Total Larinjektomili Bireylerin Koku Fonksiyonlarının Değerlendirilmesi
Özet
Başaran, R., Evaluation of Olfactory Functions of Individuals with Total
Laryngectomy, Hacettepe University Graduate School of Health Sciences Speech
and Language Therapy Programme Master Thesis, Ankara, 2020. Following total
laryngectomy, individuals' speech, pulmonary and olfactory functions are affected. It
is suggested that the main mechanim of the olfactory dysfunction is caused by the
decreased air flow to the olfactory epithelium. In order to develop this function, which
has been shown to affect individuals' quality of life significantly, evidence-based
behavioral techniques applied by Speech Language Therapists are used. In speech
rehabilitation of individuals with total laryngectomy, three methods are used:
esophageal speech, voice prosthesis and artificial larynx. While these methods were
compared in many ways; such as speech rate,, risk of infection and cost as far as it is
known, no research has been done in terms of olfactory functions between different
speech rehabilitation methods. In this thesis study, it was aimed to evaluate the
olfactory functions of individuals with total laryngectomy and to investigate whether
individuals using different speech rehabilitation methods differ in terms of olfactory
functions. The 30 individuals with total laryngectomy aged between 44 to 75 years
included in the study were divided into following three groups; esophageal speech,
voice prosthesis and artificial larynx. In addition, 10 individuals who had healthy
olfactory function and similar age and sex with the participants of total laryngectomy
group formed the control group. Participants' olfactory function evaluations were
completed by one of the functional olfactory assessment tools “Sniffin Sticks Extended
Test” and self-assessment tool after history acquisition. The results of both evaluations
showed that odor functions of individuals with total laryngectomy were affected more
significantly than the control group. There was a statistically significant difference
between the groups in terms of Sniffin Sticks test scores. In terms of Sniffing Sticks
test composit scores, the esophageal speech group had beter scores than the voice
prosthesis group. With regard to the functional odor classification scores, it was
observed that the best odor function was in the esophageal group.