Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.advisorKoruç, Ziya
dc.contributor.authorDurdubaş, Deniz
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-11T09:11:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.submitted2020-03-12
dc.identifier.citation1. Hackman JR, Katz N. Group behavior and performance. In: Fiske TS, Gilbert TD, Lindzey G, editors. Handbook of Social Psychology. 1. 5 ed. Newyork: Wiley; 2010. p. 1208-51. 2. Driskell T, Salas E, Driskell JE. Teams in extreme environments: Alterations in team development and teamwork. Human Resource Management Review. 2018;28(4):434-49. 3. Eys M, Bruner MW, Martin LJ. The dynamic group environment in sport and exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2019;42:40-7. 4. Rousseau V, Aubé C, Savoie A. Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks. Small group research. 2006;37(5):540-70. 5. Stevens D, Bloom G. The effect of team building on cohesion. Avante 2003;9(2):43-54. 6. McEwan D, Beauchamp MR. Teamwork in sport: a theoretical and integrative review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2014;7(1):229- 50. 7. Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of management review. 2001;26(3):356- 76. 8. Eys MA, Surya M, Benson AJ. 14 Communicating within sport teams. Persuasion and Communication in Sport, Exercise, and Physical Activity. 2017:159. 9. Eys M, Brawley LR. Reflections on cohesion research with sport and exercise groups. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2018;12(4):e12379. 10. Carron AV, Widmeyer WN, Brawley LR. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of sport psychology. 1985;7(3):244-66. 11. Petersen B, Eys M, Watson K, Evans MB. Taking Stock of Youth Sport Group Dynamics Research: A Scoping Review. Kinesiology Review. 2019;8(3):260-8. 12. Carron AV, Colman MM, Wheeler J, Stevens D. Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2002;24(2):168-88. 97 13. Filho E, Dobersek U, Gershgoren L, Becker B, Tenenbaum G. The cohesion– performance relationship in sport: a 10-year retrospective meta-analysis. Sport Sciences for Health. 2014;10(3):165-77. 14. Burke SM, Carron AV, Eys MA, Ntoumanis N, Estabrooks PA. Group versus individual approach? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity. Sport and Exercise Psychology Review. 2006;2(1):19-35. 15. Martin LJ, Carron AV, Burke SM. Team building interventions in sport: A metaanalysis. Sport & Exercise Psychology Review. 2009;5(2):3-18. 16. Brawley LR, Paskevich DM. Conducting team building research in the context of sport and exercise. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 1997;9(1):11-40. 17. Klein C, DiazGranados D, Salas E, Le H, Burke CS, Lyons R, et al. Does team building work? Small Group Research. 2009;40(2):181-222. 18. Senécal J, Loughead TM, Bloom GA. A season-long team-building intervention: Examining the effect of team goal setting on cohesion. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2008;30(2):186-99. 19. Dunn JG, Holt NL. A qualitative investigation of a personal-disclosure mutualsharing team building activity. The Sport Psychologist. 2004;18(4):363-80. 20. Pain M, Harwood C. Team building through mutual sharing and open discussion of team functioning. The Sport Psychologist. 2009;23(4):523-42. 21. Spink KS, Carron AV. The effects of team building on the adherence patterns of female exercise participants. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1993;15(1):39-49. 22. Bruner MW, Spink KS. Effects of team building on exercise adherence and group task satisfaction in a youth activity setting. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2011;15(2):161. 23. Bruner MW, Eys MA, Beauchamp MR, Côté J. Examining the origins of team building in sport: A citation network and genealogical approach. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2013;17(1):30. 24. Johnson DW, Johnson FP. Joining together: Group theory and group skills. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs; 1987. 25. Eys M, Patterson M, Loughead TM, Carron AV. Team building in sport. In: J. Duda, Hackfort D, Lidor R, editors. Handbook of research in applied sport 98 psychology: International perspectives. Morgantown:WV: Fitness Information Technology; 2006. p. 219-31. 26. Rovio E, Arvinen-Barrow M, Weigand DA, Eskola J, Lintunen T. Using team building methods with an ice hockey team: An action research case study. The Sport Psychologist. 2012;26(4):584-603. 27. Bloom GA, Loughead TM. Current developments in North American sport and exercise psychology: team building in sport. Revista iberoamericana de psicología del ejercicio y el deporte. 2011;6(2):237-50. 28. Zander A. The Origins and Consequences of Group Goals. . In: Festinger L, editor. Retrospections on Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1980. 29. Zander A. Motives and goals in groups. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1971. 30. Widmeyer WN, Ducharme K. Team building through team goal setting. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 1997;9(1):97-113. 31. Eys MA, Brawley LR. Reflections on cohesion research with sport and exercise groups. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2018;12(4):e12379. 32. Rovio E, Arvinen-Barrow M, Weigand AD, Eskola J, Lintunen T. Team building in sport: a narrative review of the program effectiveness, current methods, and theoretical underpinnings. Athletic Insight. 2010;2(2):1-19. 33. Binswanger H. The biological basis of teleological concepts: Ayn Rand Institute Press Los Angeles; 1990. 34. Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL. Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature. 1984;308(5959):541. 35. Locke EA. Motivation through conscious goal setting. Applied and preventive psychology. 1996;5(2):117-24. 36. Locke EA. Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational behavior and human performance. 1968;3(2):157-89. 37. Locke EA. Job satisfaction and job performance: A theoretical analysis. Organizational behavior and human performance. 1970;5(5):484-500. 38. Locke EA, Latham GP. A theory of goal setting & task performance: PrenticeHall, Inc; 1990. 99 39. Vroom VH. Work and motivation: Wiley New York; 1964. 40. Powers WT. Quantitative analysis of purposive systems: Some spadework at the foundations of scientific psychology. Psychological Review. 1978;85(5):417. 41. Vancouver JB, Thompson CM, Williams AA. The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86(4):605. 42. Bandura A. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology. 1986;4(3):359-73. 43. Locke EA, Motowidlo SJ, Bobko P. Using self-efficacy theory to resolve the conflict between goal-setting theory and expectancy theory in organizational behavior and industrial/organizational psychology. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 1986;4(3):328-38. 44. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review. 1977;84(2):191. 45. Bandura A. The role of self-efficacy in goal-based motivation. In: Locke EAL, G.P., editor. New developments in goal setting and task performance. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2013. p. 147-57. 46. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997. 47. Locke EA, Latham GP. New developments in goal setting and task performance. London, UK: Routledge; 2013. 48. Shilts MK, Townsend MS, Dishman RK. Using Goal Setting to Promote Health Behaviour Change: Diet and Physical Activity. In: Locke EAL, G.P., editor. New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance. London, UK: Routledge; 2013. p. 439-62. 49. Wood RE, Mento AJ, Locke EA. Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology. 1987;72(3):416. 50. Locke EA, Shaw KN, Saari LM, Latham GP. Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological bulletin. 1981;90(1):125. 51. Kanfer R, Ackerman PL. Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of applied psychology. 1989;74(4):657. 100 52. Lee TW, Locke EA, Phan SH. Explaining the assigned goal-incentive interaction: The role of self-efficacy and personal goals. Journal of Management. 1997;23(4):541-59. 53. Barrick MR, Mount MK, Strauss JP. Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of applied psychology. 1993;78(5):715. 54. Lerner BS, Locke EA. The effects of goal setting, self-efficacy, competition, and personal traits on the performance of an endurance task. Journal of sport and exercise psychology. 1995;17(2):138-52. 55. Kirkpatrick SA, Locke EA. Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of applied psychology. 1996;81(1):36. 56. Frayne CA, Latham GP. Application of social learning theory to employee selfmanagement of attendance. Journal of applied psychology. 1987;72(3):387. 57. Gist ME, Bavetta AG, Stevens CK. Transfer training method: Its influence on skill generalization, skill repetition, and performance level. Personnel psychology. 1990;43(3):501-23. 58. Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American psychologist. 2002;57(9):705. 59. Locke EA. Relation of goal level to performance with a short work period and multiple goal levels. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1982;67(4):512. 60. Klein HJ, Wesson MJ, Hollenbeck JR, Alge BJ. Goal commitment and the goalsetting process: conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of applied psychology. 1999;84(6):885. 61. Hollenbeck JR, Klein HJ. Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. Journal of applied psychology. 1987;72(2):212. 62. Wofford JC, Goodwin VL, Premack S. Meta-analysis of the antecedents of personal goal level and of the antecedents and consequences of goal commitment. Journal of Management. 1992;18(3):595-615. 63. Ashford SJ, Cummings LL. Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational behavior and human performance. 1983;32(3):370-98. 101 64. Illies R, De Pater I, Judge T. Emotional reactions to performance feedback: The effect on goal-regulation. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2006;22:590-609. 65. Renn RW, Fedor DB. Development and field test of a feedback seeking, selfefficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. Journal of Management. 2001;27(5):563-83. 66. Salas E, Dickinson TL, Converse SA, Tannenbaum SI. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In: Swezey RS, Eduardo, editor. Teams: Their training and performance. Westport, US: Ablex Publishing; 1992. p. 3-29. 67. Kramer W, Thayer A, Salas E. Goal setting in teams. In: Locke EA, Latham GP, editors. New developments in goal setting and task performance. London, UK: Routledge; 2013. p. 288-304. 68. Hackman JR, Morris CG. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in experimental social psychology. 1975;8:45-99. 69. Weldon E, Weingart LR. Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology. 1993;32(4):307-34. 70. O'Leary-Kelly AM, Martocchio JJ, Frink DD. A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of management journal. 1994;37(5):1285-301. 71. Van Mierlo H, Kleingeld A. Goals, strategies, and group performance: Some limits of goal setting in groups. Small Group Research. 2010;41(5):524-55. 72. Johnson MD, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, Ilgen DR, Jundt D, Meyer CJ. Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal. 2006;49(1):103-19. 73. DeShon RP, Kozlowski SW, Schmidt AM, Milner KR, Wiechmann D. A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of applied psychology. 2004;89(6):1035. 74. Högl M, Parboteeah KP. Goal setting and team performance in innovative projects: On the moderating role of teamwork quality. Small group research. 2003;34(1):3-19. 75. Saavedra R, Earley PC, Van Dyne L. Complex interdependence in taskperforming groups. Journal of applied psychology. 1993;78(1):61. 102 76. Gully SM, Incalcaterra KA, Joshi A, Beaubien JM. A meta-analysis of teamefficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of applied psychology. 2002;87(5):819. 77. Aube C, Rousseau V. Team Goal Commitment and Team Effectiveness: The Role of Task Interdependence and Supportive Behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2005;9(3):189. 78. Kleingeld A, van Mierlo H, Arends L. The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2011;96(6):1289. 79. Seijts GH, Latham GP. The effects of goal setting and group size on performance in a social dilemma. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 2000;32(2):104. 80. Pearsall MJ, Christian MS, Ellis AP. Motivating interdependent teams: Individual rewards, shared rewards, or something in between? Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010;95(1):183. 81. Barnes CM, Hollenbeck JR, Jundt DK, DeRue DS, Harmon SJ. Mixing individual incentives and group incentives: Best of both worlds or social dilemma? Journal of Management. 2011;37(6):1611-35. 82. Hollensbe EC, Guthrie JP. Group pay-for-performance plans: The role of spontaneous goal setting. Academy of Management Review. 2000;25(4):864- 72. 83. Zaccaro SJ, Rittman AL, Marks MA. Team leadership. The leadership quarterly. 2001;12(4):451-83. 84. Knight D, Durham CC, Locke EA. The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal. 2001;44(2):326-38. 85. Amabile TM, Schatzel EA, Moneta GB, Kramer SJ. Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly. 2004;15(1):5-32. 86. Wageman R. Critical success factors for creating superb self-managing teams. Organizational dynamics. 1997;26(1):49-61. 103 87. Morgeson FP, DeRue DS, Karam EP. Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of management. 2010;36(1):5-39. 88. Sivunen A. Strengthening identification with the team in virtual teams: The leaders' perspective. Group Decision and Negotiation. 2006;15(4):345-66. 89. Durham CC, Knight D, Locke EA. Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1997;72(2):203-31. 90. Graen G, Novak MA, Sommerkamp P. The effects of leader—member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational behavior and human performance. 1982;30(1):109-31. 91. Wu JB, Tsui AS, Kinicki AJ. Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Academy of Management Journal. 2010;53(1):90-106. 92. Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole; 1979. p. 33-47. 93. Haslam SA, Wegge J, Postmes T. Are we on a learning curve or a treadmill? The benefits of participative group goal setting become apparent as tasks become increasingly challenging over time. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2009;39(3):430-46. 94. Wegge J, Haslam SA. Improving work motivation and performance in brainstorming groups: The effects of three group goal-setting strategies. European journal of work and organizational psychology. 2005;14(4):400-30. 95. Colquitt JA, LePine JA, Noe RA. Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of applied psychology. 2000;85(5):678. 96. Dweck CS, Leggett EL. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological review. 1988;95(2):256. 97. Phillips JM, Gully SM. Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal--setting process. Journal of applied psychology. 1997;82(5):792. 98. VandeWalle D, Cron WL, Slocum Jr JW. The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of applied psychology. 2001;86(4):629. 104 99. Porter CO. Goal orientation: effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005;90(4):811. 100. Sanches-Runde C, Lee S, Steers RM. Cultural drivers of work behavior: Personal values, motivation, and job attitudes. In: Bhagat RS, Steers RM, editors. Cambridge handbook of culture, organizations, and work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 305-33. 101. Hertel G, Konradt U, Orlikowski B. Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of work and organizational psychology. 2004;13(1):1-28. 102. Kanas N, Salnitskiy V, Grund EM, Weiss DS, Gushin V, Kozerenko O, et al. Human interactions in space: results from Shuttle/Mir. Acta Astronautica. 2001;49(3-10):243-60. 103. Burton D, Pickering M, Weinberg R, Yukelson D, Weigand D. The competitive goal effectiveness paradox revisited: Examining the goal practices of prospective Olympic athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2010;22(1):72-86. 104. Locke EA, Latham GP. The application of goal setting to sports. Journal of sport psychology. 1985;7(3):205-22. 105. Burton D. The Jekyll/Hyde nature of goals: Reconceptualizing goal setting in sport. In: Horn TS, editor. Advances in Sport Psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1992. p. 267-97. 106. Kyllo LB, Landers DM. Goal setting in sport and exercise: A research synthesis to resolve the controversy. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1995;17(2):117-37. 107. Burton D, Weiss C. The fundamental goal concept: the path to process and performance success. 2008. 108. Larsen CH, Engell C. The art of goal setting: A tale of doing sport psychology in professional football. Sport Science Review. 2013;22(1-2):49-76. 109. Weinberg R, Butt J. Goal-setting and sport performance. In: Papaioannou AG, Hackfort D, editors. Routledge companion to sport and exercise psychology: Global perspectives and fundamental concepts London: Routledge; 2014. p. 343-55. 105 110. Weinberg R, Burton D, Yukelson D, Weigand D. Goal setting in competitive sport: An exploratory investigation of practices of collegiate athletes. The Sport Psychologist. 1993;7(3):275-89. 111. Weinberg R, Stitcher T, Richardson P. Effects of a seasonal goal-setting program on lacrosse performance. The Sport Psychologist. 1994;8(2):166-75. 112. Burton D, Naylor S. The Jekyll/Hyde nature of goals: Revisiting and updating goal-setting in sport. In: Horn T, editor. Advances in sport psychology. 2. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics 2002. p. 459-99. 113. Hall HK, Kerr AW. Goal setting in sport and physical activity: Tracing empirical developments and establishing conceptual direction. In: Roberts GC, editor. Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2001. p. 183-233. 114. Kingston KM, Wilson KM. The application of goal setting in sport. In: Mellalieu S, Hanton S, editors. Advances in Applied Sport Psychology: A Review. New York: Routledge; 2008. 115. Weinberg RS, Bruya LD, A J, Garland H. Goal difficulty and endurance performance: A challenge to the goal attainability assumption. Journal of Sport Behavior. 1986;10:82-92. 116. O’Brien M, Mellalieu S, Hanton S. Goal-setting effects in elite and nonelite boxers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2009;21(3):293-306. 117. Kane TD, Baltes TR, Moss MC. Causes and consequences of free-set goals: An investigation of athletic self-regulation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2001;23(1):55-75. 118. Weinberg R. Goal setting in sport and exercise: research and practical applications. Revista da Educação Física/UEM. 2013;24(2):171-9. 119. Kingston KM, Hardy L. Effects of different types of goals on processes that support performance. The Sport Psychologist. 1997;11(3):277-93. 120. Pierce BE, Burton D. Scoring the perfect 10: Investigating the impact of goalsetting styles on a goal-setting program for female gymnasts. The sport psychologist. 1998;12(2):156-68. 121. Jones G, Hanton S. Interpretation of competitive anxiety symptoms and goal attainment expectancies. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1996;18(2):144-57. 106 122. Hardy L, Nelson D. Self-regulation training in sport and work. Ergonomics. 1988;31(11):1573-83. 123. Kingston K, Swain A. Goal orientations and state goals: Research in golf and implications for performance. Science and golf III. 1999:150-7. 124. Filby WC, Maynard IW, Graydon JK. The effect of multiple-goal strategies on performance outcomes in training and competition. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 1999;11(2):230-46. 125. Munroe-Chandler KJ, Hall CR, Weinberg RS. A Qualitative Analysis of the Types of Goals Athletes Set in Training and Competition. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2004;27(1). 126. Weinberg R, Butt J, Knight B. High school coaches’ perceptions of the process of goal setting. The Sport Psychologist. 2001;15(1):20-47. 127. Weinberg R, Butt J, Knight B, Perritt N. Collegiate coaches' perceptions of their goal-setting practices: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2001;13(4):374-98. 128. Côté J, Salmela JH, Russell S. The knowledge of high-performance gymnastic coaches: Methodological framework. The Sport Psychologist. 1995;9(1):65-75. 129. Burton D. Winning Isn’t Everything: Examining the Impact of Performance Goals on Collegiate Swimmers’ Cognitions and Performance. 1989;3(2):105. 130. Healy L, Tincknell-Smith A, Ntoumanis N. Goal Setting in Sport and Performance. Oxford University Press; 2018. 131. Duda J, Hall H. Achievement goal theory in sport: Recent extensions and future directions. In: Singer RN, Hausenblas HA, Janelle CM, editors. Handbook of sport psychology. 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2001. p. 417-43. 132. Dweck CS. Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development Philedelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 1999. 133. Nicholls JG. Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review. 1984;91(3):328-46. 134. Burton D. Winning isn’t everything: Examining the impact of performance goals on collegiate swimmers’ cognitions and performance. The Sport Psychologist. 1989;3(2):105-32. 107 135. Burton D, Gillham A, Weinberg R, Yukelson D, Weigand D. Goal Setting Styles: Examining the Role of Personality Factors on the Goal Practices of Prospective Olympic Athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2013;36(1). 136. Weinberg R. Making goals effective: A primer for coaches. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action. 2010;1(2):57-65. 137. Weinberg R, Yukelson D, Burton D, Weigand D. Perceived goal setting practices of Olympic athletes: An exploratory investigation. The Sport Psychologist. 2000;14(3):279-95. 138. Doran GT. There’sa SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management review. 1981;70(11):35-6. 139. Wade DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2009;23(4):291. 140. Maitland A, Gervis M. Goal-setting in youth football. Are coaches missing an opportunity? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2010;15(4):323-43. 141. Wilson KM, Mellalieu SD. Investigating the processes that contribute to enhanced coordination in rugby union teams. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2007;29. 142. Day T, Tosey P. Beyond SMART? A new framework for goal setting. Curriculum Journal. 2011;22(4):515-34. 143. Swann C, Rosenbaum S. Do we need to reconsider best practice in goal setting for physical activity promotion? British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018;52(8):485-6. 144. South G. The Roadmap: Examining the impact of periodization, and particularly goal term length, on the self-confidence of collegiate tennis players. [Doctoral Dissertation]: University of Idaho; 2005. 145. Vidic Z, Burton D. The roadmap: Examining the impact of a systematic goalsetting program for collegiate women’s tennis players. The sport psychologist. 2010;24(4):427-47. 146. Sun SH, Frese M. Multiple goal pursuit. In: Locke EA, Latham GP, editors. New developments in goal setting and task performance: Routledge; 2013. p. 201-18. 147. Mills TM. Group transformation: An analysis of a learning group: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1964. 108 148. Anderson DC, Crowell CR, Doman M, Howard GS. Performance posting, goal setting, and activity-contingent praise as applied to a university hockey team. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1988;73(1):87. 149. Lee C. The relationship between goal setting, self-efficacy, and female field hockey team performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1989. 150. Beauchamp MR, McEwan D, Waldhauser KJ. Team building: conceptual, methodological, and applied considerations. Current opinion in psychology. 2017;16:114-7. 151. McGrath JE. Social psychology: A brief introduction: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1964. 152. Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L. Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of management. 2008;34(3):410-76. 153. McIntyre RM, Salas E. Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. 1995;16:9-45. 154. Stout RJ, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Milanovich DM. Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors. 1999;41(1):61-71. 155. Morgan Jr BB, Salas E, Glickman AS. An analysis of team evolution and maturation. The Journal of General Psychology. 1993;120(3):277-91. 156. Tamminen KA, Gaudreau P. Coping, social support, and emotion regulation in teams. Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology. 2014;2:222e39. 157. Beauchamp MR, Bray SR. Role ambiguity and role conflict within interdependent teams. Small group research. 2001;32(2):133-57. 158. Frese M, Zapf D. Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. 1994;4(2):271-340. 159. Wikman JM, Stelter R, Melzer M, Hauge M-L, Elbe A-M. Effects of goal setting on fear of failure in young elite athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2014;12(3):185-205. 160. Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. 1997. 109 161. Salas E, DiazGranados D, Weaver SJ, King H. Does team training work? Principles for health care. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2008;15(11):1002- 9. 162. Carron AV, Hausenblas HA, Eys MA. Group dynamics in sport. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology; 2005. 163. Carron AV, Brawley LR. Group dynamics in sport and physical activity. 2008. 164. Carron AV, Colman MM, Wheeler J, Steves D. Cohesion and performance in sport: a meta analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 2002;24(2):168. 165. Benson AJ, Šiška P, Eys M, Priklerova S, Slepička P. A prospective multilevel examination of the relationship between cohesion and team performance in elite youth sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016;27:39-46. 166. Brawley LR, Carron AV, Widmeyer WN. The influence of the group and its cohesiveness on perceptions of group goal-related variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1993;15(3):245-60. 167. Kjørmo O, Halvari H. Two ways related to performance in elite sport: the path of self-confidence and competitive anxiety and the path of group cohesion and group goal-clarity. Perceptual and motor skills. 2002;94(3):950-66. 168. Newman B. Expediency as benefactor: How team building saves time and gets the job done. Training & Development Journal. 1984. 169. Carron AV, Spink KS. Team building in an exercise setting. The Sport Psychologist. 1993;7(1):8-18. 170. Durdubas D, Martin LJ, Koruc Z. A Season-Long Goal-Setting Intervention for Elite Youth Basketball Teams. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2019:1-17. 171. Carron AV, Brawley LR, Widmeyer WN. The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement. 1998;23(7):213-26. 172. Widmeyer W, Silva J, Hardy C, editors. The nature of group cohesion in sport teams: a phenomenological approach. Association for the Advancement of Applied Sport Psychology Conference, Colorado Springs, CO; 1992. 173. Paskevich DM, Brawley LR, Dorsch KD, Widmeyer WN. Relationship between collective efficacy and team cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 1999;3(3):210. 110 174. Spink KS. Group cohesion and collective efficacy of volleyball teams. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1990;12(3):301-11. 175. Greenlees IA, Graydon J, Maynard I. The impact of collective efficacy beliefs on effort and persistence in a group task. Journal of sports sciences. 1999;17(2):151-8. 176. Mesch DJ, Farh J-L, Podsakoff PM. Effects of feedback sign on group goal setting, strategies, and performance. Group & organization management. 1994;19(3):309-33. 177. Myers ND, Payment CA, Feltz DL. Reciprocal Relationships Between Collective Efficacy and Team Performance in Women's Ice Hockey. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2004;8(3):182. 178. Chow GM, Feltz DL. Exploring new directions in collective efficacy and sport. In: Beauchamp MR, Eys MA, editors. Group Dynamics in Exercise and Sport Psychology. New York: Routledge; 2007. 179. Kelly GA. The psychology of personal constructs. Volume 1: A theory of personality: WW Norton and Company; 1955. 180. Butler R. Psychological preparation of Olympic boxers. The psychology of sport: Theory and practice. 1989:74-84. 181. Butler RJ, Hardy L. The performance profile: Theory and application. The Sport Psychologist. 1992;6(3):253-64. 182. Bayar P, Koruç Z, Demirhan G, editors. Performance Profile of Turkish Throwers. XWorld Congress of Sport Psychology; 2001; Skiathos,Greece. 183. Gucciardi DF, Gordon S. Revisiting the performance profile technique: Theoretical underpinnings and application. The Sport Psychologist. 2009;23(1):93-117. 184. Mellalieu SD, Juniper SW. A qualitative investigation into experiences of the role episode in soccer. The sport psychologist. 2006;20(4):399-418. 185. Robazza C, Bortoli L, Hanin Y. Precompetition emotions, bodily symptoms, and task-specific qualities as predictors of performance in high-level karate athletes. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2004;16(2):151-65. 186. Jones G. The role of performance profiling in cognitive behavioral interventions in sport. The Sport Psychologist. 1993;7(2):160-72. 111 187. Butler RJ, Smith M, Irwin I. The performance profile in practice. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 1993;5(1):48-63. 188. Butler R. Performance profiling: Assessing the way forward. Sports psychology in performance. 1997:33-48. 189. Dale GA, Wrisberg CA. The use of a performance profiling technique in a team setting: Getting the athletes and coach on the “same page”. The Sport Psychologist. 1996;10(3):261-77. 190. Weston NJ, Greenlees IA, Thelwell RC. Applied sport psychology consultant perceptions of the usefulness and impacts of performance profiling. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 2010;41(4):360. 191. Weston N, Greenlees I, Thelwell R. A review of Butler and Hardy's (1992) performance profiling procedure within sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2013;6(1):1-21. 192. Williams JM, Widmeyer WN. The Cohesion-Performance Outcome Relationship In a Coactlng Sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1991;13(4):364-71. 193. Eys M, Loughead T, Bray SR, Carron AV. Development of a cohesion questionnaire for youth: The Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2009;31(3):390-408. 194. Sezer U, Kocaekşi S. Examination of Youth Athletes' Team Cohesion and Collective Efficacy Beliefs. Turkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri. 2018;10(1). 195. Riggs ML, Warka J, Babasa B, Betancourt R, Hooker S. Development and validation of self-efficacy and outcome expectancy scales for job-related applications. Educational and psychological measurement. 1994;54(3):793-802. 196. Öcel H. Takım Sporu Yapan Oyuncularda Kolektif Yeterlilik Özyeterlilik İle Basarı Algı ve Beklentileri. Hacattepe Ünüversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsüpsikoloji Anabilimdalı Yayınlanmamıs Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 2002. 197. Klein HJ, Wesson MJ, Hollenbeck JR, Wright PM, DeShon RP. The assessment of goal commitment: A measurement model meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes. 2001;85(1):32-55. 198. Şenel E, Yıldız M. Hedef bağlılığı ölçeği: Türkçe uyarlaması, beden eğitimi ve spor alanında öğrenim gören öğrencilerde geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2016;11(2):58-65. 112 199. Doyle J, Parfitt G. Performance profiling and construct validity. The Sport Psychologist. 1997;11(4):411-25. 200. Bloom GA, Stevens DE. Case study: A team-building mental skills training program with an intercollegiate equestrian team. Athletic Insight: The Online Journal of Sport Psychology. 2002;4(1):1-16. 201. Hackman RJ. Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances: Harvard Business Press; 2002. 202. Randall R, Nielsen K, Tvedt SD. The development of five scales to measure employees’ appraisals of organizational-level stress management interventions. Work & Stress. 2009;23(1):1-23. 203. Pituch KA, Stevens JP. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS: Routledge; 2015. 204. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon. Needham Heights, MA. 2001. 205. Kenny DA. A quasi-experimental approach to assessing treatment effects in the nonequivalent control group design. Psychological Bulletin. 1975;82(3):345. 206. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference/William R. Shedish, Thomas D. Cook, Donald T. Campbell: Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2002. 207. Kozub SA, McDonnell JF. Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in rugby teams. Journal of sport behavior. 2000;23(2). 208. Heuzé J-P, Raimbault N, Fontayne P. Relationships between cohesion, collective efficacy and performance in professional basketball teams: An examination of mediating effects. Journal of sports sciences. 2006;24(1):59-68. 209. Louro MJ, Pieters R, Zeelenberg M. Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2007;93(2):174. 210. D’urso V, Petrosso A, Robazza C. Emotions, perceived qualities, and performance of rugby players. The Sport Psychologist. 2002;16(2):173-99. 211. Doyle J, Parfitt G. Performance profiling and predictive validity. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 1996;8(2):160-70. 113 212. Doyle J, Parfitt G. The effect of induced mood states on performance profile areas of perceived need. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1999;17(2):115-27. 213. Donovan JJ, Williams KJ. Missing the mark: Effects of time and causal attributions on goal revision in response to goal-performance discrepancies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88(3):379. 214. Altıntaş A. Basketbol antrenörlerinin psikolojik dayanıklılıklarının liderlik stillerini belirlemedeki rolü. Başkent Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi-BÜSBİD. 2017;2(1). 215. Çepikkurt F, Kale EK, Tiryaki Ş. Futbolcuların Algıladılkaları Lider davranışları ve Güdüsel İklim Arasındaki İlişki. CBÜ Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2012;7(2):19-25. 216. Fikret Pasa S, Kabasakal H, Bodur M. Society, organisations, and leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology. 2001;50(4):559-89. 217. Nadler DA. The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1979;23(3):309-38. 218. Feltz DL, Lirgg CD. Self-efficacy beliefs of athletes, teams, and coaches. Handbook of sport psychology. 2001;2(2001):340-61. 219. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. 2006;5(1):307-37. 220. Bickman L, Rog DJ. The Sage handbook of applied social research methods. California, USA: Sage publications; 2008. 221. Burton D, Naylor N, Holliday B. Goal setting in sport: Investigating the goal effectiveness paradox. New York: John Wiely & Sons. Inc; 2000. 222. Forrest CK, Bruner MW. Evaluating social media as a platform for delivering a team-building exercise intervention: A pilot study. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2017;15(2):190-206.tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/22306
dc.description.abstractDurdubaş, D., The Effects of a Season-Long Multilevel Goal-Setting Intervention on Team Variables, Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Sport Sciences and Technology Program Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Ankara, 2020. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of a season-long multilevel goal-setting intervention on team cohesion, collective efficacy, and individual performance levels. Participants were 81 female volleyball players (Mage=16,57;SD=0,25) from 6 teams that were competing in regional leagues. According to their eligibility for the program implementation, the teams were assigned to the experimental group (n=3;Mage=16,76;SD=0,43), where the multi-level goal setting program was applied, and the control group (n=3;Mage=16,38;SD=0,26) where no systematic intervention was applied. All participants completed questionnaires assessing perceptions of team cohesion and collective efficacy at 3 time-points (beginning, midseason, and end-season). Also, the individual performance levels of participants in the experimental group were assessed twice, at the beginning and the end of the season with performance profiles. The differences of collective efficacy and team cohesion perceptions between the control group and the experimental group examined through MANCOVA analysis which first measurements were controlled. Findings suggest that there was a significant difference between groups in collective efficacy and team cohesion perceptions [F(6,67)=4,393; p=0,001, 2=,28]. Follow-up ANCOVA analysis showed that collective efficacy and team cohesion perceptions within the intervention group tended to rise, those perceptions within the control group decreased throughout the season [FII(1,72)=6,909:p=.011,2=,09; FIII(1,72)=5,327:p=,024, 2=,07]. In addition, there was no significant difference between preseason and end-season measurements of performance profile levels in the intervention group (z=-1,040;p=,298,r=-,23). These results highlight the positive effects of the multilevel goal-setting program on team cohesion and collective efficacy perceptions.tr_TR
dc.language.isoturtr_TR
dc.publisherSağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsütr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectHedef belirlemetr_TR
dc.titleBir Sezon Boyunca Sürdürülen Çok Düzeyli Hedef Belirleme Programının Takım Değişkenleri Üzerine Etkisitr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesistr_TR
dc.description.ozetDurdubaş, D., Bir Sezon Boyunca Sürdürülen Çok Düzeyli Hedef Belirleme Programının Takım Değişkenleri Üzerine Etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri ve Teknolojisi Programı Doktora Tezi, Ankara, 2020. Bu çalışmanın amacı, bir sezon boyunca uygulanan çok düzeyli takım hedef belirleme programının takım sargınlığı, kolektif yeterlik ve bireysel performans düzeylerine etkisinin belirlenmesidir. Çalışmaya, bölgesel düzeyde mücadele eden 6 voleybol takımından toplam 81 kadın sporcu (𝑥yaş=16,57;Ss=0,25) katılmıştır. Takımlar, program gereksinimleri göz önüne alınarak, çok düzeyli hedef belirleme programının uygulandığı, deney grubu (n=3;𝑥yaş=16,76;Ss=0,43) ve herhangi sistematik bir müdahalenin uygulanmadığı kontrol gruplarına (n=3;𝑥yaş=16,38;Ss=0,26) atanmışlardır. Tüm katılımcılar sezon boyunca üç kez olmak üzere (sezon başı, ortası ve sonu) kolektif yeterlik ve sargınlık ölçeklerini doldurmuşlardır. Ayrıca deney grubundaki katılımcıların bireysel performans düzeyleri, performans profilleri ile sezon başı ve sezon sonu olmak üzere iki kez ölçülmüştür. Deney ve kontrol gurubu sporcularının sargınlık ve kolektif yeterlik algılarındaki sezon boyunca yaşanan değişimler, ilk ölçümlerin kontrol edildiği MANCOVA analizi ile test edilmiştir. Deney grubundaki sporcuların performans profili puanlarının sezon öncesi ve sezon sonu arasındaki değişimi bağımlı örneklem t testi ile incelenmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, deney ve kontrol grupları arasında kolektif yeterlik ve sargınlık değişkenleri açısından anlamlı bir farkın olduğunu [F(6,67)=4,393;p=,001, 2=,28], takip eden ANCOVA analizleri ise hedef belirleme programı uygulanan deney grubundaki takımların kolektif yeterlik ve sargınlık algılarının sezon süresince arttığını, kontrol grubundaki algıların ise düştüğünü göstermiştir [FII(1,72)=6,909:p=,011, 2=,09; FIII(1,72)=5,327:p=,024, 2=,07]. Bununla birlikte deney grubundaki sporcuların sezon öncesi performans profili puanları ile sezon sonu performans profili puanları arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (z=-1,040;p=,298,r=-,23). Bu sonuçlar, çok düzeyli takım hedef belirleme programının takım düzeyindeki sargınlık ve kolektif yeterlik algıları üzerinde olumlu etkileri olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentSpor Bilimleri ve Teknolojisitr_TR
dc.embargo.termsAcik erisimtr_TR
dc.embargo.lift2020-05-11T09:11:44Z
dc.fundingYoktr_TR


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster