Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorHeidenreich, Axel
dc.contributor.authorBracarda, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorMason, Malcolm
dc.contributor.authorÖzen, Haluk
dc.contributor.authorSengelov, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorVan Oort, Inge
dc.contributor.authorPapandreou, Christos
dc.contributor.authorFossa, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorHitier, Simon
dc.contributor.authorAngel Climent, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-12T06:45:05Z
dc.date.available2019-12-12T06:45:05Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0959-8049
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.01.006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/16915
dc.description.abstractBackground: Cabazitaxel/prednisone has been shown to prolong survival versus mitoxantrone/prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed during or after docetaxel. Subsequently, compassionate-use programmes (CUPs) and expanded-access programmes (EAPs) were established worldwide, allowing access to cabazitaxel before its commercial availability. Preliminary results of the European CUP/EAP, focusing on the elderly population (aged >= 70 years), are reported. Patients and methods: Enrolled patients with progressive mCRPC received cabazitaxel (25 mg/m(2)) plus 10 mg oral prednisone/prednisolone every 3 weeks until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity or physician/patient decision. Safety was analysed by age group (<70, 70-74 and >= 75 years). The influence of selected variables on grade >= 3 neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications was analysed in multivariate analysis. Results: 746 men were enrolled (<70 years, n = 421; 70-74, n = 180, >= 75 years, n = 145). Number of cabazitaxel cycles, dose reductions for any cause, dose delays possibly related to cabazitaxel adverse events, and tolerability were similar in the three age groups. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) use was more common in men aged >= 70 years. In multivariate analysis, age >= 75 years, treatment cycle 1, and neutrophil count <4000/mm(3) before cabazitaxel injection were associated with increased risk of developing grade >= 3 neutropenia and/or neutropenic complications. Prophylactic use of G-CSF at a given cycle significantly reduced this risk by 30% (odds ratio 0.70, p = 0.04). Conclusion: The results suggest that cabazitaxel has a manageable safety profile in everyday clinical practice. Prophylactic use of G-CSF, especially at cycle 1 and in men aged >= 75 years, is important and improves tolerability in senior adults treated with cabazitaxel. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ejca.2014.01.006
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectOncology
dc.titleSafety of Cabazitaxel in Senior Adults With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results of the European Compassionate-Use Programme
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal Of Cancer
dc.contributor.departmentÜroloji
dc.identifier.volume50
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage1090
dc.identifier.endpage1099
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster