Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorZhang, W.
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, M.
dc.contributor.authorLeeb, B. F.
dc.contributor.authorAlekseeva, L.
dc.contributor.authorArden, N. K.
dc.contributor.authorBijlsma, J. W.
dc.contributor.authorDincer, F.
dc.contributor.authorDziedzic, K.
dc.contributor.authorHauselmann, H. J.
dc.contributor.authorKaklamanis, P.
dc.contributor.authorKloppenburg, M.
dc.contributor.authorLohmander, L. S.
dc.contributor.authorMaheu, E.
dc.contributor.authorMartin-Mola, E.
dc.contributor.authorPavelka, K.
dc.contributor.authorPunzi, L.
dc.contributor.authorReiter, S.
dc.contributor.authorSmolen, J.
dc.contributor.authorVerbruggen, G.
dc.contributor.authorWatt, I.
dc.contributor.authorZimmermann-Gorska, I.
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-10T11:12:54Z
dc.date.available2019-12-10T11:12:54Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0003-4967
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.084772
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/15047
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To develop evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: The multidisciplinary guideline development group, representing 15 European countries, generated 10 key propositions regarding diagnosis using a Delphi consensus approach. For each recommendation, research evidence was searched for systematically. Whenever possible, the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated; relative risk and odds ratios were estimated for risk factors for hand OA. Quality of evidence was categorised using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) hierarchy, and strength of recommendation was assessed by the EULAR visual analogue scale. Results: Diagnostic topics included clinical manifestations, radiographic features, subgroups, differential diagnosis, laboratory tests, risk factors and comorbidities. The sensitivity, specificity and LR varied between tests depending upon the cut-off level, gold standard and controls. Overall, no single test could be used to define hand OA on its own (LR,10) but a composite of the tests greatly increased the chance of the diagnosis. The probability of a subject having hand OA was 20% when Heberden nodes alone were present, but this increased to 88% when in addition the subject was over 40 years old, had a family history of nodes and had joint space narrowing in any finger joint. Conclusion: Ten key recommendations for diagnosis of hand OA were developed using research evidence and expert consensus. Diagnosis of hand OA should be based on assessment of a composite of features.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ
dc.relation.isversionof10.1136/ard.2007.084772
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectRheumatology
dc.titleEular Evidence-Based Recommendations For The Diagnosis Of Hand Osteoarthritis: Report Of A Task Force Of Escisit
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/review
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases
dc.contributor.departmentİç Hastalıkları
dc.identifier.volume68
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage8
dc.identifier.endpage17
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster