C.A. And A.G. Brodie, Growth Behavior Of The Hyoid Bone. The Angle Orthodontist, 1962. 32(3): P. 193-204. 222. Ozdemir, F., F. Ulkur, And D. Nalbantgil, Effects Of Fixed Functional Therapy On Tongue And Hyoid Positions And Posterior Airway. The Angle Orthodontist, 2014. 84(2): P. 260-264.tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/22646
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of myofunctional appliances used in the treatment of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion on skeletal, dental structures and upper airway compared to the control group. Methods: Thirty patients were included in the study. Myobrace, which is referred to as a myofunctional appliance, have been applied to 15 individuals with an average age of 9.3 ± 0.7 years presenting with Class II division 1 malocclusion was compared to a control group consisting of 15 individuals with an average age of 8.85 ± 0.7 years followed without treatment. Panoramic, lateral cephalometric, posteroanterior and hand-wrist films were taken before (T0) and after (T1) treatment for the Myobrace group and during the follow up period for the control group. Dental models were also obtained. Results: As a result of cephalometric evaluations, there was a decrease in SNA and ANS-PNS / SN angles and an increase in Co-Gn distance in the myobrace group compared to the control group. In the Myobrace group, overjet amount, ANB angle and Witts value were decreased compared to the control group. In the Myobrace group, retraction was detected for the upper incisors, whereas an extrusion was observed for the control group. As for the mandibular dentoalveolar results, an increase in L1-NB distance was detected in both groups. The changes for the facial growth direction measurements were similar for both groups. There was an increase in MAS and IAS distances in the Myobrace group, however no significance was found between the groups. An increase in C3-H distance was found in the Myobrace group, and an increase in PNS-H distance in the control group. Conclusions: As a result of our study, it was determined that the effects of myobrace appliances were more dentoalveolar for maxillary and mandibular regions and no statistically significant difference was observed in between the groups for the upper airway.tr_TR
dc.language.isoturtr_TR
dc.publisherSağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectsınıf II maloklüzyontr_TR
dc.titleSınıf 2 Divizyon 1 Maloklüzyona Sahip Bireylerde Kas Fonksiyon Düzenleyici Apareylerin Dentofasiyal Yapılar ve Üst Havayolu Üzerine Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesitr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetGiriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı Sınıf II bölüm 1 maloklüzyona sahip hastaların tedavisinde kullanılan kas fonksiyon düzenleyici apareylerin iskeletsel, dental yapılarda ve üst havayolu üzerinde oluşturduğu etkilerin kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirilmesidir. Bireyler ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 30 hasta dahil edilmiştir. Tedavi grubunu oluşturacak şekilde Sınıf II bölüm 1 maloklüzyona sahip ortalama yaşları 9,3 ± 0,7 yıl olan 15 bireye kas düzenleyici apareyler olarak tanımladığımız Myobrace apareyleri uygulanmış, ortalama yaşları 8,85 ± 0,7 yıl olan 15 birey (kontrol grubu) de herhangi bir tedavi uygulanmadan takip edilmiştir. Tedavi ve takip süreleri öncesi (T0) ve sonrasında (T1) panoramik, lateral sefalometrik, posteroanterior ve el-bilek filmleri alınmış, dental modeller elde edilmiştir. Bulgular: Sefalometrik değerlendirmeler sonucunda myobrace grubunda kontrol grubuna göre SNA ve ANS-PNS/SN açılarında azalma, Co-Gn mesafesinde artış saptanmıştır. Myobrace grubunda kontrol grubuna göre overjet miktarı, ANB açısı ve Witts değerinde azalma saptanmıştır. Myobrace grubunda üst keserlerde dikleşme, kontrol grubunda üst keserlerde ekstrüzyon saptanmıştır. Mandibuler dentoalveolar bulgularda her iki grupta da L1-NB mesafesinin artış saptanmıştır. Yüzün büyüme yönüne ait ölçümlerdeki değişimler her iki grup için benzer bulunmuştur. Myobrace grubunda MAS, IAS mesafelerinde artış görülmüş ancak grupları arasında anlamlılık saptanmamıştır. Myobrace grubunda C3-H mesafesinde artış, Kontrol grubunda PNS- H mesafesinde artış saptanmıştır. Sonuçlar: Çalışmamızın sonucunda myobrace apareyinin Sınıf II Bölüm 1 malokluzyona sahip bireylerde kullanımında; myobrace apareyi ile myofonksiyonel tedavinin sonuçlarının maksilla ve mandibula üzerinde daha çok dentoalveolar olduğu ve hava yolunda anlamlı artışa neden olmadığı belirlenmiştir.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentOrdodontitr_TR
dc.embargo.terms6 aytr_TR
dc.embargo.lift2021-03-16T13:48:40Z
dc.fundingYoktr_TR
dc.subtypedentThesistr_TR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record