dc.contributor.author | Deniz Sungur, Derya | |
dc.contributor.author | Purali, Nuhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Coşgun, Erdal | |
dc.contributor.author | Calt, Semra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-16T06:34:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-16T06:34:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2234-7658 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.114 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868874/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11655/19077 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strength and dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers used with coated core materials and conventional gutta-percha. Materials and Methods A total of 72 single-rooted human mandibular incisors were instrumented with NiTi rotary files with irrigation of 2.5% NaOCl. The smear layer was removed with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Specimens were assigned into four groups according to the obturation system: Group 1, EndoRez (Ultradent Product Inc.); Group 2, Activ GP (Brasseler); Group 3, SmartSeal (DFRP Ltd. Villa Farm); Group 4, AH 26 (Dentsply de Trey)/gutta-percha (GP). For push-out bond strength measurement, two horizontal slices were obtained from each specimen (n = 20). To compare dentinal tubule penetration, remaining 32 roots assigned to 4 groups as above were obturated with 0.1% Rhodamine B labeled sealers. One horizontal slice was obtained from the middle third of each specimen (n = 8) and scanned under confocal laser scanning electron microscope. Tubule penetration area, depth, and percentage were measured. Kruskall-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis. Results EndoRez showed significantly lower push-out bond strength than the others (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found amongst the groups in terms of percentage of sealer penetration. SmartSeal showed the least penetration than the others (p < 0.05). Conclusions The bond strength and sealer penetration of resin-and glass ionomer-based sealers used with coated core was not superior to resin-based sealer used with conventional GP. Dentinal tubule penetration has limited effect on bond strength. The use of conventional GP with sealer seems to be sufficient in terms of push-out bond strength. | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.114 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.title | Push-Out Bond Strength And Dentinal Tubule Penetration Of Different Root Canal Sealers Used With Coated Core Materials | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.relation.journal | Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics | |
dc.contributor.department | Endodonti | |
dc.identifier.volume | 41 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 114 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 120 | |
dc.description.index | PubMed | |