Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorNavas-Acien, Ana
dc.contributor.authorÇarkoğlu, Asli
dc.contributor.authorErgör, Gül
dc.contributor.authorHayran, Mutlu
dc.contributor.authorErgüder, Toker
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Bekir
dc.contributor.authorSusan, Jolie
dc.contributor.authorMagid, Hoda
dc.contributor.authorPollak, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Joanna E
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-10T11:11:14Z
dc.date.available2019-12-10T11:11:14Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0042-9686
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.15.158238
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4750436/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/14957
dc.description.abstractObjective To investigate public compliance with legislation to prohibit smoking within public buildings and the extent of tobacco smoking in outdoor areas in Turkey. Methods Using a standardized observation protocol, we determined whether smoking occurred and whether ashtrays, cigarette butts and/or no-smoking signs were present in a random selection of 884 public venues in 12 cities in Turkey. We visited indoor and outdoor locations in bars/nightclubs, cafes, government buildings, hospitals, restaurants, schools, shopping malls, traditional coffee houses and universities. We used logistic regression models to determine the association between the presence of ashtrays or the absence of no-smoking signs and the presence of individuals smoking or cigarette butts. Findings Most venues had no-smoking signs (629/884). We observed at least one person smoking in 145 venues, most frequently observed in bars/nightclubs (63/79), hospital dining areas (18/79), traditional coffee houses (27/120) and government-building dining areas (5/23). For 538 venues, we observed outdoor smoking close to public buildings. The presence of ashtrays was positively associated with indoor smoking and cigarette butts, adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 315.9; 95% confidence interval, CI: 174.9–570.8 and aOR: 165.4; 95% CI: 98.0–279.1, respectively. No-smoking signs were negatively associated with the presence of cigarette butts, aOR: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3–0.8. Conclusion Additional efforts are needed to improve the implementation of legislation prohibiting smoking in indoor public areas in Turkey, especially in areas in which we frequently observed people smoking. Possible interventions include removing all ashtrays from public places and increasing the number of no-smoking signs.
dc.relation.isversionof10.2471/BLT.15.158238
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleCompliance With Smoke-Free Legislation Within Public Buildings: A Cross-Sectional Study In Turkey
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalBulletin of the World Health Organization
dc.contributor.departmentİç Hastalıkları
dc.identifier.volume94
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage92
dc.identifier.endpage102
dc.description.indexPubMed
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster