Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYazici, A. Ruya
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Zeren
dc.contributor.authorErtan, Atila
dc.contributor.authorOzgunaltay, Gül
dc.contributor.authorDayangac, Berrin
dc.contributor.authorAntonson, Sibel A
dc.contributor.authorAntonson, Donald E
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-16T07:18:08Z
dc.date.available2019-12-16T07:18:08Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3420835/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/19252
dc.description.abstractObjective The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of several self-etch adhesives to their two-step predecessors to ground and unground enamel. Methods: Seventy-five extracted, non-carious human third molar teeth were selected for this study. The buccal surfaces of each tooth were mechanically ground to obtain flat enamel surfaces (ground enamel), while the lingual surfaces were left intact (unground enamel). The teeth were randomly divided into five groups according to the adhesive systems (n=15): one-step self-etch adhesive - Clearfil S Bond, its two-step predecessor - Clearfil SE Bond, one-step self-etch adhesive - AdheSE One, and its two-step predecessor - AdheSE, and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive - Adper Single Bond 2(control). After application of the adhesives to the buccal and lingual enamel surfaces of each tooth, a cylindrical capsule filled with a hybrid composite resin (TPH) was seated against the surfaces. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, followed by thermocy-cling (5°C–55°C/500 cycles). They were subjected to shear bond strength test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/minute. The data were compared using a two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni test at P<.05. Results: All adhesives exhibited statistically similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel except for the etch-and-rinse adhesive that showed significantly higher bond strengths than the self-etch adhesives (P<.05). No significant differences in bond strength values were observed between ground and unground enamel for any of the adhesives tested (P=.17). Conclusion: Similar bond strengths to ground and unground enamel were achieved with one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors. Enamel preparation did not influence the bonding performance of the adhesives tested.
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleBond Strength Of One-Step Self-Etch Adhesives And Their Predecessors To Ground Versus Unground Enamel
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Dentistry
dc.contributor.departmentRestoratif Diş Tedavisi
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage280
dc.identifier.endpage286
dc.description.indexPubMed


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record