Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTas, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorGuneri, Sinem
dc.contributor.authorKaymak, Bayram
dc.contributor.authorErden, Zafer
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-10T10:52:45Z
dc.date.available2019-12-10T10:52:45Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1017-995X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0158
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11655/14577
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to investigate levels of validity, and inter- and intra-observer reliability of observational gait analysis (OGA) in clinical usage, done by the physical therapists with varying clinical experience, in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: The study included 33 subjects (22 female, 11 male; mean age: 58.24+/-9.14 years range: 46 to 81) clinically and radiographically diagnosed with bilateral knee osteoarthritis, and 4 physical therapists to observe the subjects' gaits. The physical therapists were separated into two groups according to their professional experience: those with 10 or more years, and those with fewer than 10 years. Video recordings were made of the subjects undergoing three-dimensional gait analysis (3DGA). These recordings were then observationally assessed twice by the participating physical therapists with at least a 6-week interval between observations. OGA was done via a form comprising 11 kinematic and 5 temporo-spatial parameters. Results: Lowest levels of agreement in both validity (r=0.06, p>0.05), and inter- (ICC:-0.12-0.06) and intra-observer (ICC:0.30-0.45) reliability were found in the parameters of ankle dorsiflexion in initial contact phase and pelvic rotation in midstance phase. Highest inter- and intra-observer agreement was found in the temporo-spatial parameters of step width, double step length, cadence and velocity (ICC:0.61-0.80). Highest validity was found in pelvic tilt in stance phase (r=0.74-0.78, p<0.001). With the exception of stance phase, moderate or good agreement (r=0.52-0.69, p<0.05) was found in the ternporo-spatial parameters. Conclusion: This study found that OGA assessment of temporo-spatial parameters had moderate or good validity and reliability. Assessment of the majority of kinematic parameters had fair or moderate validity and inter-observer reliabilty, and moderate or good intra-observer reliability.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Assoc Orthopaedics Traumatology
dc.relation.isversionof10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0158
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.titleA Comparison of Results of 3-Dimensional Gait Analysis and Observational Gait Analysis in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.relation.journalActa Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica
dc.contributor.departmentFiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon
dc.identifier.volume49
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage151
dc.identifier.endpage159
dc.description.indexWoS
dc.description.indexScopus


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster