Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOz, F. D.
dc.contributor.authorBolay, S.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-16T07:18:09Z
dc.date.available2019-12-16T07:18:09Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1687-8728
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5152703
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944286/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/19255
dc.description.abstractObjective The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate marginal adaptation and fracture strength of inlays produced by CEREC Omnicam using different types of blocs and heat-pressed technique. Methods: Seventy-five extracted human mandibular molars were divided randomly into 5 groups (n=15). 60 molars in four groups received MOD inlay preparations. Experimental groups were CO: Intact teeth, EC: IPS e.max CAD and CEREC, LU: Lava Ultimate and CEREC, EL: IPS Empress CAD and CEREC, EP: IPS Empress Esthetic ingots and heat-pressed technique. Marginal gap measurements were taken with a stereomicroscope. Restorations were cemented with Variolink N and stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. All samples were subjected to thermocycling. The fracture strength of specimens was determined at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed until fracture. Fracture modes were determined. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance for fracture strength data and Kruskal–Wallis for marginal gap data (p=0.05). Results The mean marginal gap size of EC, LU, EL, and EP were 33.54 µm, 33.77 µm, 34.23 µm, and 85.34 µm, respectively. EP had statistically higher values than other groups. The fracture strength values were significantly higher in the intact teeth group (3959,00 ± 1279,79 N) than those of restored groups EC (2408,00 ± 607,97 N), LU (2206,73 ± 675,16), EL (2573.27 ± 644,73) ve EP (2879,53 ± 897,30). Conclusion Inlays fabricated using CEREC Omnicam demonstrated better marginal adaptation than inlays produced with heat-pressed technique, whereas fracture strength values of inlays fabricated with different type of blocks using CEREC Omnicam exhibited similarity to those fabricated with heat-pressed technique.
dc.relation.isversionof10.1155/2018/5152703
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleComparative Evaluation Of Marginal Adaptation And Fracture Strength Of Different Ceramic Inlays Produced By Cerec Omnicam And Heat-Pressed Technique
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Dentistry
dc.contributor.departmentRestoratif Diş Tedavisi
dc.identifier.volume2018
dc.description.indexPubMed
dc.description.indexScopus


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record