Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorZubkoff, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorDionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorPisu, Maria
dc.contributor.authorBabu, Dilip
dc.contributor.authorAkyar, Imatullah
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Tasha
dc.contributor.authorMancarella, Gisella A.
dc.contributor.authorGansauer, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Margaret Murray
dc.contributor.authorSwetz, Keith M.
dc.contributor.authorAzuero, Andres
dc.contributor.authorBakitas, Marie A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-17T09:55:40Z
dc.date.available2019-12-17T09:55:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1478-9515
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951517000323
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/20647
dc.description.abstractObjective: Despite national guidelines recommending early concurrent palliative care for individuals newly diagnosed with metastatic cancer, few community cancer centers, especially those in underserved rural areas do so. We are implementing an early concurrent palliative care model, ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) in four, rural-serving community cancer centers. Our objective was to develop a "toolkit" to assist community cancer centers that wish to integrate early palliative care for patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer and their family caregivers. Method: Guided by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness-Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework, we undertook an instrument-development process based on the literature, expert and site stakeholder review and feedback, and pilot testing during site visits. Results: We developed four instruments to measure ENABLE implementation: (1) the ENABLE RE-AIM Self-Assessment Tool to assess reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance; (2) the ENABLE General Organizational Index to assess institutional implementation; (3) an Implementation Costs Tool; and (4) an Oncology Clinicians' Perceptions of Early Concurrent Oncology Palliative Care survey. Significance of results: We developed four measures to determine early palliative care implementation. These measures have been pilot-tested, and will be integrated into a comprehensive "toolkit" to assist community cancer centers to measure implementation outcomes. We describe the lessons learned and recommend strategies for promoting long-term program sustainability.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge Univ Press
dc.relation.isversionof10.1017/S1478951517000323
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectHealth Care Sciences & Services
dc.titleDeveloping A "Toolkit" To Measure Implementation Of Concurrent Palliative Care In Rural Community Cancer Centers
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalPalliative & Supportive Care
dc.contributor.departmentİç Hastalıkları Hemşireliği
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage60
dc.identifier.endpage72
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster